Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 146007

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : LC06 - LC09 Full Version

Risk Assessment for Non-Communicable Diseases among Adults in a Rural Area of Eastern India: A Single Centre Cross-sectional Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68827.19403
Ipsita Debata, Dibyajyoti Mandal, Basanta Kumar Behera, Prem Sagar Panda, Rosy Nayak, Priyaranjan Sahoo

1. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 6. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prem Sagar Panda,
S-15, Staff Quarter, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar-751024, Odisha, India.
E-mail: drpspanda@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) cause significant premature mortality. Prevention of major cardiovascular disease risk factors, like diabetes and hypertension, is a priority for public health.

Aim: To estimate the risk assessment of NCD using the Community-Based Assessment Checklist (CBAC) scoring system developed by the Government of India among adults in rural areas.

Materials and Methods: This community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 adults attending the hospital at the rural health training centre of Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, from March 2023 to August 2023 using consecutive sampling. Face-to-face interviews using a structured CBAC questionnaire and socio-demographic variables were used to gather data on age, tobacco consumption, alcohol intake, waist measurement, physical inactivity, and family history. Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 and interpreted in frequencies, percentages, and the Chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The overall risk of NCD was estimated to be 57.25%. The risk of NCD was significantly associated with age (p-value <0.00001), tobacco consumption (p-value <0.0001), alcohol consumption (p-value <0.0001), waist circumference (p-value <0.0001), physical activity (p-value=0.000018), family history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular illness (p-value <0.00001), education (p-value=0.0079), and socio-economic status (p-value=0.0415).

Conclusion: The overall risk of NCD was estimated to be 57.25%. Most of the CBAC variables were found to have a significant association with NCD risk. However, no significant association was found between CBAC variables and gender. CBAC is a simple and economical screening tool employed at the community level so that early intervention strategies can be planned for those at risk of NCDs.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease, Community based assessment checklist, Diabetes mellitus, Risk factors

The NCDs account for 71% of all fatalities worldwide and 85% of “premature” deaths in low- and middle-income nations (1). With the ongoing epidemiological and demographic transition, the incidence of NCD is on the rise in India. NCDs account for 60% of all fatalities in India, with coronary heart disease, stroke, and hypertension (45%), chronic respiratory disease (22%), cancers (12%), and diabetes mellitus (3%) as the leading causes of fatalities (2). The National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5) reported that 65% of mortality was due to NCDs. The State of Odisha reported a higher prevalence of both hypertension and impaired blood glucose levels (random blood glucose >140 mg/dL) among men (25.6%, 16%) and women (22.4%, 13.1%), aged 15 years and above, as compared to the national prevalence of hypertension (24% in men and 21.3% in women) and impaired blood glucose (14.4% in men and 12.4% in women). The prevalence of screening tests for breast, cervical, and oral cancers among 15 to 49-year-old women was also very low (3). Less than half of patients in rural areas knew they had these significant CVD risk factors, according to a recent evaluation of the effectiveness of the Indian healthcare system for diabetes and hypertension (4),(5). Early screening and diagnosis of such risk factors are of utmost importance. India has agreed to the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs, and as a signatory, is now required to reduce the prevalence of hypertension by 25% between 2010 and 2025 and to halt the growth in diabetes by that time (6). The National Multisectoral Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs (7) and a special program for the National Prevention and control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular disease, and Stroke (NPCDCS) have both been introduced by the Indian government to meet these goals (8).

