Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 3063

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : June | Volume : 18 | Issue : 6 | Page : OC06 - OC10 Full Version

Relationship of Helicobacter pylori Infection with Various Components of Metabolic Syndrome in Dyspeptic Patients: A Cross-sectional Study from Western Maharashtra, India


Published: June 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/71240.19516
Swapnil Suresh Patil, Mayank Mundada, Bhumika T Vaishnav, R Akhil, Shivam Sharma, Arvind Bamanikar, Hansini Raju Reddy, Arun Bijju

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 6. Professor, Department of Internal

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mayank Mundada,
K-301, K Block, Mahindra Royale, Pimpri Chinchwad, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: mundadamayank@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), despite its high prevalence in the Indian population, has been subjected to limited studies concerning its potential role as a risk factor for Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and Insulin Resistance (IR). Proposed mechanisms include inflammatory mediators, atherogenic lipid profiles, and vasoconstriction.

Aim: To determine the association between H. pylori infection and MetS components, focusing on Highly sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) levels, to enhance understanding and management of these conditions.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India spanning from September 2017 to August 2019. This study involved 100 dyspeptic patients aged 18 years or older undergoing upper Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Data collection included fasting/postprandial blood parameters, serum lipids, hs-CRP, and H. pylori detection via both rapid urease test and Histopathological Examination (HPE). Physical assessments covered height, weight, Waist Circumference (WC), and blood pressure. MetS was evaluated using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria. Statistical analysis employed unpaired t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Fisher-Exact tests using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0.

Results: The study of 100 dyspeptic patients, predominantly females, revealed a significant association between H. pylori infection and MetS (p-value <0.001). H. pylori infection was associated with elevated fasting glucose (90.24%) and triglycerides (90.24%) (p-value <0.001). Additionally, individuals with H. pylori infection exhibited higher inflammatory markers (p-value 0.0029).

Conclusion: The above findings underscore the potential role of H. pylori as a risk factor for MetS and highlight the need for further research to elucidate mechanisms and implications for preventive strategies and clinical management, offering avenues for improved patient care and outcomes, particularly in addressing cardiovascular health.

Keywords

Cardiovascular complications, Inflammatory mediators, Insulin resistance

The MetS with IR constitutes key factors contributing to cardiovascular diseases, a significant cause of global mortality (1). MetS encompasses a cluster of diabetes and cardiovascular elements, including elevated blood pressure, low High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) levels, increased serum Triglycerides (TG) levels, central obesity, and hyperglycaemia (2). While lifestyle and dietary changes are attributed to the high prevalence of MetS, they alone do not account for all MetS cases, necessitating the exploration of alternative emerging risk factors (3).

H. pylori, a spiral-shaped, microaerophilic, gram negative bacterium, is among the most common infections worldwide, especially prevalent in developing countries. H. pylori prevalence varies, reaching up to 80% in developing countries, while it is around 30% in developed nations (4). A causal factor in various GI illnesses, including chronic gastritis, gastric ulcerations, and MALToma (Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphoma), H. pylori is classified as a class I carcinogen, capable of inducing chronic gastric inflammation and cancer (5). Associations between H. pylori infection and extra-digestive pathologies, such as atherosclerotic vascular diseases and coronary artery diseases, have been indicated previously (6).

However, the relationship between H. pylori infection and MetS/IR remains controversial, with limited studies conducted in the Indian population, despite a prevalence exceeding 60% (7),(8). Some epidemiological studies support a significant association between H. pylori infection, MetS, and IR (7),(8). Postulated mechanisms, including an increase in systemic inflammatory mediators and markers, the presence of an atherogenic lipid profile, and factors of vasoconstriction, offer hypothetical explanations for this role (9). A study conducted in the Indian population suggested that H. pylori induce oxidative and inflammatory damage to beta-pancreatic cells, leading to IR (10). Another study revealed that postmenopausal Indian women are predisposed to coronary artery disease due to a high prevalence of diabetes, IR, hs-CRP levels, and low HDL-cholesterol, postulating a high prevalence of occult H. pylori infections in such study groups (11).

Furthermore, the eradication of H. pylori infection has shown potential for improving IR and serum lipid profiles, suggesting it could impede the development of MetS and IR if treated (9). Diagnosis of H. pylori infection should be based on clinical, biochemistry laboratory findings, microbiological detection, and HPEs. Although upper gastro-oesophago-duodenoscopic examination is invasive, time-consuming, and expensive, it remains crucial for determining the clinical prognosis. The severity of precancerous lesions and tissue inflammation is frequently diagnosed through histological examinations, with HPE considered the “gold standard method” for diagnosing H. pylori infection, boasting sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95% (12).

