Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 121325

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2010 | Month : June | Volume : 4 | Issue : 3 | Page : 2472 - 2477 Full Version

Maternal Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Levels During The First Trimester Of Pregnancy At The South-East Of The Caspian Sea In Iran


Published: June 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.734
MANSOURIAN A R , AHMADI AR , MANSOURIAN H R , SAIFI A, MARJANI A, VEGHARI G R ,GHAEMI E

*Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics , Biochemistry and metabolic disorder Research Center. Golestan university of medical Sciences. Gorgan medical school- Grgan-Iran.**Danesh medical Diagnostic laboratory Research Center- Gorgan-Iran.***Department of Pharmacology. Gorgan Medical School. Golestan University of Medical Sciences. Grgan-Iran.****Department of Microbiology.Infectious Research Center. Gorgan Medical Shool.Golestan Univesity of Medical Sciences. Gorgan-Iran.

Correspondence Address :
Azad,R Mansourian +98[171]4421651, Fax: +98[171]4440225. E-mail: azad_r_mansourian @ yahoo.com

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the status of the thyroid stimulating hormone [TSH] in the first trimester of pregnancy. In this analytical research, ‘Project 120’, apparently healthy pregnant women in their first trimester of pregnancy were selected randomly from pregnant women who visited the Danesh Medical Diagnostic Laboratory in Gorgan, which is located in northern Iran, during 2007-08. Serum TSH was measured by the Enzyme linked Immunosorbant Assay [ELISA]. The findings of this study indicated that 10% of pregnant women who also were apparently healthy subjects showed abnormal TSH serum concentration on the bases of the reference range of the laboratory kit used in this study, which seems to be incorrect. It is concluded here, that for the accurate measurement and the interpretation of thyroid hormones, the proper reference intervals in each region should be established to avoid confusion about the diagnosis of the thyroid function tests.

Keywords

Pregnant women, first trimester of pregnancy TSH, northern Iran.

Introduction
Pregnancy is a physiological condition with varieties of new biochemical functions. Such a significant alteration happens in the maternal thyroid gland with a subsequent effect on the fetus. During the duration of pregnancy, the maternal thyroid function should be in proper condition to face the maternal and fetal physiological requirement during this period (20),(22),(25),(27) The subjects of thyroid function during pregnancy have been reviewed extensively by many researchers word- wide (6), (13), (24).

TSH is one the key hormones which regulates thyroid gland function. Some reports indicate the prevalence of TSH elevation and the significance of TSH measurement during pregnancy (1),(3),(4),(16),(29).There are various studies indicating the specific reference intervals of the thyroid hormone during pregnancy and arguing that the reference range of non -pregnant women should not be applied during pregnancy to assess the thyroid function tests (23),(28).

The proper evaluation of the thyroid gland is provided by the determination of other hormones which are produced and the antibodies which are raised against the gland. TSH is a single test which can draw a clear picture of the thyroid function test and this hormone is regarded to be the most important hormone regulating the function of the thyroid gland (23). This is also recommended by the American thyroid Association that has classified TSH, as the best single measurement of thyroid status due to the high sensitivity. (15)

Considering the cost- effectiveness of any laboratory test, it is advisable that the first line of any laboratory investigation for thyroid function determination can be started with the measurement of a single important test, which is TSH (13),(23)

The aim of this present study was to assess the status of serum TSH levels during pregnancy among apparently healthy pregnant women in Gorgan, in the north- east of Iran, which is located in the south- east of the Caspian Sea and to assess whether the serum TSH measurement with the manufacture's reference interval of non-pregnant can be a good and reliable starting point to check for any thyroid evaluations during the first trimester of pregnancy in this region or whether local reference intervals should be established to prevent the wrong diagnosis of thyroid function tests.

