Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47510

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesTable and Figures
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2010 | Month : June | Volume : 4 | Issue : 3 | Page : 2504 - 2511 Full Version

A Pilot Study Evaluating Health Literacy Towards Breast Cancer Among Multi-ethnic Students


Published: June 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.762
KHAN T M *, AFZAL HA** KHAN A ***, TAHIR H **** , EJAZ M *****

*College of Clinical Pharmacy King Faisal University P.o.Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982 **College of Clinical Pharmacy King Faisal University P.o.Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982 ***Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar 25120 Pakistan **** Department of Psychology, Federal Government College for Women, Wah Cantt, Pakistan *****School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Penang 11000, Malaysia

Correspondence Address :
Tahir Mehmood Khan
Lecturer / Clinical Preceptor
College of Clinical Pharmacy
King Faisal University
P.o.Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982
tahir.pks@gmail.com

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the knowledge, attitudes and perception about breast cancer among students from different ethnic groups. A qualitative study was conducted among the multiethnic students at a Malaysian public university in Penang Island. The ethnic groups which were approached were Malay, Indians, Chinese, Arabs and Thais. On an average, fifteen students from every group was a part of the study. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the respondents’ knowledge about the symptoms, causes and the treatment of breast cancer. A self designed 15 items questionnaire was used to achieve the objective of the study. A total of N=125 students were approached for their participation in the study. However, only n=102 showed a willingness to be a part of the study. The mean age of the respondents was 24±4.46. Overall, the findings demonstrated that the Thai students had comparatively better knowledge than the other groups. In terms of diagnosis, mammography and physical examination were recommended by a majority of the students. Surgery and radiation therapy were the preferred options to treat breast cancer. Thai students had good knowledge about the symptoms of breast cancer. However, the knowledge level towards the diagnosis of breast cancer was best among the Malays and the Arabs. Overall, the findings highlighted the need of further educational sessions among all the groups for the substitution of negative perceptions with positive and evident beliefs about the symptoms, causes, prevention, diagnosis and the treatment of breast cancer.

Keywords

Breast cancer, Knowledge, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among females worldwide. Global statistics show that the annual incidence of breast cancer is increasing and this is occurring more rapidly in countries with a low incidence rate of breast cancer (1),(2). It has been reported that each year, over 1.15 million women worldwide are diagnosed with breast cancer and 502,000 die from the disease (3). Among Malaysian women, breast cancer is the most common cause of death (4),(5). In the year 2000, there were approximately one million registered cases of breast cancer worldwide, with estimated deaths of over three hundred and seventy thousand women. The incidence of breast cancer was highest in the developed countries, with an average estimate of 94.9 per 100,000. However, among less developed countries, it was about 19.66 per 100,000 (6). The prevalence of breast cancer was highest in North American women, with approximately 10 in hundred women at a risk of developing breast cancer (6).

In the year 2000, about 3825 new cases of breast cancer were reported in Malaysia, with deaths of about one thousand and seven hundred women. The incidence was estimated to be 34.86 per 100,000 populations (6). Still, the Ministry of Health, Malaysia, was unaware of the actual incidence rate of breast cancer. The possible factor playing a vital role in this regards are lack knowledge and awareness about breast cancer, which further leads to underreporting (6). Moreover, lack of the national breast cancer patients’ registry programs was another issue which was associated with the scarcity of the facts.

The Age Standardised Rate (ASR) of female breast cancer among Malaysian women was 47.4 per 100,000 populations. Amongst the Chinese, it was higher at 59.9 per 100,000 population, for the Indians, the ASR was 54.2 per 100,000 and it was lowest in the Malays at 34.9 per 100,000 population. The cumulative life time risk of developing breast cancer for Chinese women, Indian women and Malay women were 1 in 16, 1 in 17 and 1 in 28, respectively. In the past, a high prevalence of breast cancer was seen in the age group of 45 years and above. However, the age of onset is decreasing and more young women than ever are being affected (7). The onset of breast cancer is more abrupt among young women's cancers, with an aggressive onset resulting in lower survival rates (8),(9). This immediate onset makes it difficult for the clinicians to diagnose it within time (9). Keeping in view this motivation, a preliminary study was conducted among the newly registered students at University Sains, Malaysia. The main aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the knowledge, attitudes and perception about breast cancer among the students from different ethnic groups.