This study aims to determine the prevalence and association of MetS in dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori. Furthermore, it seeks to explore the relationship between H. pylori infection and various metabolic parameters, including blood glucose profile, high sensitivity CRP levels, lipid profile, and blood pressure measurements. Given the lack of research investigating these associations in dyspeptic patients specifically infected with H. pylori, this study addresses a significant gap in the literature. Understanding these relationships is crucial for elucidating the underlying mechanisms and developing targeted interventions for better management of metabolic health in H. pylori-infected individuals.

Material and Methods

The present was a cross-sectional study, conducted at the Department of Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune, September 2017 to August 2019. Before the commencement of the investigation, the Institute’s Scientific and Ethics Committee approval was obtained (Ethical committee clearance number: IESC/PG/044/17). Participants were given written consent forms in their own languages, ensuring they understood the study’s goals, procedures, and potential risks.

Inclusion criteria: Individuals aged 18 years or older, presenting dyspeptic symptoms and undergoing upper GI endoscopy at the institute were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with chronic liver or renal disease, significant GI procedures history, cancer, recent antacid drug use, psychiatric problems, thyroid disorders, diabetes under treatment, or persistent alcoholism were excluded from the study.

Sample size was calculated by considering the prevalence of H. pylori infection among patients with dyspeptic symptoms as 58.8% from the study by Satpathi P et al., with a confidence interval of 95% CI and an acceptable difference of 10%; the minimum sample size was 94. The software used was winPepi version 11 (13).

Study Procedure

Data collection utilised a pretested proforma designed for the study, covering parameters such as Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) and Postprandial Blood Sugar levels (PPBS), glycosylated haemoglobin, serum fasting lipids, Hs-CRP, upper GI endoscopy, and HPE of biopsy samples for H. pylori detection. Physical examination encompassed height, weight, WC, and blood pressure measurements.

Blood samples were obtained after a 12-hour overnight fasting period for laboratory investigations. MetS evaluation utilised NCEP ATP III criteria for Asian Indians (14). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD scopy) was performed after a minimum 8-hour fasting period, with specimens collected from fixed locations of the gastric antrum and corpus. Patients were categorised into H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative groups based on histopathological and rapid urease test results.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS version 21.0, expressed data as counts, percentages, and/or mean±SD. Two-tailed tests with a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of 0.05 were employed (p-value 0.05). Unpaired t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Fisher Exact tests were used to determine statistical significance.

Results

In this study, the majority of the participants were females. Out of 100 participants, 69 (69%) were females, and 31 (31%) were males. The highest prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms was observed in the age group of 41-50 years, age distribution is shown in (Table/Fig 1). The mean age of all participants was 49.81±11.10 years. Specifically, the mean age for males was 44.39±11.03 years, while for females, it was 52.24±11.10 years.

In the investigation, the distribution of H. pylori across genders revealed that 19 males (46.34%) and 22 females (53.66%) tested positive for H. pylori. Among the 41 individuals with H. pylori positivity, 37 patients (90.24%) were diagnosed with MetS. A positive family history of obesity was found in three patients (7.31%) with H. pylori infection. The study identified associations between H. pylori, MetS, and a family history of obesity among individuals with dyspeptic symptoms, with statistical significance (p-value <0.05) and odds ratios of 27.13 and 0.21, respectively (Table/Fig 2).

In this study, a comparison of age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and WC between patients with and without H. pylori infection in both males and females was made. The findings revealed that among H. pylori-positive patients, there were higher values for WC in both males and females compared to H. pylori-negative patients, and these differences were statistically significant (p-value <0.05) (Table/Fig 3).

It was observed that among H. pylori-positive patients, FBS was significantly higher compared to H. pylori-negative patients, with a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.05). Furthermore, it was noted that among H. pylori-positive patients, there were slightly higher Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) {130 (120-140) vs 128 (118.25-143.5) mmHg} compared to H. pylori-negative patients, but these differences were not statistically significant (p-value >0.05). The comparison of lipid profiles between the two groups revealed that among H. pylori-positive patients, there were slightly higher levels of TG compared to H. pylori-negative patients, with a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.05). Conversely, HDL levels in H. pylori-positive patients were lower compared to v-negative patients, showing a statistically significant difference. H. pylori-positive patients also exhibited slightly higher CRP {3.7 (2.06-4.83) vs 2.6 (2-3.1)} compared to H. pylori-negative patients, with a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.05) (Table/Fig 4).

