Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 76506

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Year : 2012 | Month : May | Volume : 6 | Issue : 3 | Page : 527 - 529 Full Version

Non Vital Bleaching – A Non Invasive Post Endodontic Treatment Option – A Case Report

Published: May 1, 2012 | DOI:
Prasanna Neelakantan, Nithya Jagannathan,

1. Assistant Professor, 2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics;Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai - 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prasanna Neelakantan,
1500, 16th Main Road, Anna nagar West,
Chennai – 600040, India.


The dental practitioner is provided with a variety of post endodontic treatment options which range from invasive methods like full veneer crowns to least invasive and aesthetic procedures like bleaching.The most important parameter in non-vital bleaching is the placement of a barrier to prevent the resorption of the tooth which has a poor prognosis. The aim of this paper was to report a case of successful non-vital bleaching by using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as a barrier, with follow up reports of two years. This article describes a one year follow up of a case of non vital bleaching which was performed on a root canal treated, discoloured, maxillary central incisor. By using mineral trioxide aggregate as a barrier, a mixture of sodium perborate and distilled water was used as the bleaching agent. The follow up visits showed significant improvement in the shade of the bleached teeth even after 24 months, with no evidence of resorption. This is the first paper to report on the use of MTA as a barrier for non-vital bleaching. The placement of a proper bleach barrier is the most important factor for successful intracoronal bleaching. Non vital bleaching can be considered as a safe, effective and non invasive treatment option in the management of endodontically treated, discoloured teeth.


walking bleach, mineral trioxide aggregate, bleachbarrier, external resorption

The discolouration of pulpless teeth could be a result of an aetiological factor (trauma) or the endodontic procedure itself. A haemorrhage in the pulp chamber may result from either a blow, death of the pulp or a failure in controlling the bleeding during endodontic therapy. The penetration of blood into the dentinal tubules, followed by haemolysis of the red cells, which results in the release of haemoglobin and its breakdown products, produces a yellowish brown discolouration. This discolouration occurs when the iron pigments get degraded to iron sulfide. Such a discolouration may appear some months after the endodontic treatment is completed and it is similar to haemorrhagic discolouration (1), (2). The failure of the operator to remove blood or other organic material completely from the pulp chamber during the treatment appears to be the most important and common reason for this post endodontic discolouration (1). Inadequate access to the cavity preparation results in the presence of shelves of dentin which make it difficult to remove the debris from the pulp horns and the lingual area of the pulp chamber. Therefore, adequate access for the complete debridement of the pulp chamber is essential. Medication and sealing pastes must be removed from the coronal pulp space subsequent to the completion of the root canal therapy. Many of these agents contain silver, which, if left in the crown, will cause discolouration (2). One material which has been used extensively in the past, for the restoration of lingual access cavities, subsequent to the root canal treatment, is silver amalgam. This material causes a grayish discolouration of the tooth, probably as a result of the penetration of the sulfidized by products of the corrosion process into the dentin tubules. The use of resin materials without the acid-etch technique, usually results in a marginal percolation, with the eventual internal staining of the crown. Case Report Extensively discoloured, non vital teeth are highly receptive to the bleaching techniques. But the clinical situation must be carefully assessed before the bleaching treatment is considered. The quality and the type of the root canal filling that has been employed are of primary importance in this regards. Proper apical sealing is necessary to prevent percolation of the bleaching agents into the periodical tissues. A pretreatment is indicated in the cases where the root canal filling is inadequate or where it is improperly condensed. Also, the crown should be relatively intact, since a crown with large carious lesions or restorations can be better treated by means of a cast post and core, together with full coverage (3), (4), (5). The dental practitioner is provided with a variety of post endodontic treatment options which range from invasive methods like full veneer crowns to least invasive procedures like bleaching (4). Though non-vital bleaching has been widely mentioned in the literature as an option in the post endodontic management, an extensive review of the literature surprisingly showed us that there were very scanty case reports and follow up reports on non- -vital bleaching. The main reason for thisfear of cervical resorption following non-vital bleaching is that adequate precautions are not taken during the procedure. This article is aimed towards filling that void by presenting a case of non vital bleaching and its follow up.

