Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 79216

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2010 | Month : October | Volume : 4 | Issue : 5 | Page : 3225 - 3229 Full Version

An Uncommon Occurrence Of Acute Myeloid Leukemia In Tabriz

Published: October 1, 2010 | DOI:
Seifi S*, Asvadi Kermani A**, Asvadi Kermani I***, Dolatkhah R****

*MD,Fellowship of Hematology and Medical Oncology; **Medical Student; ***MD Professor of Hematology and Medical Oncology; ****MD, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

Correspondence Address :
Sharareh Seifi, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Ghazi Tabatabai Hospital, Tabriz/Iran
Email Address: ,
PoBox: 5166614731
Tel: +98 411 3343811-13
Fax: +98 411 3343844


Acute Myeloid Leukemia accounts about 80% of adult acute leukemias, that presents as de novo or following MDS. It shows typical clinical and cytological pattern of presentation, Hepatosplenomegaly presents in one third of the cases and Lymphadenopathy, extramedullary involvement are rarely seen.
We tried to report an uncommon occurrence of AML in a 21 y/o female who admitted in Rheumatology service as a spondylitis. She experienced low back pain , anorexia , sever weight loss , fever, tenderness of lumbar spines and head of left humorous accumpanied with limited left shoulder girdle movements, and hematocytologic and pathologic challenges were not clear enough for specific diagnosis.
The clinical and paraclinical findings of the case looked uncommon for de novo leukemia or MDS-AML. Even thought there were so many questions left without clear answer but the diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia confirmed histopathologically.


Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Liver Dysfunction, Spondylitis

Acute myeloid leukaemia is a clonal, malignant disease of the haematopoietic tissue, which is characterized by the accumulation of abnormal (leukaemic) blast cells, principally in the bone marrow, and the impaired production of normal cells.(1) AML accounts for 80 percent of the acute leukaemias in adults1. The diagnosis of AML is based on the existence of 20 percent myeloblasts in the marrow nucleated cells. The common clinical manifestations at the time of presentation are fatigue, fever, weight loss and the signs and symptoms which are related to anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and neutropaenia.(1) Organomegaly (hepatomegaly and splenomegaly) occurs in approximately one third of the patients. Lymphadenopathy is extremely uncommon, except in the monocytic variant of AML.(1) Hepatic involvement has been rarely reported and the involvement is often in the setting of obstructive jaundice and the cholestatic pattern.(2),(3) Bone involvement in AML is rare too. Only in few case reports lytic bone lesions have been described.(2),(4),(5) This report describes the clinicopathologic findings in a patient which are extremely rare for an AML presentation.

Case Report

A 21 year – old woman presented with a history of lower back pain of 1.5 months duration in association with anorexia, weight loss and fever. The back pain was not radicular. The other symptoms were unremarkable. The patient was initially febrile (T: 39 °c). During physical examination, the positive signs included: conjunctival paleness, systolic murmur in the left sternal border, hepatosplenomegaly, tenderness in the lumbar vertebra and limitation in the left shoulder joint flexion with humerus head tenderness. The patient was admitted in the rheumatology service with the impression of spondylitis secondary to brucellosis or tuberculosis or malignancy and empirical antibiotic therapy was started for the patient (ceftriaxon and vancomycin).Laboratory tests at the beginning were as below:
WBC = 8500×103/µL, Hb=7.8g/dL, PLT=193×103/µL, ESR=67, CRP=++, retic count=1.2%, serum Iron=39µg/dL , TIBC=230 µg/dL, Ferritin = 710 ng/ml, LDH=1833U/L, AST=426 U/L, ALT=329U/L, Alkaline phosphatase=479 U/L ,Total Bil= 1.4 mg/dL, direct Bil=0.5 mg/dL, Albumin=2.1 g/dL, Hepatitis Serology= negative.
In imaging studies, abdominal and pelvic ultrasound showed hepatosplenomegaly and rernarkable fluid collection in the pelvis without paraaoritc lymphadenopathy. Spiral lumbar CT scan showed a lytic lesion in the L3 vertebra with destruction of the anterior cortex and the focal hypodensity in L3. MRI of the lumbar vertebra confirmed the abnormal signals in the L3 vertebrae. Plain radiography of the shoulder also revealed the decreased density of the humerus bone and the pathological fracture of the humerus. The biopsy of the L3 vertebra was performed. The pathology report showed scattered pleomorphic cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and a high nucleocytoplasnic ratio, which was suspective of malignancy. Considering the severe anaemia and the probability of the diagnosis of malignancy, oncologic consultation was requested, which was followed by marrow aspiration and biopsy. The peripheral blood smears showed unremarkable changes in the blood cells. Aspiration of the bone marrow revealed erythroid hyperplasia with megaloblastic changes and the presence of gigantoblasts, megakaryocytic hyperplasia with dysplastic maturation and decreased iron stores. Due to these changes, congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia or metastatic marrow was considered. (Table/Fig 1)