Material and Methods

A pilot study was conducted among the multiethnic students at a Malaysian public university in Penang Island. The ethnic groups approached were Malay, Indians, Chinese, Arabs and Thais. On an average, fifteen students from every group was a part of the study. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the respondents’ knowledge about the symptoms, causes and the treatment of breast cancer.

Participants
A convenient sampling method was adopted. Five clusters were defined on an ethnic basis and a total of twenty five students were approached from every cluster. All the new students who visited the institute of graduate studies for registration of their courses on day one (5th July 2009) were a part of the study.

Study Tool
A self designed 15 item questionnaire was used to achieve the objective of the study. Mainly the questionnaire comprised of five sections. Some of the items had some sub-items as well; the description about the study tool is illustrated as follows:

Section one covers the demographical information of the respondents like race, age, marital status, education levels and income status. Section Two covers information on the General knowledge about Breast Cancer. Three questions were a part of this section.
• Have you ever heard about a disease called Breast Cancer? Y/N
• Where did you hear about Breast Cancer for the very first time?
• Do you think that Breast cancer is a communicable disease? Y/N

Section Three covers the respondents’ perception about the risk factors for Breast cancer. Thirteen items were a part of this section. Details about the items are illustrated in (Table/Fig 1).

Section Four comprised of seven items with a main focus on how to prevent Breast cancer. Information about the items used in this section is mentioned in (Table/Fig 2).

Section five was concerned with the knowledge about the symptoms, diagnosis and the treatment of Breast Cancer. Six symptoms of breast cancer were presented to the respondents (Table/Fig 3). In addition to the symptoms, the knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment was evaluated by using two questions which are illustrated as follows:
1- Which do you think is the right way to diagnose Breast cancer?
2- Which of the following do you think is the best way to treat breast cancer?

Validation and Reliability of the Questionnaire
The content validation was conducted by the professionals at the Department of Pharmacy, Island College of Technology. Fifteen items were finalised and the questionnaire was translated into the Malay language in order to make the questionnaire easier for the respondents to understand it. The translation of the questionnaire into the Malay language was done by the experts at the School of Linguistics, USM. The translation was rechecked by the professionals at the School of Pharmacy in order to check the appropriateness of the word according to the study objectives. After this, to ensure the face validity of the questionnaire, a pilot survey was conducted among the ICT students. A total of twenty students were approached. Keeping in view the responses, the reliability scale was applied and the internal consistency of the study tool was estimated on the basis of Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.61). Furthermore, to assure about the validity of the contents, a factor analysis was carried out. The content validity was estimated by using the Bartlett’s test of sphericity and the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy. The results showed that the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant at 0.0000 and that the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.640. According to Sheridan and Lyndall (2001), a measure of more than 0.6 reflected the adequacy of the contents of the questionnaire (10). Thus, these results showed a considerable evidence of the reliability and the validity of the sampling tool.

Scoring Of Responses
The responses about the symptoms of Breast cancer were scored in order to classify the knowledge at the sub-level. This classification would provide information about the level of recognition towards Breast cancer and its symptoms. Six items were used to attain the aim of this study. Every right answer added one score to the respondent’s knowledge level. The maximum possible score for these items was six. For the better comparison of the knowledge, scoring of the responses was done. Quartiles were applied for the classification of the knowledge. Classifications of the knowledge according to quartiles are mentioned as follows (Table/Fig 4).

Data analysis
For the purpose of data analysis, the Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS13.0®) was used. In order to find the association of knowledge with demographic variables, the Chi-square test was applied, where 20% of the cells had an expected count of less than five. Fischer exact statistics was applied. However, in order to compare the knowledge level among the ethnic groups, One way ANOVA was used. Moreover, to identify the differences among the different racial groups Post-Hoc analysis was conduced.

Results

A total of N=125 students were approached for their participation in the study. However, only n=102 showed a willingness to be a part of the study. The mean age of the respondents was 24±4.46. Details about the demographical characteristics of the respondents are illustrated in (Table/Fig 5).

General knowledge about breast cancer
Exploration revealed that a majority -98(96.1%) has heard of a disease called breast cancer. About 64(62.7%) of the respondents disclosed that they had heard of breast cancer from television programs. However, 18(17.6%) disclosed that friends and family were the source of their knowledge. Nearly a half- 50(49.0%) believed that breast cancer was a transmittable disease. Further exploration on ethnic grounds revealed that a majority- 16(15.7%) among these were Malays, followed by Thais -12(11.8%), Indians- 10(9.8%) and Chinese and Arabs -6(5.9%).

