Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 180317

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : XC06 - XC09 Full Version

Pre and Postoperative Serum miR-21 Expression Levels in Oral Cancer and it’s Association with Clinical and Histological Parameters: An Observational Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70045.19367
Rajat Kala, Sunil Saini, Partha Roy, Meenu Gupta, Viney Kumar

1. Research Scholar, Cancer Research Institute, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Professor, Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Research Institution, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India. 4. Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Research Institution, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 5. Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sunil Saini,
Professor, Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Research Institution, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun-248140, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: Cri@srhu.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: The patterns of microRNA (miRNA) expression have opened up new avenues in the search for prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for various tumours. In oral carcinogenesis research, analysing microRNAs expressed in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) unveils a complex network of interest. miR-21 is known to be overexpressed in numerous solid tumours and is linked to the progression of malignancies in hepatocellular carcinomas, breast cancer, and colon carcinomas.

Aim: To determine the impact of surgical excision on serum miR-21 expression levels in OSCC cases and to establish correlations with clinicopathological parameters.

Materials and Methods: The study was an exploratory prospective observational study conducted with proper institutional ethical approval at the Cancer Research Institute (CRI), Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences (HIMS), Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. Fifty-six histologically confirmed OSCC cases were enrolled along with 25 healthy subjects as controls from May 2021 to June 2023. The relative fold expression change was calculated using the Livak method (2-??ct). Data analysis was performed using software such as Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and MS Excel. Non parametric statistical tests such as Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were utilised.

Results: Out of 56 sample included, 28 exhibited high expression of miR-21 (p-value <0.001), while 27 cases showed downregulation postsurgery (p-value <0.001), with one sample showing the same level of expression. In cases where the time difference between pre and postsurgery samples was over 25 days, no significant change was observed (p-value=0.06), and similarly, in cases with a time difference below 25 days, no significant difference was noted (p-value=0.14). A significant negative correlation was found between presurgery serum Albumin to Globulin ratio (A:G ratio) and miR-21 expression (p-value <0.05), while no other parameters showed a significant correlation with miR-21.

Conclusion: miR-21 expression decreased significantly in some OSCC cases; however, in the majority of cases, it increased postsurgery. A significant correlation was observed between miR-21 expression and the serum A:G ratio.

Keywords

Clinicopathological parameters, microRNA, Perineural invasion, Tumour necrosis

One of the most common malignancies in the world is OSCC. Because the majority of OSCC patients are detected in advanced stages of the disease, the 5-year survival rate is only around 50% (1). Its prognosis has not improved, and its incidence has grown in the last few decades despite breakthroughs in biology and technology. Innovations in prognostic and diagnostic tools for the clinical setting are necessary because of the complexity and severity of OSCC (2). By identifying the affected molecular pathways, biomarkers that might be used to anticipate a tumour’s progress or facilitate an early diagnosis can be found. Small, non coding RNAs with a length of 18-25 nucleotides known as miRNAs, control post-transcriptional regulation of protein production (2).

Among the physiological processes in which miRNAs are engaged are apoptosis, angiogenesis, immune response, cell division, proliferation, and differentiation (3). Certain miRNAs’ dysregulation has been linked to the development and spread of cancer. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that the disrupted cells release miRNAs into the bloodstream and other bodily fluids (4),(5). Deregulation of certain microRNA panels has been linked to the diagnostic and prognostic values of several malignancies, including oral cancer. The therapeutic usefulness of miRNA profiles in head and neck cancer research is limited by new difficulties. Presently published literature identifies several factors associated with these discrepancies: sample type (frozen tissue, cell lines embedded in paraffin, or formalin-fixed tissue); origin and localisation (oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx); platforms utilised; and lesion type (ranging from premalignant lesions to advanced lesions with metastasis) (6),(7).

Several earlier investigations have noted that miR-21 is overexpressed in a large number of solid tumours; moreover, this overexpression has been linked to the advancement of malignancies in hepatocellular carcinomas, breast cancer, and colon carcinomas (4),(8). The majority of previous studies have focused on finding microRNA expression alterations in cancer cases and healthy controls, particularly emphasising tissues and plasma (2),(9). Additionally, a few studies have investigated miR-21 as a prognostic marker (10),(11). Therefore, the available information regarding serum miR-21 expression levels remains unclear in postoperative cases of OSCC, as well as its usefulness as a biomarker that can be non invasive or minimally invasive in nature. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of surgical excision on the serum miR-21 in OSCC cases, along with its correlation with tumour microenvironment variables such as mitotic figures, presence of necrosis, nodal metastasis, tumour invasion status, and other factors collected through histopathological and other clinical parameters.

