Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 3712

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : June | Volume : 18 | Issue : 6 | Page : UC01 - UC04 Full Version

Evaluation of Preventive Effect of Zinc Lozenge on Sore Throat after Placement of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomised Controlled Study


Published: June 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67824.19465
Rajmala Jaiswal, Priyanka Aggarwal, Deepika, Monica Chhikara, Manoj Katewa, Teyiesito Yano

1. Senior Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Monica Chhikara,
Flat No. 27, Spring Cottage Apartment, Raj Garden, Rohtak-124001, Haryana, India.
E-mail: chhikara.monica@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative Sore Throat (POST) is a known complication after general anaesthesia with an endotracheal tube (14.4% to 50%) and less so with Supraglottic Airway (SGA) devices (5.8% to 34%). Various modalities and drugs can decrease POST. Zinc possesses anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and is utilised in oral mucositis and xerostomia.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of a zinc lozenge on POST after the removal of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA).

Materials and Methods: In this randomised, double-blinded controlled study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia at Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India, over a period of five months from August 2020 to December 2020. 100 patients aged 18-60 years of either sex belonging to American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with PLMA placement were randomly allocated into two groups to receive a 40 mg zinc lozenge (Group-I) or placebo (Group-II) and were asked to chew it 30 minutes preoperatively. Patients with upper respiratory tract infections, at risk of aspiration, or with anticipated difficult intubation were excluded from the study. The incidence and severity of POST were assessed on a 4-point scale (0-3) at 30 minutes, 2, 4, and 24 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of POST at four hours postoperatively, and the secondary outcome was the severity of POST at 30 minutes, two hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) Windows software programme. The Chi-square test and unpaired t-test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean age in Group-I was 38.6±12.32 years and in Group-II was 37.90±14.84 years (p-value 0.79). Data regarding the distribution of patients according to sex were comparable with a p-value of 0.31. There was a significantly lower incidence of POST in Group-I (zinc group) than in Group-II (placebo group) at four hours with a p-value of 0.004.

Conclusion: The present study has shown that the preoperative administration of a 40 mg zinc lozenge effectively reduces the incidence and severity of POST in the postoperative period, peaking at four hours after general anaesthesia. Zinc lozenges are easy, convenient, non invasive, and successfully prevent POST.

Keywords

Intubation, Postoperative sore throat, Supraglottic

The POST is an uncomfortable and distressing consequence of tracheal intubation due to the irritation of local tissues in the pharynx and larynx. It is caused by local tissue trauma leading to inflammation, can last for 2-3 days, and may result in patient dissatisfaction, discomfort after surgery, and a delay in the patient’s return to normal activities (1). The incidence of POST with an endotracheal tube ranges from 14.4% to 50% and is lower with SGA devices, ranging from 5.8% to 34% (2). A sore throat is classified as “mild” if it lasts for one or two days without accompanying loss of voice, hoarseness, or stridor, and “severe” if it is accompanied by loss of voice, hoarseness, or stridor, or lasts for three days or more (2).

Various methods have been attempted in the past to reduce POST, such as using a smaller size endotracheal tube, maintaining low cuff pressure (3), using beclomethasone inhalation, applying betamethasone gel, using benzydamine hydrochloride, and using lignocaine spray (4),(5),(6). N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists like ketamine and magnesium, which have analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, have also been shown to reduce POST (7),(8),(9). Preoperative zinc and magnesium lozenges can reduce POST (10),(11), and a single dose of a 40 mg zinc lozenge administered 30 minutes preoperatively is effective in reducing both the incidence of POST in the immediate postoperative period (12).

Zinc lozenges have been used to reduce the incidence of POST following endotracheal intubation. Through an internet literature search (like PubMed and Google Scholar), we did not find any published study that demonstrates the preventive use of zinc for reducing POST after SGA device placement. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of a zinc lozenge on POST after the removal of the PLMA.

Material and Methods

This randomised, double-blinded controlled study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia at Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India, over a period of five months from August 2020 to December 2020. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC/Th/19/Anst13). Informed written consent was obtained from all the patients. This trial was registered, and the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) number is CTRI/2020/07/026513.

Sample size calculation: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the present study based on the sample size calculation derived from a study by Farhang B et al., where the incidence of POST in the control group was 29% and 7% in the study group (12). Therefore, a sample size of 47 patients per group provided an 80% power to detect a significant difference between any two groups at an alpha level of 0.05.

