Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 30938

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionReferencesTable and FiguresDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2011 | Month : December | Volume : 5 | Issue : 8 | Page : 1672 - 1673 Full Version

Cervical Aplasia

Published: December 1, 2011 | DOI:
Annie Rajaratnam, Prema D’cunha, Nancy Paul, Amitha Ray

1. M.D ( Obs & Gyn ) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Father Muller Medical College, Kankanady, Mangalore- 575002, India. 2. M.D ( Obs & Gyn ) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Father Muller Medical College, Kankanady, Mangalore- 575002, India. 3. MBBS, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Father Muller Medical College, Kankanady, Mangalore- 575002, India. 4. M.D ( Obs & Gyn ) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Father Muller Medical College, Kankanady, Mangalore- 575002, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Annie Rajaratnam M.D (Obs & Gyn)
Assistant Professor,
Block B, Flat No: 4,
Father Muller Staff Quarters,
Kankanady, Mangalore- 575002
Phone: 9449525915


The incidence of genital malformations in the general population is 3-5%. Ours was a case of cervical aplasia. Our objective was to confirm the diagnosis and to manage the same surgically. It is essential that these patients receive psychological support as it has implications on their reproductive life. This case was referred to our tertiary care teaching hospital. After investigations and examination under anaesthesia, the patient underwent hysterectomy. Obstructive anomalies of the genital tract are the commonest among the mullerian duct malformations.


Cervical aplasia, Mullerian malformation

Müllerian agenesis is a congenital malformation in women which is characterized by a failure of the müllerian ducts to develop, resulting in an absent uterus, fallopian tubes and variable malformations of the upper portion of the vagina. It is the second most common cause of primary amenorrhoea after gonadal failure. Various modalities of treatment have been adopted, including anatomical reconstruction surgeries, IVF or embryo transfer to a gestational carrier.

Case Report

A 30 year old nulligravida presented with primary amenorrhoea and cyclical abdominal pain for the past two years, which increased since three months. At the age of seventeen, she was investigated for primary amenorrhoea and was diagnosed to have a hypoplastic uterus with lower genital tract obstruction. She underwent a surgery for resection of the transverse vaginal septum, but continued to be amemorrhoeic. She got married a year later and the couple had no coital problems. On examination, She was well built and had normal secondary sexual characters normal secondary sexual characters. Her thyroid and breast were normal. Her per abdomen examination revealed a suprapubic mass which arose from the pelvis, which corresponding to a 20 week sized gravid uterus. There was no other mass or free fluid in the abdomen. Her external genitalia appeared to be normal. Her vagina admitted two fingers and ended blindly and the cervix was not felt. A transverse septum was felt at the upper part of the vagina. Her ultrasound scan revealed a large haematometra and her cervix was not visualized. The right fallopian tube was grossly distended and the right ovary was cystic. The left ovary was normal. Both her kidneys were normal. Hb was 12gm % and creatinine was 0.8. The patient was posted for EUA (examination under anaesthesia) and the per vaginal findings were confirmed. She underwent laparotomy which showed these per operative findings: the uterus was soft and cystic, which corresponded to 20 weeks of gestation. The lower part of the uterus ended as a dense fibrous band which was adherent to the apex of the vagina (Table/Fig 1). The band was probed and was Case Report found to be non-canalized. The right tube showed haematosalphinx and the right ovary showed multiple cysts


