Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 42829

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : December | Volume : 5 | Issue : 8 | Page : 1614 - 1617 Full Version

Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Solid Intramedullary Interlocking Nail in the Lower Extremity: An Observational Study from Western Nepal

Published: December 1, 2011 | DOI:
Manoj Kumar Chakraborty, Pabin Thapa, Brijesh Sathian

1. Prof & HOD, Orthopedics Department, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. 2. PG 2nd Resident, Orthopedics Department, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. 3. Assistant Professor & Managing Editor in Chief NJE, Dept. of Community Medicine, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.

Correspondence Address :
Manoj Kumar Chakraborty
Prof&HOD, Orthopedics Department, Manipal College of
Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Phone: 00977-9726155900


Background: Intramedullary nail fixation has become the standard of treatment for both femoral and tibial shaft fractures. It functions as internal splints that allow secondary fracture healing. The axial and rotational stability of the conventional hollow interlocking nails depends primarily on the locking screws. Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) was formed in 1999, with the vision of creating an equality of fracture care throughout the world. This system has been utilized at a variety of facilities in low income countries throughout the world.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of SIGN nailing in the long bones of the lower extremity.

Method and Materials: This was a hospital based, retrospective study which was conducted in the Orthopedics Department of the Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal between May, 2010 and August, 2011. A total of 24 cases with fractures of the femur and the tibia were studied. Both closed and open types of fractures were included and the fracture fixation was done by using SIGN interlocking solid nails and instrumentation. The analysis was done by using descriptive statistics and the testing of the hypothesis. The data was analyzed by using Excel 2003, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows Version 16.0 (SPSS Inc; Chicago, IL, USA) and the EPI Info 3.5.1 Windows Version.

Results: Out of the 24 patients, 16 (66.7%) were males and 8 (33.3%) were females. The average age of the patients was 29.58, with a range of 13-60 years. An intramedullary interlocking SIGN nail was performed in 18 (75%) tibial and 6 (25 %) femoral fractures, with 41.7 % being right sided and 58.3% being left sided. The types of fractures which were included were closed= 66.67 % and open fractures= 33.33%. According to the Gustilo- Anderson classification, 4.17 % were Gustilo I, 25 % were Gustilo II and 4.17 % were Gustilo III a. Open reduction was done in 58.3 % and closed reduction was done in 41.7 % of the cases. Reaming was done in all the cases and no post-operative infections were noted. There was a significant relationship between the type of fracture and factors like the affected side, the method of the fracture reduction and the location of the fracture.

Conclusion: The SIGN solid intramedullary interlocking nail shows promising results in comparison to the hollow nail because of its better strength, better accuracy in distal locking and surprisingly better results in infection and non-union


SIGN , tibia, femoral, Nepal

Fractures which involve the shaft of the long bones are common worldwide. The methods which are used to achieve skeletal stabilization could vary considerably. These long-bone fractures in the femur and the tibia may be treated with external splints: Plaster of Paris, Fiber cast, external fixation (fixator), and skin traction or internal splints: Rush nails, Kuntschner nails, plates, and screws, in addition to interlocking nails (1).The intramedullary nail or rod is commonly used for long-bone fracture fixation and it has become the standard treatment for most of the long-bone diaphyseal and selected metaphyseal fractures. Intramedullary nails function as internal splints that allow secondary fracture healing (2). The axial and rotational stability of the conventional hollow interlocking nails depends primarily on the locking screws (3).

Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) was formed in 1999, with a vision of creating an equality of fracture care throughout the world. While this system has been utilized at a variety of facilities in low income countries throughout the world, the SIGN techniques and implants have also been used in the settings of disaster relief (4),(5).

The SIGN solid, stainless steel nail was designed for use in the tibia and it is strong enough for slots rather than holes, to accommodate the interlocking screw. The nail is straight but the proximal and distal ends of the nail have a 9 and 1.5 degree apex posterior bend, respectively. The nail is also used for femoral intramedullary (IM) nailing and these 2 bends create an effective radius of curvature which closely approximates that of the normal human femur. There are 4 iterations of the interlocking screw which broke in less than 0.5% of the SIGN interlocking nail surgeries (6).Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of SIGN interlocking nailing in the long bones of the lower extremity.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital based, retrospective study which was conducted in the Orthopedics Department of the Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal, between May, 2010 and August, 2011. A total of 24 cases with shaft fractures of the femur and the tibia were studied. Patients with closed and open fractures were included. The fracture fixation was performed by using SIGN interlocking nails and instrumentation, which was donated by the SIGN organization of RICHLAND, WA, USA for poor people.

The closed tibial and femur fractures were managed in the Emergency Department by immobilizing the fractures with a posterior slab of plaster of Paris for the tibia and a Thomas splint with skin traction for the femur. All the necessary investigations were sent and the patients were then admitted.