It was observed that H. pylori-positive patients had a higher prevalence of MetS (37, 90.24%) compared to H. pylori-negative patients (25.42%). Furthermore, H. pylori-positive patients showed a greater proportion of individuals with higher FBS (37, 90.24%) and TG (37, 90.24%) compared to H. pylori-negative patients, which was statistically significant, with odds ratios of 14.48 and 29.73, respectively (Table/Fig 5). There was no significant difference when it comes to abdominal obesity, HDL, and blood pressure.

Discussion

The findings of this study shed light on several important aspects of the relationship between H. pylori infection and MetS. Notably, this study revealed a higher prevalence of dyspepsia in the 41-60 years age group, with a mean age of 49.81±11.10 years for all participants. This contrasts with the notably higher mean participant age of 59.2 years reported in a Chinese study by Chen LW et al., examining the correlation between MetS and H. pylori infection (15). Additionally, a Turkish study by Is¸ iktas¸ Sayilar E et al., found that the majority of H. pylori-infected patients fell within the 40-49 years age group (12). These variations underscore the importance of considering demographic differences when interpreting findings related to MetS and H. pylori infection across diverse populations.

In terms of gender distribution, this study, along with others (12),(15),(16),(17), observed comparable percentages of males and females. Despite the variations in overall H. pylori prevalence reported in different studies, the lack of statistically significant gender-based differences in H. pylori prevalence has been consistently noted (12),(15),(16),(17). This highlights the need for further exploration to understand the nuanced factors influencing H. pylori infection rates among genders.

Both this study and the study by Liu Y et al., found statistically significant differences in WC between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients (18). This consistency highlights the robustness of the association between H. pylori infection and WC across different research studies. Similarly, elevated FBS levels in H. pylori-positive patients were consistent with previous reports by Vaishnav BT et al., emphasising a potential link between H. pylori infection and alterations in glucose metabolism (19). The current study and the reference study were both statistically significant. Furthermore, several studies have associated H. pylori infection with IR, with higher haemostatic model assessment for IR values and insulin levels observed in infected individuals (8).

Contrasting findings were observed regarding the relationship between H. pylori infection and blood pressure regulation. While this study did not find statistically significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients, other studies by Longo-Mbenza B et al., reported elevated blood pressure levels in infected individuals. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between H. pylori infection and blood pressure regulation, warranting further investigation (20).

Consistent with previous research, this study also found higher levels of TG, along with lower HDL levels, in H. pylori-positive patients. This aligns with the findings of a meta-analysis by Shimamoto T et al., which estimated the association between H. pylori infection and the serum lipid profile (21). This study revealed that H. pylori infection was positively associated with LDL, TC, and TG {Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) (95% CI)=0.11 (0.09-0.12), 0.09 (0.07-0.10), and 0.06 (0.05-0.08), respectively} and negatively associated with HDL (SMD=-0.13 (-0.14 to -0.12)). Also, the association between H. pylori infection and low HDL levels has been consistently observed across diverse populations (22),(23), suggesting a potential role of H. pylori in lipid metabolism alterations. Moreover, a meta-analysis by Watanabe J et al., has shown that after the eradication of H. pylori, HDL levels tend to increase, further supporting a link between H. pylori infection and alterations in lipid metabolism (24). These collective findings underscore the complex interplay between H. pylori infection and lipid metabolism, warranting further exploration and understanding.

Furthermore, this study demonstrated higher levels of hs-CRP in H. pylori-positive patients. This finding aligns with a similar study done on 811 patients by Altun E et al., demonstrating elevated hs-CRP levels in H. pylori-infected patients (25). CRP serves as an inflammation marker, and H. pylori infection induces a robust inflammatory response in the gastric antrum, leading to increased hs-CRP levels. Elevated hs-CRP is recognised as a risk factor for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) and stroke. Consequently, it can be inferred that H. pylori infection, with its association with heightened hs-CRP levels, may pose a potential risk for metabolic disturbances contributing to the development of CHD. This underscores the importance of understanding the inflammatory aspects of H. pylori infection in the context of cardiovascular health.

In this study, all components of MetS were compared between individuals with and without H. pylori infection, revealing statistically significant correlations with H. pylori positivity. This observation underscores a potential association between H. pylori infection and MetS components, including elevated WC, blood pressure (SBP), FBS, TG levels, and reduced HDL levels (p-value <0.05).

