Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 180317

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : UC01 - UC05 Full Version

Substance P Level in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorder undergoing Decompressive Surgery: An Observational Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69529.19352
Amrita Panda, Rajlaxmi Sarangi, Debadyuti Sahu, Saurabh Sharma, Narendra Kumar Das, Sibanarayan Rath

1. Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. (ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4255-4672). 2. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Shri-Bagchi Shankara Cancer Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Professor, Department of Neurosciences, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Research and Developement, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rajlaxmi Sarangi,
Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar-751024, Odisha, India.
E-mail: rajlaxmi.sarangi@kims.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders experience Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) for which they undergo decompressive surgery. Substance P (SP), a neurotransmitter which acts as a modulator of pain perception and transmits nociceptive signals via primary afferent fibers to the spinal cord and brainstem. In chronic painful conditions, SP level can be associated with the severity of pain and gets altered; however, this correlation is not present in acute pain.

Aim: To evaluate serum SP level in CLBP patients undergoing decompressive spine surgery.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a prospective observational study, in which 30 patients with CLBP undergoing decompressive spine surgery were enrolled. Along with them, one first-degree relative of each patient and an equal number of healthy volunteers were included in the study group. Patients were followed-up on the 5th postoperative day and at two months after surgery for the evaluation of SP levels and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. Statistical data analysis was carried out using IBM PASW Statistics (SPSS) 25.0 version software. SP levels followed a non normal distribution and were compared by Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal Wallis test (for 2 or more groups, respectively) and correlated using Spearman rank correlation.

Results: Patients undergoing decompressive spine surgery had a significantly higher SP level (97.5 picogram/mL (pg/mL)) than healthy volunteers (23.22 pg/mL), p-value <0.001. The serum SP levels in patients were found to be significantly reduced on the 5th postoperative day (31.7 pg/mL) and at two months after surgery (48.5 pg/mL), p-value=0.043. In contrast, there was no discernible change in the VAS score, which did not correlate with the fall in SP levels on the 5th postoperative day.

Conclusion: SP level was elevated in subjects with degenerative lumbar spine disorders undergoing decompressive surgery. Higher levels of SP can be attributed to CLBP in those patients. SP can be contemplated as a biomarker of pain due to degenerative lumbar spine pathology. However, further studies are warranted to substantiate this.

Keywords

Low back pain, Neurokinin-1 receptor, Visual analogue scale

Degenerative pathology involving the lumbar spine results in CLBP, which in turn affects the quality of life. Surgical measures are recommended in those cases of CLBP not responding to conservative therapy (1). Degeneration of the intervertebral disc results in an increased level of inflammatory markers, upregulation of proalgesic factors, and promotes nerve fiber growth (2). Cellular degeneration and damage lead to the activation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). The upregulation of ROS is contemplated in the synaptic transmission of pain (3). The earliest and thoroughly understood function of SP is that of a neurotransmitter and modulator of pain perception. SP is an 11-amino acid neuropeptide that acts on the Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor, which transmits nociceptive signals via primary afferent fibers to spinal cord and brainstem second-order neurons. SP aids in sensitising the neurotransmitter glutamate in the postsynaptic neurons and facilitates the transmission of pain signals to the somatosensory area of the brain (4),(5). It chiefly acts on the NK-1 receptors, which are primarily G-protein-coupled in nature (6). Low back pain in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders is chronic in nature. Increased levels of SP are linked to such chronic painful conditions, but SP does not rise substantially in response to acute pain (7).

SP binds to the NK-1 receptor, causing an increase in levels of cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP), which in turn influences the levels of release of inflammatory cytokines (8). Unbound SP is hydrolysed by peptidases in the extracellular fluid and by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) in plasma (9). The half-life of SP is longer in plasma (in hours) compared to that in tissues. In neurogenic inflammation, SP apparently has significant role because of its presence in the damaged tissue area in response to pain signals that travel along the axons of somatosensory areas of the brain, which in turn stimulates the expression of Interleukin-8 involved in neutrophil recruitment (10).

