Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 317478

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionKey MessageReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2010 | Month : February | Volume : 4 | Issue : 1 | Page : 2083 - 2086 Full Version

Tubercular Cervicitis Clinically Mimicking As Carcinoma Cervix: Two Case Reports


Published: February 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.636
BHALLA A * , MANNAN R ** , KHANNA M *** , BHASIN T S ****

*,**,***,****Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, SGRDIMSR, Amritsar (Punjab);

Correspondence Address :
Dr Rahul Mannan,C/O Dr V. K Rampal,5-Court Road, Amritsar-143001Punjab(India)Ph- +91946354525 (O), 091-0183-2504062 (R)

Abstract

Tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a prevalent infectious disease in resource challenged countries such as India. Tuberculosis of the female genital tract accounts for a minority of cases. Tuberculosis can have a varied presentation and can even mimic malignancy on clinical presentation, as illustrated by the following 2 cases. The first case was that of a 58 year old female presenting with a prolapsed uterus and a decubitus ulcer which was posted for surgical repair. However, on surgery, a diagnosis of frozen pelvis was made because of adhesions and suspicion of malignancy was high. In the second case, a 38 year old female presented in the gynaecology outpatient department with complains of menometrorrhagia. Her pelvic examination revealed a friable papillary growth on the cervix. The clinical differentials in this case included neoplastic and viral aetiologies. The histopathological diagnosis in both the cases after taking into consideration the history, clinical findings and other ancillary investigations was given as tubercular cervicitis. Ancillary investigations are necessary to exclude other causes of granulomatous inflammation such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Trichomonas vaginalis and Herpes simplex. Various studies have emphasized that the presence of typical granulomas are sufficient for the diagnosis of tuberculosis if other causes of granulomatous cervicitis are excluded. A high index of suspicion for tuberculosis is justified while dealing with cervical lesions in tuberculosis endemic areas.

Keywords

Cervix, Tuberculosis, Malignancy

Introduction
Tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a prevalent infectious disease in resource challenged countries such as India. Tuberculosis of the female genital tract accounts for a minority of cases. 90% of cases are those of women in the reproductive age group. The most commonly affected regions are the endometrium and fallopian tubes (1),(3). Tuberculosis of the cervix includes 5-24% of genital tract tuberculosis and 0.1% -0.65% of all tuberculosis cases3. Tuberculosis can have a varied presentation and can even mimic malignancy on clinical presentation. The differential diagnosis of tuberculosis has to be kept in mind whenever an atypical presentation is encountered in clinical practice. The following are 2 cases which presented on clinical examination as malignancy, which turned out to be cases of cervical tuberculosis on the basis of histopathological reports.

Case Report

Case 1
A 58 year old female presented with complaints of difficulty in urination, defaecation and something coming out of the vaginal os for one month. Her physical examination revealed cystocele and rectocele with third degree descent of the uterus. There was a decubitus ulcer on the anterior lip of the cervix and congestion on the posterior lip.

The routine laboratory investigations were within normal limits. The chest skiagram was unremarkable. An ultrasound examination revealed a retroverted uterus which was normal in shape and size. The endometrial thickness was 5mm. A Manchester repair was planned. The pouch of Douglas was opened and the uterus was found to be adherent. A clinical diagnosis of frozen pelvis was made and malignancy was suspected. The cervix was partially amputated and was sent for histopathological examination.

The histopathological examination revealed hyperkeratosis and acanthosis of the ectocervix along with endocervicitis. The mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate consisted of lymphocytes, histiocytes and macrophages. At places, well formed epithelioid cell granulomas were seen along with Langhans and foreign body giant cell formation. A provisional diagnosis of granulomatous cervicitis was made and ancillary investigations were carried out to find the cause. The AFB stain did not reveal any bacilli.

The patient was investigated for other veneral diseases which also simulate granulomatous pathology such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Herpes simplex virus. All these investigations did not point towards any of the veneral diseases mentioned above. HIV, HBsAg and HCV tests were non reactive. A hormone profile was normal. ESR was 135 mm after one hour.

The Mantoux test was positive. On the basis of the histological reports and other ancillary investigations, the case was diagnosed as that of cervical tuberculosis and the patient was initiated on anti tubercular treatment. A repeat biopsy three months later was negative for granulomatous pathology. Surgical treatment for prolapse was followed up.

Case 2
A 38 year old female presented in the gynaecology outpatient with the complaint of menometrorrhagia. Her pelvic examination revealed a friable papillary growth on the cervix. Pap smear revealed a mixed inflammatory infiltrate along with atypical cells of uncertain origin (ASCUS). A punch biopsy was taken for diagnostic confirmation. The clinical differentials included neoplastic and viral aetiologies.

The histopathological examination revealed endocervicitis with well formed epithelioid cell granulomas along with Langhans giant cell formation and caseation necrosis (Table/Fig 1). A provisional diagnosis of tuberculosis of the cervix was made. AFB stain did not reveal any bacilli. Further investigations were done to rule out any comorbid conditions. A re- biopsy of the growth was done and the tissue was sent for tubercular polymerase reaction (TB-pcr), which was positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The patient was started on antitubercular therapy. The growth regressed after four months. A repeat biopsy revealed the absence of granulomatous inflammation. Till the last follow up, the patient was symptom free.