Consistent with the findings of this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Upala S et al., of six trials reported a statistically significant association between H. pylori and MetS with a pooled odds ratio of 1.34 (95% CI 1.17-1.53, I(2)=39%, Pheterogeneity <0.01) (26). Between the infected and non-infected groups, there were significant differences in FBG, HDL, BMI, TG, and SBP (all p-value <0.05), suggesting a potential role of H. pylori infection in the development of MetS components. One more study by Liu Y et al., also reveals similar findings (18).

Regarding the relationship between H. pylori infection and diabetes mellitus, this study found significantly higher FBS levels in H. pylori-positive patients. According to the findings of a study by Hosseininasab Nodoushan SA and Nabavi A H. pylori is was more common in Type 2 diabetic patients than in healthy individuals or non diabetic patients (27). The reason is the growth of H. pylori infection-induced inflammation and the generation of inflammatory cytokines, as well as numerous hormonal imbalances caused by this bacterium, which are related to diabetes mellitus.

Limitation(s)

Despite the valuable insights gained from this study, several limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the cross-sectional design of the research inherently restricts the establishment of causal relationships, limiting our ability to infer causation between H. pylori infection and MetS. Additionally, the study’s relatively small sample size might influence the generalisability of the findings to larger populations. The exclusion of individuals with certain medical conditions, such as chronic liver or renal disease, and the focus on dyspeptic patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy could introduce selection bias, affecting the study’s external validity. Furthermore, the study’s reliance on a single-center setting may limit the generalisability of the results to diverse demographic and geographic contexts. Despite these limitations, the findings contribute valuable information to the existing literature on the potential association between H. pylori infection and MetS.

Conclusion

In essence, this study underscores the significant association between H. pylori infection and MetS components, highlighting its potential as a risk factor. These findings shed light on H. pylori’s involvement in metabolic disturbances, inflammation, and subsequent cardiovascular complications, informing preventive strategies and clinical management. Recognising this interplay is crucial for targeted interventions, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

