Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 21586

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Year : 2012 | Month : May | Volume : 6 | Issue : 3 | Page : 530 - 532 Full Version

Nasal Stent Fabrication for an Atrophic Rhinitis Patient: A Simplified Technique

Published: May 1, 2012 | DOI:
E. Nagaraj, Nitin Shetty, Nivedita Mankani, Subramanian M. Rao, Sunil Kumar Gurram

1. Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Prosthodontics, PMNM Dental College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka. 2. Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Prosthodontics, D.Y. Patil Dental College, Navi Mumbai. 3. Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Prosthodontics, PMNM Dental College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka. 4. Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Periodontics, PMNM Dental College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka. 5. Reader, Dept. of Prosthodontics, Mamata Dental College, Kaammam, AP.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. E. Nagaraj, Senior Lecturer
Dept. of Prosthodontics, PMNM Dental College and Hospital,
Bagalkot, Karnataka.


Atrophic rhinitis is a chronic nasal disease which is characterized by progressive atrophy of the nasal mucosa and the underlying bones of the nasal turbinate, accompanied by the formation of foul-smelling, thick, dry crusts in the nasal cavities. Atrophic rhinitis has become less common in countries where the social conditions and the health have generally improved. Various local, medical and surgical methods are available for the treatment of this slowly progressive and disabling disease, but all have had limited success. This article describes a simplified non-invasive technique of fabricating a polymethyl methacrylate, acrylic resin nasal stent for treating an atrophic rhinitis patient.


Atrophic rhinitis, Nasal stent, Non-invasive technique, Acrylic resin nasal stent and foul-smelling nasal cavities

Introduction Atrophic rhinitis is a chronic nasal disease which is characterized by progressive atrophy of the nasal mucosa and the underlying bones of the nasal turbinate, accompanied by the formation of foulsmelling, thick, dry crusts in the greatly enlarged nasal cavities (1). Atrophic rhinitis presents either as primary or secondary atrophic rhinitis. The treatment options for atrophic rhinitis have had limited success (2). Various local, medical and surgical methods are available for treating this uncommon condition. Local treatment with saline or alkaline douching, emollients and lubricants such as 25% glucose and glycerine drops, and regular decrusting may suffice. The medical management includes the treatment of the infection with antibiotics (fluoroquinolones and metronidazole), which are rarely successful in the long term (3). The surgical procedures which have been suggested, are largely aimed at the reduction of the size of the cavity, all with limited success (3). The complete closure of the nostrils with small skin flaps, as advocated by Young (4), can be helpful, but a relapse often occurs on reopening it (3). This also results in mouth breathing, a nasal voice and non-aesthetic nasal deformities. Another surgical approach is the partial closure of the anterior nares, leaving a 3-mm opening in the nostrils for nasal breathing, in patients who object to the mouth breathing and the nasal voice (5). An effective, non-invasive method for treating atrophic rhinitis by means of a nasal stent prosthesis which was made of heat polymerized clear acrylic resin has been described. The advantages of the stent are, that the technique is non-invasive, cost-effective, tissue tolerant, aesthetic to the patient, comfortable to use, easy to fabricate and easy to clean. It maintains the patency and the contour of the nasal cavities.

Case Report

A 27-year-old male patient was referred to the Department of Prosthodontics, P M Nadagouda Memorial Dental College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India, with the diagnosis of atrophic rhinitis, from the Department of Otolaryngology, S Nijalingappa Medical College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India. The clinical examination revealed enlarged nasal cavities, a foul smell Case Report from the nose, and a discharge of greenish crusts from the nose, which were suggestive of an infection. There was no improvement in the condition after treatment with local and oral drugs. The patient declined surgery and douching the nose was not comfortable for him. So, a heat-polymerized, clear, acrylic resin nasal stent was planned for the patient.
1. A nasal impression was obtained with the patient-sitting upright in the dental chair.
2. Petroleum jelly was applied to the anterior nares to facilitate the subsequent removal of the impression.
3. Anaesthesia was not required.
4. An impression of the nasal cavity was made with additional silicon putty elastomeric impression material (Aquasil; Dentsply, Dentray, Germany).
5. The material was mixed and molded into a cylindrical form of the approximate length of the nasal cavity and it was then inserted into each nasal vestibule of the patient. Care was taken not to push the material beyond the cartilaginous pyramid of the nasal cavity.
6. A band of material was left across the columela to join the 2 sides (Table/Fig 1). This prevented the accidental posterior displacement and the possible inhalation of the prosthesis.
7. When the putty was set, the impression was removed from the nose (Table/Fig 2). The excess material which was external to the nares was trimmed, so that when the putty was reinserted, the margin of the nostril could be seen.
8. The impression was invested in artificial dental stone (Kala stone; Kala bhai pvt ltd, Mumbai) in a dental flask.
9. The impression was removed from the flask and processed in heat polymerizing clear acrylic resin (DPI – heat cure; Dental products of India, Mumbai). 10. After deflasking, a 3-mm hole was drilled through the prosthesis to provide an airway, followed by trimming and polishing (Table/Fig 3) &(Table/Fig 4). The prosthesis had a smooth outer surface to provide comfort and to prevent injury to the nasal mucosa and the growth of microorganisms.
11. The prosthesis was inserted into the nasal vestibule (Table/Fig 5). The patient was trained to orient the prosthesis correctly and to insert and remove the prosthesis from the nose. The patient was instructed to wear it continuously, removing it only for a short period of time for cleaning.
12. Recall checkups were scheduled after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months to make necessary adjustments. The nasal cavities were clean and they were reduced insize, with an absence of crusts and the associated foul odour. The patient had relief from the nasal blockage and he was free from the disease at 9 months of follow-up (Table/Fig 6).