Perception regarding the risk factors and preventive measures for breast cancer
Findings demonstrated that lack of blood flow to the breast, early adolescent (< 12 years), late menopause (> 55 years) and pregnancy after 30 years were the mainly identified risk factors of breast cancer. The respondent’s perceptions in this regard are illustrated in (Table/Fig 1). A majority of the respondents believed that the use of vegetables and fruits and the avoiding of alcohol use could be the preventive measures for breast cancer (Table/Fig 2).

Knowledge about Symptoms of Breast Cancer and the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer
Overall, knowledge evaluation revealed that a swelling or thickening in or near the breast, a swelling in the underarm area and change in the size or shape of the breast were the frequently recognised symptoms of breast cancer (Table/Fig 3).Findings demonstrated that the Thai students had a comparatively better knowledge about the symptoms of breast cancer than other groups (Table/Fig 6). However, further evaluation through post hoc analysis revealed significant knowledge differences between the Thai and Arab students (Table/Fig 7). In terms of diagnosis, mammography and physical examination were recommended by a majority of the students (Table/Fig 8). Surgery and radiation therapy were the preferred options to treat breast cancer (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

Of the few studies which were carried out to determine women’s knowledge on the lifetime risk of breast cancer, the majority were conducted on those with a family history (11) , (12). In these studies, every third women had overestimated the risk. However, the current study was undertaken to evaluate young women’s knowledge about the symptoms, risk factors, causes and the diagnosis of breast cancer among different ethnic groups. Five ethnic groups were a part of this study i.e Malay, Chinese, Indians, Arabs and Thais. Findings demonstrated a significantly (p=0.043) excellent knowledge regarding the symptoms of breast cancer among Thai students. However, a poor knowledge level was observed among the Arab students (Table/Fig 6). Swelling or thickening of the breast was the most commonly recognized symptom of breast cancer by all groups (Table/Fig 3). In terms of the evaluation of the respondents’ perception regarding the prevention of breast cancer, a majority (94.1%) of the respondents believed that breast self examination (BSE) could prevent breast cancer. This statement reflected the negative insight of the respondents; BSE can be helpful only in early diagnosis and treatment. A majority - 22(21.65%) of the Arab and Indian students recommended the excessive use of fruits and vegetables as preventive measures for breast cancer. However, the use of soya and soya products was highly recommended by the Chinese participants. The use of soya and soya products can be a preventive measure because their high iso-flavone and phytoestrogen contents play a vital role in minimizing the risk of breast caner.

In addition to the knowledge about the symptoms of breast cancer, the perception regarding the risk factor is another vital issue to be explored. Overall, a majority -86.3% of the respondents stated that family history was the most potential risk factor for breast cancer. However, segregation of the responses on ethnic grounds revealed that a majority of the Chinese and Arab respondents has stated contraceptive use as a risk factor for breast cancer. Indians reported that irritation due to a tight bra and lack blood flow to breast were the factors which led to breast cancer. On the other hand, Thai students held smoking responsible for the progression of breast cancer. These findings are in compliance with the findings of World Cancer Research Fund that report similar behaviour in their study (13). However, comparatively, Malay, Chinese and Indian students were found to have a lack of awareness about the symptoms and risk factors of breast cancer. The public health department is playing its part through educational programs on media. However, educational sessions at the school and college levels can be helpful to reduce these knowledge gaps.

The knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are the other two important aspects of the knowledge domain. Evaluation of the respondents’ knowledge about diagnosis revealed that 50 (49.0%) of the respondents had recommended mammography, followed by physical examination. Arabs and Malays were found to have a better knowledge regarding the diagnosis of breast cancer. However, Thai students had poor knowledge regarding diagnosis, as a majority recommended ultrasound as the diagnostic method. In terms of treatment, surgery was recommended by the majority, followed by radiation therapy. About 8(7.8%) of the respondents recommended the use of herbs to treat breast cancer. A majority among these were Malays and Indians. It was quite disappointing to discover that the Malays and the Indians had beliefs on the use of traditional and herbal therapies to treat breast cancer. Though this survey was conducted among healthy individuals, however, it reflected that these respondents were at high risk. Previous findings provided evidence that 20.4% of the patients defaulted proper treatment and follow-up. The reason for this behaviour was the use of alternative or traditional medicine to treat breast cancer. Similarly, surgery was the least recommended treatment for breast cancer by the Malays. These findings complied with the findings of Leong et al (2009) (14). Leong et al (2009), reported that surgery was the treatment which was most commonly refused by the Malay women. The findings of our study somewhat proved the findings of Leong et al (2009), because nearly half of the Malay respondents did not recommend surgery as an option to treat breast cancer. Cosmetic and cultural factors can contribute to this behaviour, because Malay women felt that their role as a wife, mother and female as a whole, would be seriously jeopardised if they had breast cancer and surgery. They were worried that their husbands would leave them and their children and would love them less as a mother. Thus, a strong sense of denial would normally develop as a protective mechanism against such a threat (14). They feared that surgery would disturb the tumour and cause it to grow and spread faster (14). Moreover, a lack of awareness with a wrong social and cultural perception of breast cancer have been associated with advanced disease at presentation (15),(16). Due to a strong traditional influence and fear of surgery, many women would initially seek traditional or alternative treatment, such as “bomoh” or faith healing, before they presented to the hospital. It was reported by Taib et al that between 15.5% and 45.3% of Malaysian women with breast cancer sought traditional treatment before they attended the breast clinic (17). Traditional and alternative therapies are freely available in Malaysia. Advertisement boards and banners promoting such therapies can easily be seen at common public places in Malaysia.

