Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 77056

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesTable and Figures
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Year : 2010 | Month : December | Volume : 4 | Issue : 6 | Page : 3654 - 3658 Full Version

Evaluation Of Correlation Between Periodontitis And Rheumatoid Arthritis In An Indian Population

Published: December 1, 2010 | DOI:

*(MDS Periodontology), Reader, Dept of Periodontology, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Anjora, Durg (C.G), India; **(MDS Oral Pathology), Professor, Dept of Oral Pathology, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad (Andhra Pradesh); ***(MDS Pedodontics), Senior Lecturer, Dept of Pedodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad (Andhra Pradesh)

Correspondence Address :
Dr Farah Vakar Momin (MDS Periodontology),
Reader, Dept of Periodontology
Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Anjora, Durg (C.G), India
Cell- 9000512911


Background and Objective: Considering the hypothesis that generated a link between joint diseases and periodontitis many centuries back, and the renewed interest lately in association between periodontitis and specifically rheumatoid arthritis, this study was undertaken in an Indian population. A correlation was done between the degree of periodontal disease in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and non rheumatoid arthritis (NRA).

Materials and Methods: The study comprised of 202 subjects, who were divided into rheumatoid arthritis and non rheumatoid arthritis groups of 101 subjects each. The periodontal status was evaluated through an inclusion criteria by evaluating the probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), bleeding scores and plaque scores. The degree of periodontal disease was compared to the severity of rheumatoid arthritis.

Results: There was no statistically significant prevalence and severity of periodontal disease in the RA and NRA groups.

Interpretation and Conclusion: Thus, as per this study, RA is not a risk indicator for periodontal disease, as both these diseases were not associated significantly in the Indian population.


Rheumatoid arthritis, periodontitis, Indian population, correlation

Periodontitis is one of the most common chronic disorders in humans, which is characterized by chronic inflammation and is associated with the destruction of both the connective tissue and the alveolar bone. Most patients of periodontitis respond to bacterial invaders by mobilizing their defensive cells and releasing cytokines like interleukin-1B, tumour necrosis factor-a, and interleukin-6, which ultimately causes tissue destruction by stimulating the production of collagenolytic enzymes like matrix metalloproteinases.
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that affects several organs and it is also associated with the destruction of joint connective tissues and bones.(1) Both periodontitis and RA represent an imbalance between pro-inflammatory and cytokines anti-inflammatory cytokines, which are deemed responsible for tissue damage.(2)
Recently, there has been growing evidence suggesting an association between periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis, as both these conditions are associated with the destruction of bones(1). Possibly, a bidirectional relationship between RA and periodontitis may involve RA, thus affecting the pathogenesis of periodontitis and vice-versa (2). Still, there is possibility of a common genetic trait predisposing to both these conditions.
The literature regarding a relationship between periodontal disease and RA is controversial. Most of the studies have been carried out on non-Indian populations and are diverse in their results and conclusions (2). Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between periodontitis and RA in an Indian population.

Material and Methods

This is an observational and an analytical study, which was approved by the Ethical Committee on Human Trials. A written and informed consent was obtained from all volunteers.

The study comprised of 202 subjects, who were divided into rheumatoid arthritis and non rheumatoid arthritis groups of 101 subjects each. The periodontal status was evaluated in both these groups to determine the extent of their periodontal disease, and to correlate these findings with various indicators of rheumatoid arthritis. The indicators of RA included the number of swollen joints, the number of tender joints, pain index, RA factor and CRP titers.

The Rheumatoid arthritis group (The RA group): The patients in the RA group were diagnosed according to the Revised Criteria for the classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis of the American College of Rheumatology (3). Chronic RA patients attending a rheumatology clinic under a standard drug regimen, with duration between 1 to 25 years were selected for the study. The eligibility for participation in the study was determined by the patient’s physician, in order to ensure that the patient did not have any other condition that would modify the periodontal disease manifestations. Patients having at least 8 teeth in each jaw were included. Smokers were not specifically excluded.

The Non-rheumatoid arthritis group (The NRA group): Subjects whose age, sex and smoking status matched to the RA group, were included in the NRA group from the general population. [Table/Fig1].

(Table/Fig 1): Demographic details of patient population in the study
The periodontal status was assessed in both the RA and the NRA groups by using the following criteria:
Probing pocket depth (PPD), Clinical attachment loss (CAL 1to3), Bleeding scores and Plaque scores by using the Turesky Gilmore Index, and bone loss on periapical radiographs was assessed by using the Hugoson’s and Jordon’s Index (4) [Table/Fig 1-4].

