Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 73101

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2008 | Month : February | Volume : 2 | Issue : 1 | Page : 605 - 611

Role Of Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen Intermediates, And Micro-Organisms In The Prevention Of Injuries Related To Copper Intrauterine Devices

GUPTA I, MAHAJAN U, SAHA P K, DHAWAN V*, SETHI S**, SHARMA M**, MAJUMDAR S S*

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, *Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology and **Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India – 160 012.

Correspondence Address :
Dr Pradip Kumar Saha, Senior lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh – 160 030.
India. Tel. No.: 91-171-2645262
Email-pradiplekha@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to study reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) along with the microbiological flora in intrauterine device users before and after its insertion.
Study and design: Fifty three women seeking a copper intrauterine contraceptive device (Cu-IUD), were included in the study. Microbiological flora were studied from endocervical and uterine aspirates along with reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, before insertion of Cu IUD, and subsequently at one, four, and 12 weeks, post insertion. Twenty subjects were also followed up at 24 weeks.
Results: There was a steady increase in reactive oxygen intermediates at 1, 4, and 12 weeks, though it was not statistically significant (p>0.5). On the other hand, there was a decrease in the reactive nitrogen intermediates and L-citrulline levels, which is statistically significant (p<0.5). The number of organisms grown at one week post insertion were more than those present during preinsertion, but there was a steady fall in the number observed at four and 12 weeks. The values of RNI and ROI were the same at 24 weeks follow-up as preinsertion in the 20 subjects.
Conclusion: The balance between reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates is perhaps responsible for the action of activated macrophages on different organisms. Presence of microorganisms introduced at the time of insertion of an IUD causes a rise in ROI levels and a fall in RNI levels. Presence of copper in copper IUDs perhaps enhances these reactions.

Keywords

Intrauterine device, reactive nitrogen intermediates, microbiological flora.

In contrast to previous belief that intrauterine devices (IUD) were associated with an increase in pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)(1), copper IUD seems to carry less risk for PID. The copper in the IUD has been shown to have some bactericidal activity. Mishell et al(2) found a decrease in the incidence of Gardnerella vaginalis in copper IUD users. Fiscina et al(3) observed inhibition in the growth of Neisseria gonorrhoea with micromolar concentration of copper, and reported about the bactericidal activity of copper in vitro. Elhag et al(4) showed the inhibitory effect of copper on gram positive bacteria and lactobacilli. Kleinman et al(5) demonstrated that Chlamydia trachomatis growth could be inhibited in cultured human endometrial cells by copper ions, at concentrations of copper known to be released by the copper IUDs. However, the exact mechanism of antimicrobial action of copper IUD is not known.

The increase in the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the endometrium following IUD insertion has been documented.(6) The cells are activated by various stimuli such as opsonized microorganisms, complement fragments, and by N. formylated oligopeptides of bacterial origin that are actively secreted or released by the lysis of dead organisms(7). These activated inflammatory cells release reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI)(8). It has been shown that metals like iron and copper act as catalysts in augmenting the toxicity of reactive oxygen intermediates. Gupta et al(9) observed that the copper levels in the uterine flushings were significantly higher at one week post insertion. Similarly, Nathan and Hibbs(10) have also shown the effect of RNI in the control of infection, and interaction of nitric oxide with microbial enzymes containing iron-sulphydryl proteins that could account for antimicrobial action. ROI and RNI levels have been studied separately (11), (12) and subsequently together(13) in copper IUD users, but, no microbiological studies which have been done in the present study were carried out, and the number of subjects studied is larger, with a longer follow-up.

Material and Methods

The subjects for the study included women seeking Cu IUD insertion in the family planning clinic of the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical microbiology, Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India from February 2001 to February 2003 . After routine examination and excluding women with local infection and any contraindication for IUD insertion, swabs were taken from the endocervix. Then the cervix and vagina were cleansed with betadine, and the uterine aspirate was collected. The copper IUD was inserted in the immediate post menstrual phase. All the subjects recruited for the study were followed up at one, four and 12 weeks, and cervical swabs and uterine aspirate were collected on each visit again, in the post menstrual phase. Thus, each subject acted as her own control. A written informed consent was taken from each patient. The plan of work was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee. In twenty subjects, the endocervical swabs and uterine aspirate were collected at 24 weeks also.

Collection of cervical swab samples
After cleansing and draping before any vaginal examination was made, swabs were taken from the endocervix for smear examination and culture for aerobic and anaerobic organisms. Endocervical swabs were collected to screen for the following:
- Chalamydia trachomatis
- Neisseria gonorrhoea
- Group B streptococcus
- Staphylococcus species
- Ureaplasma urealyticum
- Gardnerella vaginalis
- Aaerobic organisms

The Chlamydia trachomatis antigen was detected in the endocervical epithelial cells collected with the swab by ELISA test, using Micro Track kit Syva company 3403 Verba Bnena Road, Sanjose CA-95-161-9013.
Out of three swabs from the endocervix, one swab was used for detection of pus cells, epithelial cells, aerobic and anaerobic organisms and yeast cells, after staining with Gram’s stain. The second swab was inoculated in pleuro pneumonia – like organisms (PPLO) media for detecting genital mycoplasma. The third swab was inoculated on two plates of sheep blood agar for detecting aerobic and anaerobic organisms. New York City media and human blood agar were used for detecting Neisseria gonorrhoea and Gardnerella vaginalis, respectively. Different organisms were identified according to standard methods(14).

