Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 3063

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : June | Volume : 18 | Issue : 6 | Page : CC01 - CC04 Full Version

Development of a Model to Predict the Jumping Performance in Elite Male Volleyball Players: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: June 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69179.19477
Abhimanyu Singh, Pradeep Singh Chahar

1. Professor, Department of Physical Education, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Pradeep Singh Chahar,
Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: pradeeps@bhu.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Vertical Jump Performance (VJP) has been identified as a significant characteristic in elite volleyball players and is an essential component for successful volleyball practice.

Aim: To better understand volleyball players’ anthropometric and physical fitness characterstics and to predict jumping performance of the players using these variables.

Materials and Methods: For this cross-sectional study, 20 Indian junior male volleyball players were randomly selected from a coaching camp organised at Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education (LNIPE), Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India from May 2018 to July 2018. All the subjects were measured for VJP, selected anthropometrics {Right Thigh Girth (RTTG), Left Thigh Girth (LTTG), Average Thigh Girth (ATG), Right Calf Girth (RCG) and Left Calf Girth (LCG), Average Calf Girth (ACG)} and physical fitness characteristics {Flexibility (FLEX), Left Calf Strength Endurance (LTCSE), Right Calf Strength Endurance (RTCSE), speed, Core Endurance Abdomen Flexion (CEAF), Core Endurance Back Extension (CEBE), Low Body Explosive Power (LBEP) and Upper Body Explosive Power (UBEP), Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CF), VO2 max, Abdominal Endurance (AE). The Subset regression analysis method was used to fit the appropriate linear regression model, while R-Square and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to identify a better model for a proper explanation of the vertical jumping performance of volleyball players, and a level of significance was set at the 0.05 level.

Results: The volleyball players included had an average age of 18.05±0.76 years. The results revealed that CEBE (β=-0.1525, p=0.0199), FLEX (β=1.0842, p=0.0001), LBEP (β=8.1636, p=0.0018), right (β=-0.2417, p=0.0125), and LTCSE (β=0.5143, p=0.0012), VO2 max (β=-9.2467, p<0.001), and AE (β=1.0009, p<0.001) were the variables with the highest predictive power for jumping performance.

Conclusion: The current study identifies CEBE, FLEX, LBEP, RTCSE and LTCSE, VO2 max, and AE as critical factors for improving jumping performance, emphasising the importance of considering multiple anthropometric and physical fitness variables when identifying talent and designing a volleyball training programme.

Keywords

Athletic performance, Humans, Vertical jumping

Volleyball is a highly dynamic sport defined by a high rate of movement repetition in a short period, as well as explosive motions such as jumping and sprinting on the field (1). It is also identified as one of the most explosive and fastest sports, requiring excessive muscular strength, power, speed, and agility (2). In a five-set volleyball game, it has been shown that 250-300 acts of high-intensity and explosive activities are conducted at the highest level (3), including intense landing following a vertical jump used for techniques like serve, block, and attack (4),(5).

Volleyball performance is typically determined by a player’s ability to project themselves into the air during both attacking and defending actions. The effectiveness of the opponent’s attacking skill is related to the vertical jump height during a block jump. Vertical jump height helps the player make contact with the ball over the net while serving or spiking, providing for greater spiking or serving angles (6). Vertical jump height has been associated with an increased risk of patellar tendinopathy, despite success in sports (7), the most frequent overuse ailment among volleyball players. These findings emphasise the need to measure and enhance volleyball jumping abilities.

Anthropometric characteristics and physical fitness are essential for successful sports participation. Anthropometric variables can change as people grow, and physical abilities can be improved with adequate training. In this regard, determining specific anthropometric traits that distinguish successful players from unsuccessful ones is critical. In volleyball, earlier research has shown that anthropometric parameters are significantly correlated with VJP (8),(9), and different positions have varied anthropometric characteristics (10),(11), as well as physical fitness characteristics (6),(11).

Despite research on anthropometric and fitness factors in volleyball players, information on such parameters, especially in junior (aged under 19 years) Indian volleyball players, is limited. The current study was designed to fill gaps in the literature. Therefore, the present study was conducted to better understand volleyball players’ anthropometric and physical fitness characteristics and to predict jumping performance using these variables.

Material and Methods

In the present cross-sectional study, twenty Indian junior male volleyball players were chosen at random from a coaching camp held at LNIPE, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India, from April 2018 to July 2018, using simple random sampling.