No previous literature was available on the estimation of the serum level of SP in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders undergoing decompressive surgery. Again, studies have been conducted on Caucasian controls and African American controls, but to date, no other literature is available with respect to the Indian population (11). This study presents a sincere attempt to provide insight into the Indian scenario. Considering all these factors, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the serum SP level among CLBP patients undergoing decompressive spine surgery, both preoperatively as well as on the 5th day and two months after-surgery. The secondary objective was to compare the presurgery serum SP levels of patients with those of their first-degree relatives and available pain-free healthy volunteers (acting as controls). The secondary outcome objective of the study was to correlate the changes in SP levels in patients postsurgery (over time) with VAS used for pain perception by individuals.

Material and Methods

This prospective observational study was undertaken during the period January 2022 to August 2022 in association with the Departments of Anaesthesiology, Biochemistry, and Neurosciences at Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), KIIT DU, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. The study was in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (KIIT/KIMS/IEC/782/2021) and registration with the Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI/2022/01/039780), written informed consent was taken from all study participants (i.e., patients with CLBP scheduled for decompressive surgery, their corresponding first-degree relatives, and healthy volunteers). Study participants were recruited as per inclusion and exclusion criteria in the Department of Anaesthesiology.

Inclusion criteria: Individuals with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II in the age group of 30 to 70 years with a history of low back pain lasting ≥3 months duration posted for decompressive spine surgery were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with other co-existing chronic painful conditions and those under ACE inhibitor drugs were excluded from the study.

Sample size: Based on a study by Brandow AM et al., the average serum SP level were 22.99±7.6 and 32.5±11.6 in the control group (N=35) and the case (SCD) group (N=25), respectively. The effect size was calculated to be 0.97. Considering a 95% level of significance (alpha=0.05) with a study power of 95% and effect size of 0.97 (11), the sample size was calculated to be 29. Hence, 30 patients were recruited as cases (15 males and 15 females). The participants in the healthy volunteer group were attempted to be matched with the patient group in terms of age and gender. Healthy and pain-free volunteers who were neither related to the patients nor accompanying them were recruited (30 in total: 15 male and 15 female) as the healthy control group.

Simultaneously, 30 of their corresponding first-degree relatives were also recruited as controls. Matching both age and gender was not possible for the patient relative group, as the available first-degree relative of the patient was chosen. They can act as one of the control groups with similar pain perception to the patients studied. Thus, the levels of study parameters in patient relatives can be considered as the baseline for the respective patients.

Study Procedure

Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from all study participants in the Department of Anaesthesiology and sent to the Department of Biochemistry for storage and further analysis. Demographic data from all study participants were analysed. Under strict aseptic measures, 1.5 mL of venous blood samples were collected from the patients thrice: 24 hours prior to surgery, on the 5th postoperative day, and then around two months after surgery. Simultaneously, 1.5 mL of blood was collected from the first-degree relatives of patients at the time of admission. Concurrently, 1.5 mL blood samples were also collected from healthy volunteers. All venous blood samples were collected at the Anaesthesiology department in serum separator tubes and sent to the biochemistry laboratory. Blood samples were allowed to clot, then centrifuged at a speed of 2000 to 3000 rpm, aliquoted, and stored at -80°C. SP levels were estimated using the Human SP ELISA Kit (ELK Biotechnology, Catalog number: ELK1039) by sandwich enzyme-linked immunoassay. The analytical measurement range of SP in the ELISA kit was between 15.63 to 1000 pg/mL.

A standard general anaesthesia protocol was followed for all patients. All patients were premedicated with Intravenous (i.v.) glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg. Induction of anaesthesia was done with i.v. propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg. Endotracheal intubation was done with i.v. vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg.

Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and Isoflurane 0.8-1 MAC. The effect of the muscle relaxant was reversed using i.v. neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg along with glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg. One gram of i.v. paracetamol was administered 10 minutes prior to reversal. Pain was estimated using the VAS. VAS static (without any movement in the supine posture) and VAS dynamic (with movement in the supine posture) were used for the assessment of postoperative pain. The patient was asked to rate his/her pain on a scale of 1 to 10. A score of 0/10 indicates no pain, while a score of 10/10 indicates the worst pain. VAS score was assessed at different time intervals: presurgery, at “0” minutes, and 5 days postsurgery, with both VAS static and VAS dynamic scores (12).