Case Report

A 24-year old male patient reported to the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics of the University with complaints of the discoloured and unaesthetic appearance of his upper tooth. Clinical and radiographic examinations were carried out (Table/Fig 1) and (Table/Fig 2). A diagnosis of non vital maxillary right central incisor was made, based on the vitality testing which was performed by using an electric pulp tester (Parkell Digitest Digital pulp tester, Parkell Inc, NY, USA). The endodontic treatment was carried out under a rubber dam. The access cavity was temporarily sealed with Cavit (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). The patient was recalled after one week for the bleaching procedure. In the subsequent visit, the tooth was cleaned with pumice and the shade was noted (VITA shade guide). A rubber dam was applied to ensure the complete isolation of the tooth. The root filling in the coronal pulp chamber was removed to 1 mm below the facial cemento enamel junction. The procedure was adopted from Wray and Welbury (4). Following this, a 1 mm thick layer of white MTA (ProRoot MTA, Dentsply Tulsa) was placed over the gutta percha (Table/Fig 3). The barrier placement was based on Steiner and West’s recommendations (6). A wet cotton pellet was used to condense the MTA. A pellet of cotton was placed in the chamber, it was sealed temporarily with Cavit and the patient was recalled after 24 hours. After 24 hours, the temporary filling and the cotton pellet were removed completely. The chamber was etched with 37 % phosphoric acid (Total Etch, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) for 30 seconds and it was washed and dried. A mixture of sodium perborate (in the tetrahydrate form) (Degussa, Hanau, Germany) and 30 % hydrogen peroxide (in the ratio, 1 g of powder: 0.5 ml of liquid) was made and it was placed in the pulp chamber and condensed with a wet cotton pellet (7). A piece of dry cotton was placed over this mixture and the access cavity was sealed with modified zinc oxide eugenol cement (IRM, Dentsply). The patient was recalled after 2 weeks for a review. After 2 weeks, the tooth showed a definitive improvement in the shade, except at the incisal third tooth (Table/Fig 4). So, the internal bleaching procedure was repeated and the patient was recalled after 1 week. The sodium perborate – water mixture was removed from the pulp chamber and the access cavity was sealed with composite resin (Filtek Z350, 3MESPE, MN, USA)). Radiographs were taken to serve as a comparison for the subsequent follow up visits. The patient was asked to report after 12 months and 24 months for reviews. The bleached shade was maintained even 24 months after the bleaching and the radiographs showed no evidence of the cervical resorption.


The literature has reported numerous reviews on the bleaching of vital and non vital teeth; yet, there are extremely few published case reports on successful non-vital bleaching. One factor which stops the dental practitioner from performing this procedure in the clinical practice is the fear of invasive cervical resorption, which has been reported to occur in several cases following internal bleaching (8), (9), (10), (11). The “walking bleach” technique that was introduced in 1961 involved the placement of a mixture of sodium perborate and water into the pulp chamber that was sealed off between the patient’s visits to the clinician (12). The method was later modified and water was replaced by 30–35% hydrogen peroxide, to improve the whitening effect (13),(14). Some reports have suggested the use of a mixture of sodium perborate and water because of its decreased potential to cause cervical resorption (10),(13), (15). Non vital bleaching has not found much favour amongst the clinicians because of the fear of resorption following the procedure, which has a poor prognosis. But our case report has shown that adhering to the proper barrier placement methods can definitely prevent the development of the resorption. The protective barrier was placed 1 mm below the facial CEJ because it resulted in more acceptable aesthetic results, particularly in the cervical region (6). However, this procedure exposed more dentinal tubules, leading towards the approximal cervical parts of the periodontal ligament. But the placement of the intra-coronal bleach barrier based on Steiner and West’s protocol prevents the extra radicular diffusion of the bleaching agent. This is the first clinical case report to describe the use of MTA as a barrier material prior to the non-vital bleaching. Several barrier materials and supplementary barriers have been proposed in the literature. They range from materials like Cavit to Modified Zinc Oxide eugenol (IRM), glass ionomer cement, calcium hydroxide and resin modified glass ionomer cement (11), (14), (15). But taking into consideration the properties of MTA, like its high alkaline pH, insolubility and reduced moisture permeability, it appears to be a favourable material which can serve as an intracoronal isolating barrier prior to the bleaching (15), (16). After placing the MTA, the patient was asked to report after 24 hours for the bleaching procedure, as MTA took about 2 hours and 45 minutes to set. The tetrahydrate form of sodium perborate which was mixed with distilled water was used in this case, because of the decreased leakage of hydrogen peroxide, and hence, a reduced potential risk of invasive cervical resorption was noted with this material (7),(17). Non vital bleaching has several advantages over other post endodontic treatment options like full veneer crowns. Difficulties in shade matching and achieving the life like appearance and the emergence profile of the natural teeth are the possible drawbacks of the full coverage restorations. In contrast, non vital bleaching is a non invasive procedure and it is also less time consuming and economical. Also, the patient’s natural tooth structure is preserved.