Material and Methods

This study was designed as an exploratory prospective observational study, conducted at CRI, HIMS, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India from May 2021 to June 2023. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) with the reference number SRHU/HIMS/ETHICS/2021/29. All subjects who participated in this study filled an informed consent form.

Inclusion criteria: Fresh or newly diagnosed cases of OSCC were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with recurrent malignancy. HIV and any other immunological disorder, patients with terminal stage of disease were excluded from the study.

In this study, convenient sampling was conducted. A total of 56 histologically confirmed OSCC cases were randomly selected and enrolled, along with 25 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects as controls to normalise miR-21. The following demographic factors were recorded for each patient: age, sex, alcohol, tobacco, and smoking status. Furthermore, the histopathological factors (tumour necrosis, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, mitotic figures, TNM status, lymph node status), biochemical parameters, and clinical parameters such as clinical staging (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, 8th edition, 2018) (12), serum A:G ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio of all OSCC cases were collected during the study.

Approximately, 3-4 mL of pre- and postsurgery blood samples was collected in yellow cap Serum-Separating Tubes (SST) from the patients. The time gap between presurgery and postsurgery samples was typically around 2-5 weeks. The collected samples were first set aside for 20-30 minutes, then centrifuged (REMI) at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C. The light yellow or yellow-colored serum was separated from the blood. The separated serum would be stored at -80°C for further processing.

RNA isolation and cDNA preparation: For RNA isolation, RNA-Xpress™ Reagent (Himedia MB-6017) is used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Takara Primescript™ RT reagent kit (cat # RR037A) was utilised to reverse transcribe the separated RNA into cDNA in a final reaction volume of 20 μL using PCR (Veriti from Applied Biosystems). All reactions were performed with the following conditions: 10 μL of RNA, 4.5 μL buffer, 0.5 μL RT Enzyme, 1 μL miR-21 RT primer, 1 μL U6 RT primer, and 3 μL RNAase-free water. The RT-PCR conditions were 37°C for 15 minutes, 42°C for two minutes, and 85°C for five seconds, followed by holding at 4°C.

qPCR reaction: For qPCR, Takara TB Green® Premix Ex TaqTM (Tli RNase H Plus) (Cat #RR420A) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the reactions were performed in triplicate. Each reaction was performed at a final volume of 10 μL containing 1 μL cDNA, 5 μL of TB Green premix (Ex TaqII), 0.5 μL human pre-miR-21 forward primer, 0.75 μL human pre-miR-21 reverse primer, 1 μL U6 forward primer, 0.75 μL U6 reverse primer, 0.2 μL ROX dye II, and 0.8 μL RNase-free water. The conditions for qPCR were as follows: first denaturation at 94°C for three minutes, then 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 seconds (denaturation), 60°C for 20 seconds (annealing), 70°C for 40 seconds (extension), and a final step at 94°C for one minute. The reactions were carried out in a Thermo Fisher lightcycler real-time PCR system. The relative fold expression change was calculated using the Livak method (2-??ct) (13). The sigmoid curves showing the expression of U6 (internal control) or miR-21 (gene of interest) with Ct values shown below are from one of the samples of OSCC cases in the study (Table/Fig 1).

Statistical Analysis

All data were analysed using SPSS 20.0 and MS Excel. Depending on the normality of the data, the median (IQR) was used. Non parametric statistical tests such as Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were utilised. The level of significance considered in the study was p-value ≤0.05.

Results

In this study, 56 OSCC cases were enrolled, with 47 cases involving men and nine cases involving women. The mean age in the study population was 49.1±1.3 years. No significant relationship was established between sex and miR-21 expression, while significantly higher miR-21 expression was observed in individuals aged over 50 years (p-value=0.02). A significant association between miR-21 expression and alcohol consumption (p-value <0.001) was observed, while the p-values for smokers and tobacco users were 0.07 and 0.139, respectively, which were non significant (Table/Fig 2).

The change in serum miR-21 expression of oral cancer cases between pre- and post-tumour resection was calculated using the Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test, as the data were found to be non parametric. It was observed that the change in miR-21 expression was non significant (p-value=0.75) between presurgery and postsurgery in the serum samples of OSCC cases (Table/Fig 3). However, out of 56 samples, 28 samples showed high expression of miR-21 postsurgery (p-value <0.001), while 27 samples showed down-regulated expression which was significant (p-value <0.001) postsurgery and one sample showed the same level of expression. The miR-21 expression in healthy controls was considered as a baseline.