Material and Methods

In this research project, 120 apparently healthy pregnant women who in their first trimester of pregnancy visited the Danesh Medical Diagnostic Laboratory in Gorgan, which is located in northern Iran, for the confirmation of pregnancy were selected during 2007-08. The exclusion criteria for pregnant women in this study was any history of thyroid disease and if the pregnant women had taken any medicines which were related to thyroid disease at the time of blood sampling. A questionnaire was filled up for each woman, which contained demographical characteristic, 2 ml of venous blood was taken from each pregnant woman and serum was obtained from each blood sample. Serum thyroid stimulation hormone [TSH] levels were determined by the Enzyme linked Immunosorbant Assay [ELISA], technique (6)

The reference intervals of the standard kit for the ELISA method in this study for TSH was [0.32- 5.2 MIU/L].

The findings of this study were entered into the computer. The SPSS-11.5 software and the Student’s t test were used to analyze the data.

Results

In this present study, the pregnant women were in their first trimester of pregnancy, the mean of their maternal and gestational ages being 26.06 years and 7.79 weeks, respectively. The median of their maternal and gestational ages were 25 years and 4 weeks, respectively.

The mean serum TSH for our sample population in this study was 1.31mIU/L. The lower and upper values for serum TSH in this study were 0.1 and6.2 mIU/L
in (Table/Fig 1). The findings indicated that 10% of pregnant women had suppressed TSH levels and could be diagnosed .

Maternal serum TSH is presented for hyperthyroidism, which in our opinion can not be correct. In our earlier work we faced with the same problem, and we found that the same sample population demonstrated to have about 48% reduced thyroxine concentration (9) and therefore should have been evalutated further for hypothyroidism.We argued on that study although that those findings from laboratory point of view might be correct ,but clinically should not be taken seriously, because half of o apparently healthy pregnant women can not be labeled as hypothyroidism,. with findings in this present study ,we argue also that there is something wrong somewhere and it seems that the manufactrurer refrence interval kit for non-pregnant women can not be a base for evalution of pregnant women.This confusion raised also echoed by many others working in this area of research (14),(23) Considering our earlier work(9) with the present findings indicat that there was not an acceptable correlation between the serum level of TSH and thyroxin serum concentration , which could be a base for misinterpretation of the thyroid function tests , with eventual harm to the fetus and the outcome of pregnancy. This problem in interpretation of thyroid function test during the first trimester of pregnancy was also reported by others[kurioka et al 2005].

In this present study according to our laboratory manufacturer's reference range, 10% of our pregnant women should be considered as hyperthyroidism cases and should be treated for thyroid hyperactivity.
If the above findings was the base for drug prescription, the pregnant women would approach hypothyroidism with all its adverse effects on fetus [kurioka et al 2005,

In addition the pregnancy in women characterized by increasing demand of thyroxine. In addition, other studies indicated that during pregnancy even pregnant women with thyroxine therapy should be checked up further for an extra dose of required thyroxin in the early stage of pregnancy to prevent the possibility of neurophysiological damage to the growing foetus (24).

Our findings are in favor of establishing specific first- trimester reference intervals. Due the complex picture, the TSH and T4 concentrations have to be correlated and evaluated to prevent the risks involved with possible neurophysiologic and euro psychological events in our region. It should be noted that in pregnancy, non pregnant women reference intervals should not be the basis for the evaluation pregnant women. Our findings are in agreement with the results of other workers in various parts of the world.

Examples are China (10), Australia (23) India (28) Czech (13).

Discussion

Serum TSH is considered to be the most important hormone whose levels can be used to assess thyroid function test during pregnancy and also, it can be extended to evaluate the thyroid status at any particular physiological condition. (3),(15), (23).

