Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 39976

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : TC12 - TC15 Full Version

Comparison of Carotid Ultrasound Parameters in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Control Subjects: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68286.19441
Chinmayee Biswal, Janki Bharat Kumar Jaradi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Chinmayee Biswal,
Flat No. 402, Mithila 4, Civil Hospital Quarters, Meghaninagar, Ahmedabad-380016, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: chinmayee612@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is considered one of the risk factors for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Carotid ultrasound is used to assess the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with RA. Very few studies have evaluated all carotid ultrasound findings, such as Carotid Intima-media Thickness (CIMT), carotid diameters like Luminal Diameter (LD) and Interadventitial Diameter (IAD), and plaque characteristics in patients with RA.

Aim: To assess and compare the various carotid parameters in RA patients with controls and also to evaluate their association with age and duration of onset of the disease.

Materials and Methods: A single-centre cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, involving 40 patients with RA (Group-RA) and 40 controls (Group-C). Patients were further divided into three age subgroups. Carotid ultrasound parameters like CIMT, LD, IAD, and plaque were evaluated in both groups. Continuous variables were analysed using the t-test, and categorical data were analysed using the Chi-squared test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Age- and sex-matched controls were included with 28 females and 12 males in both the study groups. The mean LD and IAD were significantly higher in the RA group than in controls (Mean LD- 5.88±0.97 mm vs 5.26±1.08 mm with p=0.009; Mean IAD- 6.85±0.89 mm vs 6.30±0.87 mm with p=0.006). The mean CIMT was higher in the RA group but not statistically significant (0.57±0.13 mm vs 0.54±0.12 mm with p=0.256). Further subgroup analysis showed that all carotid parameters were statistically significant in the 31-60 years age group as compared to 18-30 years and 61-80 years subgroups. The effect of the duration of the disease (>5 years) on the carotid parameters was also significantly higher in the 30-60 age group (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The present study showed that various carotid ultrasound parameters can be used as a screening tool in the follow-up of RA patients to detect early changes in atherosclerosis, with LD and IAD having superior predictive capability. The study further showed that carotid ultrasound parameters have a better predictive value in the 31-60 years age group.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis, Carotid intima media thickness, Interadventitial diameter, Lumen diameter

The RA is the most common autoimmune arthritis with a prevalence of up to 1% (1). It is considered one of the risk factors for CVD, and the chronic inflammatory process is the underlying cause of atherosclerosis (2). To assess the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis and the burden of CVD in RA, many non-invasive screening techniques are being used. One of these non-invasive screening techniques is carotid ultrasound, in which we measure the CIMT (3),(4).

The CIMT and plaque measurements on carotid ultrasound have been assessed as early indicators of systemic atherosclerosis in non-RA populations (5),(6),(7). CIMT and carotid plaque characteristics could also potentially prognosticate CV events in patients (8), but few studies showed discrete results (9),(10),(11). Although CIMT and plaque are commonly used parameters to assess atherosclerosis, carotid diameters such as LD and IAD are also key indicators of arterial remodelling and can be used to assess atherosclerotic changes (12),(13).

So far, only a single study has included carotid diameters (LD, IAD) with IMT in carotid ultrasound in patients with RA, but it was restricted to the female population (14). Our study aimed to assess and compare the CIMT, plaque, and carotid diameters in RA patients with controls of both genders and also to evaluate the association of carotid ultrasound features with age and duration of onset of the disease.

Material and Methods

This was a single-centre cross-sectional study involving a total of 80 subjects, with 40 in each group (Group RA and Group Controls), conducted in the Department of Radiology, GCS Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, from June 2021 to May 2022.

Sample size calculation: The sample size for the present study was calculated based on the study done by Mohan A et al., which showed the prevalence of asymptomatic atherosclerosis in RA patients as 50%, assumed to be four times that observed in the general population (15), with α=5% and a study power of 80% (1-β). The sample size was calculated to be 32 in each group; hence, we included 40 patients in each group. The flowchart is depicted in (Table/Fig 1).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria encompassed adults aged 18 to 80 years diagnosed with RA who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA for a minimum of two years. Patients willing to undergo carotid doppler using B-mode ultrasound to measure CIMT were included. Patients with disease younger than 16 years of age and those with RA overlapping with other rheumatic diseases were excluded. Additionally, patients with a history of type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, chronic liver failure, hypothyroidism, and chronic renal failure were excluded. Patients who were pregnant or had a history of pregnancy within the last three months were also excluded.