Marrow biopsy showed cellular marrow and increased megakaryocytes, but the erythroid and the myeloid series were intact. The most probable diagnosis was that of metastatic marrow or the unusual onset of AML-M7.
Despite receiving antibiotics and supportive care, the general condition of the patient deteriorated, and in two weeks, the biochemical tests showed the declining levels of the liver transaminases (ALT=204 U/L, AST=262 U/L).Due to the acute elevation of serum ALT and AST, the gastroenterologist did not agree with the liver biopsy performance Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were repeated two weeks later. The neutrophil and platelet counts were normal, but anisopoikilocytosis and macroovalocytosis were seen in the RBCs. Marrow aspiration revealed hypercellularity, erythroid and megakaryocyte hyperplasia, megaloid changes in the erythroid and the myeloid series and the increase of blast cell numbers in some areas (5-6%). A diagnosis of acute nonlymphocytic leukaemia, most probably M6 or metastatic marrow was considered (Table/Fig 2).

The pathologist reported that the marrow biopsy consisted of leukaemic infiltration. Then, the patient was transferred to the oncology service. At this time, the patient developed icteric sclera, distended abdomen and lower extremity oedema. The laboratory tests included: WBC= 3760×103/µL, Hb=7.7g/dl, PLT=66×103/µL, Neutrophil count=2.6 ×103/µL, AST=190U/L ALT=79U/L, Alkaline Phosphatas=757 U/L, Total Bil=9.59 mg/dL, Direct Bil =5.63 mg/dL, LDH=1173U/L, Albumin=2.2U/L. Further, the ultrasound showed lymphadenopathy around the splenic vein and the head of the pancreas, splenomegaly and hepatomegaly and considerably free fluid collection in the abdomen and pelvis. Liver biopsy was performed and the pathological description revealed acute hepatitis, which was not confirmed by the second pathologist. The third peripheral blood smear demonstrated no changes in the RBCs and neutrophils, but the numbers of the platelets decreased and in the marrow aspirate, severe erythroid and myeloid hyperplasia with 5-6% myeloblasts and an increased number of megakaryocytes were seen. (Table/Fig 3)
The flowcytometry results showed the expression of the myeloid markers: CD14=48% CD13=65%, CD33=72%, CD34=13%, CD45=68% HLA-DR=62% CD11b=39% CD41=negative and glycophorin=negative. The molecular analysis for t (15), (17), inv (16) t (16, 16) and t (8), (21) showed negative results.

The general condition of the patient was declined. In a few days, leukocyte, neutrophil and platelet counts decreased. Serum bilirubin reached the level of 12mg/dl and AST and ALT levels declined (28), (94) respectively). Another bone marrow aspirate showed decrease in the erythroid, myeloid and the megakaryocyte series, with an increase in the % of myeloblasts to more than 20%. So, the diagnosis of AML was confirmed. (Table/Fig 4)

The examination of serial bone marrow aspirates in another center was described as follows:

First one: normal leukocyte and platelet counts in PBS and in the marrow aspirate, 60% cellularity with marked erythroid hyperplasia.
Second one: In PBS, neutrophils without hyper segmentation, normal platelet counts and ovalocytosis in the RBCs were seen. In the marrow aspirate, few myeloblasts were seen with severe erythroid hyperplasia. By Prussian blue staining, the iron stores were found to be low.

Third one: marrow cellularity was 65% with erythroid hyperplasia, 4-5% myeloblasts and increased numbers of megakaryocytes. In the last PBS, leukocyte and platelet counts were decreased and few myeloblasts were seen. Cellularity in the marrow aspirate was 65% and the erythroid and the megakaryocyte series were found to be decreased. Large and small myeloblasts were seen, which were characteristic of AML-M2. Due to the low performance status of the patient and marked elevation of the serum bilirubin, chemotherapy administration was impossible and she finally died due to sepsis.