Serum miR-21 expression and its correlation with clinical parameters such as tumour necrosis, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, mitotic figures, depth of invasion, invasion to adjacent site of the tumour, and clinical stage were also investigated in this study. The tests used to investigate these parameters were the Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test. The analysis of histological parameters showed no significant changes except for perineural invasion (p-value=0.05), indicating that miR-21 expression is affecting perineural invasion in OSCC cases (Table/Fig 4).

There was no significant relationship seen between clinical staging and miR-21 expression in OSCC cases, while the highest miR-21 expression was observed in cases with IVb staging (Table/Fig 5).

There were 18 patients in whom the difference between pre- and postsurgery samples was above 25 days, and no significant change was found in those patients (p-value=0.06), while in 38 patients in whom the difference was below 25 days, no significant value was observed (p-value=0.14) (Table/Fig 6).

miR-21 and other parameters: To find out the correlation between presurgery miR-21 expression level and the duration of symptoms (in days), depth of invasion (in mm), mitotic figures (per high-power field), serum A:G ratio, Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), total protein (serum), etc., the Spearman’s rho test was used. As the correlation between presurgery serum A:G ratio and miR-21 was significant (p-value=0.053), the albumin-to-globulin ratio was negatively correlated with miR-21 expression in serum; that is, with the increase in miR-21 expression, the A/G ratio will decrease, as the correlation coefficient (r) is -0.325. No other parameter showed any significant correlation with miR-21 (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

In this study, the expression levels of serum miR-21 were examined in fresh cases of OSCC and after a few weeks of the tumour resection of oral cancer. A total of 56 histologically confirmed oral cancer cases were enrolled, of which 47 cases were men and nine cases were women. The study found that 27 OSCC cases (p-value ≤0.001) showed low expression of miR-21 in the postoperative condition, while 28 OSCC cases (p-value ≤0.001) showed high expression. Eighteen OSCC cases in which the presurgery and postsurgery difference was more than 25 days showed a slight change in the median value of miR-21 expression (p-value=0.06), but 38 OSCC cases in which the difference was less than 25 days also showed no significant change (p-value=0.14). It has been found that miR-21 is involved in the inflammation of wounds and their healing. miRNAs are involved in modulating the inflammatory response, promoting angiogenesis, and facilitating re-epithelialisation, which are essential phases for effective wound repair (14). This could be one of the reasons why higher expression was found in those cases where the difference was less than 25 days. Most studies have found high miR-21 expression in oral cancer tissues and compared it with healthy individuals or precancerous conditions (2),(9). Additionally, in this study, there were no significant changes in miR-21 expression between pre- and postsurgery OSCC cases. A study conducted by Hsu CM et al., revealed a noteworthy alteration in the plasma samples obtained before and after surgery of OSCC, but it also showed that the expression of miR-21 remained elevated in patients who did not recover (10). Another longitudinal investigation on plasma miR-21 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) revealed that in the event of no recurrence, the expression level of plasma miR-21 was significantly lower two months after therapy. However, in the instance of 10 patients who experienced recurrences throughout the follow-up period, plasma miR-21 did not decrease following treatment (11).

A study performed by Singh P et al., on oral cancer showed a significant change in miR-21 expression levels in oral cancer and pre-malignant lesions in the oral cavity. Additionally, high expression of miR-21 was detected from stages I-IV, which was related to different stages from early to later stages (15). This study revealed no association between the clinical state and miR-21 expression in patients with OSCC. However, the highest median miR-21 expression was seen in stage IV OSCC cases.

In this study, other parameters such as perineural invasion (p-value=0.05) and A/G ratio (p-value=0.05) produced significant values with up-regulated serum miR-21 levels (presurgery). Perineural invasion, a pathological characteristic, has the potential to influence the prognosis, particularly in cases of OSCC, by affecting the growth of cancer cells. According to the study by Yu EH et al., miR-21 may encourage a cancer cell’s invasion and dissemination within a nerve bundle (16). This study also showed a positive association between perineural invasion and miR-21 expression. Furthermore, increasing evidence shows that miR-21 contributes to the perineural invasion of certain non neural origin tumours. It was also demonstrated that miR-21 might promote perineural invasion of oral carcinoma through inhibiting the Phosphate and Tensin Homolog Gene (PTEN) (17).

The A:G is a significant biomarker used to monitor inflammation, nutritional status, and predict various health outcomes (18). Up-regulation of miR-21 has been associated with lung cancer, stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, glioblastoma, neuroendocrine tumours, colon cancer, and prostate cancer (5),(7),(8),(9). Numerous investigations have demonstrated the significance of miR- 21 in the diagnosis and assessment of tumours. In another study on oral cancer patients, a poor prognosis and lymph node metastases in addition to high expression of miR-21 were recorded (19). However, in this study, no significant association was established.

