Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18105

AbstractMaterial and MethodsCase ReportDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2011 | Month : April | Volume : 5 | Issue : 2 | Page : 364 - 366 Full Version

Secondary Cardiac Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcoma – A Case Report and Review of Literature


Published: April 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1260
SANDHYA ILANTHODI,ARAVIND PALLIPADY, JAYAPRAKASH K, FRANCIS N P MONTEIRO

Dept of Pathology, A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, India. Dept of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sandhya Ilanthodi, Faculty, Dept of Pathology, A.J. Institute of
Medical Sciences, Mangalore-575004, India.
Email: drsandhyai@rediffmail.com, Phone: +91-9611873871

Abstract

Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) is a rare and controversial tumour of the skeletal muscle phenotype. Although it has been recognized that aggressive soft tissue sarcomas may give rise to cardiac metastases, these manifestations are usually late and clinically silent, they being the prevailing findings in exceptional cases. This report describes the occurrence of a massive cardiac metastasis which was secondary to the PRMS of the lower limbs, for which the patient had undergone amputation.

This manifestation was the cause of rapidly progressive congestive heart failure and together with the unusual occurrence of autoimmune thrombocytopaenia, this led to a difficult patient care with a significantly negative influence on the outcome.

Keywords

Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma; Cardiac metastasis; Sarcomas; Metastasis

Primary cardiac tumours are rare, with an incidence of 0.0017 to 0.019% (1). It is important to note that metastatic tumours in the heart are 20 to 30 times commoner than the primary tumours (2). Approximately 200 sarcomas which primarily involved the myocardium have been recorded, 31 of which were rhabdomyosarcomas (3). The name ‘rhabdomyosarcoma’ is derived from the Greek words ‘rhabdo’, which means rod shape, and myo, which means muscle. Although Weber first described rhabdomyosarcoma in 1854, a clear histological definition was not available until 1946, when Arthur Purdy Stout recognized rhabdomyosarcoma as a distinct entity (4). Rhabdomyosarcomas are high-grade sarcomas that exhibit varying degrees of skeletal muscle differentiation. Collectively, they have accounted for 2.2% of all soft tissue tumours of the foot in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering series and 3.6% of those that were malignant (5). Although rhabdomyosarcomas may arise anywhere in the body, they occur predominantly in three regions: the head and neck, the genitourinary tract and the retroperitoneum, and in the upper and lower extremities. The head and neck is the principal location of rhabdomyosarcoma. After the head and neck, the genitourinary tract is the second most common site for rhabdomyosarcoma. Rare rhabdomyosarcomas of virtually all subtypes have also been described in the anterior mediastinum, lung, bone and skin (4). Rhabdomyosarcoma is rare in adults (6). The most common subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma which occurs in adults, however, is the pleomorphic type. Other rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes that occur rarely in adults include the predominantly juvenile alveolar and embryonal, the spindle cell subtype of the embryonal, and the rare adult clear cell and sclerosing pseudovascular subtypes (7). Each of these subtypes occur in characteristic age groups. Because of the few recorded instances and the unusually diffuse nature of the metastasis which we encountered, the following additional case is being reported.

Material and Methods

After the death of the patient, a clinical autopsy was done. All the organs were inspected thoroughly for metastatic foci. All the metastatic foci were subjected to histopathological examination, with special stains and immunohistochemistry for confirmation. Metastatic deposits were noted in the heart and the retroperitoneum. The lungs were spared of the metastases, but they showed extensive sepsis. A microscopic examination of the tumour revealed a tumour consisting of sheets of loosely arranged, haphazardly oriented, spindle shaped, large, round, pleomorphic cells with eccentric hyperchromatic nuclei and deeply eosinophilic fibrillar cytoplasm. (Table/Fig 2)

Large tad pole and racket shaped rhabdomyoblasts along with large bizarre tumour giant cells were noted. Large bizarre cells with fibrillar cytoplasm and eccentric nuclei showed desmin immunereactivity, thus suggesting a diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma. (Table/Fig 3)

The advanced age of the patient and the microscopic features with desmin immune-reactivity, helped us in identifying this tumour as pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma. The microscopic features of the retroperitoneal mass and the perirenal masses were similar to that of the cardiac mass. The gross and microscopic examination of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, spleen, pancreas, prostate, testes, thyroid, and the bone marrow showed no additional abnormality. The death was attributed to secondary cardiac pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma.

Case Report

A 55 years old man presented with a 3 week history of right-sided pleuritic chest pain, high fever, night sweats and cough with expectoration. He was extremely breathless, with poor oxygenation and his blood tests showed the presence of anaemia and thrombocytopaenia. He had undergone the amputation of the left leg 2 years back for some malignancy, for which he had no hospital recordsin his possession.

