
Isolated “Blow Out” Jejunal Perforation Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma- Experience of Two Cases
Correspondence Address :
B V Goudar
Associate Professor, Dept. of Surgery,
SN Medical College and HSK Hospital,
Bagalkot, Karnataka, India-587101.
Telephone: +918354-235400
E-mail: drbvgoudar@yahoo.co.in
Small bowel injury following blunt abdominal trauma has been widely reported. Isolated jejunal perforation which is caused by blunt abdominal trauma is rare and is most often seen in road traffic accidents. Here, we present two cases of isolated jejunal perforation due to raised intra abdominal pressure in the form of abdominal tightening by the dhoti after it was caught in the belt of an engine and a fall from the stairs while stepping down. Explorative laparotomy revealed the slit-like perforation on the anti mesenteric border. Early surgical intervention led to good recovery in both the cases. A high index of suspicion, repeated clinical examination and the proper utilization of investigational tools definitely helped us in managing these kinds of rare cases.
Jejunum, Perforation, Blunt Trauma
Introduction
Small bowel injury following blunt abdominal trauma is the commonest presentation in road traffic accidents. The isolated blowout perforation of the jejunum is extremely rare. We came across two cases of isolated jejunal perforations following blunt abdominal injury during 2010–2011 in our hospital.
Samuel Annan reported the first case of intestinal perforation following blunt abdominal trauma in 1837 (1). Punctate or slit like perforations often occurring on the anti mesenteric border are probably the consequence of a sudden increase in the intraluminal pressure in a fluid or air filled loop. Robbs et al. (2), in 1980, reported five such lesions in Zulu tribesmen, which were mostly caused by a blow to the abdomen with a heavy, round-headed weapon. These perforations were not surrounded by damaged tissue and did not appear to result from a crushing type injury (2), (3). They are referred to as “blowout” perforations. These perforations may be missed initially and may become apparent around three days after the injury (4). or bowel ischaemia which is secondary to contusion, leading to stricture and delayed perforation occurs after 4 weeks. The two cases were reported almost 2 months following blunt abdominal trauma (5).
CASE-1
A 34-year old male patient was admitted to the hospital with intense abdominal pain after his dhoti was caught in the wheel belt of the engine while working in the field. Bruise marks were noted in the flanks. Palpation revealed tenderness and guarding all over the abdomen. Liver dullness was obliterated and free fluid was noted. Bowel sounds were absent. His blood parameters were normal. The erect abdomen showed gas under the diaphragm. Ultrasound of the abdomen revealed free fluid in the peritoneum. Written informed consent was obtained from him.
Laparotomy revealed bile stained fluid and an isolated perforation which was sized 2cms in the jejunum, on the anti mesenteric border,25 cms distal to the ligament of Treitz was seen (Table/Fig 1). The rest of the bowel and other organs were normal. The perforation was closed primarily. The postoperative course was uneventful.
CASE-2
A 45-year old female patient was admitted to the hospital with a history of fall from the stairs. The patient had intense abdominal pain and vomiting. The patient was in hypotension and had tachycardia. Her abdomen was slightly distended and tenderness was present. Her blood parameters revealed leucocytosis. The erect X –ray of the abdomen did not show free gas (Table/Fig 2), but ultrasonography and CT revealed free gas and fluid in the peritoneum (Table/Fig 3). The patient consented for the surgery.
The laparotomy of the patient showed isolated jejunal perforation with bile stained fluid. The perforation was along the longitudinal axis of the anti mesenteric border and 20cms away from the ligament of Treitz. No other injury was seen. The ruptured jejunum was sutured primarily.
Seventy-five percent of the blunt abdominal trauma cases are caused by motor vehicle accidents (1). Although small bowel injuries have been reported to be the third most common injuries in blunt abdominal trauma, they occur in less than 1% of the blunt trauma patients (6), (7). The mechanisms of small bowel injuries with blunt trauma include shearing forces, compression between the abdominal wall and the vertebral column and bursting injury due to a sudden increase in the intraluminal pressure. The isolated “blowout type” of rupture of the jejunum following constriction by a dhoti or fall from the stairs is extremely uncommon. This leads to a sudden increase in the intra-abdominal pressure, which in association with a full stomach, can lead to this kind of perforation. A similar mechanism of small bowel injury was caused by physical assault (8) and knee kick (9) during a game of foot ball.
Physical examination is not adequate on its own for the diagnosis of such cases, and it was found to be reliable in only 30% of the blunt trauma cases (7). Fakhry et al (10) observed that 67.7% out of 198 patients with blunt small bowel injury, initially presented with signs or symptoms which were highly suggestive of perforative peritonitis and 84.3% were taken to the operating room without delay. X rayof the erect abdomen, USG, diagnostic peritoneal lavage and CT of the abdomen are most commonly used diagnostic aids other than physical examination. In the first case, the diagnosis of the hollow viscous perforation was not problematic, but in the other case, the persistent physical findings forced us to opt for CT of the abdomen. CT of the abdomen definitely helped us in the diagnosis. According to Burney et al (11), peritoneal lavage has proven to be sensitive for the demonstration of the haemoperitoneum, but it was found to be less reliable in the early diagnosis of intestinal injuries. The gold standard for the assessment of blunt trauma diagnosis is C T scanning, with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 94% (12). In recent times, laparoscopy has played an important role in the diagnosis as well as in the treatment of blunt abdominal trauma. Diagnostic laparoscopy should be preferred instead of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in relatively haemodynamically stable patients. Most of the patients will be having punctuate or slit like perforations on the anti mesenteric border and so, ideally they require laparotomy and the primary closure of the perforation, with peritoneal lavage. Now, with the advent of laparoscopy, it is possible to close the perforation by using endosutures or staplers (13). Small bowel perforation has low mortality and complication rates if it is treated before 24 hours after the injury (8). Delayed jejunal perforation is often associated with high mortality and morbidity. Since 1990, 9 cases of isolated jejunal perforations have been reported (Table/Fig 4), but the nature of the injury which was seen in our cases was different.
Clinical observation was not sufficient to justify the diagnosis and so the pre operative diagnosis of isolated jejunal perforation was definitely challenging. A high index of suspicion, repeated clinical examinations and the utilization of imaging modalities really helped us to diagnose these kinds of clinical entities.
We would like to thank Dr A S Mallapur, Principal and Dr E B Kalburgi Professor and Head, Dept. of Surgery, S N Medical College and HSK Hospital, Bagalkot for the valuable support that they rendered for preparing this article.
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
- Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
- Academic Search Complete Database
- Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- Embase
- EBSCOhost
- Google Scholar
- HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
- Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
- Journal seek Database
- Popline (reproductive health literature)
- www.omnimedicalsearch.com