The formula for calculated sample size is given below:

n={z1-α/2.v2P(1-P)+z1-β.v{P1(1-P1)+P2(1-P2)}}2/(P1-P2)2

n={1.96*0.543+0.842*0.521}2/(0.22)2

=2.2597/0.0484
=46.68

Where, Zα/2 is the critical value of the normal distribution at α/2 (e.g., for a confidence level of 95%, α is 0.05 and the critical value is 1.96), Zβ is the critical value of the normal distribution at β (e.g., for a power of 80%, β is 0.2 and the critical value is 0.842), and p1 and p2 are the expected sample proportions of the two groups.

Inclusion criteria: One hundred patients aged 18 to 60 years, ASA I and II, who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia in the supine position with the placement of a PLMA size 3.0 or 4.0 were enrolled.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with an active infection within the oral cavity and those at an increased risk of aspiration (such as those with a full stomach, morbidly obese patients, obstetric patients, and those with upper gastrointestinal dysfunction) were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Randomisation was done using a computer-generated randomisation table (Table/Fig 1), and patients were divided into two groups. Group-I (n=50) received a 40 mg zinc lozenge (12), while Group-II (n=50) received a placebo prepared by the pharmacist at the study institution. The placebo was identical in colour, appearance, smell, and taste to the zinc lozenge but had no pharmaceutical activity. The lozenges were administered by a fellow colleague, and patients were instructed to completely dissolve them by sucking orally 30 minutes prior to surgery. Patients, the individual administering the lozenge, and the investigator were all blinded to the group allocation. None of the patients received sedative medication.

Upon arrival in the operating theatre, standard monitors for heart rate, Electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximetry (SpO2), and Non invasive Arterial Blood Pressure (NIBP) were attached for monitoring vital signs. Ringer lactate solution was started after securing an intravenous line. After preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for three minutes, anaesthesia induction was performed with glycopyrrolate (0.005 mg/kg), fentanyl (2 μg/kg), and thiopentone (5 mg/kg). The patient’s ability to mask ventilate was assessed before administering a neuromuscular blocking agent. Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) was administered as the neuromuscular blocking agent. Anaesthesia was maintained with either sevoflurane or isoflurane with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, and then the appropriate size PLMA was placed and the cuff inflated. Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate were given to reverse any residual neuromuscular block at the beginning of skin closure. After completion of surgery and emergence from general anaesthesia, the patient was extubated and monitored for nausea and vomiting before being transferred to the Post-anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU). In the PACU, the patient received tramadol 50-100 mg every eight hours for postoperative pain relief. The incidence of POST was determined by asking patients about the presence or absence of throat soreness at 30 minutes in the PACU. Patients were then transferred to the ward and observed for POST at two hours, four hours, and 24 hours, as well as for any nausea, vomiting, and managed accordingly.

Patients were assessed for the incidence and severity of POST using a standardised scale ranging from 0 to 3: 0 for no sore throat, 1 for mild discomfort (complained only upon questioning), 2 for moderate sore throat (complained on their own), and 3 for severe sore throat (change in voice, hoarseness, and throat pain) (12),(13). This evaluation was conducted at 30 minutes, two hours, four hours, and 24 hours postsurgery, with the assessment at four hours being the primary outcome of the study. No treatment was provided for grades 0 and 1, while patients with grades 2 and 3 were advised to use oral aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) gargles every six hours.

Statistical Analysis

After the data was coded, it was entered into a Microsoft excel spreadsheet. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) Windows software programme. The unpaired t-test was used for quantitative data to compare two independent groups, while the Chi-square test was used for qualitative data when comparing two or more than two groups. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05.

Results

One hundred patients were enrolled for the study in the preoperative area, and none were excluded. They were then randomised into two groups: Group-I received a 40 mg zinc lozenge, and Group-II received a placebo. Both groups were assessed postoperatively for sore throat at various time intervals, and no patient was lost to follow-up. The data was analysed.

The mean age and gender were comparable between the two groups with p-values of 0.79 and 0.31, respectively. The number of attempts taken for the placement of the PLMA and the presence or absence of blood after the removal of the PLMA did not show any significant differences. Patient satisfaction was 100% in both groups, and the data for the duration of surgery was also comparable (Table/Fig 2).

At 30 minutes, two hours, and four hours, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. In Group-II, the incidence of sore throat was higher with p-values of 0.02 at 30 minutes, 0.007 at two hours, and 0.004 at four hours. At 24 hours postoperatively, none of the patients had a sore throat in both groups (Table/Fig 3).