Procedure

Following the appropriate testing procedure, data on anthropometry and physical fitness, were collected.

All of the subjects were living on the LNIPE premises and had similar food arrangements. Prior to administering tests, the researcher met with the authorities and subjects to explain the requirements of the testing procedures in full so that there would be no confusion about the effort expected of them. All of the participants voluntarily agreed to take part in the study, understood the requirements, and signed a consent form acknowledging their understanding of the procedures. The study was conducted under the supervision of the Volleyball Federation of India (VFI) as part of the routine evaluation procedure, and a consent was obtained from participants. All of the players were in good health, had no prior injuries, and were motivated to participate in the examination. All of the exams were given between the hours of 9 to 11 am.

Measurement: Prior to the start of the investigation, all the instruments used in the study were thoroughly tested. The study participants’ Height (Ht), Weight (Wt), Body Mass Index (BMI), RTTG, LTTG, ATG, RCG, and LCG, ACG, were taken as per the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) procedure (12). At each site, three measurements were made, and the average value was taken for calculations. Following the completion of the anthropometric measures, each participant had a 5-minute warm-up to condition the body and minimise the chances of injury, followed by 5 minutes of dynamic stretching activities. Physical fitness characteristics, namely flexibility (FLEX), were measured using the sit and reach test (13) in centimetres, LTCSE, RTCSE, were tested using the calf raise test (14) in seconds, speed (SP) was determined using the ‘20 metres dash’ test (15) through a SPEED digital hand-held stopwatch (Germany) in seconds, CEAF, CEBE were examined using trunk flexor and extensor tests in seconds (16), LBEP was measured using the standing broad jump test in centimetres, UBEP was tested with a medicine ball throw (17) in metres, CF was evaluated by running 2.4 kilometres distance on the track to the nearest second, VO2 max was measured in liters/minute using a VO2 Max Tracker ergo spirometre (18) (Morgan Scientific, Inc., Haverhill, MA, USA), which includes a pneumotach headpiece and quick oxygen and carbon dioxide analysers suitable for applying the ‘breath-by-breath’ approach to each exhalatory phase, AE was tested using the sit-ups test for 60 seconds, Jump Time (JT) and VJP were measured using standard procedures (19).

Statistical Analysis

The Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, histogram, and PP-plot were used to determine the data’s normality in order to meet the assumption of using a parametric test. The sub-set regression analysis method was used to fit the appropriate linear regression model for choosing those explanatory variables which are responsible for better explaining the jumping performance of players. R-Square and AIC criteria were used to identify the best model for explaining the vertical jumping performance of volleyball players. Statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using the R-Software (version 4.1.0 for Windows).

Results

(Table/Fig 1) revealed the descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) for demographic, anthropometric, physical fitness characteristics, and jump performance of junior Indian volleyball players, respectively. (Table/Fig 2) illustrates the concept of fitting an appropriate linear regression model. The subset regression method is used to generate models. The linear regression was carried out by selecting ten explanatory variables, and the best model was chosen by considering the values of R2p, Adjusted R2p, and AIC. In general, it is not a good idea to use R2 (the coefficient of determination when considering the entire model) as a criterion for determining the number of regressors to include in the model. However, for a fixed number of variables p, R2p, can be utilised to maintain a superior model. Aitkin MA proposed a criterion for selecting the optimum value of R20 (at a 5% level of significance), and he called any subset regression variable yielding R2 larger than that optimum value R20 =0.4830 a better fit (20).

In the fitted models, the first model has the best R2p among the other six fitted models that satisfy the Aitkin criterion, and the value of AIC for the first model is the lowest compared to the other models. Therefore, model one is the best fit for analysing vertical jumping performance.

(Table/Fig 3) showed the values of R2, adjusted R2, and AIC as 0.8697, 0.7938, and 98.8343, respectively. For testing the significance of our model, the p-value is 0.0001813, which is less than 0.05, indicating that the fitted linear model is significant at a 5% level of significance.

The best-fitting model, Jumping Performance=-75.6016-0.1525 (CEBE)+1.0842 (I#IFLEXI?I)+8.1636 (LBEP)+0.5143 (LTCSE)-0.2147 (RTCSE)-9.2467 (VO2 Max)+1.009(AE), comprises CEBE, FLEX, LBEP, RTCSE, LTCSE, VO2 Max, and AE.