Statistical Analysis

All continuous parameters were analysed for normality by Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed parameters were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD) and compared using Student’s t-test or one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for two or more than two groups, respectively. Paired parameters were compared by paired t-test, and correlations were tested using Pearson’s correlation analysis. Parameters with non normal distribution were expressed as median (interquartile range), compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired parameters, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for paired parameters, and correlations were tested using Spearman’s rank correlation. Non continuous parameters were analysed for differences using the Chi-square test. Data analysis was carried out by using IBM PASW Statistics (SPSS) version 25.0 software. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

After collecting the data, a comparative analysis was done for the demographic variables of patients undergoing surgery. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of continuous variables. Demographic variables like age, height, weight, and Body Mass Index (BMI) followed a Gaussian distribution, while serum SP levels did not. A total of 30 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were enrolled in the study, with 15 males and 15 females. Relatives were selected as per availability. Healthy controls were only gender-matched but not age-matched, as being free of any kind of pain was an essential inclusion criterion for the healthy control group. Age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and serum SP levels were significantly higher in patients at the presurgery state than in the other two groups (p-value <0.05) (Table/Fig 1).

Gender had no effect on serum SP levels in all three study groups (p-value >0.05) (Table/Fig 2). Also, serum SP levels among patients before surgery, with a median value of 97.5 pg/mL, were higher than among their relatives (median: 59.5 pg/mL),
although not statistically significant (p-value=0.084), and significantly higher (p-value <0.001) than among healthy subjects (Table/Fig 3).

Serum SP levels among patients two months postsurgery were significantly lower than presurgery levels (p-value=0.043). The five-day postsurgery levels of serum SP were still lower, which could be due to the effect of analgesia. Then, at two months postsurgery (i.e., after the weaning of the analgesia effect), serum SP levels, though raised than during immediate postsurgery state, were still lower than the patients’ relative levels (which can be considered as the baseline for respective patients) (Table/Fig 4).

Both static and dynamic VAS scores exhibited a significant alteration following surgery (p-value <0.001) (Table/Fig 5). In the presurgery stage, SP levels did not exhibit a significant correlation with age, BMI, or pain duration suffered by the patient (p-value >0.05) (Table/Fig 6). The association of presurgery serum SP levels with gender, static, and dynamic VAS scores (presurgery and 0 minutes postsurgery) were analysed. In all cases, the associations were found to be statistically not significant (p-value >0.05). Similarly, the association between five days postsurgery serum SP levels and corresponding static and dynamic VAS scores were also statistically not significant (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The findings of this study reveal that serum SP levels among patients (presurgery) and their relatives were significantly higher than in healthy controls. Presurgery SP levels in patients were higher than in their respective first-degree relatives, but not statistically significant. Postsurgery (5-day) SP levels in patients were significantly lower than presurgery levels. Two months postsurgery, SP levels were higher than 5-day postsurgery levels but significantly lower than presurgery SP levels.

SP belongs to the Tachykinin (TAC) family of neuropeptides and is encoded by the TAC1 gene. In animals, SP, Neurokinin A (NKA), and Neurokinin B (NKB) are the three primary TAC members. All mammalian tissues and body fluids are distributed with TAC family members, but the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system have the highest densities of SP (13),(14). SP is synthesised in ribosomes as a large non functional protein and undergoes post-translational modification to produce active SP (15). A cell surface metalloendopeptidase breaks down unbound SP, indicating a shortened half-life of SP in tissues (16),(17). SP plays a major role in immune cell migration and expression of chemokines and adhesion molecules (8). It has been established that mediators of chronic pain are emitted from both neuronal and non neuronal components.

When considering the demographic details in the present study, the age and BMI of patients undergoing surgery were higher and significantly different from healthy individuals and their relatives. However, in this study, gender had no effect on serum SP levels in all three groups. A study done by Racine M et al., showed that there was no difference in human pain sensitivity between genders, even with the use of deep, tonic, long-lasting stimuli that mimic clinical pain (18).

