Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 35675

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : TR01 - TR04 Full Version

Neuroimaging Manifestations and Clinical Correlates of Japanese Encephalitis: Insights from an MRI Case Series


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69964.19347
Ameer Hussain, Ajay Lucas Rubben, Vishnu Raj

1. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ajay Lucas Rubben,
Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: mslucas007@gmail.com

Abstract

Japanese Encephalitis (JE) poses a significant public health threat across Asia and the Western Pacific, leading to considerable mortality and morbidity if not promptly diagnosed and treated. This flaviviral infection, transmitted by Culex mosquitoes, primarily affects children but can impact individuals of all ages. Prompt diagnosis relies on detecting Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) IgM antibodies in serum or Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), alongside characteristic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. In this MRI case series, three confirmed cases of JE are presented, showcasing the typical neuroimaging manifestations observed in affected individuals. All cases exhibited bilateral thalamic hyperintensities on T2-weighted and Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images, a hallmark feature of JE. Additionally, one patient demonstrated involvement of the substantia nigra and bilateral frontal cortex. The clinical implications of present study findings underscore the importance of considering JE as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with symptoms of encephalitis, especially when MRI reveals bi-thalamic signal alterations. Early recognition and initiation of appropriate treatment, including antiviral agents, are crucial for improving outcomes and reducing mortality. This study contributes to the existing literature by reinforcing the importance of neuroimaging in diagnosing JE and highlighting the distinct MRI patterns associated with the disease. Recognising these characteristic imaging features can aid clinicians in promptly identifying and managing JE cases, thereby mitigating the associated morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

Bilateral thalamic hyperintensities, Diagnosis, Infectious disease, Magnetic resonance imaging

The JE, caused by JEV, is a flavivirus related to dengue, yellow fever, and West Nile viruses, and is the most common preventable cause of mosquito-borne encephalitis in Asia and the Western Pacific. Culex species of mosquitoes transmit the virus through their bites. Transmission is most common in agricultural areas such as farms and paddy fields, but can also occur in urban areas (1). Although most infections are asymptomatic, significant morbidity and mortality are seen in those who develop symptoms of encephalitis. JE is confirmed by CSF or serum IgM ELISA antibody. Typical MRI findings include bilateral thalamic hyperintensities with or without haemorrhage. Other regions like the brainstem, cerebellum, basal ganglia, and cortex may be involved. MRI findings may also be expected in certain patients. Haemorrhage may also be present in the above regions but may not be detectable if imaging is done within the first 3-4 days of the onset of the disease. Co-existing infections with Neurocysticercosis may also be seen (2).

Case Report

Case 1

A 13-year-old boy presented to the emergency department with complaints of two episodes of new-onset seizures, and intermittent low-grade fever for three days associated with vomiting. On examination, vitals were stable, the patient was drowsy, oriented, and able to respond to commands. The rest of the neurological exam was unremarkable. The other system exam was normal. Complete Blood Count (CBC) showed elevated leukocytes. An MRI of the brain (Table/Fig 1)a-f was taken which showed a high Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) signal in bilateral thalami and low Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) signal in the right thalamus. T2 axial and FLAIR coronal sections showed hyperintense signal of both thalami. No evidence of blooming was noted in Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) images. Features were consistent with viral encephalitis. The CSF sample showed significantly elevated titres of IgM ELISA antibodies for JE at 1:320. The patient was treated with antipyretics, anticonvulsants, and acyclovir. The patient’s general condition improved with no further episodes of seizure.

Case 2

A 33-year-old male presented to the emergency department with complaints of one episode of seizure, headache, and generalised myalgia for five days. On examination, vitals were stable, the patient was conscious, oriented, and able to respond to commands. The rest of the neurological exam was unremarkable. The other system exam was normal. CBC showed leukocytes and mildly elevated RBC counts. An MRI of the brain (Table/Fig 2)a-f was taken to rule out any space-occupying lesions. The MRI showed high DWI and ADC signal in bilateral thalamus. T2 axial and FLAIR coronal sections show the hyperintense signal of both thalami. No evidence of blooming was noted in SWI images. Features were consistent with viral encephalitis. The CSF sample showed significantly elevated titres of IgM ELISA antibodies for JE at 1:640. The patient was treated with anticonvulsants and acyclovir. The patient’s general condition improved with no further episodes of seizure.