Discussion

Anthropometric and physical fitness characteristics are crucial for predicting athletic success (21),(22). Specific physical fitness characteristics and anthropometric profiles are required for peak performance in particular sports (23),(24). The current study examines the relationship between anthropometric measurements, physical fitness variables, and the jumping performance of volleyball players. Individual relationship assessments do not provide a detailed picture, so an adjusted relationship was utilised in the analysis. All relevant predictors were included using subset regression models, resulting in eight separate models generated based on the order of model fitting according to AIC.

The model parameters were found to be significantly linked to the dependent variable, which was the jumping performance of volleyball players. The R-squared value of 0.87 indicates that 87% of the variation in players’ jumping performance is explained by a total of seven explanatory variables. The coefficients’ estimates indicate how changes in the predictors affect the jumping ability of volleyball players (Negative coefficient values suggest changes in jumping performance in the opposite direction). The sign of the regression coefficient indicates the direction of the correlation between the jumping performance of volleyball players and the explanatory variables.

The study revealed that core endurance is crucial for jumping performance, consistent with findings from a study by Bliven KCH and Anderson BE, which emphasised that core stability focuses on maintaining neutral spinal alignment, ideal trunk posture, and the transfer of loads along the kinetic chain to reduce the risk of injury (25). Additionally, the model identified flexibility as a predictor of volleyball players’ jumping performance. Stretching exercises are considered crucial for joint flexibility (26), enhancing an athlete’s movement precision and allowing them to exert maximum force across the full range of motion (27),(28).

The study also found that LBEP is related to jumping performance. Leg muscle power enables a muscle to produce the same amount of work in less time or with greater effort within the same time-frame, crucial for activities like sprinting, jumping (29), and volleyball (30). Smith’s study (31) highlighted that explosive strength in the lower extremities contributes to a good jump. Multiple studies (29),(32) confirm the importance of the correlations between strength, power, and VJP (33).

The findings are also in line with a study conducted by Ben Ayed K et al., which examined the relationship between 5-jump test performance and two specialised laboratory tests for explosive power in volleyball players {Counter Movement Jump (CMJ) and Squat Jump (SJ)} (34). Their findings revealed that 5-jump test performance was significantly correlated with SJ, peak jumping velocity, SJ height, peak power, peak jumping force, CMJ, peak jumping velocity, peak height CMJ, peak power, and peak jumping force. Calf Strength Endurance (CSE) is also found to be a factor in predicting jumping performance. A study conducted by Meylan C et al., found that having a high level of lower-body strength and explosiveness is vital for maximising sports performance (35). Secomb JL et al., investigated connections between lower-body muscle structure and strength, characteristics assessed during a CMJ and SJ in adolescent athletes (36).

Their findings revealed that adolescent athletes with greater vastus lateralis and lateral gastrocnemius demonstrated stronger expression of dynamic and isometric force-producing abilities. This is most likely due to increased hypertrophy in the lower-body extensor muscles, which increases muscular cross-bridging. Furthermore, increased lower-body strength presumably allowed for stronger neuro-muscular activation. Similarly, a study (37) of adults’ high-level volleyball practice found that “specific strength and physical traits were strongly linked with spike performance.” VO2 max was found to be inversely connected to jumping performance in the suggested model, which means that when jumping performance increases, VO2 max falls, and vice versa. The fact that elite volleyball players do not have VO2 max values as high as conventional endurance-trained athletes, despite the fact that playing volleyball requires an optimum degree of aerobic capacity, supports the findings (38). Similarly, AE is related to jumping performance. This finding is supported by a study conducted by Lin H et al., which found that following rectus abdominis exhaustion, the maximum jump height is significantly lowered, resulting in a change in landing approach (39). Because of abdominal exhaustion, the volleyball players were unable to squat to a lower position to gather energy before taking off, resulting in a decrease in maximum jump height and ankle moment, as well as a change in the load ratio of both legs during landing. Strong abdominal muscles are essential for maintaining stability during fast or intensive motions. According to research, the transverse abdominis and multifidus muscles contract before the lower limbs move to provide force to help support the spine and assist the lower limbs in providing strength during motions (39).

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted using a small sample size, which poses limitations on the generalisability of the findings and necessitates the use of a higher alpha level. Furthermore, the scope of this study was restricted to male volleyball players within a certain geographical area. Consequently, further investigation is necessary to validate the present study’s results through a more extensive and varied sample.