Studies have demonstrated that SP is known to be associated with chronic painful conditions, inducing the release of proinflammatory mediators like prostaglandins (5),(9). This neuropeptide is released from pain-sensing fibers to increase pain sensitivity through its actions on the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and is a key element in neurogenic inflammation (19),(20). Liswowska B et al., in their study, found a positive correlation between serum SP concentration and chronic pain intensity. SP and its receptor are involved in chronic pain and are associated with joint and tissue inflammation, triggering an inflammatory cascade that causes the release of a variety of inflammatory mediators, one of them being SP (21). Therefore, in degenerative spine disorders, SP can be contemplated as a neurotransmitter attributed to CLBP and underlying inflammatory pathology. Patients with chronic degenerative lumbar spine disorders undergoing decompressive surgery often experience chronic pain. In the present study, SP levels were significantly higher among CLBP patients during the presurgery state {97.5 (36.25-170.09) pg/mL} compared to healthy controls {23.22 (16.14-32.04) pg/mL} (who were free from any painful conditions). Similarly, the presurgery SP levels of CLBP patients were higher compared to their relatives {59.5 (16.25-95.2) pg/mL, although the value was not statistically significant.

Relatives are genetically similar to the patient and may represent the patient in a pain-free (basal) condition. The SP levels in relatives were also significantly higher than in healthy controls (although both groups are free from pain). This can be explained by the hypothesis that the level of apprehension and/or stress among patients’ relatives may be at similar levels to that of the patients, as they share either similar genetic makeup or environmental circumstances, or both. This hypothesis needs further validation. Thus, serum SP levels may be affected by psychological stress, apprehension, or emotions alongside the effect of pain. A study by Ebener K and Singewald N illustrated that stressful and aversive stimuli alter the content of SP in brain tissue and increase the efflux of SP in particular limbic regions like the amygdala and septum. The intensity of this effect depends on the severity of the stressor, which was similar to present study findings (22). Many chronic pain syndromes like osteoarthritis and CLBP are associated with elevated SP levels. The present study yielded similar results, where serum SP levels were found to be elevated in subjects with degenerative spine pathology requiring decompressive surgery.

In this study, the serum SP level was significantly higher preoperatively {97.5 (36.25-170.09) pg/mL compared to its concentration at the 5th postoperative day {31.7 (17.24-56.37) pg/mL} as well as at two months {48.5 (26.75-71.06) pg/mL} following decompressive surgery. These findings were in agreement with a study by Smith HS and Clauw DJ who demonstrated that CLBP is associated with elevated SP levels (23). A study conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing orthopaedic surgery concluded that there was a correlation between the intensity of acute pain and serum SP levels postoperatively, but there was no correlation between the intensity of acute pain and the concentration of SP in drainage fluid (24). In the present study, serum SP levels exhibited a weak positive correlation with the duration of pain suffered by the patient, which was statistically not significant. This finding was supported by Izumi M et al., who reported that both the pain duration and shoulder pain VAS were not directly associated with serum SP levels in rotator cuff tear cases (25).

Regarding the association of VAS scores and SP levels in patients before surgery and on the 5th postoperative day, significant association was observed. The results of the present study do not correlate with the findings of the study by Brandow AM et al., where elevations in SP levels were linked with significantly higher preoperative VAS scores (11). This is quite similar to the fact that chronic painful conditions such as CLBP are associated with elevated SP levels. Once elevated, SP levels do not fluctuate much, not even in response to acute painful stimuli. Thus, elevated levels of SP appear to be a biological marker for the presence of chronic pain.

Limitation(s)

In this study, only venous blood was utilised for the estimation of SP, although SP can be detected in other body fluids such as saliva. A more in-depth analysis of the role of SP as a biomarker for chronic pain is needed, involving a larger sample size. Also, the stress levels of study participants were not measured.

Conclusion

Serum SP levels were substantially elevated in patients with CLBP requiring decompressive spine surgery compared to their first-degree relatives and healthy volunteers. There was a significant reduction in their SP levels following decompressive surgery. Hence, the raised level of SP can be attributed to chronic pain. However, SP levels are unaffected by the duration of pain suffered. Further studies are warranted to validate SP as a biomarker of pain, which can pave the way for the development of novel analgesics acting on NK-1 receptors.