Case 3

A 59-year-old female presented to the emergency department with complaints of high-grade fever associated with a headache, drowsiness, and altered consciousness. On examination, vitals were stable; the patient was drowsy, disoriented, and not able to respond to commands. The rest of the neurological exam was unremarkable. The other system exam was normal. CBC showed elevated leukocytes and anaemia. An MRI of the brain [Table/Fig-3a-j] was taken, which showed high DWI and ADC signal in bilateral thalamus, bilateral substantia nigra, and bilateral middle frontal gyri. T2 axial and FLAIR coronal sections showed hyperintense signal of both thalami, bilateral substantia nigra, and bilateral middle frontal gyri. No evidence of blooming was noted in SWI images. Features were consistent with viral encephalitis. The CSF sample showed significantly elevated titres of IgM ELISA antibodies for JE at 1:1280.

The patient was treated with antipyretics, anticonvulsants, and acyclovir. The patient’s general condition improved with no further episodes of seizure.

All patients with serologically proven JE showed abnormal signal alterations in bilateral thalami, which are typical MRI findings described in the literature. One patient showed involvement of the substantia nigra and bilateral frontal cortex. So, if a patient presents with symptoms of encephalitis and if an MRI shows bi-thalamic signal alterations, then JE should be considered as a top differential diagnosis. Clinical presentation, MRI observations, and treatment of three patients are shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

JE presents significant epidemiological variations worldwide, with outbreaks yielding annual incidence rates ranging from under 1 to over 10 cases per 100,000 individuals. An estimated 68,000 clinical cases of JE occur annually, resulting in 13,600 to 20,400 deaths. While predominantly affecting children, individuals of all ages can be impacted, with most adults in endemic areas developing immunity post childhood infection. JEV transmission occurs primarily through Culex mosquito bites, notably Culex tritaeniorhynchus, maintaining a transmission cycle involving mosquitoes, pigs, and/or water birds in rural and peri-urban areas. Transmission peaks during warmer seasons in temperate regions and during the rainy season and before rice harvest in tropical and subtropical areas (3).

The majority of JEV-infected individuals remain asymptomatic, with less than 1% developing clinical illness, typically characterised by acute encephalitis. Initial symptoms include sudden fever, headache, and vomiting, progressing to potential mental status changes, neurological deficits, weakness, and movement disorders over subsequent days (4). A characteristic presentation of JE includes symptoms resembling Parkinson’s disease, such as a rigid facial expression, tremors, and abnormal movements. Additionally, acute flaccid paralysis, resembling poliomyelitis, has been linked to JE. Seizures, particularly in children, are common. The fatality rate ranges from 20 to 30%, with survivors often experiencing significant neurological, cognitive, or psychiatric issues, affecting 30 to 50% of cases (5).

T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities in typical JE are seen in the thalamus, substantia nigra, basal ganglia, hippocampus, and pons, and less commonly in cortical and subcortical regions and cerebellar hemispheres. DWI can detect cytotoxic oedema, the earliest sign of the encephalitis process. As a result, DWI is more sensitive in JE cases that occur early but less sensitive in situations that occur later. DWI can identify changes in the brain parenchyma of JE patients hours or days before detectable abnormalities show up on T2WI and FLAIR imaging. Diffusion restriction with low ADC signal is seen in acute cases of JE. ADC values gradually increase after the late acute phase and remain higher in the chronic phase (6).