All cases of open fracture were resuscitated in the Casualty Department. After the wound inspection, a sterilized dressing was applied and the fracture site was splinted. Anti tetanus toxoid, antibiotics and analgesics were given and the required investigations were sent. The patients were shifted to the emergency operation theater where the fractures were evaluated and the wounds were assessed on the basis of the Gustilo- Anderson classification and were managed accordingly. Most of the fractures were irrigated by using about 3-6 liters of 0.9% normal saline and they were managed by using 1st generation cephalosporin and aminoglycosides which were added to the contaminated wounds.

Plain radiographs were taken preoperatively in the Radiology Department to determine the fracture configuration and its suitability for the interlocking nail insertion. Also, radiographs were taken postoperatively to determine the position of the SIGN nail and the locking screws. The SIGN nails were inserted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the nails were statically locked, but not all the possible screw holes were used.

All the patients had a similar postoperative regime. In stable fractures, early weight-bearing as tolerated, was recommended. The weight-bearing was determined by the stability of the fracture. The time to achieve full weight-bearing was significantly delayed in the high-energy and the open fractures. No cast or brace was applied and the patients were discharged after the suture was removed after 14 days. The analysis of the outcome of the treatment with respect to the time of the fracture union and the presence of complications was performed. The fracture union was assessed clinically and radiologically at 6 weeks and at monthly intervals. The clinical criteria of the union included the absence of pain and local tenderness on stressing the fracture site or on full weight bearing on the operated limb. The radiological healing of the fracture was defined as the presence of a callus around the fracture circumference with a density which was similar to that of the adjacent cortex, or the obliteration of the fracture line, whichever was earlier. The healing of the fracture was considered as complete when both the clinical and the radiological criteria of the union were fulfilled to the satisfaction of the authors and the independent observers. A delayed union was recorded when the fracture was united between 4 and 6 months, while a non-union was noted when the union had not occurred after 8 months of treatment.

The analysis was done by using descriptive statistics and the testing of hypothesis. The data was analyzed by using Excel 2003, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows Version 16.0 (SPSS Inc; Chicago, IL, USA) and the EPI Info 3.5.1 Windows Version. The Chi-square test was used to examine the association between the different variables. A p-value of < 0.05 (two-tailed) was used to establish statistical significance


Out of 24 patients, 16 (66.7%) were males and 8 (33.3%) were females. The average age of the patients was 29.58, with a range of 13-60 years. In this study, the intramedullary interlocking nail was used in 18 (75%) tibial and 6 (25 %) femoral fractures, with 41.7 % of them being right sided and 58.3% of them being left sided. Thefractures were proximal shaft in 8.3 % cases, mid shaft in 33.3% cases, and distal shaft in 58.3 % cases, with 25% of them being communited, 16.7% of them being oblique, 4.2% of them being segmented, 16.7 % of them being spiral and 37.5 % of them being transverse. The mode of injury was road traffic accidents in 66.7% cases, 29.2 % were due to fall injuries and 4.2 % were caused by crush injuries. The types of fractures which were included were closed- 66.67 % and open- 33.33%. According to the Gustilo- Anderson classification, 4.17 % were Gustilo I, 25 % were Gustilo II and 4.17 % were Gustilo III a. The fracture reduction was closed in 41.7% and open in 58.3 % of the cases. Reaming was done in all the cases. There were no post-operative infections.

(Table/Fig 1) depicts that there were no statistical relationships between the affected side, the affected bone, the fracture reduction technique, gender, location of the fracture and the type of fracture.


Long bone fractures are quite common in the most productive period of life due to increasing road traffic accidents and fall injuries [1,7]. These fractures occur mostly in people who are aged between 20 and 50 years, with a greater vulnerability of males to trauma (8). In our study, 66.67% of the patients had met with road traffic accidents and 66.7% were males.

An interlocked intramedullary nail is the universally accepted fixation device which is used for closed diaphyseal fractures of the long bones. It is a load-sharing implant and consistent satisfactory results have been reported with their use (9),(10). Intramedullary nailing after reaming is now accepted as the method of choice to treat close femoral fractures, but its use remains controversial with regards to open tibial fractures (11). But with appropriate softtissue treatment, IM nailing gives good results in the treatment of open tibial fractures (12). The use of unreamed intramedullary nails avoids pin-track infection, a complication of external fixation which is popularly used in treating open fractures, but it may potentially compromise the stability at the site of the fracture (13),(14),(15) .The management of open tibial fractures with reamed IM nails is controversial. While reamed nails offer improved stability to the fracture, their use carries a theoretical risk of increasing infection and nonunion as a consequence of disturbing the endosteal blood supply (16).