Under the Ayushman ka Amrit Mahotsav, the Government of India plans to screen and include 75 million people with hypertension and diabetes in routine care by the year 2025 through the network of health and wellness centres as a part of upscaling services at primary care settings (9). Since the onus is now on primary health centres, screening tools that are economical and can be implemented by grassroots workers are required to achieve this coverage for NCDs. Identifying the hidden spectrum using non invasive and basic screening techniques is essential for the general public to address the steadily rising burden of NCDs. The CBAC is one such tool developed by the Government of India to screen the risk factors of NCDs at the community level and ultimately act as a tool for early detection and treatment under the NPCDCS program (2). It screens the population for both modifiable and non modifiable risk factors of NCDs. Tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, and physical inactivity are some of the behaviour-related risk factors that can be modified and should be the focus of NCD control efforts. The risk of NCDs could be eliminated if these risk factors are managed early and effectively (10). Studies about employing the CBAC screening tool for the adult population in a rural setting are scarce. The population registered under the rural health unit of KIMS represents a virgin population, as the population visiting the health unit has never been screened by the CBAC tool. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the risk assessment of NCDs using the CBAC scoring system developed by the Government of India among the rural population visiting the health unit for different health needs.

This opportunistic screening will provide baseline data on the NCD risk scores among the registered population. This data can be further utilised by administrative bodies and government health officials when planning a mass community screening to achieve the targets of Ayushman ka Amrit Mahotsav for NCDs. The population with higher NCD risk scores should be prioritised for early management of their condition through referrals and follow-ups.

Material and Methods

This community-based cross-sectional observational study was carried out at the Rural Health and Training Centre (RHTC) in Kalarabanka. The RHTC is a health unit under the Department of Community Medicine at KIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, between March 2023 and August 2023. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of KIMS, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, (Reference no. KIIT/KIMS/IEC/1324/2023).

Inclusion criteria: All consenting adults aged 30 years and above who were visiting the rural health centre and had been residing in the study area for at least six months were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All known and diagnosed cases of NCDs, such as diabetes, hypertension, cancers, disabled individuals, pregnant females, and severely ill individuals, were excluded from the study.

The study area was the rural field practice area under the RHTC located in Kalarabanka, a smart village in Odisha. This area caters to the population of 39 villages covering an area of 68 square km with approximately 54,260 residents. For sample size estimation, the expected prevalence (p) of the adult population at risk of developing NCDs with a CBAC score greater than four was taken as 57.7% from a study by Kaur P et al., at a 95% confidence interval and 5% allowable error (d). The sample size (n) was estimated using the formula: n=3.84 p(1-p)/d2 (11). A 5% attrition rate was added, and the final sample size was rounded up to 400.

The eligible population (patients and individuals accompanying them) visiting the health centre for various health needs were included in the study until the sample size was met, after obtaining valid informed consent. The participants were briefed about the study’s purpose, and informed consent was obtained.

The socio-demographic details like age, gender, socio-economic status (according to the Modified Kuppuswamy classification) (12), and educational status, were collected using a predesigned and pretested proforma through face-to-face interviews. Information about NCD risk factors (both modifiable and non modifiable) was gathered using the CBAC (2). Data on risk factors like tobacco consumption, alcohol intake, waist measurement, physical activity, and family history were collected using the tool. Waist measurement was conducted using a non stretchable measuring tape. Individuals who met specific criteria and had a CBAC score exceeding four were classified as “high-risk,” based on the following: Waist circumference: 81-90 cm (women)/91-100 cm (men) (+1), >90 cm (women)/>100 cm (men) (+2); physical activity <150 min per week (+1); a family history of high Blood Pressure (BP), diabetes, or heart disease (+2); age 40-49 years (+1), age ≥50 years (+2); history of smoking, use of smokeless tobacco products, or occasional current use (+1), daily current use (+2); daily alcohol consumption (+1). Those with CBAC scores below four were categorised as “low-risk.”

