Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 54068

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
Knowledge is treasure of a wise man. The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help ones reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journalsNo manuscriptsNo authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : November | Volume : 5 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1219 - 1223 Full Version

A descriptive Study on the Sex Ratio at Birth in Institutional Deliveries at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

Published: November 1, 2011 | DOI:
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Dinesh Kumar Pal, Rajesh Tiwari, Prashant Gupta, Lokesh Agrawal, Radha Sarawagi

Corresponding Author M.D, Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. Email : MD, Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. Email : BHMS, Trainee of the course, post graduate diploma in clinical research (PGDCR) at Indian Institute of Public Health Delhi, India. Email : Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Cuddalore Main Road Pillayarkuppam Pondicherry, India. Email- M.D, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Cuddalore Main Road Pillaiyarkuppam Pondicherry, India. Email :

Correspondence Address :
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine,
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute,
Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam Pondicherry, India.
Ph. : Mobile: +91-7639656802, +91-7639656801
Fax : +91-4132615457
Email :


Background and Objectives: The sex ratio at birth and the sex ratio in the population should remain constant without manipulation. However, several parts of the world, particularly some Asian countries including India, have shown a low sex ratio at birth due to the preference for a son and due to sex selective abortion. The objectives of our study were, to find out the sex ratio at birth in institutional deliveries and the factors which were associated with a low sex ratio.

Methods and Material: In the present study, the secondary sex ratio was analyzed from the birth records of all the deliveries which were conducted at the Medical College Hospital and Elgin Hospital, Jabalpur, during the period from January 1st 2008 to December 31st 2008.

Results: During the study period, 5967 institutional deliveries took place, of which 2807 were female births, thus giving an overall sex ratio of 888.

Conclusion: In our study, a trend towards a higher sex ratio was seen with a higher educational status. The sex ratio was lower in the rural population and it decreased with parity.


Sex ratio, Institutional delivery, Literacy Rate, Parity, Religion.

The sex ratio at birth (SRB) is an important demographic indicator that was initially studied in the late 17th century(1). The sex composition of a population is determined, in part, by the number of male births which are relative to the number of female births. In humans, the sex ratio at birth is commonly assumed to be 100 boys to 105 girls (which is sometimes shortened to “a ratio of 105”). However, the sex ratios at birth or among infants may be considerably skewed by sex-selective abortion and infanticide. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has estimated that the current world wide sex ratio at birth is 107 boys to 100 girls (2).

The sex ratio at birth also affects the critical demographic measures, for example, the ‘‘doubling-time’’ of a population increases as the ratio of males to females at birth increases (3),(4). The data on the sex ratio at birth is necessary to understand the trends in infant morbidity like low birth weight and mortality, since male infants are more susceptible to illness and have higher infant mortality rates than females (5),(6),(7).

Rising sex ratios in India have been recorded since the early 1980s, and have since continued increasing alarmingly. The impact of this early rise is already visible among the adult population of several Indian districts (8). The sex ratio at birth which is biased against female births can result in a gender imbalance, which in turn can have grave implications on the society in the form of lack of marriage-ability of the excess male population, thus resulting in social unrest, a demand driven increase in prostitution, kidnappings of women, etc (9),(10).

The sex ratio at birth can be affected by sex-selectivity at birth (11). The SRB for India for the period from 2004-06 (3 years average) has been estimated to be 892. It varies from 895 in the rural areas to 881 in the urban areas. In the rural areas, the highest and lowest SRBs are in the states of Tamil Nadu (970) and Delhi (810)respectively. The SRB in the urban areas varies from 962 in Kerala to 800 in Punjab (12).

The various factors which are associated with declining sex ratios are social, economic and cultural in nature. Health institutions represent the health related behaviour of the population. It was thought that the sex ratio at birth would give some idea about the overall picture of the sex ratio in the society.

Material and Methods

This study was undertaken at the Medical College Hospital and the Elgin Hospital which are tertiary care government teaching hospitals in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh (MP), to find out the sex ratio at birth in institutional deliveries. It was a retrospective, record based, observational study. The birth records of all the deliveries which were conducted at the above mentioned institutes during the study period were analyzed by using the study variables i.e. literacy rate, religion, parity and residential status.

Statistical analysis:
The sex ratio at birth and the factors which were associated with them were analyzed by using the Chi square (c2) test of significance. The F-test statistics, Mcnemar‘s test and ANOVA were applied wherever they were relevant. The 5% and 1% levels of significance were used.