This case report demonstrates the successful management of a discoloured, endodontically treated tooth by non-vital bleaching. Non vital bleaching can be used as a very effective and safe post -endodontic treatment for discoloured anterior teeth, provided the procedural protocol and precautions are strictly adhered to.


Ingle J, Bakland: Endodontics, ed 5. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1976.
Cohen SC, Bums RC. Pathways of the Pulp. St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co,1980.
Fisher NL, Radford JR. Internal bleaching of discolored teeth. Dent Update, 1990; 110–14.
Wray A, Welbury R. Treatment of the intrinsic discoloration in the permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 309–31.
Nutting EB, Poe GS. Chemical bleaching of discolored, endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1967: 655–62.
Steiner DR, West JD. A method to determine the location and shape of an intracoronal bleach barrier. J Endod 1994; 20: 304 – 06.
Weiger R, Kuhn A, Lost C. Radicular penetration of hydrogen peroxide during intra-coronal bleaching with various forms of sodium perborate. Int Endod J 1994 ;27:313-17.
Heithersay GS, Dahlstrom SW, Marin PD. Incidence of invasive cervical resorption in bleached, root-filled teeth. Aust Dent J 1994 ;39:82-87.
Lee GP, Lee MY,Lum SO, Poh RS, Lim KC. Extra-radicular diffusion of hydrogen peroxide and the pH changes which were associated with the intracoronal bleaching of discolored teeth by using different bleaching agents. Int Endod J 2004 ;37:500-06.
Rotstein I, Lewinstein I, Zuwabi O, Stabholz A, Friedman M. Role of the cementoenamel junction on the radicular penetration of 30% hydrogen peroxide during intracoronal bleaching in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:146-50.
Costas FL, Wong M. Intra-coronal isolating barriers: effect of location on the root leakage and the effectiveness of the bleaching agents. J Endod 1991 ;17:365-68.
Spasser HF. A simple bleaching technique by using sodium perborate. NY State Dent J 1961; 27:332–34.
Nutting EB, Poe GS. A new combination for bleaching teeth. J So Calif Dent Assoc 1963; 31:289–91.
Lambrianidis T, Kapalas A, Mazinis M. Effect of calcium hydroxide as a supplementary barrier in the radicular penetration of hydrogen peroxide during intra-coronal bleaching in vitro. Int Endod J 2002; 35:985-90.
Tselnik M, Baumgartner J, Marshall J. Bacterial leakage with mineral trioxide aggregate or a resin-modified glass ionomer which was used as a coronal barrier. J Endod 2004 ;30:782-84.
Barrieshi – Nusair KM, Hammad HM. Intra-coronal sealing comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer. Quintessence Int 2005; 36: 539-45
Arı H, Ăśngör M. In vitro comparison of different types of sodium perborate which was used for the intracoronal bleaching of discolored teeth. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 433–36.

DOI and Others

DOI: JCDR/2012/3556:1959

No competing Interests.

Date of Submission: Nov 04, 2011
Date of Peer Review: Jan 07, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jan 27, 2012
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2012,

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)