In present case series, low ADC was observed in one patient involving the right thalamus. The rest of the patients showed high DWI and ADC signal. In the research conducted by Prakash M et al., among the 54 participants, 53 exhibited hyperintensities in both thalamic regions, while bilateral involvement of the substantia nigra was observed in 44 individuals. Lentiform nuclei were affected in 29 patients, and caudate nuclei showed involvement in 8 patients. Hippocampal participation was noted in 14 individuals, with cortical involvement seen in 21 patients. Brainstem inclusion was identified in 8 patients, and microbleeds were present in the thalamus of two patients (7). In present study, every participant displayed bilateral thalamic involvement, while only one patient exhibited involvement of the substantia nigra and cortex. None of the participants showed microbleeds. In the initial phase of the disease, Keng LT and Chang LY demonstrated a development of T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities in the thalami (8). As JE advanced, the subacute stage revealed a T2 shrine-through effect in the lesions. Additionally, there was an incremental rise in the ADC value, accompanied by the obscuring of bright signals on DWI.

JE accompanied by Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon event, with only a limited number of cases documented in the literature (9). Distinguishing between dengue encephalitis and JE can be challenging due to their similar imaging characteristics. Both conditions often exhibit hyperintensities on T2 and FLAIR sequences, along with restricted diffusion, particularly evident in the thalami and basal ganglia. In some cases, the involvement can extend to other brain regions such as the pons, medulla, cerebellum, corpus callosum, and cerebral cortex. However, dengue encephalitis tends to present with a higher prevalence of parenchymal or extra-axial bleeding compared to JE. Additionally, diffuse cerebral oedema may occur, and cerebellitis is more commonly observed in dengue encephalitis compared to JE (10).

Other potential diagnosis to consider include cerebral malaria, extrapontine myelinolysis, and deep cerebral venous thrombosis affecting the straight sinus or internal cerebral vein. This condition manifests as hyperintensities in both thalamic regions and the brainstem, with observable areas of blooming (11). The use of MR Venography and SWI images aids in the identification of thrombosis. In instances of acute thrombosis, the thrombus may exhibit hyperdensity on Computed Tomography (CT) scans. Artery of Percheron infarcts also display bilateral thalamic hyperintensities with diffusion restriction, and clinically, patients may present with vertical gaze palsy (12). The characteristic “V sign,” a hyperintense signal along the midbrain surface adjacent to the interpeduncular fossa, is classically described and is best visualised on axial FLAIR and DWI images (13).

Wernicke encephalopathy stands out as a crucial consideration in the differential diagnosis due to its clinical features overlapping with encephalitis. MRI findings typically reveal symmetrically increased signal intensity in the mammillary bodies, tectal plate dorsomedial thalami, and periaqueductal grey matter around the third ventricle on T2/FLAIR sequences. Post-gadolinium contrast enhancement may also occur in these regions, with the mammillary bodies being the most commonly affected.

Biochemical assays for vitamin B1 levels in serum may indicate a decrease. Additionally, thalamic glioma represents a noteworthy neoplasm that can mimic the presentation of viral encephalitis (14).

To diagnose JE, the typical laboratory approach involves testing serum or CSF for the presence of virus-specific IgM antibodies. These antibodies are usually identifiable 3 to 8 days after the onset of symptoms and can persist for 30 to 90 days, with instances of even longer persistence documented. However, it’s important to acknowledge that positive IgM antibodies may sometimes indicate a previous infection or vaccination. If serum collected within the first 10 days of illness onset doesn’t reveal detectable IgM, the test should be repeated using a convalescent sample (15).

Confirmatory testing for patients with JE virus IgM antibodies should include neutralising antibody testing. In fatal cases, additional diagnostic approaches like nucleic acid amplification, histopathology with immunohistochemistry, and virus culture from autopsy tissues can provide valuable insights (16).

Treatment for JE involves conservative measures and the use of medications such as minocycline, interferon, ribavirin, immunoglobulin, dexamethasone, and acyclovir. Among these, minocycline has shown promising results in clinical outcomes (17),(18).