In the general female population, genital malformations occur with an incidence of 1%–5%, in groups of patients with infertility up to 6.5% (1),(2),(3),(4),(5). The aetiology is possibly due to an aberrant developmental inhibition of the Mullerian ducts during embryogenesis. Various genetic factors have been investigated, but there is no conclusive evidence about the aetiology of any type of malformation (6),(7),(8). The Vagina, Cervix, Uterus, Adnexa and Associated Malformation (VCUAM) classification which was designed for easy clinical use, makes it possible to record all the anatomic malformations and associated abnormalities separately. This is important particularly for the description of syndromes with genital involvement (9). The congenital absence of the cervix is relatively infrequent and it occurs in 1 in 80,000 to 100,000 births. It is associated with partial or complete vaginal aplasia and renal anomalies (10). Agenesis of the cervix presents a diagnostic challenge to the gynaecologist. Ultrasound and MRI ( Magnetic Resonance Imaging ) with pelvic examination under anaesthesia help in confirming the diagnosis. An early diagnosis offers effective presurgical planning and preparation. Patient counselling should be initiated before the treatment. Two basic categories of cervix anomalies have been observed. 1. The first type is cervical aplasia ie. lack of the uterine cervix , with the lower uterine segment which narrows to terminate in a peritoneal sleeve at the vaginal apex. 2. The second type of cervix dysgenesis is where the endocervical glands are seen on pathological examination. It has four subtypes Many authors recommended hysterectomy for cervical agenesis with a functioning uterine corpus, to eliminate problems such as sepsis, cryptomennorrhoea, endometriosis and multiple surgeries (11),(12). With the recent advances in the reproductive medicine and laparoscopic surgical techniques, conservative surgery is a possibility and perhaps should be considered as the first-line treatment option (13). Peritoneal grafts for the reconstruction of the cervix was reported by Alborzi S (14). The canalization procedures are worthwhile in cases with adequate stroma to allow cervicovaginal anastamosis (15),(16). With the advances in reproductive medicine, pregnancy with IVF (in vitro fertilization) and embryo transfer is possible. However, the management modalities can vary from one institution to another, but we concluded that the treatment of choice should be hysterectomy, coupled with a psychological component. The development of extreme anxiety about the patient’s femininity and a distortion of her physical image can affect her self-esteem. The psychological adjustment and general attitude are also very important in deciding as to what procedure should be used and when it should be done as per the updated protocol by Lindenman. E et al (17). Ultimately, the best surgical approach requires a discussion on the post-operative complications, the degree of cervical abnormality and the patient’s desired treatment outcome. Whether the patient desires definitive treatment with a hysterectomy or whether she wants to pursue a patent outflow tract and the possibility of future childbearing when she is anatomically appropriate, evidence-based medicine must become the source for the surgical strategies (16).


Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among the subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998;43: 877–87.
Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. The reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277–81.
Marten K, Vosshenrich R, Funke M, Obenauer S, Baum F, Grabbe E. MRI for the evaluation of müllerian duct anomalies. Clin Imaging. 2003;27:346–50.
Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, Rubin A, Hill M, O’Donnell R, et al. Prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies which were detected by ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 2000;94:9–12.
Acien P. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1372–76.
Lee DM, Osathanondh R, Yeh J. Localization of Bcl-2 in the human fetal müllerian tract. Fertil Steril 1998;70:135–40.
Oppelt P, Strissel PL, Kellermann A, Seeber S, Humeny A, Beckmann MW, et al. DNA sequence variations of the entire anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) gene promoter and AMH protein expression in patients with the Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 2004;20:149–57.
Simpson JL. Genetics of the female reproductive ducts. Am J Med Genet 1999;89:224–39.
Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel P, Strick R, Oppelt PG, et al. The VCUAM (vagina cervix uterus adnex-associated malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1493–97.
Suganuma N, Furuhashi M, Moriwaki T, Tsukahara S, Ando T, Ishihara Y. Management of missed abortion in a patient with congenital cervical atresia. Fertil Steril 2002;77:1071–73.
Rock JA, Schlaff WD, Zacur HA, Jones HW Jr. The clinical management of the congenital absence of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1984;22:231–35.
Hampton HL. Role of the gynaecologic surgeon in the management of urogenital anomalies in adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 1990;2:812–18.
Grimbizis GF, Tsalikis T, Mikos T, Papadopoulos N, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN. Successful end-to-end cervico-cervical anastomosis in a patient with congenital cervical fragmentation: a case report. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1204–10.
Alborzi S, Momtahan M, Parsanezhad ME, Yazdani M. Successful treatment of cervical aplasia by using a peritoneal graft. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Mar; 88(3):299-302.
Daraï E, Ballester M, Bazot M, Paniel B–J. Laparoscopic–assisted uterovaginal anastomosis for uterine cervix atresia with partial vaginal aplasia. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology. January 2009; 16(1): 92-94.
Roberts, Carla P.A, Rock, John A.B Surgical methods in the treatment of congenital anomalies of the uterine cervix. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. August 2011;23(4): 251–57.
Lindenman E, Shepard MK, Pescovitz OH. Mullerian agenesis: An update. Obstet Gynaecol 1997;90:307–11.

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)