Collection of uterine aspirate and isolation of cells
After taking the endocervical samples, the vagina and cervix were cleansed and 5ml of sterile normal saline was instilled into the uterine cavity through a polythene cannula. It was aspirated after one minute and collected in a siliconized centrifuge tube. This was followed by copper IUD insertion.

The aspirate was centrifuged at 500 rpm for 10min at 4°C, to separate any tissue debris. The supernatant containing mononuclear cells was separated by density gradient centrifugation, by using a Ficoll isopaque column. Cells in the interface i.e. monocytes and lymphocytes were taken in a separate tube, and suspended in 1 ml minimum essential medium (MEM) (pH 7.2). It was kept for 2 hours at 30°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere, and viability of monocytes was checked by the trypan blue exclusion test(15). Cells were identified by esterase staining(16).

Determination of reactive nitrogen intermediates
Monocytes in the concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml MEM, were centrifuged at 1000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and nitrite determination was carried out by using Griess reagent following the methods of Green et al(17), and expressed as nmoles of RNI/106 cells.

Estimation of L-citrulline
L-citrulline in the uterine aspirate was determined by the colorimetric method of Boyde et al(18) and expressed as nmoles/106 cells.

Determination of reactive oxygen in

Results

Of the 53 recruited subjects, 45 completed all 4 visits, and 20 subjects came for a 24 weeks of follow up also. Forty nine subject completed one week post insertion follow up. The online statistical programme (GraphPad Instat 3) was used for statistical analysis.

RNI values and L-citrulline in uterine aspirate
A statistically significant decrease in the RNI and L-citrulline values was observed at one week post insertion, as compared with preinsertion values (p<0.05). A similar declining trend was observed at four and 12 weeks, and the decrease at all times was statistically significant (p<0.05). However, in 20 subjects in whom samples were collected at 24 weeks, the values observed were similar to the preinsertion value (Table/Fig 1) and (Table/Fig 2).

ROI level in uterine aspirate
The CL Index at one week post insertion was higher than the preinsertion value. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). A similar rising trend was observed at four and 12 weeks, but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). These values at 24 weeks were similar to the values observed before insertion of the device (Table/Fig 1) and (Table/Fig 2).

Microbiological studies
On all visits (both before and after CuT insertion), the organisms found in the cervical smear, as well as in the smear of the uterine aspirate, were gram positive and negative bacilli, mainly lacto bacilli, which is a normal commensal in the female genital tract. There were some gram negative and positive cocci also.

Six subjects had grown Gardnerella vaginalis on the first visit. One of these did not come for follow up, as she got the CuT removed the same day due to excessive bleeding. The other five were given treatment when they came one week after insertion. In three of these subjects, the endocervical swab was positive for Gardnerella on the 4 week visit also, but negative in the subsequent samples. Three had the growth at one week, two in the cervical swab, and one in both the cervical swab and uterine aspirate.

The total number of subjects having growth of organisms, increased at one week from 29 to 32 in the cervical swab, and from 13 to 15 in the uterine aspirate though most of these were normal commensals. The same subjects when followed up at a 4 week period, showed that only 13 had growth in cervical swab, and 3 subjects in uterine aspirate. A similar decrease was observed at 12 weeks, when 7 had the growth in cervical swab, and 2 in the uterine aspirate. However, the decrease in the number of subjects having growth of organisms when compared to those having no growth, was not found statistically significant by using Mcnmars Chi-squre test (p<0.05) in both cervical swab and uterine aspirate.

Many subjects who had no growth at preinsertion visit (24 had no growth in cervical swab and 40 had no growth in uterine aspirate), showed a growth of organisms in their subsequent cervical and uterine samples. However, the difference in the number of subjects with growth in their 1, 4 and 12 weekly visit was not statistically significant.

The total number of women having growth at each visit did not show any significant increasing trend (Table/Fig 3) and (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Copper IUD is an effective, safe, and convenient contraceptive method, and is one of the popular methods of temporary contraception used today. (1) The association of PID with IUD use is still controversial. Moyer and Mishell showed that there is an increased number of polymorphonuclear cells in IUD users.(6) However, the local inflammation in the endometrium following IUD insertion may cause the inflammatory cells to release reactive oxygen intermediates and nitrogen intermediates, thereby causing oxidative stress.

