Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 241936

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2010 | Month : April | Volume : 4 | Issue : 2 | Page : 2198 - 2207 Full Version

Factors Associated With Objective Wellbeing In Jamaica: Is Objective Index Still A Good Measure Of Health?


Published: April 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.693
PAUL A. BOURNE*, DONOVAN A. MCGROWDER**, ONIEL JONES***

*(PhD) Research Fellow and Biostatistician Department of Community Health and Psychiatry Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica **(PhD) Senior Lecturer Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica ***(MSc) Research Assistant Department of Management Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Paul Andrew Bourne
Department of Community Health and Psychiatry
Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica
(876) 457-6990 (Mobile)
Email: paulbourne1@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the factors that influenced the wellbeing of Jamaicans. In addition the study sought to ascertain the power of each factor that influenced wellbeing.
Method: The current study used one of the World Bank’s Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS) - the Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions (JSLC). The JSLC was conducted between June and October 2002, using a detailed administered questionnaire. The survey was a nationally representative stratified random sample of 25 018 respondents. For the current work, descriptive statistics were used to provide background information on the sampled population; chi-square for bivariate associations and stepwise technique in multiple regressions was utilized to establish the parameter of the explanatory variables and to determine their influence on the general model. The subsample used to established the current model was 21 740 respondents (i.e. 86.9%).
Results: It was found that 16 factors were used to predict the economic wellbeing of Jamaicans, and there was 92.1% variability in economic wellbeing. Moreover, four factors accounted for 82% of the variability in economic wellbeing. The factors were assets owned, number of children ages 14 years and less, consumption per head, and living arrangement. Assets owned and the number of children in the household accounted for 61% of the total explanation of the change in economic wellbeing of an individual. Individuals in the two wealthiest quintiles had greater economic wellbeing than their counterparts in the two poorest quintiles; but, those in the latter had better health status.
Conclusion: The number of children and access to economic resources had a strong influence on wellbeing with the former being a future economic investment for the parents. This suggests that that objective wellbeing is still a better measure of wellbeing in Jamaica than subjective indexes.

Keywords

economic wellbeing; assets owned; consumption; Jamaica

Introduction
Prior to the 1900, health was proxied by ill-health (dysfunctions, or illnesses), which were from a biomedical approach. It was not until the late 1940s, when the WHO (1) expanded on this uni-directional model that in the 1950s, Engel (2),(3),(4),(5) introduced the bio-psychosocial model which was in keeping with the WHO’s broad definition. This model includes social and economic wellbeing, other tenets, and not merely illnesses. This led to a discourse in which some researchers like Bok (6) argued that it was elusive and ‘too broad’ to capture. Despite that discourse, traditional economic perspective was that standard of living can be capture by income (i.e. Gross Domestic Product per capita or Income per capita) as this was objective and by extension a good tool to assess wellbeing.

Numerous studies and investigations have examined the relationship between income and subjective wellbeing (happiness) (7),(8),(9). There are studies that have found that happiness provides a good proxy for wellbeing (quality of life) (10),(11),(12). The use of subjective wellbeing to proxy people’s quality of life is primarily owing to the scope of happiness in measuring people’s life satisfaction as against income (economic wellbeing), which focuses on tangible instead of the intangible events (13). Crisp opined that wellbeing is what is ‘good’ for people, suggesting that income fails to capture this complex phenomenon (14). Some researchers like Sen (15) and Easterlin (16) have even endorse the perspective that wellbeing must include the non-market elements; and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita does not take into account the physical condition of the individual, people’s choices, entitlement, capabilities, empowerment and civic participation. Happiness, according to Easterlin (17) is associated with wellbeing, and so does ill-being (e.g. depression, anxiety, dissatisfaction). Easterlin (17) argued that material resources have the capacity to improve one’s choices, comfort level, state of happiness and leisure, which militates against static wellbeing. From Crisp’s perspective (14), wellbeing is related to health, and the strength of those associations.

