Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 1024

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2010 | Month : June | Volume : 4 | Issue : 3 | Page : 2416 - 2420 Full Version

Assessment Of Satisfaction Among Patients Attending Surgical Outpatient

Published: June 1, 2010 | DOI:

*Assistant Professor,Dept. of Community Medicine Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Bathinda. (Punjab),(India) **(MS, Surgery) Assistant Professor,Dept. of Surgery,Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research. Bathinda. (Punjab) (India) ***Department of MicrobiologyAdesh Medical College & Hospital.Bathinda. (Punjab) (ndia))

Correspondence Address :
Dr. RAJIV KUMAR,Department of MicrobiologyAdesh Medical College & Hospital. Bathinda. (Punjab) (INDIA) ,Tel.+919915022267


Objective: To find out patient satisfaction with the Surgical Outpatient Department in Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda which is a tertiary care teaching hospital using Concise OPD User Satisfaction Scale.
Methodology: From August 2009 to January 2010, only new patients attending the surgical OPD of Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda were included in this observational study after taking informed consent. The Concise Outpatient Department User Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patient satisfaction. The items in this score were (i) physical environment, (ii) equipment and facilities, (iii) appointment arrangement, (iv) waiting time, (v) service of the dispensary, (vi) support staff (vii) physician’s professionalism, (viii) explanation given by the case physician, (ix) consultation time.
Results: A total of 510 patients, 308 (60.39%) males and 202 (39.61%) females attending the Surgical Outpatient Department were included in this cross-sectional study from August 2009 to January 2010. Physician’s professionalism scored maximum with a mean ± SD score of 7.71 ± 1.68 and service of dispensary scored minimum with a mean ± SD of 3.67 ± 1.57. Significant difference was found between gender, with males satisfied more in terms of support staff, physician’s professionalism , explanation and consultation time given by physicians.
Conclusion: Patient satisfaction level was overall good with the Surgical Outpatient Department. The patients were most satisfied with physician’s professionalism and least satisfied with service of dispensary.

The quality of service in health means an inexpensive type of service with minimum side effects that can cure or relieve the health problems of the patients. It is easier to evaluate the patient’s satisfaction towards the service than evaluate the quality of medical services that they receive(1). Satisfaction can be defined as the extent of an individual's experience compared with his or her expectations (2) The goal of the health care team is to provide the best quality of health care and service to the patient. It is now a worldwide trend in the healthcare system to include subjective user satisfaction into the evaluation of quality of medical service provided (3),(4). Unfortunately, this trend is still very much at infancy level in our country. It is reported that satisfied patients are more likely than their dissatisfied counterparts to show positive illness behaviors (5). Therefore, knowledge of users’ satisfaction with the service can serve not only as a performance indicator but also to identify areas of improvement to provide better delivery of care and services to the patients.

Patient satisfaction is a domain not given much importance in our part of the world, especially if we talk about tertiary care public hospitals. This study was planned to measure the patient satisfaction in a surgical OPD of a tertiary care teaching hospital to improve the quality of care provided. There are very few user satisfaction scales that are suitable for use in outpatient settings across different specialties (6). Some reported satisfactory or good levels of psychometric properties, but very often they contain many items (typically 20-30 items) (6),(7),(8). We used the validated the 9-item Concise Outpatient Department User Satisfaction Scale to measure patient satisfaction (9). This scale has the following advantages: Short - a 9-item score so that it is administrable in a busy surgical OPD; items not specialty-specific; and items not culture or region-specific (9). Apart from these advantages, this scale is very easily explainable to the patients.

Material and Methods

Patients attending the surgical OPD of Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda were included in this cross-sectional study from August 2009 to January 2010 after taking informed consent. To minimize a possible bias in sampling, we recruited only new patients, as there is evidence that satisfaction varies with visit frequency. Based on average daily estimate of new patients attending surgical OPD it was decided to include 1% of patients on two days a week by random sampling for six months.