Study Procedure

Control subjects without RA were selected from the community and recruited based on socio-demographic matching characteristics such as age, sex, co-morbidities, and the absence of atherosclerotic CVD. All patients underwent a clinical evaluation, including socio-demographic, personal, medical, and treatment history, along with a physical examination.

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were informed about the study’s nature and registered after obtaining written informed consent. Subjects were further divided into three subgroups based on their age (18-30 years, 31-60 years, 61-80 years). RA patients were further classified according to the duration of disease onset (<5 years and >5 years). Carotid ultrasound parameters were obtained for all subjects.

Carotid ultrasound measurements: Carotid and vertebral artery ultrasound were performed using a GE Logiq P5 color Doppler machine with a high-frequency linear transducer (4-10 MHz) and a Mindray Ultrasonography (USG) machine with a high-frequency linear transducer (8-10 MHz).

The carotid ultrasound was performed in a supine position, with the left and right arteries scanned in transverse and longitudinal planes at end-diastole. Greyscale, spectral, and colour Doppler ultrasonography were conducted for the near and far walls of the carotid bulb 2 cm below its bifurcation, as well as the internal and external carotid arteries bilaterally. The intima-lumen interface, IMT, and media-adventitia interface were calculated, with the average of both arteries considered. The LD was measured as the distance from the near wall to the far wall of the lumen-intima interface. The intra-adventitial diameter was determined by measuring the distance between the adventitia-media interfaces. Measurements of carotid ultrasound parameters assessed in control and RA patients are shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Velocities were calculated at a Doppler angle of 45° to 60°. An intimal-medial thickness ≥0.9 mm was considered elevated (16). A CIMT ≥1.2 mm or a focal narrowing ≥0.5 mm of the surrounding lumen was taken as the measurement for Carotid plaque (16). An experienced sonographer performed the ultrasound without prior knowledge of the clinical and angiographic parameters of the patients. Carotid ultrasound was conducted in both cases and controls.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous distributed variables were presented as mean {Standard Deviation (SD)} and median {Interquartile Range (IQR)}, and groups were compared using the Student’s t-test. Categorical data were analysed and compared using the Chi-squared test. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 22.0 software. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among a total of 80 participants there were 28 females and 12 males each in both study groups (Table/Fig 3).

Mean CIMT, LD, and IAD were found to be higher in the RA group compared to the control group. However, only LD and IAD showed statistically significant values (Table/Fig 4).

The mean age was comparable between the two study group with P=0.91. (Mean ± SD of Group RA was 45.07±14.29, and that of Group C was 45.4± 13.63). The RA group and the controls were divided into three age subgroups. The first age subgroup was 18-30 years (n=8), the second was 31-60 years (n=23), and the third was 61-80 years (n=9). It was observed that in the three age subgroups, carotid parameters were higher in the RA group compared to the control group. However, statistically significant values were observed only in the 31-60 age subgroup for all the carotid parameters (31-60 year age subgroup- mean CIMT showed a p-value of 0.042; mean LD had a p-value of <0.001; mean IAD had a p-value of <0.001) (Table/Fig 5).

In the RA study group, patients were again divided according to the duration of the disease. A total of 17 subjects had a disease duration of <5 years, and 23 subjects had a disease duration of >5 years. The mean CIMT was 0.60+0.07 mm vs 0.55+0.05 mm; mean LD was 6.1+0.43 mm vs 5.7+0.33 mm, and the mean IAD 6.8+0.50 mm vs 6.5+0.45 mm. All three parameters were significantly higher in RA patients with >5 years duration (p<0.05). It was observed that all three carotid parameters were higher in all age subgroups with a duration of disease >5 years. However, statistically significant values were observed in the 31-60 years age subgroup. (all three carotid ultrasound parameters showed p<0.001) (Table/Fig 6).

Plaque formation was observed in both RA patients and controls. Bilateral plaques were found in seven patients in the RA group (17.5%) and three members in the control group (7.5%) (p-value- 0.179). A total of 17 patients in the RA group (42.5%) and 9 members in the control group (22.5%) had unilateral carotid plaques (p-value=0.057).

The plaque morphology was homogenous in 13 patients in the RA group (54.1%) and 6 members in the control group (50%), while heterogeneous plaques were in 9 (37.5%) and 3 members (25%) in the RA and control groups, respectively (p-value=0.061). Two plaques from patients in the RA group and three plaques in the control group were calcified. The present study showed that bilateral carotid plaques were found more than twice in RA than in controls (17.5% vs 7.5%). In plaque morphology, heterogeneous plaques were also more common in RA patients than controls (37.5% vs 25%).