The use of income, a relatively old indicator of wellbeing is still applicable in contemporary societies. As income still affords an individual to purchase the best preventative care, information through education and preceding this, it allows for the acquisition and use of the necessary components that either prevents or delays particular latent health concerns, from lifestyle practices. In addition, the assets owned can be use as a form of investment in older years with which the aged is able to use to acquire earnings (18). Within the computation of GDP are consumption expenditure, investment expenditure, inventory, imports and exports, which means that this construct include income from work, income from ownership of property that would have been accumulated in previous years. Therefore, from an objective perspective it constitutes total domestic income, which is available to the population of a geographic space. Thus, the aged is able to use assets (houses, buildings etc.) which were acquired in earlier years to earn valuable income upon which wellbeing can be sustained in the future. In addition, pension and other social security benefits that the retired received because of having reached 60 years and beyond are also important contributors to increased wellbeing of the aged (19).

Wellbeing can be computed from either the direct or the indirect approach (20). The former is calculated using consumption expenditure, whereas the latter uses disposable income. Ringen noted that in order to use income as a proxy for wellbeing, it must be assumed that: (1) income is the only resource, and (2) all persons operate in identical market places (20). On the other hand, the direct approach has two key assumptions. These are: (1) what is bought is what can be consumed and (2) what is consumed is an expression of wellbeing (20). Moreover, based on the aforementioned literature, despite the challenges that are inherent in economic wellbeing, it provides germane information about the choices of a society and health status of a people.

It is within this construct that we extensively review the literature in Jamaica in order to garner material on this vital phenomenon. No study has been found that sought to explain the factors that influence the wellbeing of Jamaicans. Furthermore, in 2007, 30% of Jamaicans were in poverty and 14.5% were below the poverty line compared with 29% in poverty in 1997 and 13.4% below the poverty in the same year (21). It is within this general framework and the importance of income to purchase medicine, improve water quality, sanitary and provide a particular nutrition, that a study on economic wellbeing is critical to development. Therefore the study investigated the factors that influenced the wellbeing of Jamaicans. In addition the study sought to ascertain the power of each factor that influenced wellbeing.

Material and Methods

Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework that will be modified and used to interpret this work is one that was done by Rojas (7). In attempting to examine the association between happiness and income, he used Ordinary Least Square (OLS) technique to estimate the linear regression. The model that was developed by Rojas (7) was on subjective wellbeing; however, this paper is on economic wellbeing. It is this difference within the current work that there will be more variables than that used by Rojas; and this will mean a different outcome variable, economic wellbeing (proxied by expenditure).

Measure
The current study used one of the World Bank’s Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS) modified surveys [Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions (JSLC)]. The study used cross-sectional survey data collected by the Planning Institute of Jamaica (PIOJ) and the Statistical Institute of Jamaica (STATIN) (22). The survey was drawn using stratified random sampling. This design was a two-stage stratified random sampling design where there was a Primary Sampling Unit (PSU) and a selection of dwellings from the primary units. The PSU is an Enumeration District (ED), which constitutes of a minimum of 100 dwellings in rural areas and 150 in urban areas. An ED is an independent geographic unit that shares a common boundary. This means that the country was grouped into a strata of equal size based on dwellings (EDs). The JSLC began in 1988, but the one that was used for the current study was conducted between June and October 2002, using a detailed administered questionnaire. The survey was a nationally representative stratified random sample of 25 018 respondents, and the data were weighted to represent the population.