His chest X-ray showed haziness in the upper, middle and lower lobes. An ultrasonographical study of the abdomen revealed a large retroperitoneal mass which was associated with other smaller masses in the perirenal region. A trans-thoracic echocardiogram confirmed the presence of a large right ventricular mass filling the entire right ventricle. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of the abdominal mass confirmed it to be a soft tissue sarcoma. Due to extensive metastatic deposits and the poor general condition of the patient, even before further intervention, the patient succumbed to death.

Because of the diffuse nature of the metastasis, the aggrieved relatives wanted a clinical autopsy to be done, to find out the exact type of malignancy. The heart weighed 450 grams and it was occupied by a massive yellow tan-to-white, firm tumour expanding from the right ventricular wall into the cardiac cavity (Table/Fig 1).

The tumour projected into the right ventricle as a multiple pedunculated mass, measuring 2cm x 1.5cm to 3cm x 1cm, over an area of 7cm x 6cm. The myocardium which was uninvolved by the tumour, measured up to 0.5cm in thickness in the right ventricle and 2.0 cm in the left ventricle. The valves and the coronary arteries were normal. The cut surface of the pedunculated mass was fleshy, with necrotic and haemorrhagic areas. There was a retroperitoneal mass with a bosselated surface, measuring 30cm x 15cm x 8cm. The cut surface was fleshy, with areas of necrosis and haemorrhage. The perirenal metastatic deposits measured 7cm x 5cm x 4cm and were similar in appearance, both externally and on the cut surface. The cut surface of the lung showed abundant exudative material oozing out. Grossly, no metastasis was noted in the lung.

Discussion

The National Cancer Institute classified Rhabdomyosarcoma into three broad categories, which included Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma. The embryonal subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma accounts for approximately 49% of all the rhabdomyosarcomas (4). It mostly affects children who are younger than 10 years of age, but it also occurs in adolescents and young adults; it is rare in patients who are older than 40 years of age. This RMS variant arises most commonly in the soft tissue of the head and neck or in the genitourinary system; however, roughly 9% of these rhabdomyosarcomas occur in the skeletal musculature of the extremities (8). Genetic studies have identified allelic losses in the chromosomal region 11p15 in most cases of embryonal RMS (9).

Histologically, “embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma” bears a close resemblance to various stages in the embryogenesis of the normal skeletal muscle, but its pattern is much more variable, ranging from poorly differentiated tumours that are difficult to diagnose without immunohistochemical or electron microscopic examination, to well differentiated neoplasms that resemble the foetal muscle (4). Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is the second most common subtype, accounting for approximately 31% of all the rhabdomyosarcomas (8). Unlike embryonal RMS, the alveolar variant is more variable with regards to its sites of predilection. Though this neoplasm may arise in any location, almost 40% of such tumours are located in the extremities (10). There were 3 alveolar sarcomas which have been described among the 401 soft tissue tumours of the foot, which have been published in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering series (5). Alveolar RMS demonstrates a higher level of aggressiveness than the embryonal subtype. Most cases of alveolar RMS carry the genetic translocation t(2;13) and less commonly, they show the translocation t(1;13) (11). Histologically, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is composed largely of .ill-defined aggregates of poorly differentiated round or oval tumour cells that frequently show the central loss of cellular cohesion and degeneration and necrosis. In rare instances, viable cells are virtually absent, and the tumour consists merely of a coarse sieve-like or honeycomb-like meshwork of thick fibrous trabeculae surrounding small, loosely textured groups of severely degenerated cells with pyknotic nuclei and necrotic cellular debris (4).

In contrast to the embryonal and alveolar RMS, the pleomorphic variant is found exclusively in adults, most of whom are middleaged or older (12). There is a slight male predominance (12). The most common location for pleomorphic RMS is the deep soft tissue of the lower extremities; however, they may virtually arise anywhere (13). The tumour arises most commonly in the skeletal muscle of the extremities, particularly in the thigh, though rare tumours arise in the chest wall musculature, in the retro peritoneum, and in the head and neck (12), (13). PRMS usually presents with a rapidly growing painless mass with a history of several months duration, sometimes with pulmonary metastasis. However, it is interesting to note that in this case, the patient had no metastasis in the lung, when he otherwise had extensive metastasis including those in the heart. The tumours are usually large (> 10 cm), and most are fleshy, well-circumscribed, intramuscular masses with focal haemorrhage and extensive necrosis. Histologically, pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcomas can be distinguished from embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas by the association of loosely arranged, haphazardly oriented, large, round or pleomorphic cells with hyperchromaticnuclei and deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm. The presence of large bizarre tumour cells with deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm is quite helpful in arriving at the diagnosis of the pleomorphic subtype. These cells are classically immunoreactive to desmin. In embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas, there are racket-shaped and tadpoleshaped rhabdomyoblasts, but they are generally larger with more irregular outlines. Cells with cross-striations, with focal pleomorphic features, are commonly found in embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas, but these are rare in adult pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcomas (14).