References

1.
Haffner SM, Miettinen H. Insulin resistance implications for type II diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. Am J Med. 1997;103(2):152-62. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00027-2. PMID: 9274899. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al; International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; Hational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Association for the Study of Obesity. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640-45. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. Epub 2009 Oct 5. PMID: 19805654. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Carnethon MR, Loria CM, Hill JO, Sidney S, Savage PJ, Liu K. Coronary artery risk development in young adults study. Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, 1985-2001. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(11):2707-15. Doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2707. PMID: 15505009. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Pereira-Lima JC, Marques DL, Pereira-Lima LF, Hornos AP, Rota C. The role of cagA Helicobacter pylori strains in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16(7):643-47. Doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000108340.41221.9e. PMID: 15201576. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Lee YC, Chen TH, Chiu HM, Shun CT, Chiang H, Liu TY, et al. The benefit of mass eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: A community-based study of gastric cancer prevention. Gut. 2013;62(5):676-82. Doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302240. Epub 2012 Jun 14. PMID: 22698649; PMCID: PMC3618687. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Adiloglu AK, Nazli C, Cicioglu-Aridogan B, Kinay O, Can R, Ergene O. Gastroduodenal Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosed by Helicobacter pylori stool antigen is related to atherosclerosis. Acta Cardiol. 2003;58(4):335-39. Doi: 10.2143/AC.58.4.2005291. PMID: 12948039. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Aydemir S, Bayraktaroglu T, Sert M, Sokmen C, Atmaca H, Mungan G, et al. The effect of Helicobacter pylori on insulin resistance. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(11):2090-93. Doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-3012-z. PMID: 16240220. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Eshraghian A, Hashemi SA, Hamidian Jahromi A, Eshraghian H, Masoompour SM, Davarpanah MA, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection as a risk factor for insulin resistance. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(9):1966-70. Doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0557-7. Epub 2008 Nov 14. PMID: 19009348. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Manolakis A, Kapsoritakis AN, Potamianos SP. A review of the postulated mechanisms concerning the association of Helicobacter pylori with ischemic heart disease. Helicobacter. 2007;12(4):287-97. Doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00511.x. PMID: 17669100.[crossref][PubMed]
10.
Rahman MA, Cope MB, Sarker SA, Garvey WT, Chaudhury HS, Khaled MA. Helicobacter pylori infection and inflammation: Implication for the pathophysiology of diabetes and coronary heart disease in Asian Indians. J Life Sci. 2009;1(1):45-50. Doi: 10.1080/09751270.2009.11885133. PMID: 22308070; PMCID: PMC3269913. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Wasir JS, Misra A, Vikram NK, Pandey RM, Luthra K. C-reactive protein, obesity, and insulin resistance in postmenopausal women in urban slums of North India. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clin Res Rev. 2007;1(2):83-89. [crossref]
12.
Işiktas¸ Sayilar E, Çelik B, Dumlu S . Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and metabolic syndrome. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015;26(6):468-73. Doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.0197. Epub 2015 Oct 26. PMID: 26510087. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Satpathi P, Satpathi S, Mohanty S, Mishra SK, Behera PK, Maity AB. Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients in an industrial belt of India. Trop Doct. 2017;47(1):02-06. Doi: 10.1177/0049475515626033. Epub 2016 Jan 15. PMID: 26774110. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Huang PL. A comprehensive definition for metabolic syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2009;2(5-6):231-37. Doi: 10.1242/dmm.001180. PMID: 19407331; PMCID: PMC2675814. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Chen LW, Chien CY, Yang KJ, Kuo SF, Chen CH, Chien RN. Helicobacter pylori infection increases insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in residents younger than 50 years old: A community-based study. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0128671. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128671. PMID: 26020514; PMCID: PMC4447445. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Takeoka A, Tayama J, Yamasaki H, Kobayashi M, Ogawa S, Saigo T, et al. Impact of Helicobacter pylori immunoglobulin G levels and atrophic gastritis status on risk of metabolic syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0166588. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166588. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Yang W, Xuan C. Influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on metabolic syndrome in old Chinese people. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6951264. Doi: 10.1155/2016/6951264. Epub 2016 Jun 27. PMID: 27429613; PMCID: PMC4939336. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Liu Y, Shuai P, Chen W, Liu Y, Li D. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and metabolic syndrome and its components. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1188487. Doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1188487. PMID: 37404306; PMCID: PMC10316390. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Vaishnav BT, Shaikh SR, Bamanikar AA, Kakrani AL, Tambile RR. Diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori infection in dyspeptic type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. J Dig Endosc. 2018;9(2):53-60. [crossref]
20.
Longo-Mbenza B, Nkondi Nsenga J, Vangu Ngoma D. Prevention of the metabolic syndrome insulin resistance and the atherosclerotic diseases in Africans infected by Helicobacter pylori infection and treated by antibiotics. Int J Cardiol. 2007;121(3):229-38. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.003. Epub 2007 Mar 26. PMID: 17368586. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Shimamoto T, Yamamichi N, Gondo K, Takahashi Y, Takeuchi C, Wada R, et al. The association of Helicobacter pylori infection with serum lipid profiles: An evaluation based on a combination of meta-analysis and a propensity score-based observational approach. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234433. Doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0234433. PMID: 32511269; PMCID: PMC7279579. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gen R, Demir M, Ataseven H. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on insulin resistance, serum lipids and low-grade inflammation. South Med J. 2010;103(3):190-96. Doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181cf373f. PMID: 20134372. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Hoffmeister A, Rothenbacher D, Bode G, Persson K, März W, Nauck MA, et al. Current infection with Helicobacter pylori, but not seropositivity to Chlamydia pneumoniae or cytomegalovirus, is associated with an atherogenic, modified lipid profile. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(3):427-32. Doi: 10.1161/01. atv.21.3.427. PMID: 11231924. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Watanabe J, Hamasaki M, Kotani K. The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on lipid levels: A meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):904. Doi: 10.3390/ jcm10050904. PMID: 33668848; PMCID: PMC7956592. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Altun E, Yildiz A, Cevik C, Turan G. The role of high sensitive C-reactive protein and histopathological evaluation in chronic gastritis patients with or without Helicobacter pylori infection. Acta Cir Bras. 2019;34(3):e201900310. Doi: 10.1590/ s0102-865020190030000010. PMID: 30916140; PMCID: PMC6585886. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Upala S, Jaruvongvanich V, Riangwiwat T, Jaruvongvanich S, Sanguankeo A. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis. 2016;17(7):433-40. Doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12367. PMID: 27273478. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Hosseininasab Nodoushan SA, Nabavi A. The interaction of Helicobacter pylori infection and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adv Biomed Res. 2019;8:15. Doi: 10.4103/ abr.abr_37_18. PMID: 30993085; PMCID: PMC6425747.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/71240.19516

Date of Submission: Apr 12, 2024
Date of Peer Review: May 07, 2024
Date of Acceptance: May 14, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 13, 2024
• Manual Googling: May 08, 2024
• iThenticate Software: May 12, 2024 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com