Model
For this study multivariate analyses is used because the application of this approach is better than bivariate analyses as many variables can be tested simultaneously for their impact (if any) on a dependent variable. The model that will be tested in this study is given in Eqn (2), below:

lnWi = f(Li, Ri,lnCi, Eni, ARi, CRi, EDi, HHi, Ai, HIi, Mi, Fi, NCi,lnMCi, Di, PQi, εi)
lnWi (i.e. logged per capita economic wellbeing of person i in household) is a function of living arrangement of person i, 1 if living alone, 0 if not living alone; Li is the retirement benefits of person i, 1 if receiving private and/or government pension, 0 if otherwise; Ri is logged consumption expenditure per head for person i, in dollars; lnCi is the physical environment of person i, 1 if in the lived milieu there has been flooding, soil erosion, and landslide, 0 if no; Eni the area of residence of person i, Other Towns, urban areas with the referent group being rural areas; ARi is crowding in the household of person i; CRi is psychological conditions - where NPi is the summation of all negative affective psychological conditions of person i, and PPi is the summation of all positive affective psychological conditions; educational level of the person i, in categories, with primary and below education being the reference group; EDi is household head of person i, 1 if yes, 0 if no; HHi is the age of person i, in years;, Ai is the self-reported ownership of private health insurance coverage of person i, 1 if have a health insurance policy, 0 if otherwise; HIi is the number of male in household of person i; Mi number of female in household of person i; Fi, number of children below 14 years in household of person i; NCi is the logged medical expenditure of person i in Jamaican dollars; lnMCi assets owned by individual i, 1, if yes and 0 if otherwise; Di income quintile, 1, if rich (i.e. those in the richest two quintiles) and 0 if otherwise (i.e. in the two poorest quintiles) PQi; and an error term (i.e. residual error), εi.

The data was be used to test for statistical significance (P < 0.05) of each of the predisposed variables identified in Eqn (2). Having tested for the statistical significance, using the principle of parsimony, the final model constitute of only those variables that are significant (P < 0.05), after which the data will be used to ascertain the parameter estimates for the variables, , and α as identified in the function Eqn (3) .
+ + + + + + + - + ED+ + - + - +

Other Measures
Per capita economic wellbeing is proxied by total expenditure of person i in Jamaican dollars divided by the number of persons in household of person i.
Self-reported health conditions: A dummy variable, where 1 = self-reported ailments, injuries or illnesses suffered in the last four weeks.
Household crowding:

Where represents each individual, and is the summation of the all the individuals with the household, and ‘i’ denotes first person to the last person, n, and is the summation of number of rooms in the house excluding kitchen, bathroom(s) and verandah.

Physical environment: the number of responses from people who indicated suffering landsides, property damage due to rains, flooding and soil erosion.

Negative affective psychological condition: the number of responses from a person on having loss a breadwinner and/or family member, loss of property, made redundancy, failure to meet household and other obligations.

Positive affective psychological condition: the number of responses with regards to being hopeful, optimistic about the future and life generally (Table/Fig 6).
where ki represents the frequency with which an individual witnessed or experience a crime, where i denotes 0, 1 and 2, in which 0 indicates not witnessing or experiencing a crime, 1 means witnessing 1 to 2, and 2 symbolizes seeing 3 or more crimes. Ti denotes the degree of the different typologies of crime witnessed or experienced by an individual, where j = 1 …4, which 1 = valuables stolen, 2 = attacked with or without a weapon, 3 = threatened with a gun, and 4 = sexually assaulted or raped. The summation of the frequency of crime by the degree of the incident ranges from 0 and a maximum of 51.

Average consumption per head: total amount of money that is spent on consumption goods, in Jamaican dollars divided by the number of persons in the household of person i.

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency and percentage were used to analyze the socio-demographic characteristics of the sample. Chi-square was utilized to examine non-metric variables. Stepwise technique in multiple regressions was utilized to establish the parameter of the explanatory variables and to determine their influence on the general model. The level of significance used in this research was 5% (i.e. 95% confidence interval). The correlation matrix was examined in order to ascertain if autocorrelation or collinearity existed between variables. Where collinearity existed (r > 0.7), variables were entered independently into the model to help determine which one should be retained during the final model construction (the decision was based on the variable’s contribution to the predictive power of the model and the goodness of fit).

Results

The sampled population was 25 018 respondents, of which there were 49.3% males and 50.7% females. The mean age was 28.8 (± 22 years). The majority of the sampled respondents was never married (67.3%); and 73.2% had secondary or tertiary level education. The majority of the sampled respondents did not report a health condition (83.6%). Moreover, 40% of the respondents were poor, with 20% falling below the poverty line (Table/Fig 1).