Conclusion

Thai students had good knowledge about the symptoms of breast cancer. However, the knowledge level about the diagnosis of breast cancer was best among the Malays and the Arabs. Overall, our findings highlight the need of further educational sessions among all groups for the substitution of negative perceptions with positive and evident beliefs about the symptoms, causes, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Limitations
Small sample size can be one of the main limitations of this study. However, the facts provided by this study are valuable enough for the public health policy makers to conduct more methodologically strong studies in order to further explore the knowledge, attitudes and the perception about breast cancer among the various ethnic groups in Malaysia.

Recommendation
In both the local and the international scenario, a majority has focused on women’s knowledge regarding Breast self examination. Knowledge about the symptoms, causes, risk factors, diagnosis and beliefs about the treatment and help seeking are the gaps which need to be filled in by future research efforts.

References

1.
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005, 55(2):74-108.
2.
Wilson CM, Tobin S, Young RC: The exploding worldwide cancer burden: the impact of cancer on women. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004, 14:1-11.
3.
World Health Organization: Cancer. (http://www.who.int/media centre/factsheets/fs297/en). accessed 30.07.2008
4.
AN Hisham, CH Yip. Overview of Breast Cancer in Malaysian Women: A Problem with Late Diagnosis. Asian J Surg 2004; 27(2): 130-3.
5.
AN Hisham, CH Yip. Spectrum of Breast Cancer in Malaysian Women: Overview. World J Surg 2003; 27(8): 921-3.
6.
Ferlay F, Bray F, Pisani P, et al. Globocan 2000 (online software). Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide, Version 1.0. IARC Cancer Base No.5. IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2001
7.
Fry RB, Prentice-Dunn S: Effects of a psychosocial intervention on breast self-examination attitudes and behaviors. Health Educ Res 2006, 21:287-295.
8.
Rosenberg R, Levy- Schwartz R: Breast cancer in women younger than 40 years. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2003, 48:200-205.
9.
E Nor Aina (2008) Cancer Patient Registry-Breast Cancer (NCPR-Breast Cancer) Med J Malaysia Vol 63(c).
10.
Sheridan, J. C. & Lyndall, G. S. (2001). SPSS analysis without anguish version 10.0 for Windows, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
11.
Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade-Walsh M et al. Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? J Med Genet 1998;35:731–8.
12.
Evans DG, Burnell LD, Hopwood P et al. Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1993;67:612–14.
13.
World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Menasha, Wisconsin, Banta Book Group, 1997.
14.
Leong B D K, Chuah J A, Kumar V M, Rohamini S, Siti Z S, Yip C H Trends of breast cancer treatment in Sabah, Malaysia: a problem with lack ofAwareness Singapore Med J 2009; 50(8) : 772
15.
Hisham AN, Yip CH. Overview of breast cancer in Malaysian Women: a problem with late diagnosis. Asian J Surg 2004; 27:130-3.
16.
Sandelin K, Apffelstaedt JP, Abdullah H, Murray EM, Ajuluchuku EU. Breast Surgery International-breast cancer in developing countries. Scand J Surg 2002; 91:222-6.
17.
Taib NA, Yip CH, Ibrahim M, Ng CJ, Farizah H. Breast Cancer in Malaysia: are our women getting the right message? 10-year experience in a single institution in Malaysia. Asian Pac J

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com