Statistical Analysis

The data were compiled in MS Excel and analysed using IBM SPSS version 21.0 software. Descriptive statistics were presented as means, frequencies, and percentages. The Chi-square test was employed to examine the relationship between risk factors and CBAC scores, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 400 adults completed the baseline assessment, of which 248 (62%) were males and 152 (38%) were females. Approximately 131 (32.75%) of the study sample had education up to intermediate or diploma, and 103 (25.75%) belonged to the upper-middle-class socio-economic status. The risk of NCD with a score ≥ 4 was found in 229 (57.25%) of the study population, while a score <4 was observed in 171 (42.75%). The socio-demographic characteristics of the study population are outlined in (Table/Fig 1) along with their association with NCD risk scores. There was a significant association of NCD risk score with education (p-value=0.0079) and socio-economic status (p-value=0.0415). The distribution of study participants as per the CBAC variables is outlined in (Table/Fig 2). Approximately 177 (44.25%) of the participants belonged to the age group 30-39 years. About 234 (58.5%) of the participants had never consumed tobacco, and the majority, i.e., 312 (78%), did not have a history of daily alcohol intake. Amongst those with an NCD risk score ≥4, 81 (35.4%) people consumed tobacco daily, and 71 (31%) consumed alcohol daily. Around 109 (47.6%) of participants at higher risk of NCDs belonged to the group of females with 80-90 cm and males with 90-100 cm waist circumference. A total of 204 (51%) of the study population engaged in physical activity <150 minutes a week, of which 138 (34.5%) had an NCD risk score ≥4. Approximately 202 (50.5%) of participants had a family history of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. A significant association was found between NCD risk score and CBAC variables - age, tobacco consumption, daily alcohol intake, waist circumference, physical activity, and family history (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases) (p-value <0.00001) (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

This study presents the risk assessment for NCDs by the CBAC in a rural area. It was found that more than half of the study population was at ‘high-risk’ for developing NCDs after the risk assessment by the CBAC. It is a well-known fact that prevalent risk factors will manifest into diseases in the future. Given the lag time between exposure and disease development, identifying these risk factors in the community serves as the focal point of the surveillance system. An economically feasible early screening strategy at the primary healthcare level can be crucial in decreasing the burden of NCDs. One such screening tool is the CBAC checklist, which was first validated by Choudhary N et al., (13). In this study, the overall risk of common NCDs was 57.25% with a CBAC score ≥4, while 42.75% had a score <4. A similar prevalence was noted in a study by Yadav SP et al., where the overall risk of NCDs was 60.9% with a CBAC score ≥4 and 39.1% with a score <4 (14). A study by Kalidoss VK et al., also reported an overall NCD risk of 70% with a CBAC score of >4 (15). The presence of ‘high-risk’ in more than half of the study population was probably due to the reason that the study sample was selected from a health centre, which will include people with pre-existing health problems. However, the findings of this study can provide a baseline for undertaking more robust community screening projects for NCDs.

Around 177 (44.25%) of the participants belonged to the age group 30-39 years. However, in studies by Kaur P et al., and Choudhary N et al., 41% and 64.66% of the participants were more than 50 years of age, respectively (11),(13). This difference may be because, in the present study, most of the participants who were more than 50 years of age were diagnosed cases of NCDs and hence were excluded. The prevalence of daily tobacco consumption and alcohol intake was 22% in this study. Similar findings were also noted by Jaacks LM et al., where the prevalence of tobacco consumption was as low as 4.5% and that of alcohol intake was 12.8% (16). Similar prevalence was also reported in studies by Choudhary N et al., and Preet K et al., (11),(17). This low prevalence might be due to under-reporting of these habits since it is considered taboo behaviour. Around 109 (47.6%) of participants with a higher risk of NCDs belonged to the group of females with 80-90 cm and males with 90-100 cm waist circumference. This finding was inconsistent with the findings of other studies by Choudhary N et al., and Yadav SP et al., (11),(14). However, waist measurement might be considered a slightly invasive test since it requires the measuring tape to be used on bare skin for accurate estimation. Thus, other non invasive procedures like Blood Pressure (BP) measurement might be considered for implementation as a screening tool. Nevertheless, proper training sessions need to be planned for the frontline workers who will be conducting the BP measurements.