Further examination of health conditions by rich or poor revealed that nearly one-fifth (16%) of respondents reported at least one health dysfunctions (illness, ailment or injury). Just under one-fifth (18.1%) of those who were in the two wealthiest quintiles indicated that they suffered from at least one health condition compared to 15.3% of those in the two poorest quintiles (χ2(1) = 34.173, P < 0.001), suggesting that the lifestyle behaviour of the affluent is adversely affecting their health status [Table/Fig 2]. A part of this explanation is owing to the disparity of crime and victimization that are levied against the two groups. A cross-tabulation between those two phenomena showed a statistical difference between crime and victimization that affected the more wealthy (25.1%) and the poor (21.8%; χ2(1)= 36.6, P < 0.001; Table 3) (Table/Fig 3).

A cross-tabulation between area of residence and the two poorest versus the two wealthiest quintiles revealed that poverty is substantially concentrated in rural areas (70.2%) and the least in the urban areas, (9.4%). A similar distribution was observed for those in the two wealthiest quintiles (Table/Fig 4). There is exists inequality of income distribution in the geopolitical zones in Jamaica as for every 100 wealthiest people in rural areas there were 148 of those in the two poorest income quintiles. In urban areas, for every 100 people in the two wealthiest income quintiles there are 49 in the two poorest income quintiles. The dissimilarity was lower in Other Towns as for every 100 of those in the two wealthiest quintiles there were 61 in the poorest quintiles.

Using the econometric analysis, the final model is expressed in a multiple regression that is capture in Eqn (3). Approximately 87% of the sampled population was used to establish the final model. Of all the predisposed variables, 16 of them explain 92.1% of the variability in economic wellbeing. These variables include: assets owned, consumption per head, number of children in household below 14 years old, number of adults living in the household, crowding, age of respondents, psychological conditions, property ownership, retirement income, household head, medical expenditure, educational attainment, physical environment, and income quintile of respondents. Moreover, the model is a good fit - F statistic = 5474.67, P < 0.001 (Table/Fig 5).

Deconstructing the explanatory variables of the final model showed that the two most crucible factors determining the economic wellbeing of an individual were assets owned (38.1%), number of children below 14 years old (22.7%) followed by consumption per head (10.8%) and living alone (10.0%) (Table/Fig 6). There are some factors whose contribution to economic wellbeing were minimal (less than 1%) - crowding 0.7%, physical environment 0.1%, age of respondents 0.1% and 7 factors accounted for approximately 0% of the variability in wellbeing. These include: psychological conditions, property ownership, income quintile, retirement income, medical expenditure and being head of household. Embedded in those findings are minimal contributions of owning a home, an individual’s affective psychological state, retirement income, medical expenditure, being head of household, the physical environment, age of respondents and the number of person living in a room (crowding) and educational achievement.

economic wellbeing (5.2%) compared to being females (4.2%). This suggests that the more males in a household, the more likely that household will have a higher economic wellbeing than one with more females. Conversely, a household with one person will have a lower economic wellbeing. Another aspect to the aforementioned finding is fact that union status in which people cohabit will experience a greater economic wellbeing than people who were not in unions. In addition to the abovementioned variables, household that spent more of their income on assets owned will have a greater wellbeing than one that spend on perishable goods (consumer goods).

The study found that 16 variables accounted for 92% of the explanatory power of economic wellbeing. Forty-one percent (41.4%) of the explanatory power is accounted for by asset ownership; number of children in household, 24.6%, per capita consumption, 11.7%, and living arrangement, 10.9%. Concurrently, number of females or males in household and crowding accounted for 11% of the explanatory power of the economic wellbeing model. Other variables such as age, physical environment, education, psychological conditions, property ownership, social class, retirement benefits and household heads contributed between 0.0% and 0.2% individual to the general model. It follows that although some variables are correlated with economic wellbeing of Jamaicans, their contribution is negligible to such a model. On the other hand, whether people reported being ill or otherwise this was not correlated with lower or higher economic wellbeing.