The clinical picture of thyroid function is better understood when all the key players of thyroid function tests such as thyroxin, [T4] triidothyronine [T3], T3 uptake, antibodies produced against peroxides and thyroglobulin [Anti TPO, Anti Tg] are measured, (7) but due to the high expenses involved in measuring these factors, it is considered best to recommend the most important test which gives the clue for thyroid function, which is TSH. It has also been recommended by others (17),(23) In our study, we measured TSH levels of apparently pregnant women in order to have a thyroid hormone test during a normal routine pregnancy, which is most important for the gynecologist and the pregnant women themselves for the outcome of their pregnancy. The adverse complications related to thyroid dysfunction in pregnant women (22), the clear status of the thyroid function of pregnant women and the correction of abnormalities is of utmost importance and have been the topics of many researches, but there has been no comprehensive argument on whether to screen the pregnant women for their thyroid hormone status (8). In spite of substantial reports word- wide on the risks involved if the hypothyroidism in particular, was not diagnosed in the early stage of pregnancy (22),(27), there are rare reports that maternal thyroid dysfunction does not always play an adverse effect on the pregnancy outcome (21) Comprehensive literature review does not end up with the above finding and there are universal agreements on the need of thyroxin substitution when maternal thyroxin levels are not enough for the outcome of pregnancy and the growing foetus. (13), (20),(25)

Although there are reports encouraging the assessment of the thyroid function test
with ultimate correction of any dysfunction (14), the reference intervals and the methodology of thyroid hormone determination is of utmost importance (5),(11),(13) in addition to the environmental factors, ethnicity and the nutritional habits in one region, which should be taken into account for any interpretation of results for the thyroid status in pregnant women (16), [30 ].

Our findings in this research project indicated that according to the method and laboratory kits that we used and the given reference interval of our method [0.32-5.2 mIU/l], 10% of pregnant women in this region have the serum TSH levels below lower limit of normal values <0.32 mIU/L]. The mean serum TSH was 1.3mIU/L, which was far away from the higher limit of the normal range in this study which was 5.2mIU/L.

Our earlier reports on the serum T4 levels among the same pregnant women also showed that 48% of pregnant women had T4 concentrations >12.5 microgram/ dl (9). The reference interval of our method for T4 was [4.7-12.5 microgram/dl] and therefore, according to our findings and due to the manufacturer's reference range that we used, 48% and 10% of our pregnant women remained in the hyperthyroid status according to the serum T4 and TSH levels, which logically cannot be true, because the pregnant women whom we randomly selected were apparently healthy without any thyroid dysfunction. On the other hand, if we had 48% of pregnant women with elevated T4 (9), logically we should have had far more suppressed TSH levels. On the basis of our findings in this study and our earlier reports, we argue that the manufacturer's reference interval that we used for the interpretation of results of the thyroid function test is not fully correct and the way that these women’s thyroid function tests were evaluated, can lead to misdiagnosis. We assume that a considerable misclassification of thyroid function tests occurred when the manufacturer's normal range of TSH [0.32- 5.2 mIU/L] and T4 [4.7- 12.5 microgram/dl] was considered as the guideline to interpret the findings of the thyroid function tests.

It this present study, our data clearly predicted that some miscalculation occurred when the above mentioned reference intervals were used to approach pregnant women and if the thyroid function tests in this study was considered an important tool for the evaluation of pregnancy there would a definite misdiagnosed directed by the laboratory results. It should be emphasized that the specific reference intervals for non- pregnant women cannot be applied to interpret the thyroid function tests of pregnant women, a practice which gives clinicians the incorrect advice to approach the thyroid status in pregnant women (10). Our findings were confirmed by other studies which argued that a miscalculation occurred when thyroid function tests results were interpretated in pregnant women and they were compared using non- pregnant reference range intervals (2),(12),(13),(14),(28)

Stricker et al in their study reported that 10.4% of the potential misclassifications of thyroid function tests were found when the non- pregnant women normal range was used for pregnant women. In another study, while screening for thyroid function during pregnancy, the reference interval for TSH was considered to be [0.27- 4.2 mIU/l]. If this normal range was to be considered for our pregnant women, we would have had fewer pregnant women with suppressed TSH. The interpretation of our findings on the basis of this latter reference interval was different and less than 10% of our pregnant women who were considered to be hyperthyroid now have a normal thyroid status.

In a separate study, the reference interval for TSH was established to be [0.06-3.67mIU/L] on the basis of this latter normal range. Also, for none of our pregnant women who were considered to have thyroid dysfunction, was our normal range for TSH 0.32-5.2 mIU/L (3) .