Ethical clearance:
The ethical clearance for conducting the study was taken from the ethical committee of the institution i.e. NSCB Medical College and Elgin Hospital, Jabalpur, with the assurance that confidentiality would be maintained and that the information which was obtained for this study would not be used for any other purpose except for academic purposes.


In the present study, a total of 5967 deliveries took place in these hospitals, with 3160 male and 2807 female births, giving an overall sex ratio of 888. More than 80% mothers belonged to 20-29 year age group, from rural as well as urban areas(Table/Fig 1).

Nearly 1/4th of the mothers were illiterate. The level of literacy was relatively low among the mothers from the rural areas.(Table/Fig 2) A majority of the mothers who came from the urban (88.19%) and rural (89.93%) areas were Hindus. (Table/Fig 3).

The sex ratio was highly dependent on the literacy status, which was statistically significant (p< 0.01), showing a high degree of negative correlation.(Table/Fig 4).

The highest sex ratio at birth was observed among Christians (1178), followed by Muslims (953) and Hindus (879). These variations among different religions was due to chance, but they were statistically not significant (Table/Fig 5).

The sex ratio at birth was 909 for urban mothers and it was 820 for rural mothers, which showed high statistical significance (p< 0.01). There was a significant and negative correlation of SRB with the rural population. (Table/Fig 6).

There were 926 females per 1000 males for the 1st birth order, but the sex ratio was unfavourable towards females in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th birth orders. (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).


In our study, we tried to investigate the influence of various factors such as parity, female literacy, religion and rural and urban background on the sex ratio at birth.

In the present study, the SRB (888) was found to be below the national average in this study, but the SRB for the first born child was close to the national average. As per the census of the year 2001, the sex ratio in India was 933 per 1000 boys, where it was 976 in 1961, just four decades back. The sex ratio in Madhya Pradesh was 919 per 1000 males, which was much below the national average of 933. According to NFHS 3, there was an accelerated decline in the sex ratio at birth from 1993-97 to 2000-04 (13), (14).

More than four fifth of the mothers belonged to the 20-29 year age group, who were from rural as well as urban areas. 24.79% of the mothers were found to be illiterate in the present study. The level of literacy was relatively low among the mothers from rural areas. According to the census of the year 2001, the female literacy in MP was 50.28% and in Jabalpur, it was 59.47 % (13). The National Family Health Survey-II (NFHS-II) revealed that the maximum population (77.8%) in the rural area of Madhya Pradesh (M.P.) was illiterate and that only 5% had attained education up to class five (15). The literacy rate in our study population was higher. This could be explained by the fact that both the hospitals which were involved in the study were tertiary care hospitals and that the patient population did not represent the whole community.

The analysis showed that the SRB was lowest among the illiterate population [863 girls per 1000 boys] and that it increased with the increasing educational status of the women. The highest SRB was seen among those with education up to the higher secondary level [944 girls per 1000 boys]. However, there was a decrease in the SRB among women with undergraduate education or above [902 girls per 1000 boys]. A similar observation was also made in other studies from India (9),(16). This could be explained by the fact that the women with higher education opted more for sex selectiondue to the preference for a son and a small family size. The NFHS III data also showed that 56% of the women and 59% of the men considered the ideal family size to be two children or less, but that there was a consistent preference for sons over daughters among both women and men. About one- third of the women and onequarter of the men wanted more sons than daughters, but only 2% wanted more daughters than sons (17). It showed that though female education could lead to some decrease in the gender disparities, it was not enough. Hence, with increased female education, there hadto be an increased awareness regarding the adverse consequences of the declining sex ration, particularly among females.

The highest sex ratio at birth was observed in Christians, followed by Muslims and Hindus Similar findings are noted in some other studies (8),(18),(19). It showed that the religion and cultural background influenced the preference for sons, which resulted in decreased SRB.

The sex ratio at birth was 909 for urban mothers and it was 820 for rural mothers. In institutional deliveries, the sex ratio at birth was low in both urban and rural areas as compared to the state average. Studies by other groups also showed that the preference for a son and the discrimination against the girl child were common among the rural population and that it mainly arose out of social attitudes and the society’s prejudices, myths and beliefs. The preference for a son has two pronounced and predictable family-level effects on the sex composition of children who were ever born. It could be explained that smaller families had a significantly higher proportion of sons than the larger families and that socially and economically disadvantaged couples not only wanted but also attained a higher proportion of sons, if the effects of the family size are controlled.