Discussion

This study found a relationship between economic wellbeing and some explanatory variables. A study of economic wellbeing is of importance because a nationally representative probability stratified sampling of 1,338 respondents in Jamaica in 2006 revealed that more than two-thirds of the Jamaicans (68.7%) indicated that their present economic situation was at most average, with 7% mentioned that it was very bad (21). Just over one-half (57.4%) revealed that their salary and the total of their family’s salary did not allow them to satisfactorily cover their needs without some level of difficulty. Nearly three-quarters indicated that they may be left without work or become unemployed during the next 12 months; with 43% indicated that they were ‘very concerned’ about their employment status; and 42% reported that they were living worse than their parents/guardians (21). Therefore the factors that accounts for Jamaicans economic wellbeing will give a better understanding and allow the tailoring of policies that are driven by research. Another rationale for the seriousness of right programme is embedded in a critical aspect of the society as approximately 30% (in 2007) were in the two poorest quintiles (21). Ergo, if we are to structure and formulate programmes that are effective in alleviating poverty, as this is a goal with the United Nations Millennium Declaration Goals, we need to comprehend what affects economic wellbeing.

It is widely held in many societies that children are parent economic investment or future pension, in particular developing countries such as China, Pakistan and India. In this study this is equally the case in Jamaica, as we found that the number of children is the second most influential factor that determines economic wellbeing of Jamaicans. And the preference for a son which is an issue in China is not overtly the case in Jamaica. However, the current research has found that more males in a household contribute more to economic wellbeing than their female counterparts. Although the study has shown no statistical difference between the economic wellbeing of the gender in Jamaica, embedded herein is the fact that males add more to economic wellbeing than females. This goes further to emphasize the importance of crowding on economic wellbeing of an individual. Even though there are psychological drawbacks to crowding, the more adults in a household, the greater will be the access to income and thereby increased economic wellbeing. The reverse hold true as will less persons in the household there will be lower access to income and by extension economic resources. In this study, the fourth most influential determinant of economic wellbeing is living arrangement.

If people have lower access to income and economic resources, they will have lower economic wellbeing. In the current work, assets owned is the most critical determinant followed by children and then consumption per head. The poor have lower access to income and economic resources and so they will have lower wellbeing. Income does not only affect an individual’s consumption pattern, it also influences health status (23),(24),(25),(26), suggesting how health education towards the poor often fail in its endeavour, although there may be good intervention programme in poor milieus. Powell et al.’s work (21) showed that the poorest in Jamaica has the lower health status, using Abraham Maslow’s needs hierarchy (27),(28). Furthermore, when poverty is mixed with being female, living alone, poor environment, ageing, illness, and below tertiary level education, the disadvantage is even more complex.

Poverty is synonymous with rural areas in Jamaica with the least being in urbanized areas (29). This study investigated rural area residence and found that for every 1 person who is in the two wealthiest income quintiles, there are 2 persons who are in the two poorest quintiles. This represents a massive disparity in income in rural areas compared to urbanized areas in the society; as well as failure of these people to fulfill their ‘fullest potential in life’, a finding similar to that of Powell et al. (21). In order to comprehensive understand the state of poverty in rural areas in Jamaica, the matter must be contextualized within a broader situation as in 2007, 61% Jamaican reported that their current economic situation compared to 12 months ago was at most the same, with 25% indicated that it was worse (21). Furthermore, Jamaicans are pessimistic about the future of the society as in 2007, 75% reported that it was at most the same and 34% said it was likely to become worse.