Conclusion

This cross-sectional study found that core endurance, back extension, FLEX, LBEP, CSE, VO2 max, and AE successfully predicted volleyball players’ jumping ability. The variables chosen can be utilised to select outstanding junior male volleyball players. The outcomes of the current study provide helpful data that can be used by national federations, clubs, volleyball players, and coaches to establish the significance of anthropometric and physical fitness for player selections. Future research should emphasise the importance of upper body strength as well as technical and tactical abilities in male volleyball players during talent identification. The study could also help volleyball coaches to analyse their players’ feedback and performance so that they can make better decisions.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge all the junior Indian volleyball players for being a part of the study, LNIPE, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India, for giving us the administrative support to host the Indian Camp, VFI for allowing imparting coaching to the talented volleyball player and Institution of Eminence (IoE), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (UP)-221005, India for support.

References

1.
Hedrick A. Training for high level performance in Women’s Collegiate Volleyball: Part I training requirements. Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2007;29(6):50. Doi: 10.1519/1533-4295(2007)29 [crossref]
2.
Hadžić V, Sattler T, Marković G, Veselko M, Dervišević E. The isokinetic strength profile of quadriceps and hamstrings in elite volleyball players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 2010;18(1):31-37. Doi: 10.3233/ies-2010-0365. [crossref]
3.
Seminati E, Minetti AE. Overuse in volleyball training/practice: A review on shoulder and spine-related injuries. European Journal of Sport Science. 2013;13(6):732-43. Doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.773090. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Kim CG, Jeoung BJ. Assessment of isokinetic muscle function in Korea male volleyball athletes. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. 2016;12(5):429-37. Doi: 10.12965/jer.1632710.355. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Çelenk B, Elif ÖZ, Öner AG, Elvan ÖZ. The relationship between isokinetic knee strength and jumping in young male volleyball players. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise. 2019;21(1):12-15. Doi: 10.15314/tsed.521569.[crossref]
6.
Sattler T, Hadžić V, Dervišević E, Marković G. Vertical jump performance of professional male and female volleyball players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015;29(6):1486-93. Doi: 10.1519/jsc.00000000000 00781. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Lian ØB, Refsnes PE, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Performance characteristics of volleyball players with patellar tendinopathy. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2003;31(3):408-13. Doi: 10.1177/03635465030310031401. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Cherouveim E, Tsolakis C, Ntozis C, Apostolidis N, Gkountas K, Koulouvaris P. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of 13-14-year-old female volleyball players in different playing positions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2020;20(6):3642-50. Doi: 10.7752/jpes.2020.06491. [crossref]
9.
Sattler T, Sekulić D, Hadžić V, Uljević O, Dervišević E. Vertical jumping tests in volleyball. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2012;26(6):1532-38. Doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318234e838. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Jahandideh A, Rohani H, Hemmati S. Anthropometric profile of FIVB Volleyball Girls’ U18 World Championship Volleyball players according to the playing position- World Championship 2017. International Journal of Sport, Exercise and Health Research. 2021;5(1):23-27. Doi: 10.31254/sportmed.5107. [crossref]
11.
Milić M, Grgantov Z, Chamari K, Ardigò LP, Bianco A, Padulo J. Anthropometric and physical characteristics allow differentiation of young female volleyball players according to playing position and level of expertise. Biology of Sport. 2017;1:19-26. Doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63382. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart AD, Carter L. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Potchefstroom, South Africa: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry- ISAK, 2006. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS. Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science, Ed. 6, WCB/McGraw-Hill Publishing. 1998.
14.
André H, Carnide F, Borja E, Ramalho F, Santos-Rocha R, Veloso A. Calf-raise senior: A new test for assessment of plantar flexor muscle strength in older adults: Protocol, validity, and reliability. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2016;11:1661-74. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Saward C, Hulse M, Morris JG, Goto H, Sunderland C, Nevill ME. Longitudinal physical development of future professional male soccer players: Implications for talent identification and development? Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2020;2:578203. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: Clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1999;80(8):941-44. Doi: 10.1016/ s0003-9993(99)90087-4. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Stockbrugger BA, Haennel RG. Validity and reliability of a medicine ball explosive power test. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2001;15(4):431-38. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Ekblom-Bak E, Björkman F, Hellenius ML, Ekblom B. A new submaximal cycle ergometer test for prediction of VO2 max. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2014;24(2):319-26. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Johnson B, Nelson J. Practical Measurements for Evaluation in Physical Education, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing. 1974.