In a study by Kaltenecker et al, no infections were reported after the treatment of sixty-six type-I and II open tibial fractures with nailing after reaming, which was consistent with our results.17 Court-Brown et al. recently reported a rate of infection of 6 per cent (one of eighteen) for type-IIIA fractures and of 13 per cent (three of twenty-four) for type-IIIB fractures which were treated with the insertion of a Grosse-Kempf nail after reaming.(18), (19).

(Table/Fig 2) depicts the closed fracture of the left distal tibia following road traffic accidents in a POP slab. (Table/Fig 3) shows that after the fixation of the sign nail with two proximal and distal interlocking screws, the fracture was stabilized. In one of the femoral fractures (Table/Fig 4) , there was gapping at the fracture site after nailing, for which we did dynamization after two months. Another case (Table/Fig 5) , a posterior malleolus of the tibia was fractured during distal locking and it was fixed by using a screw. These two iatrogenic complications were found, which may be because different surgeons were operating the cases. Which is a learning curve will be automatically corrected in future. A limitation of this study was the less number of cases, because until now we have operated only 24 cases. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to get a statistical significance.


Although it is too early to list the merits and demerits of SIGN nail with our limited number of cases, our initial experience has been encouraging. Stability against rotation, bending and axial loadinglength, telescoping, segmental fractures, infection and non-union were found to be better with SIGN nail use, with the advantage of mobilization and early weight bearing.

SIGN nail and system shows promising results in comparison to hollow nail, because of its better strength, better accuracy in distal locking and surprisingly better results in infection and nonunion. This study showed that the complication rates were minimal and within an acceptable range. None of our cases developed infections. It has the added advantage of reduced costs to the patient whilst, at the same time, ensuring a high-quality fracture care which is comparable to any type of care which is achieved in the developed countries. It is possible to treat the poorer section of people in developing countries like Nepal by using this equipment. Proficiency in the use of these SIGN interlocking nail instrumentation will develop with practice.


Ikem IC., Ogunlusi JD. Ine HR. Achieving interlocking nails without using an image intensifier. Int Orthop. 2007 August,; 31(4): 487–490.
Bong M.R, Kummer F.J, Koval K.J, Egol K.A. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: Biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007 February; 15(2): 97-106. ,
Kapoor S.K, Kataria H, Boruah T, Patra S.R, Chaudhry A, Kapoor S: Expandable self-locking nail in the management of closed diaphyseal fractures of the femur and the tibia. Indian J Orthop. 2009 Jul–Sep; 43(3): 264–270.
Zirkle Lewis G. Injuries in developing countries—How can we help? The role of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 October; 466(10): 2443–2450.
Bhandari K.K. Solid IM Nail (SIGN NAIL) for tibial shaft fracture; An experience in a Nepal orthopaedic hospital. Orthocon 2004;34:
Feibel R J, Zirkle Jr.Use of interlocking intramedullary tibial nails in developing countries. Tech Orthop 2009;24: 233–246
Pant B.R, Pandey R.C, Lamsal H, Suwal K. Tibial fracture management by different modalities of treatment. Orthocon 2004;36:
Onabowale BO, Onuminya JE, Essien IAI, Ukegbu ND. The management of open tibial shaft fractures: the National Orthopaedic Hospital experience. Nig J Surg 1995;2:37–42
Lepore L, Lepore S, Maffulli N. Intramedullary nailing of the femur with an inflatable self locking nail: comparison with locked nailing. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8:796–801
Trafton PG. Tibial Shaft Fractures. In: Browner DB, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, editors. Skeletal Trauma Basic Science, Managementand Reconstruction. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Sauunders [Elsevier Science]; 2003; 2175–6.
O’Brien P. J. Meek R. N. Powell J. N. and Blachut P. A. Primary intramedullary nailing of open femoral shaft fractures. J. Trauma 1991; 31:113-116.
Shah RK, Moehring HD, Singh RP, Dhakal A. Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibia. Int Orthop 2004:(28):163-6
Fairbank AC, Thomas D, Cunningham B, Curtis M, Jinnah RH. Stability of reamed and unreamed intramedullary tibial nails: a biomechanical study. Injury 1995;26:483-5.
Whittle AP, Wester W, Russell TA. Fatigue failure in small diameter tibial nails. Clin Orthop 1995;315:119-28.
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EM. Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82-B:62-8
Rhinelander FW. Tibial blood supply in relation to fracture healing. Clin Orthop 1974;105:34-8
Kaltenecker G. Wruhs O. Quaicoe S. Lower infection rate after interlocking the nailing in open fractures of the femur and the tibia. J. Trauma 1990; 30:474-479.
Court-Brown C. M. Keating J. F. McQueen M. M. Infection after the intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Incidence and protocol for management. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1992; 74-B(5):770-774.
Court-Brown C. M. McQueen M. M. Quaba A. A. Christie J. Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1991; 73-B(6):959-964.

DOI and Others


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)