Discussion

In the present study, CIMT and carotid diameters were found to increase linearly with age in both study and control subjects. Similar results were obtained by Van den Munckhof ICL et al., and Tosetto A et al., (17),(18). There is evidence of an increase in atherosclerosis with age. Hence, the carotid parameters that indicate subclinical atherosclerosis will also increase linearly with age.

The mean CIMT was not significantly higher in RA patients than in controls. However, the other diameters (mean LD and IAD) showed statistical differences between RA patients and controls. Similar results were obtained by Schott LL et al., (14). This can be explained by the fact that inflammatory and protease activities in RA cause arterial remodelling in the early stages. During the process of early vascular remodelling, a concomitant increase in carotid diameters can occur (i.e., outward radial enlargement), while allowing the lumen cross-sectional area and IMT/plaque to be maintained constant by distributing them over a larger area (12). However, in a later stage of vascular remodelling, the continued formation of plaque/IMT can ultimately cause a reduction in blood flow. This shows that enlarged diameters can be considered a sign of vascular adaptation and a marker of early atherosclerosis than CIMT (14). The RA patients scanned in the present study may have had the early changes of vascular remodelling in the arteries.

In the RA study group, there was a significant increase in mean CIMT, LD, and IADs with increased disease duration (>5 years). Similar results were observed in the study by Mahajan V et al., who obtained that the mean CIMT in RA patients (>3 years) was (0.595±0.18 mm) vs (0.519±0.32 mm) in RA patients (<3 years), and CIMT was significantly greater with increased disease duration (19). Similar results were also seen in the study by Shravan Kumar P et al., (20). The mean value of CIMT in Group-I (1±047 years) was 0.703±0.09 mm; in Group-II (3.35±0.65 years) was 0.791±0.146 mm, and in Group-III (11.6±3.68 years) was 0.91±0.136 mm. The increase in CIMT with duration was significant. It may be attributed to the fact that more years of exposure lead to increased inflammation and other factors such as increased arterial stiffness and prothrombotic markers in patients with RA (21). The role of inflammation as a basic pathogenic mechanism in atherosclerosis is also well known. Hence, increased disease duration leads to increased atherosclerotic changes.

In the 18-30 and 61-80-year subgroups, CIMT, LD, and IAD were not significantly higher in patients with RA compared with controls. Similarly, the effect of increased duration of disease (>5 years) on the carotid parameters in RA patients was also not significant in the 18-30 years and 61-80 years subgroups. The plausible explanation for these findings could be that in the study in the 18- to 30-year age subgroup, the number of patients with >5 years of duration was lower. Hence, the effect of the increased disease duration/increased inflammation on the carotid parameters was seen less significantly in RA patients compared to controls. Whereas, in the elderly age group (61-80 years), age-related atherosclerotic changes also occur, confounding the effect of inflammation as a risk factor for atherosclerosis. Therefore, in the present study, the 31-60-year-old subgroup showed a significant increase in carotid parameters in RA patients. This was similar to the results of the study by Gauri LA et al., who obtained similar results in <50 years of age (mean CIMT in RA patients was (0.5996±0.109 mm) vs (0.5290±0.006 mm) in the control group) (22).

Bilateral carotid plaques were found more than twice as often in RA than in controls. In plaque morphology, heterogeneous plaques were more common in RA patients. Similar results were observed in the study by Wah-Suarez MI et al., (23). The findings can be attributed to the fact that the chronic inflammatory process in RA can amplify the process of atherosclerosis (24). The systemic inflammation in RA releases proinflammatory cytokines which contribute to endothelial dysfunction, leading to the earlier and faster progression of atherosclerotic plaques.

As far as authors know, the present research was the first attempt to incorporate measurements of carotid diameter in conjunction with other parameters assessed through carotid ultrasound in assessing atherosclerotic risk in patients with RA, spanning both genders.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the present study were that the sample size was small and was obtained from a single region of ethnicity. Therefore, further studies regarding the effect of disease duration can be carried out with a larger sample size extending to multiple ethnic groups. To avoid the effect of other confounding factors on carotid ultrasound parameters, the authors chose patients without co-morbidities and complications of RA. Therefore, further studies involving patients with such aspects can be carried out on a larger scale. Additional research involving extensive, multicentre trials that encompass RA patients with co-morbidities can be conducted to evaluate the impact of complications or anti-rheumatoid drug treatments on carotid diameters or parameters.