The Concise Outpatient Department User Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patient satisfaction. The items in this score were (i) physical environment, (ii) equipment and facilities, (iii) appointment arrangement, (iv) waiting time, (v) service of the dispensary, (vi) support staff, (vii) physician’s professionalism, (viii) explanation given by the case physician, (ix) consultation time. Respondents need to answer each item in a response format of a 10-point anchored numerical scale, where ‘1’ indicates not satisfied at all and ‘10’ extremely satisfied. All the patients were interviewed after attending their physicians and visit of the hospital pharmacy. Data was collected in a specially designed proforma and analyzed. Mean and Standard Deviation were calculated. Unpaired t-test was used to find patient satisfaction score between genders.


Total 510 patients, 308 (60.39%) males and 202 (39.61%) females, attending the Surgical Outpatient Department of Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda were included in this study.

Patients satisfaction with different items of Concise Outpatient Department User Satisfaction scale with Mean±SD are shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Physician’s professionalism scored maximum with a mean ± SD score of 7.71 ± 1.68 and service of dispensary scored minimum with a mean ± SD of 3.67 ± 1.57.

While comparing results by gender, statistically significant difference was found between support staff, physician’s professionalism and explanation given by physician. In all three domains males were more satisfied as compared to females as shown in (Table/Fig 2).


Our results showed that most of the patients are satisfied with the surgical OPD with a mean score in different domains of more than six. This is contrary to our expectations, as we believe there are a lot of improvements which can be done to elevate the quality of service provided. One reason may be that patients wanted to be good patients and a negative answer negated this aspect. The other explanation is that being a private sector tertiary care hospital, all treatment provided is at its best and accordingly the quality of services and the accountability of health providers is very high.

Satisfaction with the quality of care provided is a very sensitive issue, but unfortunately little work was done in our country about this important aspect of patient care (10),(11),(12),(13). One reason is that we are still struggling for the primary care provision to all of our population rather than talking about its quality. By literature search, we were unable to find any reference about satisfaction with the surgical OPD but reports on satisfaction in some other domains were found (1),(9),(10),(11),(12),(20).

A Nigerian study about patient satisfaction with the services provided at a general outpatients' clinic showed high level of satisfaction with the different aspects of care assessed. However, bad experiences were reported with the organization of the clinic, attitude of record clerks' and consultation process.14 A survey was conducted of 1500 health centers in Trinidad and Tobago to evaluate the impact of health centers on patients and their characteristics. Results showed that the services most in need of improvement were pharmacies (35.1%) and physicians' care (27.4%) (15). In a study about an outpatient department of plastic surgery, the most important predictors of patient satisfaction were those related to efficient clinic operation (scheduling of appointments and clinic waiting time) and the quality of the patient-physician interaction (16). Another study from a dental OPD from Turkey showed that the most important components of satisfaction were found to be relationship between doctor and patients, organized service system and scientific ability of dental personnel while the most prominent complaints were long treatment span, disorganized service system and slowness of radiographic examination procedures (17).

These findings, including that of present study, point to a very important determinant of patient satisfaction which was pointed out by Calnan et al. in 1988 (18). According to them, during the early visits, patients were more passive and less critical about how they were treated. But as the level of interaction increased with their physicians, patients gained more information and became more critical about the professional practices (18). The same observation was also reported by Cho et al (19). According to them, through multiple visits, patients become more informed about the health care service and their physician, and they are able to include a wider range of factors into their assessment of overall service quality. As the frequency of visits increased, patients were weighing ‘‘physician’s care,’‘ a core health care service dimension, as the most important determinant of their satisfaction. This contrasts to the attention paid to the more auxiliary or peripheral dimensions of health care service by patients in their early visits to the hospital. In our study we included only the first time visitors. Maybe that is the reason that the patients scored physician’s professionalism as the highest. Often it is not the lack of a particular service that upsets the patients, but the lack of knowledge about the available services. If the patients know the reason behind services or a particular procedure that are not available or even know why the service is not available, they are less likely to complain (2).