Conclusion

Present study MRI case series emphasises the importance of recognising JE as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with encephalitis symptoms, particularly when MRI reveals bilateral thalamic hyperintensities. Early identification facilitates prompt treatment initiation, improving patient outcomes. Present study highlights the crucial role of neuroimaging in JE diagnosis and underscores the need for multidisciplinary collaboration for effective management. Confirmation through virus-specific IgM antibody testing is essential for accurate diagnosis. Overall, present study findings stress the significance of timely intervention in JE cases to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Authors contribution: ALR, AH: Concept and design; AH, ALR, and VR: Sourcing and editing of clinical images and investigation results; ALR: Drafting of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References

1.
Campbell GL, Hills SL, Fischer M, Jacobson JA, Hoke CH, Hombach JM, et al. Estimated global incidence of Japanese encephalitis: A systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(10):766-74, 774A-E. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Solomon T, Dung NM, Kneen R, Gainsborough M, Vaughn DW, Khanh VT. Japanese encephalitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68(4):405-15. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Wang H, Liang G. Epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis: Past, present, and future prospects. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:435-48. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Fischer M, Hills S, Staples E, Johnson B, Yaich M, Solomon T. Japanese encephalitis prevention and control: Advances, challenges, and new initiatives. Emerging Infections. 2014;8(1):93-124. [crossref]
5.
Misra UK, Kalita J. Movement disorders in Japanese encephalitis. J Neurol. 1997;244(5):299-303. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Phukan P, Sarma K, Sharma BK, Boruah DK, Gogoi BB, Chuunthang D. MRI spectrum of Japanese encephalitis in Northeast India: A cross-sectional study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2021;12(2):281-89. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Prakash M, Kumar S, Gupta RK. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in Japanese encephalitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28(6):756-61. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Keng LT, Chang LY. Japanese encephalitis. CMAJ. 2018;190(21):E657-57.[crossref][PubMed]
9.
Mokkappan S, Basheer A, Iqbal N, Chidambaram S. Bilateral thalamic bleed and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in Japanese encephalitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2014207957. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Carmo RLD, Alves Simão AK, Amaral LLFD, Inada BSY, Silveira CF, Campos CMS, et al. Neuroimaging of emergent and reemergent infections. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1649-71. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Jia M, Xiong N, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang Z, et al. Japanese encephalitis accompanied by cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A case report. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:43. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Phate N, Pawar T, Andhale A, Kumar Singh R, Talwar D, Acharya S, et al. Artery of Percheron stroke: A case report with a diagnostic challenge. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e21939. [crossref]
13.
Executive Committee of IJMS I. Abstracts of the XXVII Medical Academic Congress of Unicamp, CoMAU, 2018. Int J Med Stud [Internet]. 2019;8(1):S3 1-S59. [crossref]
14.
Zuccoli G, Gallucci M, Capellades J, Regnicolo L, Tumiati B, Giadás TC, et al. Wernicke encephalopathy: MR findings at clinical presentation in twenty-six alcoholic and nonalcoholic patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(7):1328-31. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Johnson BW, Goodman CH, Jee Y, Featherstone DA. Differential diagnosis of Japanese Encephalitis Virus infections with the inbios JE Detect™ and DEN detect™ MAC-ELISA kits. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(4):820-28. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Burrell CJ, Howard CR, Murphy FA. Laboratory diagnosis of virus diseases. Fenner and White’s Medical Virology. 2017:135-54.[crossref][PubMed]
17.
Kumar R, Basu A, Sinha S, Das M, Tripathi P, Jain A, et al. Role of oral minocycline in acute encephalitis syndrome in India- A randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:67. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Singh AK, Mehta A, Kushwaha KP, Pandey AK, Mittal M, Sharma B, et al. Minocycline trial in japanese encephalitis: A double blind, randomized placebo study. Pediatric Review: Int J Pediatr Res. 2016;3(5):371-77. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69964.19347

Date of Submission: Feb 06, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Feb 22, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Feb 29, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 07, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 25, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 28, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com