In this patient, the clinical and laboratory features were unusual for AML. Anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and neutropaenia are common findings in AML at the time of presentation.(1)Anaemia is a constant feature and thrombocytopaenia is nearly always present at the time of diagnosis. Neutropenia is also present in most of the patients.(1) This patient was anaemic at presentation. In spite of multiple packed cell transfusions and without any evidence of haemolysis, the anaemia did not resolve, other blood elements (platelets and leukocytes) were in normal limits until the end stage of the disease and finally at the end, the patient developed neutropaenia and thrombocytopaenia. During the sequential examination of the bone marrow aspirates, the myeloid series were not decreased and maturation arrest was not observed but the erythroid series were hyperplastic. Considering the morphological changes of the marrow cells and the low iron stores, myelodysplastic syndrome was not considered. Other unusual findings in this patient were significant for the elevation of liver transaminase, hepatomegaly and acsites at the time of presentation. AML patients rarely present with hepatic failure (2). Liver involvement in AML is rare and often it occurs in the obstructive jaundice feature, secondary to granulocytic sarcoma(2),(3). Only in one case report, hepatic involvement was reported with the features of transaminitis (73,49)(3). In this patient, transaminase elevation was several times more than that of the normal limit. Considering negative hepatitis serology, this elevation remained ambiguous.
The pathology report revealed the sparing of the liver from leukaemic infiltration, but it was denied by the second pathologist’s report. Gradually, the transaminases declined but they never reached the normal range. On the other hand, serum direct bilirubin rose in association with increase in the ascitic fluid. Hepatosplenomegaly is seen in one third of AML patients (1),(2), and ascites at the time of presentation is unusual. This patient initially presented with ascites that increased with the progression of the disease, despite albumin administration and other supportive treatments. Repeated abdominal ultrasound revealed paraaortic lymphadenopathy in addition to ascites, which is rare for AML.(1)The other unusual presentation in AML is lytic bone lesion, which rarely has been reported(2),(5) and also skeletal lytic lesion.(5) In the setting of the lymphoid malignancy, osteolytic lesions have been described in ALL, NHL, CLL, HCL, MDS and Waldenstrom’s disease(5). Additionally, several case reports have described lytic lesions in association with acute megakaryocytic leukaemia. Our patient presented with a lytic lesion in the L3 vertebra and the head of humerus bone that led to a pathological fracture in the humerus head. But unfortunately, the L3 vertebra biopsy was not so helpful and confirmatory; the diagnosis through the mechanism leading to the lytic lesion in this patient remained obscure.
As this patient presented with anaemia, splenomegaly and mild hyperbilirubinaemia in association with hyperplasia and megaloblastic changes with gigantoblasts in the erythroid series, the diagnosis of congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia type I was proposed , but this impression was ruled out with the presentation of the lytic bone lesion, fever and progressive weight loss. AML-M6 was one of the differential diagnoses, but AML–M6a has 50% or more erythroid precursors in the nucleated population and 20% or more myeloblasts in the nonerythroid population of the marrow 2. In the same way, AML-M6b was ruled out because the marrow cells did not contain 80% immature erythroid cells. Furthermore, in flowcytometry, erythroleukaemic markers (glycophorin) were not expressed by the marrow cells. In spite of the observation of more lytic bone lesions in AML-M7, morphological changes in the marrow aspirate cells and the cell markers in flowcytometry were not in favour of AML-M7.
The reason leading to the focus in this patient was the controversy over the explanation of the rheumatologist about the diagnosis and the management of the 21-year old weak woman with back pain, fever, fatigue and weight loss of two months duration that had become questionable initially for one medical student . At first, the patient presented in the setting of a rheumatological diseases, but the unique clinical and laboratory findings in this patient were unexplainable. Despite having long years of experience in the diagnosis and the treatment of haematological diseases, the sum of all these manifestations remained an uncertainty for our hematologists and hemopathologists. Although the consensus was AML diagnosis, answer to many questions remained ambiguous.


Liesveled JL,Lichtman MA .Acute myeloid Leukemia . In: Lichtman MA , Beutlers E , Kipps TJ , Seligsohn U , Kaushansky K,Rrchal JT. Williams Hematology 2006,seventh edition , McGraw-Hill Medical,page:1183-1236.
Baer MR , Greer JP . Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Adult. In: Greer JP , Foerster J , Rodgers GM , Paraskevas F , Glader B , Arber DA, Means RT. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology 2009 , 12th Edition , Lipincott Williams& Wilkins , Page: 1843-1888.
Mathews E , Lauric T , O'Riordan K , Nabhan C. Liver Involvement with Myeloid Leukemia. Cas Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2:121-124.
Johnson JL , Moscinski L , Zuckerman K .Value of Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Staging Cancers,and an Unusual Presentation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology.2004;22(14):2968-2970.
Lima CS , Pinto Neto JV , da Cunha ML , Vassallo J , Cardinalli IA , De Souza CA . Osteolytic lesions as a presenting sign of acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologia (Budap).2000;30(4):325-31.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)