Atrophic rhinitis presents either as primary or secondary atrophic rhinitis. Primary atrophic rhinitis has been attributed to an infection, which is most notably caused by a gram-negative organism (Klebsiella pneumonia, subspecies Ozaenae), but it may also relate to environmental factors and general health conditions, like endocrine balance and an autoimmune basis, which are possibly initiated by a virus or which owe to vitamin or iron deficiencies. This condition is characterized by a progressive atrophy of the mucosa, with loss of the turbinate bone, resulting in a capacious cavity full of foul-smelling crust, of which the patient may be unaware. The copious crusts often bleed when they detach and they may extend into the nasopharynx, producing an unpleasant choking sensation and snorting. The nose paradoxically feels blocked, owing to the drying effect in the abnormally patent airway. Secondary atrophic rhinitis has been attributed to trauma, radiotherapy, and chronic granulomatous conditions and following excessive surgery (3). Dentists may become involved in the provision of prosthesis in the field of otolaryngology because of their specialized knowledge of impression procedures and allied techniques which are necessary for the fabrication of prostheses. One such application is the construction of alar stents. The primary function of the alar stents is to maintain the nasal airway for patients in whom nasal collapse on inspiration causes a significant level of respiratory inconvience (6). Internal nares inserts were fabricated with heat-polymerized acrylic resin to restore the nasal airways, which were lost after reconstructive nasal surgery for a deviated nasal septum. These inserts restored the support for the lateral nasal tissues and allowed the free passage of air through the nasal cavities. The tissue acceptance of this prosthesis was excellent (7). Various local, medical and surgical methods are available for treating this disease. The local treatment involves nasal douching with an alkaline solution of diluted sodium bicarbonate, sodium borate and sodium chloride (8). To keep the nasal cavities clean from the crusts, nasal douching must be performed twice daily for 6 weeks to provide relief. This was uncomfortable for our patient.9 The medical line of treatment with antibiotics are rarely successful in the long term (3). Surgery was tried in severe cases by completely closing the nasal cavities, which resulted in a difficulty in breathing, a nasal voice and mouth breathing (10). Recurrence of the disease is more common, which makes a revision surgery more difficult because of the exuberant scar/fibrous tissue in the nasal vestibule. Treatment with a nasal stent prosthesis helps in overcoming the disadvantages of the local, medical and the surgical procedures. A nasal stent prosthesis reduces the air entry through the nose, thereby providing rest to the nasal cilia and inducing the reversibility of the nasal mucosa condition (10). The nasal stent is retentive and there is no risk for dislocation and aspiration of the nasal stent (11). The advantages of the nasal stent are that the technique is noninvasive, cost-effective, tissue tolerant, comfortable to the patient and easy to insert and remove (12).


In this report, a patient with atrophic rhinitis was successfully treated with a nasal stent prosthesis. It is easy to fabricate, simple, non-invasive, more economical, well tolerated by the patient and it is aesthetically made from clear acrylic resin.


Zohar Y, Talmi YP, Strauss M, Finkelstein Y, Shvilli Y. Ozena revisited. J Otolaryngol 1990; 19:345-9.
Irwin SR, Irwin R, Curley FJ, Grossman RF. Diagnosis and treatment of the symptoms of the respiratory tract.
Snow Jr BJ, Ballenger JJ. Ballenger’s Otorhinolaryngology. Head and Neck Surgery (ed 16). Hamilton, Canada, Decker, 2002.
Young A. Closure of the nostrils in atrophic rhinitis. J Laryngol Otol 1967; 81:515-24.
Sinha SN, Sardana DS, Rajvanshi VS. A nine years’ review of 273 cases of atrophic rhinitis and their management. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91: 591-600.
Davenport JC, Brain DJ, Hunt AT. Treatment of an alar collapse with nasal prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45:435-7.
Young JM. Internal nares prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 24: 320-3.
Shehata M, Dogheim Y. Surgical treatment of primary chronic atrophic rhinitis (an evaluation of silastic implants). J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100:803-7.
Shenoy VK, Shetty P, Alva B. Pin hole nasal prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:359-61.
Sajjad A. A new technique for nasal stent fabrication for atrophic rhinitis: A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2011; 20: 326-28.
Savion I, Lee Miller MD, Malloy RB. Construction of a surgical stent for posttraumatic nasal synechia. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 462-65.
Kumar NS, Chandra TS. Prosthetic management of atrophic rhinitis. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 2008; 60: 379-81.

DOI and Others

DOI: JCDR/2012/4014:1941


Date of Submission: Aug 12, 2011
Date of Peer Review: Jan 14, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jan 20, 2012
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)