Gender difference showed that females were less satisfied as compared to males in three items: support staff, physician’s professionalism, explanation and consultation time given by physician. We do not know any solid reason but maybe males being more confident and more vocal are likely to ask questions if they do not understand and so they were more satisfied. Females are mostly accompanied by male attendants, and most of the time, all communication about investigations and treatment occur between doctor and the attendant, which may have result in less satisfaction with the physician’s professionalism and explanation given by physicians in our study. However, more work needs to be done about this important finding.

Limitation of the Study
One limitation of the study is the single-site sample used in this study which limits the generalizability of the findings. Different hospitals may have different systems of service delivery and physical atmospheres. So there is need to do multi-centric studies. Reasons for less satisfaction of female patients in different aspects need to be explored more in future studies.


Patient satisfaction level was overall good with the Surgical Outpatient Department. The patients were most satisfied with physician’s professionalism and least satisfied with service of dispensary. This study points out different areas of surgical OPD service of a tertiary care hospital that need improvement. This improvement can be achieved and maintained by repeated monitoring of patient satisfaction.


Kumari R, Idris MZ, Bhushan V, Khanna A, Agarwal M, Singh SK. Study on patient Satisfaction in the Government Allopathic Health Facilities of Lucknow District ,India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2009;34(1):35-42.
Pascoe GC: Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann 1983, 6: 185-210.
Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3167-77.
Urden LD. Patient satisfaction measurement: current issues and implications. Outcomes Manag 2002; 6: 125-31.
Ferris LE, Health Services Research Group. A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. CMAJ 1992; 146: 1727-31.
Labarere J, Francois P, Bertrand D, Peyrin JC, Robert C, Fourny M. Outpatient satisfaction: validation of a French-language questionnaire: data quality and identification of associated factors. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1999; 7: 63-9.
Gasquet I, Villeminot S, Estaquio C, Durieux P, Ravaud P, Falissard B. Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients’ opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 43.
Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Mathias SD, Bloor L, Carroll PR. An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: 70-6.
Tso IF, Ng SM, Chan CLW. The development and validation of the Concise Outpatient Department User Satisfaction Scale. Int J Qual Health Care 2006:1-6.
Qadri SH, Sadiq F, Pervez A, Mir ZA, Rehman S, Tauni RA. Patient satisfaction with Day Case Surgery. J Fatima Jinnah Med Coll Lahore 2008; 2(2): 46-8.
Danish KF, Khan UA, Chaudhry T, Naseer M. Patient satisfaction; An experience at Islamic International Medical College/Railway Hospital. Rawal Med J 2008; 33(2): 245-8.
Qidwai W, Dhanani RH, Khan FM. Implications for the practice of a patient expectation and satisfaction survey, at a teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2003; 53(3): 122-5.
Saaiq M, Zaman K. Pattern of satisfaction among neurosurgical inpatients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2006; 16(7): 455-9.
Ajayi IO, Olumide EA, Oyediran O. Patient satisfaction with the services provided at a general outpatients' clinic, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 2005; 34(2): 133-40.
Singh H, Mustapha N, Haqq ED. Patient satisfaction at health centres in Trinidad and Tobago. Public Health 1996; 110(4): 251-5.
Chung KC, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Walters MR, Wilkins EG. Predictors of patient satisfaction in an outpatient plastic surgery clinic. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 42(1): 56-60.
Gurdal P, Cankaya H, Onem E, Dincer S, Yilmaz T. Factors of patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction in a dental faculty outpatient clinic in Turkey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28(6): 461-9.
Calnan M. Towards a conceptual framework of lay evaluation of health care. Social Science and Medicine 1988; 27(9): 927-33.
Cho WH, Lee H, Kim C, Lee S, Choi KS. The impact of visit frequency on the relationship between service quality and outpatient satisfaction: a South Korean study. HSR: Health Services Research 2004; 39: 1.
Prasanna KS, Bashith MA, Sucharitha S. Consumer satisfaction about Hospital Services:A Study from Outpatient Department of a Private Medical College Hospital at Mangalore. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2009;34(2):156-9.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)