Conclusion

The present research demonstrated that carotid ultrasound parameters have the potential to function as a screening tool for monitoring RA patients and detecting early changes of atherosclerosis. Among these parameters, LD and IAD were found to exhibit superior predictive capabilities. Moreover, the study found that carotid ultrasound parameters possess a more favourable predictive value in individuals aged 31-60 years.

References

1.
van der Woude D, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Update on the epidemiology, risk factors, and disease outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32(2):174-87. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Liao KP. Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27(2):136-40. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Alkaabi JK, Ho M, Levison R, Pullar T, Belch JJ. Rheumatoid arthritis and macrovascular disease. Rheumatology. 2003;42(2):292-97. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima media thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007;115(4):459-67. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Increased common carotid intima-media thickness. Adaptive response or a reflection of atherosclerosis? Findings from the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 1997;28(12):2442-47. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Schmidt-Trucksäss AS, Grathwohl D, Frey I, Schmid A, Boragk R, Upmeier C, et al. Relation of leisure-time physical activity to structural and functional arterial properties of the common carotid artery in male subjects. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145(1):107-14. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Spagnoli LG, Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G, Fratoni S, Bonanno E, Schwartz RS, et al. Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2004;292(15):1845-52. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Evans M, Escalante A, Battafarano D, Freeman GL, Leary DHO, Rincón I. Carotid atherosclerosis predicts incident acute coronary syndromes in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(5):1211-20. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Lorca J, Testa A, Revuelta J, Garcia-Porrua C, Gonzalez- Gay MA. Increased prevalence of severe subclinical atherosclerotic findings in long-term treated rheumatoid arthritis patients without clinically evident atherosclerotic disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003;82(6):407-13. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Ciftci O, Yilmaz S, Topcu S, Caliskan M, Gullu H, Erdogan D, et al. Impaired coronary microvascular function and increased intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis. 2008;198(2):332-37. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Rodriguez G, Sulli A, Cutolo M, Vitali P, Nobili F. Carotid atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A preliminary case-control study. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;966:478-82. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Ward MR, Pasterkamp G, Yeung AC, Borst C. Arterial remodeling. Mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation. 2000;102(10):1186-91. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Pasterkamp G, Galis ZS, de Kleijn DPV. Expansive arterial remodeling: Location, location, location. Arteriosclerosis Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(4):650-57. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Schott LL, Kao AH, C Amy, Wildman RP, Kuller LH, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Do carotid artery diameters manifest early evidence of atherosclerosis in women with rheumatoid arthritis? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(1):21-29. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mohan A, Sada S, Kumar BS, Sarma KVS, Devi BV, Rao PV, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by utilizing carotid intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140(3):379-86.
16.
Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(10):1025-38. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Van den Munckhof ICL, Jones H, Hopman MTE, de Graaf J, Nyakayiru J, van Dijk B, et al. Relation between age and carotid artery intima-medial thickness: A systematic review. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(5):698-704. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Tosetto A, Prati P, Baracchini C, Manara R, Rodeghiero F. Age-adjusted reference limits for carotid intima-media thickness as better indicator of vascular risk: population-based estimates from the VITA project. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(6):1224-30. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mahajan V, Handa R, Kumar U, Sharma S, Gulati G, Pandey RM, et al. Assessment of atherosclerosis by carotid intimomedial thickness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:587-90.
20.
Shravan Kumar P, Bhargavi M, Abhilash T, Mythili L. Correlation of carotid intimal media thickness with activity and duration of Rheumatoid arthritis using carotid doppler ultrasonography. Int J Med Res Rev. 2016;4(10):1786-90. [crossref]
21.
McEntegart A, Capell HA, Creran D, Rumley A, Woodward M, Lowe GD. Cardiovascular risk factors, including thrombotic variables, in a population with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40(6):640-44. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gauri LA, Fatima Q, Diggi S, Khan A, Liyakat A, Nagar K. Study of carotid artery intimomedial thickness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and its co-relation with severity of the disease. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65(7):37-40.
23.
Wah-Suarez MI, Galarza-Delgado DA, Azpiri-Lopez JR, Colunga-Pedraza IJ, Abundis-Marquez EE, Davila-Jimenez JA. Carotid ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis and control subjects: A case-control study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(1):25-31. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Nagornev VA, Pigarevsky PV. Cellular-molecular mechanisms of atherosclerosis development (Scientific legacy of academician RAMS VA. Nagornev). MAJ. 2009;9(4):09-17.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68286.19441

Date of Submission: Oct 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 13, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 15, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 26, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 09, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Feb 12, 2024 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com