Within the context that 67% of nation’s elderly populace (ages 60 years and older) dwelled in rural areas. Economic hardship is even more intense for this age cohort and the same goes for youth (ages 15 to 25 years) as 59% lived in rural areas. The economic hardship is faced by elderly and those who reside in rural areas does not overshadow the deprivation that is experienced by poor in urban areas - pollution, overcrowding, inadequate water, sanitation and waste disposal, street violence (24), (30), (31). Moreover, studies have been conducted by Bourne (32),(33) showed that the place in which the elderly resides affect their general wellbeing. However, the findings in this study do not concur with those in the literature. In this study we examine the economic wellbeing of Jamaica while the aforementioned work investigated the social wellbeing of elderly Jamaicans. Another fact that may explain this difference is owing to the composition of wellbeing. In the current work, wellbeing is operationalized as income while in Bourne’s work (32),(33), wellbeing was a composite variable that included health conditions and material resources. In this study health condition was used as an independent variable and we found that it does not influence economic wellbeing (P > 0.5) when placed in a model of many other variables. However, there exists a bivariate correlation between health condition and economic wellbeing (P < 0.05), indicating that this is nullified by the inclusion of other variables such as consumption and number of persons in a household.

Of many of the studies, using multivariate regression analyses, done in the English-speaking Caribbean (34), (35), (36), (37), (38),(39),(40), none had an explanatory power more than 40%. Those researchers used self-reported health status, self-assessed illness, life satisfaction, and quality of life to measure health (or wellbeing). The present study however, using objective wellbeing (i.e. income measured by expenditure), which showed an explanatory power of 92% (adjusted r-squared). This suggests that objective wellbeing is still a better measure for wellbeing than the identified subjective indexes used by Caribbean scholars. Concurrently, many of the social determinants that were identified as exogenous variables for health by some scholars as well as the WHO (25), (26), (41),(42),(43),(44) were not significant correlated with particular subjective indexes used by different Caribbean scholars to evaluate health, but they are concurred in the present study when objective index (i.e. income) is used to assess wellbeing.

Conclusion

In this study, it is found that 16 factors can be used to predict economic wellbeing of a Jamaican, and there was 92.1% variability in economic wellbeing. Four factors accounted for 82% of the variability in Jamaican’s economic wellbeing. The factors are assets owned, number of children ages 14 years and less, consumption per head, and living arrangement; with assets owned and the number of children in the household accounted for 61% of the total explanation of the change in economic wellbeing of an individual. This indicates that children and access to economic resources have a strong influence on economic people and they are an economic investment of parents. This suggests that that objective wellbeing is still a better measure of wellbeing in Jamaica than subjective indexes.