Physical inactivity was around 51% in this study, which was consistent with the findings of other studies (18),(19),(20),(21). This physical inactivity might be due to increased life responsibilities with age, leading to less time and opportunity for physical activity. Additionally, people tend to become less conscious about their physical appearance as they age. With urbanisation rapidly spreading to rural areas, jobs involving manual labour are decreasing. Around 202 (50.5%) of participants had a family history of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. A much lower prevalence was reported by Kaur P et al., Choudhary N et al., and Kalidoss VK et al., where 42.9%, 49.24%, and 48.2% respectively had a family history of NCDs (11),(13),(15). These results validate the planned intervention efforts of the Government through the National Program for NCD (NP-NCD) (22), especially through the participation of the local health department committed to ensuring diagnosis, testing, and medication availability within the community health system.

In the present study, there was a significant association of NCD risk score with education (p-value=0.0079) and socio-economic status (p-value=0.0415), which was consistent with the findings of a study by Jaacks LM et al., (16). A significant association was also reported between NCD risk score and CBAC variables such as age, tobacco consumption, daily alcohol intake, waist circumference, physical activity, and family history (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases) (p-value <0.00001). These findings were similar to the results of a study by Kaur P et al., except for tobacco usage (11). A study by Premanandh K and Shankar R also found that alcohol consumption and abdominal obesity were significantly associated with a higher CVD risk (23). The findings of this study will pave the way for further robust community-based screening projects in collaboration with local administrative bodies and policymakers so that the growing pandemic of NCDs can be halted at a nascent stage.

Limitation(s)

This was an observational cross-sectional study that did not conduct any investigations for further screening of the identified individuals with a higher NCD risk score. Hence, a more comprehensive approach is warranted. The data on tobacco and alcohol consumption might have been underreported due to the associated stigma. Family history and physical activity might not have been accurately reported by the participants.

Conclusion

The overall risk of NCD was high among the adults visiting the rural health centre. There was a significant association between the majority of CBAC variables and an increased risk of NCDs. Proper awareness activities need to be planned by the local government bodies so that the frequency of risk factors and the development of diseases in subsequent generations are reduced, thus ending the vicious cycle of NCDs in the community.