(Table/Fig 2): PPD of 7mm in a RA patient

(Table/Fig 3): Periapical bone loss score P2 in same patient

(Table/Fig 4): PPD of 8mm in a NRA patient

(Table/Fig 5): Periapical bone loss score P3 in NRA patient

The results obtained from both the groups were subjected to statistical analysis. Missing teeth, plaque, and bleeding percentages were analyzed by using paired t tests. The difference in the radiographical bone loss scores was analyzed by the application of the Fisher’s exact test. P0 and P1 were grouped as P01 and P2 plus P3 were grouped as P02. PPD and CAL in both the groups were subjected to the Chi square test.


As the age and sex matched subjects were selected in both the study groups, the age range was 25 to 61 years, with a mean age of 43 years. The male to female ratio (M: F) in the RA and NRA groups was (1:2.4) and (1:1.8) respectively.
There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of teeth present, plaque scores and the gingival bleeding indices scores between the RA and the NRA groups (p=0.8, p=0.35 and p=0.27 respectively) (Table/Fig 6).
(Table/Fig 6): Mean values of teeth present, plaque & gingival bleeding scores
The mean PPD was higher in the RA group as compared to that in the NRA group; however, it was not statistically significant (p=0.601). Similarly, though the mean CAL in the RA group was higher than that of the NRA group, it was statistically insignificant (Table/Fig 7).

(Table/Fig 7): Mean values of periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment loss
The difference in the radiographical scores between both the groups after the application of Fisher’s exact test was not statistically significant (p=0.484) (Table/Fig 8).

(Table/Fig 8): Number of subjects with radiographic periodontal bone loss


The published studies vary widely with respect to the design, setting and the methods which are used to ascertain an association between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis. However, the strength and temporality of the association are uncertain. Well designed epidemiological studies are thus needed to be carried out, especially in the Indian population.

The average number of teeth present in both the study groups was not statistically significant. This observation is similar to the results obtained by other studies by Sjostrom et al and Mercado et al (5),(6).
The observation that the plaque scores were not significant in the RA and the NRA groups is consistent with the observations of Sjostrom et al and Mercado et al. (5),(6) Thus, the general concept that RA patients tend to have more plaque deposits because of limited dexterity (7), was not validated.

In this study, the mean bleeding score was lower in the RA group, but this observation was not statistically significant. The lower gingival bleeding score in the RA group may be due to the effect of the NSAID therapy. This result is similar to that from the study performed by Sjostrom et al.(5)

There was no significant difference in the mean PPD scores between the two groups studied. This finding is in agreement to the results of few previous studies done by Waite I M et al.(8) However, this observation is in contrast to the study results of Mercado et al6, which stated a significantly greater PPD in the RA group than in the NRA group.

The absence of significant radiographical bone loss scores in this study is in accordance with the results from the study by Sjostrom et al (5) and this finding is in contrast to the results of the study done by Mercado et al (6).


In our study, the prevalence and severity of periodontal disease was not significantly different in the RA and the NRA groups. Thus, as per this study, RA is not a risk indicator for periodontal disease, as both these diseases were not associated significantly in the Indian population.
The development of new paradigms has allowed the application of most advanced drugs in the treatment of RA. What remains to be seen is, whether the pathogenic mechanisms of these diseases are similar, and if yes, then whether these also can be used in the treatment of periodontal disease as well.


Depinder KM, Vipinder SG, Usha B. Rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis: Biological links and the emergence of dual purpose therapies. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20(1): 86-90
Eduardo de PI, Manoel BB, Carlos RJ et al. Periodontal condition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Braz. Oral Res 2008,; 22(1):
Page RC, Offenbacher S, Schroder HE et al. Advances in pathogenesis of periodontitis, Summary of developments, clinical implications and future direction. Periodontology 1997; 14: 216-247.
Offenbacher S. Periodontal diseases pathogenesis. Annal Perio 1996;1: 821-878
Sjostrom L, Laurell L, Hugoson A et al. Periodontal conditions in adults with RA. Commu Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989, 17 : 234-236
Mercado RI, Klestor AC, Bartold PM. Is there a relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontal disease. J Clinical Periodontol 2000; 27; 267-272
Feldman RS, Szeto B, Chauncey HH et al. Non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs in reduction of human alveolar bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10: 131-136.
Waite IM, Santon CA, Young et al. The periodontal status of subjects receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Jou of Perio Res 1981;16: 100-108.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)