A low sex ratio at birth in the rural areas was a point of concern. It possibly reflected an increased access of prenatal diagnostic techniques among the rural population who were possibly more biased against women due to an agriculture based male dominant society (20),(21).

There was a decline in the SRB from the 2nd birth onwards. The variation of SRB with the birth order (or parity) was seen in Asia and in all the other countries where the SRB was increased. It showed that after the first child, a large number of couples availed of the prenatal techniques for sex selection. Similar findings were observed in other studies (16),(17).


An extremely complex situation is existent regarding the sex ratio at birth in India due to diverse demographic, cultural, and socio economic factors. These have shown a variable influence over the sex ratio in different studies. It is necessary to understand these complex mechanisms before making policies and planning to decrease the gender discrimination.

The effective implementation of a legislation which prevents sex selective abortion should be combined with education with respect to the declining sex ratio and its future consequences. All forms of gender inequality with equal social and economic rights for males and females, including the rights of inheritance, need to be addressed, to strike at the causes for the declining sex ratio. The PCPNDT Act should be effectively implemented, so as to discourage sex selective abortion. The mass media, both print and electronic, should be utilized and community organizations should be mobilized to disseminate the relevant information to prevent female foeticide. The IEC strategy must include celebrity women from different aspects of life. In addition, further studies are recommended to explore the reasons of the unhealthy sex ratio at birth. The women folk from the general population, especially those from the rural areas where two thirds of the Indian population reside and access to information is still a challenge, should be targeted to be educated, which could make both the men and women accept more female births.

Study limitations:
The present study was conducted at two tertiary care hospitals and the patient population did not represent the whole community. Hence, it was not possible to elicit the actual reasons for the preference of sons by a large section of the society.


Graunt J. Natural and political observations on the bills of mortality. London. 1662.
“CIA Fact Book”.The Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. Available at geos/xx.html.
Markle GE. Sex ratio at birth: values, variance, and some determinants. Demography. 1974; 11(1):131–42.
Petersen W, Petersen R. Dictionary of demography: terms, concepts, and institutions. New York: Greenwood Press, Inc. 1986.
Stevenson DK, Verter J, Fanaroff AA, et al. Sex differences in the outcomes of very low birth weight infants: the newborn male disadvantage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000; 83(3):182–5.
Mathews TJ, Menacker F, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2002 period linked birth/infant death data set. National Vital Statistics Reports; Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 2004; 53(!0).
Getahun D, Amre D, Rhoads GG, Demissie K. Maternal and obstetric risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(4):646–52
Guilmoto C Z: Characteristics of the sex- ratio imbalance in India and future scenarios. Available at india.pdf
Mitra S. What explains the sex ratio at birth? An exploration into the root causes (July 13, 2007). Available at SSRN [social science research network]: [last retrieved on 2011 Jan 10]
Hesketh T, Xing ZW. Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(36):13271-5.
Park K. Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine 20th ed Jabalpur India Bhanot Publication; 2009.
Govt. of India (2007), Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2008, Report No. 4 of 2007
Office of the Registrar General (2003), India. Available at http://censusindia. pdf
The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005-06 Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in India. Available at http://www.
The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA); Government of India, Ministry of Rural Development; Department of Rural Development; Available from: BPL_AC_Photo_1733.html[last accessed on 2009 Nov 26]
Varghese J, Aruldas V, Jeemon P. Analysis of the trends in the sex ratio at birth of hospitalised deliveries in the state of Delhi. Available at http:// trends%20in%20sex%20ratio%20at%20birth.pdf [last accessed on 2011 Jan 10]
The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005-06. Fertility and fertility preferences. Available at NFHS-3-Chapter-04-Fertility-and-Fertility-Preferences.pdf [last accessed on 2011 Jan 10]
Bhat PN, Zavier AJ. Fertility bias and gender decline in northern India. Demography. 2003 ;40(4):637-57.
Lane T. In India, the son preference declines with an ideal family size, but it remains strong. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2004; 30(2).
Bandyopadhyay M. Missing girls and son preference in rural India: looking beyond popular myths. Health Care Women Int. 2003; 24(10): 910-26.
Varma1 GR, Babu BV. Son preference and desired family size in a rural community of the west Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India .J. Soc. Sci., 2007;15(1): 59-64

DOI and Others


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)