There are various reports suggesting trimester- specific reference intervals for thyroid function. Particular attention was applied to the first- trimester specific range due the critical phase of early pregnancy during which the brain develops within the fetus

Above all, trimester specific intervals in each particular region also should have been taken into consideration when thyroid function tests in pregnant women were evaluated (4), (17).

Conclusion

Finally, on the basis of the findings from this study, we conclude that in this region within northern Iran:
· The establishment of the reference interval for TSH levels during the early stage of pregnancy is of utmost importance if the thyroid function test is to be evaluated properly.
· Ÿ The reference interval of non-pregnant women cannot be applied for pregnant women due to a potential misclassification which might have occurred when thyroid function tests were assessed.
· Our pregnant women were apparently healthy subjects. We conclude that the reason why we had 10% of pregnant women with suppressed TSH levels is due to the above miscalculation and misclassifications of the reference range.
· ŸFurther studies should have been done to establish the pregnant women reference interval in this region of Iran to avoid the misinterpretation of thyroid function tests during pregnancy, which might have irreversible consequences for the growing fetus.

Acknowledgement

The Danesh Medical Diagnostic Laboratory in Gorgan and Mr A. Asgare in particular are sincerely thanked for the assistance in this research project.

References

1.
Baloch Z P, Carayon. B, Conte- Devolx LM, Demer and U, Feldt- Rasmussen et al 2003, laboratory medicine practice guidelines laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Thyroid 13: 3-126.
2.
Brent CA. Editorial: diagnosing thyroid dysfunction in pregnant women: is case findings enough? 2007 , Journal of clinical Endocrinology and metabolism, 92, 39-41.
3.
Haddow JE. Gy, Knight CE, palomaki MR, Mc clain, AJ Pokkinen. 2004. The reference range and within- person variability of thyroid stimulating hormone during the first and second trimester of pregnancy J Med screen, 11: 170-74.
4.
Haddow, JE. MD, Glem, E, Palomki BS, Water, and C, Allan et al., 1999 Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsychological development of the child. The new England Journal of medicine, 341, 8, 549- 555.
5.
Roti E E, Gardini R, Minelli L, Bianconi, and M. Flisi, 1991. Thyroid function evaluation by different commercially available free thyroid hormone measurement kits in learn pregnant women and their newborns. J Endocrinol Invest, 14, 1-9.La, ulu, SL. WL. Roberts, 2007.
6.
LeBeau, So, and, Mandel SJ. 2006. Thyroid disorder during pregnancy Endocrinology, and metabolism, clinics of North America, 35, 117-36.
7.
Negro, R. G, Formoso. T mangieri A, Pezzarossa and D, Sazzi.Levothyroxine, treatment in euthyroid pregnant women with autoimmune thyroid disease: effects on obstetrical complication. 2006. Journal of clinical Endocrinology and metabolism, 91, 2587- 91.
8.
Morreale de Escobar, G. MJ, obregon and F, Escobar del Rey. 2004. Maternal thyroid hormone early in pregnancy and fetal brain development. Best practice and Research. Clinical and Endocrinology and metabolism, 18, 225- 48.
9.
Mansouian, AR . Ahmadi,A R. Ghaemi ,E .Saifi, A. Bakhshadehnosrat, S. Masourian, H R. 2010.Elevation of serum Thyroxin level during early stage of first-trimester of pregnancy; [ CMBS2010,Feb]
10.
Panesar, NS. Cy, Li, and Ms, Rogers. Reference interval for thyroid hormones in pregnant Chinese women, 2001. Annals of clinical Biochemistry, 38, 329- 32.
11.