The popularity of PRMS waxed and waned with the introduction of electron microscopy and the entity of malignant fibrous histiocytoma, respectively (12). Immunohistochemical antibodies were applied to these tumours in the early 1980s predominantly, by using myoglobin, desmin, creatinine kinase subunit M, and various actins to detect the skeletal muscle differentiation (15). With the exception of myoglobin, a protein which is found late in the embryonic muscle development and which requires experienced interpretation, all other antibodies were found to be nonspecific for the skeletal muscle phenotype. In the most recent decade, several researchers in their several series of experiments, have used an immunohistochemical approach to identify PRMS (12), (13), (16).

In 1993, fast myosin, a skeletal muscle-specific marker, was added to the repertoire for PRMS (12). MyoD1, the product of a gene which is activated early in myogenesis was discussed as a skeletal muscle-specific marker, but it was not applied to pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma until 1995 (16), (17). Myf4, a skeletal musclespecific myogenin, has only been studied on four cases of PRMS in the literature (17).

Metastatic heart involvement is gaining increased attention. It has been recognized that heart metastases are more common (at least 2% of all the disseminated cancers) than it was previously thought. However, secondary heart tumours, especially those arising in the context of the cardiac wall, usually remain silent and rarely gain clinical attention. Nevertheless, the obstruction of the ventricular inflow or the outflow tract may occur, and in exceptional cases, the heart involvement substantially contributes to the mechanism of death, as in our patient.

In this case, the cause for the amputation of the leg may be attributed to the primary PRMS, which had metastasized into the cardiac and the abdominal structures. This case has been presented for its unusual metastatic involvement, along with the use of immunohistochemistry for its confirmation.

References

1.
Shanmugam G. Primary cardiac sarcoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29:925 - 932.
2.
Devbhandari MP, Meraj S, Jones MJ, Kadir I, Bridgewater B. Primary cardiac sarcoma: reports of two cases and a review of current literature. J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 2:34.
3.
Fine G. Neoplasms of the pericardiurn and heart. In Pathology of the Heart and Blood Vessels. 3rd Edition. Canada: Charles C Thomas; 1968; 851-883
4.
Weiss SW, Goldblum JR, Enzinger FM. Enzinger and Weiss’s soft tissue tumors. 4th ed. Missouri: Mosby Inc.; 2001: pp 785-836.
5.
Bakotic BW, Borkowski P. Primary soft-tissue neoplasms of the foot: The clinicopathologic features of 401 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 2001; 40:28-35.
6.
Yang GCH, Tao LC. Transabdominal fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a colour atlas and monograph. 2nd Edition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. 2007. 234-285
7.
Miettinen M. Rhabdomyosarcoma in patients older than 40 years of age. Cancer 1988; 62:2060–2065
8.
Newton WA Jr, Soule EH, Hamoudi AB, Reiman HM, Shimada H, Beltangady M, et al. Histopathology of childhood sarcomas , Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma. Studies I and II:clinicopathologic correlation. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 67-75.
9.
Koufos A, Hansen MF, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Lampkin BC, Cavenee WK: Loss of heterozygosity in three embryonal tumours suggests a common pathogenetic mechanism. Nature 1985; 316:330-334.
10.
Harms D. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a prognostically unfavorable rhabdomyosarcoma type and its necessary distinction from embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Curr Top Pathol 1995; 89:273-296.
11.
Barr FG. Molecular genetics and pathogenesis of rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1997; 19:483-491.
12.
Gaffney EF, Devan PA, Fletcher CDM. Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adulthood: analysis of 11 cases with definition of diagnostic criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:601-607.
13.
Schurch W, Begin LR, Seemayer TA, Legace R, Boivin JC, Lamoureux C, et al. Pleomorphic soft tissue myogenic sarcomas of adulthood. A reappraisal in the mid-1990’s. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20(2):131- 147.
14.
Kodet R, Newton WA Jr, Hamoudi AB, Asmar L, Jacobs DL, Maurer HM. Childhood rhabdomyosarcoma with anaplastic (pleomorphic) features: .a report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17(5):443-53.
15.
Enzinger PM, Shiraki M. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: an analysis of 110 cases. Cancer 1969; 24:18-31.
16.
Wesche WA, Fletcher CDM,
17.
Dias P, Houghton PJ, Parham DM. Immunohistochemistry of myoD1 in adult pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19(3):261-269. Dias P, Parham DM, Shapiro DN, Tapscott ST, Houghton PJ. Monoclonal antibodies to the myogenic regulatory protein myoD1: epitope mapping a diagnostic utility. Cancer Research 1992;52:6431-6439.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1260

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com