References

1.
WHO. Noncommunicable diseases; 2021. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicablediseases.
2.
Module for Multi-Purpose Workers (MPW)-Female/male on prevention, screening and control of common non-communicable diseases. National Health Mission. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 09]. Available from: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/Module%20for%20Multi-Purpose%20Workers%20-%20Prevention%2C%20Screening%20and%20Control%20of%20Common%20NCDS_2.pdf.
3.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-2021: India. 2021; Volume I. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 15]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf.
4.
Prenissl J, Jaacks LM, Mohan V, Manne-Goehler J, Davies JI, Awasthi A, et al. Variation in health system performance for managing diabetes among states in India: A cross-sectional study of individuals aged 15 to 49 years. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):92. Doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1325-6. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Prenissl J, Manne-Goehler J, Jaacks LM, Prabhakaran D, Awasthi A, Bischops AC, et al. Hypertension screening, awareness, treatment, and control in India: A nationally representative cross-sectional study among individuals aged 15 to 49 years. PLoS Med. 2019;16(5):e1002801. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002801. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789241506236.
7.
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. National Multisectoral Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Common Noncommunicable Diseases (2017 2022). New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2017. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 12]. Available from: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/ National%20Multisectoral%20Action%20Plan%20%28NMAP%29%20for%20 Prevention%20and%20Control%20of%20Common%20NCDs%20%282017- 22%29_1.pdf.
8.
Thakur JS, Paika R, Singh S. Burden of noncommunicable diseases and implementation challenges of National NCD Programmes in India. Med J Armed Forces India. 2020;76(3):261-67. Doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.03.002. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Roadmap to scale up hypertension and diabetes services in primary health care. Ayushman Ka Amrit Mahotsav. WHO. 2023. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 03]. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/searo/ncd/75-million-people-with-hypertension-or-diabetes-on-standard-care-by-2025.pdf?sfvrsn=2fb8123d_1.
10.
Thakur JS, Jeet G, Pal A, Singh S, Singh A, Deepti SS, et al. Profile of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Punjab, Northern India: Results of a state-wide STEPS survey. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157705. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157705. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kaur P, Jaswal P, Sarin J. Predicting risk for Non-Communicable Disease (NCDs) using Community Based Assessment Checklist (CBAC) form among adults of Haryana. Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol. 2021;25(6):17623-30. Available from: https:// www.annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/9125.
12.
Radhakrishnan M, Nagaraja SB. Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale 2023: Stratification and updates. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2023;10(11):4415-18. [crossref]
13.
Choudhary N, Sangra S, Narangyal A. Risk assessment for non- communicable diseases among out patients visiting urban health centre in Jammu region: A cross sectional study. Int J Adv Commun Med. 2020;3(1):109-11. Doi: 10.33545/ comed.2020.v3.i1b.124. [crossref]
14.
Yadav SP, Thakre SS, Jadhao AR, Agarwal S, Rathod S, Mahesswaran U. Risk assessment for non- communicable diseases among adult population of area adopted by urban and rural health care training centre of IGGMC, Nagpur: A cross sectional study. J Community Health Manag. 2022;9(3):136-43. Doi: 0.18231/j. jchm.2022.027. [crossref]
15.
Kalidoss VK, Aravindakshan R, Kakkar R, Sathiyanarayanan S, Chelimela D, Naidu NK. A study to assess the validity of community based assessment checklist – the standard non- communicable diseases screening tool of frontline health workers. Kerala Med J. 2021;14(1):03-06. Available from: https://www. keralamedicaljournal.com/index.php/KMJ/article/view/598.
16.
Jaacks LM, Awasthi A, Bhupathiraju S, Kumar S, Gupta S, Sonawane V. A community-based noncommunicable disease prevention intervention in Punjab, India: Baseline characteristics of 11,322 adults. Indian J Community Med. 2022;47(1):23-29. Doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_672_21. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Preet K, Kaur S, Kaur N, Singh D. Prevalence and risk factors of non - communicable disease among population attending medical camp organized by Ayush Healthcare in Bakhtawarpur, Delhi. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. 2019;5(5):136-41. Available from: https://www.ijariit.com/manuscripts/v5i5/V5I5-1171.pdf.
18.
Maimela E, Alberts M, Modjadji SEP, Choma SSR, Dikotope SA, Ntuli TS, et al. The prevalence and determinants of chronic non-communicable disease risk factors amongst adults in the Dikgale Health Demographic and Surveillance System (HDSS) Site, Limpopo province of South Africa. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147926. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147926. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Allender S, Lacey B, Webster P, Rayner M, Deepa M, Scarborough P, et al. Level of urbanization and noncommunicable disease risk factors in Tamil Nadu, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(4):297-304. Doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.065847. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sandhu S, Singh MM, Chauhan R, Mazta SR, Prashar A. Risk factor profile for non-communicable diseases in public institutions of Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3(11):3063-67. Doi: 10.18203/2394- 6040.ijcmph20163912. [crossref]
21.
Nelson F, Nyarko KM, Binka FN. Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases for new patients reporting to Korle-Bu teaching hospital. Ghana Med J. 2015;49(1):12-18. Doi: 10.4314/gmj.v49i1.3. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
National NCD Program. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. [Internet] [Accessed 20 Nov 2023]. Available from: https://ncd.nhp.gov.in/.
23.
Premanandh K, Shankar R. Predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk using WHO/ISH risk prediction chart among urban population in Salem. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(12):5228-34. Doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20184795. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68827.19403

Date of Submission: Nov 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 10, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 20, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 30, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 15, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Mar 18, 2024 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com