References

1.
Barrey CY, Le Huec JC; French Society for Spine Surgery. Chronic low back pain: Relevance of a new classification based on the injury pattern. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(2):339-46. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Pathak S, Conermann T. Lumbosacral Discogenic Syndrome. 2023 Nov 22. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. PMID: 32809372.
3.
Beckhauser TF, Francis-Oliveira J, De Pasquale R. Reactive oxygen species: Physiological and physiopathological effects on synaptic plasticity. J Exp Neurosci. 2016;10(Suppl 1):23-48. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Akiyama T, Tominaga M, Takamori K, Carstens MI, Carstens E. Roles of glutamate, substance P, and gastrin-releasing peptide as spinal neurotransmitters of histaminergic and nonhistaminergic itch. Pain. 2014;155(1):80-92. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Zieglgänsberger W. Substance P and pain chronicity. Cell Tissue Res. 2019;375(1):227-41. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Thom C, Ehrenmann J, Vacca S, Waltenspühl Y, Schöppe J, Medalia O, et al. Structures of neurokinin 1 receptor in complex with Gq and Gs proteins reveal substance P binding mode and unique activation features. Sci Adv. 2021;7(50):eabk2872. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Zheng J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Guo Z, Wu W, Chen Z, et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate low back pain by upregulating Substance P in intervertebral disc degeneration. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:6681815. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Mashaghi A, Marmalidou A, Tehrani M, Grace PM, Pothoulakis C, Dana R. Neuropeptide substance P and the immune response. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(22):4249-64. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Graefe SB, Rahimi N, Mohiuddin SS. Biochemistry, Substance P. 2023 Jul 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. PMID: 32119470.
10.
Sloniecka M, Le Roux S, Zhou Q, Danielson P. Substance P enhances keratocyte migration and neutrophil recruitment through interleukin-8. Mol Pharmacol. 2016;89(2):215-25. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Brandow AM, Wandersee NJ, Dasgupta M, Hoffmann RG, Hillery CA, Stucky CL, et al. Substance P is increased in patients with sickle cell disease and associated with haemolysis and hydroxycarbamide use. Br J Haematol. 2016;175(2):237-45. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, et al. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(3):e088. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Suvas S. Role of substance P neuropeptide in inflammation, wound healing, and tissue homeostasis. J Immunol. 2017;199(5):1543-52. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Ribeiro-da-Silva A, Hökfelt T. Neuroanatomical localisation of substance P in the CNS and sensory neurons. Neuropeptides. 2000;34(5):256-71. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Maggi CA. The troubled story of tachykinins and neurokinins. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21(5):173-75. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Skidgel RA, Engelbrecht S, Johnson AR, Erdös EG. Hydrolysis of substance p and neurotensin by converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase. Peptides. 1984;5(4):769-76. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Campbell DJ. Neprilysin inhibitors and bradykinin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:257. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA, Dion D, Dupuis G, Choinière M. A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception - Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men? Pain. 2012;153(3):602-18. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ma W, Zheng WH, Kar S, Quirion R. Morphine treatment induced calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P increases in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neuroscience. 2000;99(3):529-39. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Zhu J, Qu C, Lu X, Zhang S. Activation of microglia by histamine and substance P. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34(3):768-80. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Lisowska B, Lisowski A, Siewruk K. Substance P and chronic pain in patients with chronic inflammation of connective tissue. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139206. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Ebner K, Singewald N. The role of substance P in stress and anxiety responses. Amino Acids. 2006;31(3):251-72.[crossref][PubMed]
23.
Smith HS, Clauw DJ. An essential of pain medicine (Third Edition), 2011. Experimental Pain- An overview science direct topics: 345-350. ISBN 9781437722420. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Lisowska B, Siewruk K, Lisowski A. Substance P and acute pain in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146400. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Izumi M, Harada Y, Kajita Y, Muramatsu Y, Morimoto T, Morisawa Y, et al. Expression of Substance P and nerve growth factor in degenerative long head of biceps tendon in patients with painful rotator cuff tear. J Pain Res. 2021;14:2481- 90. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S320811. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69529.19352

Date of Submission: Jan 11, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Feb 05, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 23, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 11, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 03, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Mar 21, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com