In the present study, we observed a steady and significant increase in the levels of CL index at 4 and 12 weeks, indicating an increased production of ROI at this time. Our results are in accordance with those of Amla et al.(11) At the same time, a steady decline in RNI levels was observed at 1, 4 and 12 weeks, post insertion. Anjalika et al(13), who studied RNI levels in Cu IUD users, also reported similar results. The findings of the present study corroborate the observations made by these two groups of workers. However, it was also observed that CL index and RNI values at 24 weeks, were similar to the values observed preinsertion. This corroborates the findings of Moyer et al(6), who studied the endometrium at intervals up to 5 years after insertion, and observed that the changes reverted back to normal at 6 months.

The fall observed in the RNI levels may be due to an increased local inflammation in the endometrium due to Cu IUD insertion, as well as due to the increase in the number of organisms post insertion. It has been reported that the phagocytic respiratory burst with production of superoxide anion, is a critical component of host defense against infection.(20) The enzymatic pathways leading to synthesis of ROI and RNI are distinct, and the end products can influence each other.(21) The superoxide anion then produced, may rapidly inactivate nitric oxide produced by the cells. The other manner could be by the activation of cAMP, which decreases cGMP, which forms the basis of nitric oxide activity.(22)

This observation, that synergistic antimicrobial activity results, perhaps, from the combination of the phagocytic respiratory burst and the nitric oxide synthase interaction in vivo, is further strengthened by our findings, that the increased growth of organisms, immediately following Cu IUD insertion, was attenuated significantly during the 12 week post insertion period. Timothy et al(23) and Mishell et al(2) reported that copper enhances the microbicidal activity of an IUD, but did not comment on the mechanism. In another study, Gupta et al(9) have shown that there is increase in copper levels in the uterine aspirate, which is associated with a rise in ROI levels, following Cu IUD insertion. Inorganic mediators like ROI and RNI released by the activated inflammatory cells, could be responsible for the microbicidal action of copper in the IUD.

The progressive fall in RNI levels, along with a decrease in the number of the growth of organisms, as well as a concomitant increase in ROI levels as observed in our study, indicate the control of infection due to activation of macrophages, thereby leading to a fall in RNI levels. The number of subjects whose cervical swabs/uterine aspirate showed growth of organisms, were found to be negative for all pathogenic organisms, except one subject who had persistently grown chlamydia at 12 and 24 weeks, and was given antibiotics. Also though 45.4% and 54.7% subjects had positive cultures for mycoplasma and ureaplasma urealyticum respectively, both these organisms were found in a considerable number of sexually active health adults, and all these subjects

Acknowledgement

This study was funded for the extra mural grant from Indian Council of Medical Research.

References

1.
Burkman RT. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: evolving perspectives on the data. Obstet Gyaecol Surv .1996;51;(12 suppl) s 35-41
2.
Mishell DR, Bell JH, Good RR, Moyer DL. The intrauterine device; a bacteriological study of the endometrial cavity. Am J Obst Gynaecol 1996; 96: 119-126.
3.
Fiscina B, Oster GK, Oster G, Swanson J. Gonococcidal action of copper in vitro.Am J Obset Gynecol.1973; 116:86-90.
4.
Elhag KM, Bahar AM, Mubarak AA. The effect of a copper IUD on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract. J Med Microbiol 1988; 25: 245-251.
5.
Kleinman D, Sarov I and Insler V. Inhibition of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in endometrial cells by copper. Possible relevance for the use of copper IUD. Contraception 1989; 39: 665-676.
6.
Moyer DL and Mishell DR Jr. Reactions of human endometrium to the intrauterine foreign body. II Long term effects on endometrial histology and cytology. Am J Obst Gynecol 1971; 111: 66-80.
7.
Boxer LA, Yoder M, Bonsib S. Effects of a chemotactic factor, N-formylmenthionyl peptide, on adherence, superoxide anion generation, phagocytosis and microtubule assembly of human polymorph nuclear leucocytes. J Lab Clin Med 1979; 93: 506-514.
8.
Ding AH, Nathan CF, Stuehr DJ. Release of Reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates from mouse peritoneal macrophages. Comparison of activating cytokines and evidence for independent production. J Immunol 1988; 141: 2407-2412.
9.
Gupta I, Kaushalya S, Gupta KR, Mahajan U, Prasad R, Ganguly NK. Copper levels and reactive oxygen species in uterine flushing in copper intrauterine contraceptive device users. Indian J Med Res 1994; 100: 225-227.
10.
Nathan C, Hibbs JB. Role of nitric oxide synthesis in macrophage antimicrobial activity. Curr opinion Immnol 1991; 3: 65-70.
11.
Amla S, Gupta I, Kaushalya S, Ganguly NK. Active oxygen species in copper intrauterine device users. Contraception 1993; 48: 150-156.
12.
Pradhan M, Gupta I, Ganguly NK. Nitrites and L-citrulline levels in copper intrauterine

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com