Limitation(s)

The small sample size and early postsurgery sample collection period are major limitations of this study. This suggests that to determine the impact of variations in miR-21 expression in serum, a larger sample size is required and an extended follow-up period of patients, which can help maximise the biomarker’s predictive potential.

Conclusion

Although miR-21 expression was significantly reduced in a few OSCC patients, it remained high in the majority of cases in the postsurgery state. Despite the strong correlation established Between miR-21 and perineural invasion in tissue and serum A:G ratio, further research is still required to fully understand the relationship between microRNA and other clinical and histological markers. Therefore, more studies are needed to consider miR-21 expression in OSCC as a predictive biomarker. It is important to note that research on postsurgery miR-21 expression levels in oral cancer is still evolving, and postsurgery miRNA expression is a promising area of research with the potential to improve the management of oral cancer. Large datasets may be needed to fully exploit these short RNAs as a therapeutic diagnostic and prognostic tool for OSCC.

References

1.
Chow LQM. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):60-72. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1715715. PMID: 31893516. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Dioguardi M, Spirito F, Sovereto D, Alovisi M, Troiano G, Aiuto R, et al. MicroRNA- 21 expression as a prognostic biomarker in oral cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3396. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Annese T, Tamma R, De Giorgis M, Ribatti D. microRNAs biogenesis, functions and role in tumor angiogenesis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:581007. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Uzuner E, Ulu GT, Gürler SB, Baran Y. The role of miRNA in cancer: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods Mol Biol. 2022:2257:375-422. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Condrat CE, Thompson DC, Barbu MG, Bugnar OL, Boboc A, Cretoiu D, et al. miRNAs as biomarkers in disease: latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Cells. 2020;9(2):276. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Segal M, Slack FJ. Challenges identifying efficacious miRNA therapeutics for cancer. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. 2020;15(9):987-91. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Cacheux J, Bancaud A, Leichlé T, Cordelier P. Technological challenges and future issues for the detection of circulating microRNAs in patients with cancer. Front Chem. 2019;7:815. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Wang Y, Zhang P, Yuan M, Li X. Overexpression of miRNA-21 promotes the proliferation and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma cells via suppressing SMAD7. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819878686. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Ali Syeda Z, Langden SS, Munkhzul C, Lee M, Song SJ. Regulatory mechanism of MicroRNA expression in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1723. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Hsu CM, Lin PM, Wang YM, Chen ZJ, Lin SF, Yang MY. Circulating miRNA is a novel marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2012;33(6):1933-42. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ishinaga H, He F, Hou B, Shah S, Murata M, Takeuchi K. A longitudinal study on circulating miR-21 as a therapeutic effect marker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40(9):1070-76. Doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz075. PMID: 31063535. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-99. Doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17. PMID: 28094848. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Forero DA, González-Giraldo Y, Castro-Vega LJ, Barreto GE. qPCR-based methods for expression analysis of miRNAs. Biotechniques. 2019;67(4):192-99. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Mulholland EJ, Dunne N, McCarthy HO. MicroRNA as therapeutic targets for chronic wound healing. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;8:46-55. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Singh P, Srivastava AN, Sharma R, Mateen S, Shukla B, Singh A, et al. Circulating microRNA-21 expression as a novel serum biomarker for oral sub-mucous fibrosis and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(4):1053.
16.
Yu EH, Tu HF, Wu CH, Yang CC, Chang KW. MicroRNA-21 promotes perineural invasion and impacts survival in patients with oral carcinoma. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017;80(6):383-88. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Zhang M, Xian HC, Dai L, Tang YL, Liang XH. MicroRNAs: Emerging driver of cancer perineural invasion. Cell & Bioscience. 2021;11:01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Chen L, Xu M, Huang Q, Liu Y, Ren W. Clinical significance of albumin to globulin ratio among patients with stroke-associated pneumonia. Front Nutr. 2022;9:970573. Doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.970573. PMID: 36051899; PMCID: PMC9424928. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mahmood N, Hanif M, Ahmed A, Jamal Q, Mushtaq S, Khan A, et al. Circulating miR-21 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(5):1408-12. Doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.331. PMID: 31489016; PMCID: PMC6717445.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70045.19367

Date of Submission: Feb 17, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Mar 08, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Apr 09, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 18, 2024
• Manual Googling: Apr 03, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 05, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com