References

1.
World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19-22, 1946; signed on July 22, 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2. p.100) and entered into force on April 7, 1948. “Constitution of the World Health Organization, 1948” In Basic Documents, 15th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1948.
2.
Engel GL. A unified concept of health and disease. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1960;3:459-85.
3.
Engel GL. The care of the patient: art or science? Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 1997;140:222-232.
4.
Engel GL. The biopsychosocial model and the education of health professionals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1978;310:169-81.
5.
Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry 1980;137:535-44.
6.
Bok S. Rethinking the WHO definition of health. Working Paper Series, 14; 2004.
7.
Rojas M. Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual-referent-theory explanation. Journal of Economic Psychology 2005;10:1-14.
8.
Stutzer AA, Frey BS. Reported subjective well-being: A challenge for economic theory and economic policy;2003.
9.
Veenhoven R. Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research 1991;24:1-34.
10.
Veenhoven R. The utility of happiness. Social Indicator Research 1997;20:233-35.
11.
Diener E, Sandvik E, Seidlitz L, Diener M. The relationship between income and subjective wellbeing: Relative or absolute? Social Indicator Research 1993;28:195-223.
12.
Diener E, Larson RJ, Levine S, Emmon RA. Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 1999;125:276-302.
13.
Diener E. Subjective wellbeing: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychological Association 2000;55:34-43.
14.
Crisp R. Wellbeing. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2005 Edition). Zalta EN, editor;2005.
15.
Sen A. Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures. Journal of Philosophy 1985;82:169-221.
16.
Easterlin R. Life cycle welfare: Evidence and conjecture. Journal of Socio-Economics 2001:30:31-61.
17.
Easterlin R. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal 2001;111:465-84.
18.
United Nations. Handbook of Social Indicators. Geneva: UN; 1989.
19.
Haveman R, Holden K, Wilson K, Wolfe B. Social security, age of retirement, and economic wellbeing: Inter-temporal and demographic patterns among retired-worker beneficiaries. Demography 2003;40:369-94.
20.
Ringen S. Wellbeing, Measurement, and Preferences. Scandinavian Sociological Association 1995;38:3-15.
21.
Powell LA, Bourne P, Waller L. Probing Jamaica’s Political culture: Main Trends in the July-August, 2006 Leadership and Governance survey. Kingston: Centre of Leadership and Governance, Department of Government, The University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Jamaica;2007.
22.
Planning Institute of Jamaica and Statistical Institute of Jamaica (PIOJ & STATIN). Economic and Social Survey of Jamaica;2002.
23.
Smith J. Measuring health and economic status of older adults in developing countries. Gerontologist 1994;34:491-96.
24.
Marmot M. The influence of Income on Health: Views of an Epidemiologist: Does money really matter? Or is it a maker for something else? Health Affairs 2003;21:31-46.
25.
Grossman M. The demand for health- a theoretical and empirical investigation. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.; 1972.
26.
Smith JP, Kington R. Demographic and economic correlates of health in old age. Demography 1997;34:159-70.
27.
Maslow AH. Toward a psychology of being. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company;1968.
28.
Maslow H. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper;1970.
29.
Planning Institute of Jamaica. Economic and Social Survey, 1989-2007. Kingston: Planning Institute of Jamaica; 1990-2008.
30.
Goldstein G, Kickbusch I. Urban health challenges and opportunities. Urbanization and Health Newsletter 1996;28:7-13.
31.
Nakajima H. Healthy cities for better life. Urbanization and Health Newsletter 1996;28:5-6.
32.
Bourne PA. A theoretical framework of good health status of Jamaicans: Using econometric analysis to model good health status over the life course. North Am J of Med Sci 2009;1:86-95.
33.
Bourne PA. Good health status of older and oldest elderly in Jamaica: Are there differences between rural and urban areas? Open Geriatric Medicine J 2009;2:18-27.
34.
Bourne PA. A comparative analysis of health status of men 60 + years and men 73 + years in Jamaica: A Multivariate Analysis. Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics (In Press).
35.
Bourne PA, Rhule J. Good Health Status of Rural Women in the Reproductive Ages. Int J of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health 2009;1:132-55.
36.
Bourne PA, McGrowder DA. Rural health in Jamaica: Examining and refining the predictive factors of good health status of rural residents. Journal of Rural and Remote Health 2009;9: 1116.
37.
Bourne PA. Medical Sociology: Modelling Well-being for elderly People in Jamaica. West Indian Med J 2008;57:596-604.
38.
Bourne PA. Good health status of older and oldest elderly in Jamaica: Are there differences between rural and urban areas? The Open Geriatric Med J 2009;2:18-27.
39.
Hambleton IR, Clarke K, Broome HL, Fraser HS, Brathwaite F, Hennis AJ. Historical and current predictors of self-reported health status among elderly persons in Barbados. Rev Pan Salud Public 2005;17:342-52.
40.
Hutchinson G, Simeon DT, Bain BC, Wyatt GE, Tucker MB, LeFranc E. Social and Health determinants of well-being and life satisfaction in Jamaica. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2004;50:43-53.
41.
World Health Organization. HO. The Social Determinants of Health. Washington DC: WHO;2008.
42.
Victorino CC, Guathier AH. The social determinants of child health: variations across health outcomes – a population-based cross-sectional analysis. BMC Pediatrics 2009;9:53.
43.
Wilkinson R, Marmot M, eds. Social Determinants of Health. The Solid Facts. 2nd ed. Copenhagen Ø: World Health Organization;2003.
44.
Solar O, and Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Analysis and Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Discussion paper for the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: WHO;2007.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com