No other significant side-effects, like nausea or vomiting, were observed in either of the groups.

Discussion

The POST is due to pharyngeal, laryngeal, or tracheal irritation, leading to inflammation of local tissues. Multiple treatments have been recommended for POST, and recently, zinc lozenges have been used to reduce the incidence of POST (12). Studies have shown that following epithelial injury, endogenous zinc is released, which may lead to the activation of intracellular signaling pathways associated with wound healing. The topical application of zinc may enhance the formation of barriers and have anti-inflammatory effects (13),(14). Polprezinc (PZ) is a zinc-containing molecule that has been used in the treatment of gastric ulcers and oral mucositis associated with radiochemotherapy. It inhibits the induction of Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) as well as the cellular signalling of TNF-α (15),(16),(17),(18).

In the current study, patients were allocated into two groups to receive either a placebo or a 40 mg zinc lozenge 30 minutes preoperatively. They were instructed to completely dissolve it by sucking. The incidence and severity of POST were assessed at 30 minutes, two hours, four hours, and 24 hours post-extubation. The primary outcome was the incidence of POST at four hours.

Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender distribution, size of the PLMA used, the presence or absence of blood on the PLMA after removal, the number of attempts taken, patient satisfaction, and the duration of surgery. The mean age in Group-I was 38.6±12.32 years, and in Group-II, it was 37.90±14.84 years, with a p-value of 0.79, which was statistically not significant. The distribution of sex was also comparable in both groups, with a p-value of 0.31. The mean duration of surgery in Group-I was 101.38±19.60 minutes, and in Group-II, it was 106.20±16.36 minutes, with a p-value of 0.18, which was statistically not significant.

The overall incidence of POST was reduced in the zinc group compared to the placebo group. The maximum reduction was observed at four hours in the zinc group (Group-I) with a statistically significant p-value of 0.004. Farhang B and Grondin L studied the effect of zinc lozenges on POST in patients undergoing the placement of an endotracheal tube. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group received a placebo, and the zinc group received 40 mg zinc lozenges 30 minutes preoperatively. Patients were assessed for the incidence and severity of POST (using a 4-point scale from 0-3) at 0, two, four, and 24 hours postoperatively. At four hours, the zinc group had a significantly lower incidence of POST at 7% compared to the control group at 29% (p=0.046). The incidence of POST at 0 hours was 0% in the zinc group and 24% in the control group (p=0.004) (12). Sarkar T and Mandal T also studied the effect of zinc tablets on the prevention of sore throat and found a significantly lower incidence of POST in the zinc group compared to the placebo group. At four hours postoperatively, there was a significantly lower incidence of POST in the zinc group at 6.8% compared to the control group at 31.8%, with a p-value of 0.003 (13).

The reduction in the incidence of POST in the zinc group is most likely due to the prevention of cytokine release, a decrease in radical oxygen species, and subsequent decrease in Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and prostaglandin E2 release (19). Zinc is a chemical element with an oxidation state of +2 and is involved in various physiological processes such as immune system modulation, growth and tissue repair, and acts as an anti-inflammatory agent. It has also been shown to be an effective antioxidant by protecting sulfhydryl groups against oxidation and inhibiting the production of reactive oxygen species by transition metals (20).

In the present study, the severity of sore throat was found to be lower in the zinc group compared to the placebo group. In Group-II (placebo group), at 30 minutes, 10% of patients developed mild sore throat; at two hours, 16% had mild sore throat and 2% had moderate sore throat; and at four hours, 16% had mild sore throat and 4% had moderate sore throat. At 24 hours, no patient developed sore throat. The data was comparable between the two groups, and the difference was found to be statistically significant with a p-value of 0.004 at four hours. The present study’s findings were similar to those of the study conducted by Farhang B and Grondin L (12), where the severity of POST was significantly lower in the zinc group (p=0.004) (12).

It was concluded that the oral intake of a 40 mg zinc lozenge 30 minutes preoperatively is effective in reducing the incidence of POST in the first four hours and the severity of POST in the immediate postoperative period. Sarkar T and Mandal T also showed in their study that the incidence and severity of POST were significantly lower in the zinc group than the control group, with p-values of 0.003 and 0.001, respectively, at four hours and 0 minutes (13). It was concluded that the prophylactic administration of a 40 mg dispersible zinc tablet before surgery reduces the incidence and severity of POST in the immediate postoperative period. Our study was very similar to their study in preventing sore throat after using zinc lozenges, except that we used PLMA in the present study.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of the present study was that it was not multicentric. The authors recommendation for future studies is to use a larger sample size, study the exact dosage, timing, and frequency of administration of zinc lozenges, and explore different preparations. It would also be beneficial to compare different SGAs, as well as compare different drugs such as zinc, magnesium, antioxidants like vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, and other anti-inflammatory agents.