(Table/Fig 1): Photomicrograph of section of endocervix (↓) showing caseating granulomas and Langhans giant cells (↑) admist chronic inflammatory infiltrate. (H&E 400 X).

Discussion

In 2005, the World Health Organization reported a prevalence of 20 million cases of tuberculosis worldwide. Out of these 15 million cases reside in developing countries (1). The average prevalence of tuberculosis in India is estimated to be 5.05 per thousand and the average annual incidence of smear positive cases is 84 per 100,00 (2).

The most common presenting symptoms are infertility, amennorhoea and constitutional symptoms. Menstrual irregularities, procidentia with decubitus ulcer and abdominal pain may also be present. A history of contact with a tuberculosis index case is variable(1),(4),(5). HIV positive patients are at an increased risk of developing these lesions (6).

The affected cervix may be hypertrophied, ulcerated or may show friable papillary growth which mimicks carcinoma. The pap smear may reveal dyskaryosis and may also show the evidence of granulomatous inflammation and giant cell formation. A punch biopsy is required for histopathological evaluation. Chronic inflammation with the formation of caseating or non caseating granulomas is evident in most of the cases. Staining for AFB and culture of the tissue is the gold standard for diagnosis. Ancillary investigations must be carried out to exclude other causes of granulomatous inflammation such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Trichomonas vaginalis and Herpes simplex. Other rare causes of granulomatous cervicitis include schistosoma, amoebiasis, brucella, tularemia, sarcoidosis and foreign body reactions. ESR, Mantoux test and X ray chest also support the diagnosis. Molecular probes are sensitive but not specific (3),(7).

Some studies have emphasized that the presence of typical granulomas are sufficient for the diagnosis of tuberculosis if other causes of granulomatous cervicitis are excluded (3),(6).

Pelvic organs including cervix are usually secondarily affected by haematogenous spread following primary pulmonary infection. The cervix gets involved by direct extension or lymphatic spread. Rarely may tuberculosis be contracted primarily as a sexually transmitted disease (1),(3). The lesion should respond to six months of standard therapy. Serial biopsy specimens usually confirm a therapeutic response (3).
Sometimes tuberculosis may coexist with an underlying uterine malignancy, which should be thoroughly investigated (7). A higher incidence has been reported from areas which are endemic for tuberculosis and where HIV prevalence is more. A high index of suspicion for tuberculosis is justified while dealing with cervical lesions in females of the reproductive age group.

The cases described in this report are both HIV negative. The patient in the first case is postmenopausal, which is a rare presentation. It is thus emphasized, that tuberculosis of cervix must be included in the differential diagnoses, especially in the endemic areas.

Key Message

1. In 2005, the World Health Organization reported a prevalence of 20 million cases of tuberculosis worldwide. Out of these, 15 million cases reside in developing countries like India.
2. The most commonly affected regions in genital tuberculosis in case of females are the endometrium and fallopian tubes. Tuberculosis of the cervix includes only 5-24% of genital tract tuberculosis and 0.1% -0.65% of all tuberculosis cases.
3. Tuberculosis can have a varied presentation and can even mimic malignancy on clinical presentation. The differential diagnosis of tuberculosis has to be kept in mind whenever an atypical presentation is encountered in clinical practice.
4. Chronic inflammation with the formation of caseating or non caseating granulomas is evident in most cases.
5. Ancillary investigations are necessary to exclude other causes of granulomatous inflammation such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Trichomonas vaginalis and Herpes simplex. Other rare causes of granulomatous cervicitis include schistosoma, amoebiasis, brucella, tularemia, sarcoidosis and foreign body reactions.
6. The lesion should respond to six months of standard therapy. Serial biopsy specimens usually confirm a therapeutic response.

References

1.
Mehrangiz Hatami. Tuberculosis of the female genital tract in Iran. Arch Iranian Med 2005; 8 (1): 32 – 35
2.
A.K. Chakraborty. Epidemiology of tuberculosis: Current status in India. Indian J Med Res 120, October 2004, pp 248-76.
3.
Maj M Paprikar, Col M Biswas, Col S Bhattacharya, Lt Col B Sodhi, Maj I Mukhopadhyay. Tuberculosis of Cervix: Case report. MJAFI 2008;64/ 3:,.
4.
Wadhwa N, Singh UR, Saith S. A report of two unsuspected cases of cervical tuberculosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2005 Jul; 48(3):390-2.
5.
Chakraborty P, Roy A, Bhattacharya S, Addhya S, Mukherjee S. Tuberculous cervicitis: a clinicopathological and bacteriological study. J Indian Med Assoc. 1995 May; 93(5):167-8.
6.
Lamba H, Byrne M, Goldin R, Jenkins C. Tuberculosis of the cervix: case presentation and a review of the literature. Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Feb; 78(1):62-3.
7.
Olutoyin G, Omoniyi-Esan, Steven A Ossan, Olusegun S Ojo. Non neoplastic diseases of the cervix in Nigerians: A histopathological study. Afr Health Sci. 2006 June; 6(2): 76-80.

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com