20.
Aitkin MA. Simultaneous inference and the choice of variable subsets in multiple regression. Technometrics. 1974;16(2):221-27. [crossref]
21.
Wilmore JH, Costill DL, Kenney WL. Physiology of sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics. (3rd Ed.) 2004. 744 pp., ISBN: 0736044892.
22.
Koley S, Singh J, Sandhu JS. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics on Indian inter-university volleyball players. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2010;5(3):389-99. Doi: 10.4100/jhse.2010.53.09. [crossref]
23.
Slater G, Rice AJ, Mujika I, Hahn AG, Sharpe K, Jenkins DG. Physique traits of lightweight rowers and their relationship to competitive success. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(10):736-41. Doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015990. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Villaseca-Vicuña R, Sotomayor EM, Zabaloy S, González-Jurado JA. Anthropometric Profile and physical fitness performance comparison by game position in the Chile Women’s senior National Football team. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(5):2004. Doi: 10.3390/app11052004. [crossref]
25.
Bliven KCH, Anderson BE. Core stability training for injury prevention. Sports Health. 2013;5(6):514-22. Doi: 10.1177/1941738113481200. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Chaouachi A, Padulo J, Kasmi S, Othmen AB, Chatra M, Behm DG. Unilateral static and dynamic hamstrings stretching increases contralateral hip flexion range of motion. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2015;37(1):23-29. Doi: 10.1111/cpf.12263. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Lu T, Chang C. Biomechanics of human movement and its clinical applications. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;28(2S):S13-25. Doi: 10.1016/j. kjms.2011.08.004. [crossref]
28.
Zakas A, Balaska P, Grammatikopoulou MG, Zakas N, Vergou A. Acute effects of stretching duration on the range of motion of elderly women. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2005;9(4):270-76. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2004.10.006. [crossref]
29.
Peterson MD, Alvar BA, Rhea MR. The contribution of maximal force production to explosive movement among young collegiate athletes. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2006;20(4):867. Doi: 10.1519/r-18695.1. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Menzel HJ, Chagas MH, Szmuchrowski LA, Araújo SRS, Campos CE, Giannetti MRS. Usefulness of the jump-and-reach test in assessment of vertical jump performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2010;110(1):150-58. Doi: 10.2466/ pms.110.1.150-158. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Smith TK. Off-Season vertical jump training for junior high volleyball players. Strength and Conditioning. 1996;18(1):24. Doi: 10.1519/1073-6840(1996)018. 2.3.CO;2>[crossref]
32.
Gonçalves CA, Lopes T, Nunes C, Marinho DA, Neiva HP. Neuromuscular jumping performance and Upper-Body horizontal power of volleyball players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2021;35(8):2236-41. Doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003139. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Sheppard JM, Cronin J, Gabbett TJ, McGuigan MR, Etxebarria N, Newton RU. Relative importance of strength, power, and anthropometric measures to jump performance of elite volleyball players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2008;22(3):758-65. Doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31816a8440. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Ben Ayed K, Ben Saad H, Ali Hammami M, Latiri I. Relationships of the 5-jump test (5jt) performance of youth players with volleyball specific’ laboratory tests for explosive power. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2020;14(6):1557988320977686. Doi: 10.1177/155798832097. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Meylan C, Cronin J, Oliver JL, Hughes MG, McMaster DT. The reliability of jump kinematics and kinetics in children of different maturity status. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2012;26(4):1015-26. Doi: 10.1519/jsc. 0b013e31822dcec7. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Secomb JL, Nimphius S, Farley ORL, Lundgren L, Tran TT, Sheppard JM. Relationships between lower-body muscle structure and, lower-body strength, explosiveness and eccentric leg stiffness in adolescent athletes. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2015;14(4):691-97.
37.
Forthomme B, Croisier JL, Ciccarone G, Crielaard JM, Cloes M. Factors correlated with volleyball spike velocity. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;33(10):1513-19. Doi: 10.1177/0363546505274935. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Lidor R, Ziv G. Physical characteristics and physiological attributes of adolescent volleyball players-A review. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2010;22(1):114-34. Doi: 10.1123/pes.22.1.114. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Lin H, Huang YC, Li YY, Chang JH. The effect of rectus abdominis fatigue on lower limb jumping performance and landing load for volleyball players. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(15):6697. Doi: 10.3390/app11156697. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69179.19477

Date of Submission: Dec 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 14, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Apr 10, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 19, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 16, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 08, 2024 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com