Conclusion

The prophylactic administration of a 40 mg zinc lozenge 30 minutes before surgery effectively reduces the incidence and severity of POST in the first four hours after extubation, with a significant reduction at four hours. This could be beneficial for preventing POST in patients undergoing general anaesthesia, whether with an endotracheal tube or supraglottic devices. Proper management of POST will enhance patient satisfaction and improve the overall anaesthesia experience.

References

1.
Gong Y, Xu X, Wang J, Che L, Wang W, Yi J. Laryngeal mask airway reduces incidence of post-operative sore throat after thyroid surgery compared with endotracheal tube: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):16.[crossref][PubMed]
2.
McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: Cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:444-53. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Rashwan S, Abdelmawgoud A, Badawy AA. Effect of tramadol gargle on postoperative sore throat: A double blinded randomized placebo controlled study. Egypt J Anaesth. 2014;30(3):235-39. [crossref]
4.
Honarmand A, Safavi M. Beclomethasone inhaler versus intravenous lidocaine in the prevention of postoperative airway and throat complaints: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Saudi Med. 2008;28(1):11-16. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Shaaban AR, Kamal SM. Comparison between betamethasone gel applied over endotracheal tube and ketamine gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat, cough and hoarseness of voice. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2012;21(4):513-19.
6.
Hung NK, Wu CT, Chan SM, Lu CH, Huang YS, Yeh CC, et al. Effect on postoperative sore throat of spraying the endotracheal tube cuff with benzydamine hydrochloride, 10% lidocaine, and 2% lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(4):882-86. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Canbay O, Celebi N, Sahin A, Celiker V, Ozgen S, Aypar U. Ketamine gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(4):490-93. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Gupta SK, Tharwani S, Singh DK, Yadav G. Nebulized magnesium for prevention of postoperative sore throat. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):168-69. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kuriyama A, Maeda H, Sun R. Topical application of magnesium to prevent intubation-related sore throat in adult surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2019;66(9):1082-94. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Ruetzler K, Fleck M, Nabecker S, Pinter K, Landskron G, Lassnigg A, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of licorice versus sugar-water gargle for prevention of postoperative sore throat and postextubation coughing. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(3):614-21. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Borazan H, Kececioglu A, Okesli S, Otelcioglu S. Oral magnesium lozenge reduces postoperative sore throat: A randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(3):512-18. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Farhang B, Grondin L. Effect of zinc lozenge on postoperative sore throat: A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):78-83. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Sarkar T, Mandal T. Preoperative oral zinc tablet decreases incidence of postoperative sore throat. Indian J Anesth. 2020;64(5):409-14. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Sharir H, Zinger A, Nevo A, Sekler I, Hershfinkel M. Zinc released from injured cells is acting via the Zn2+-sensing receptor, ZnR, to trigger signaling leading to epithelial repair. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(34):26097-106. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Hayashi H, Kobayashi R, Suzuki A, Ishihara M, Nakamura N, Kitagawa J, et al. Polaprezinc prevents oral mucositis in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(12):7271-77.
16.
Watanabe T, Ishihara M, Matsuura K, Itoh Y. Polaprezinc prevents oral mucositis associated with radiochemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(8):1984-90. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Mansouri A, Hadjibabaie M, Iravani M, Shamshiri AR, Hayatshahi A, Javadi MR, et al. The effect of zinc sulfate in the prevention of high-dose chemotherapy-induced mucositis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Hematol Oncol. 2012;30(1):22-26. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Sangthawan D, Phungrassami T, Sinkitjarurnchai W. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of zinc sulfate supplementation for alleviation of radiation-induced oral mucositis and pharyngitis in head and neck cancer patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013;96(1):69-76.
19.
Kim J, Kim S, Jeon S, Hui Z, Kim Y, Im Y, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of zinc in PMA-treated human gingival fibroblast cells. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(2):e180-e187. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Rostan EF, DeBuys HV, Madey DL, Pinnell SR. Evidence supporting zinc as an important antioxidant for skin. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41(9):606-11. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67824.19465

Date of Submission: Oct 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 04, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 18, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 09, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 10, 2024
• iThenticate Software: May 21, 2024 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com