Roti E L, Bartalena R, Minelli. M, Flisi and E. Gardini.et al 1995, circadian thyrotropin variation preserved in normal pregnant women, European Journal of Endocrinology 133
1.
: 74-74.
12.
La ulu, SL. WL. Roberts, 2007. Second- trimester Reference Intervals for thyroid tests: the Role of Ethnicity clinical chemistry, 53, 1658- 64.
13.
Springer DT, Zima and Z, Limanova, 2009. Reference intervals in evaluation of maternal thyroid function during the first trimester of pregnancy. European Journal of Endocrinology 160, 5, 791- 97.
14.
Striker Rt. M, Echenard. R Eberhart M-C, Chevailler and V, Perez et al 2007. Evaluation of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy: the importance of using gestational age- specific reference intervals. European Journal of Endocrinology 157, 509-14.
15.
Surks MI, Chopra IJ, Mariash CN, Nicoloff JT, Solomon DH, American Thyroid Association guidelines for use of laboratory tests in thyroid disorders. JAMA 1990; 263: 1529-32.
16.
Vaidya BS, Anthony. M, Bilous. B, Shields and J, Drury. et al ,2007. Detection of thyroid Dysfunction in Early pregnancy: universal screening for target High-Risk case finding? The Journal of clinical Endocrinology and metabolism 92
1.
, 203-207.
17.
Weeke J, Dybkjaer K, Granlie S.E, Jensen and E, Kjaerulff et al 1982 study of serum TSH and total and free idothyronines during normal pregnancy. Acta Endocrinologica, 101, 4, 531- 537.
18.
Hattetsley AT, RW Bilus. B Vaidya 2009 Gigartte smoking during pregnancy is associated with alteration in maternal abnd fetal thyroid function J Clin Enocrinol metab, Feb; 94
2.
: 570-4.PMID: 19017761
19.
Best pract Res clin Endocrinol menta. Jun; 18
2.
: 225-48. PMID: 151547838
20.
Chen yt, DH Jhoo. 2002, hyroid deseases in pregnancy. Ann Acad med Singapore. May; 31
3.
: 296-302. PMID: 12061289
21.
Cleary- Godman J, FD Malone , G, Lambert- messerlian, L Sullivan, J Canick, TF Porter D, luthy, S cross, DW Bianchi , ME D'Alton 2008. Maternal thyroid hypofunction and pregnancy outcome. Obstet cynecol , jul; 112
1.
: 85-92. PMID: 18591312
22.
De Escobar CM, MJ OBREGON , FE del Rey 2004, Maternal thyroid hormones early in pregnancy and fetal brain development.
23.
Gilbert RM, NC Hadlow, JP Walsh, SJ Fletcher SJ Brown, BG Stuckey EM Lim. Assessment of thyroid function during pregnancy: first- trimester [week 9-13] reference intervals derived from western Australian women. Med J Aust. 2008 sep 1: 189
5.
O: 250-3.PMID: 18759718.
24.
Hallengren B, Mlantz , B Andreasson, L Grennert 2009. pregnant women on thyroid substitution are often dysregulated in early pregnancy, thyroid 2009 Apr; 19
4.
:391-4. PMID: 1920 7005
25.
Idris I ,R Srinivasan, A Simm. RC Page 2005. Maternal hypothyroidism in early and late gestation: effect on neonatal and obstetric outcome lin Endocrinol [oxf] Nov; 63
5.
: 5605.
26.
Liewendahl J 1990, Assessment of thyroid status by laboratory methods : development and perspective . Scand. J. Clin. Invest. 50, 83-92.
27.
Kooistra L, S Crawford, AL Van Baar, EP Brouwers, VJ Pop. 2006, Neonatal effects of maternal hypothyroxinemia during early pregnancy, pediatrics, Jan; 117
1.
: 161-7. PMID : 16396874
28.
Kumar A, N Gupta, T Nath, JB Sharma, S Sharma, 2003, "Thyroid function tests in pregnancy" Indian, J Med Sci, Jun; 57
6.
: 252-8.PMID: 14510345
29.
Kurioka H, K Takahashi, K, Miyazki 2005, Maternal thyroid function during pregnancy perio, Endocr J. oct: 52
5.
: 584-91.PMID: 16284437
30.
Shields B, A Hill, M Bilous, B Knight.Soldin OP, D Soldin , M Sastoque 2007, Gestation- Specific thyroxine and thyroid stimulating hormone levels in the united states and word wide 2007, ther Drug Monit. Oct: 29
5.
: 553-9. PMID: 17898643.

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com