Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 48127

AbstractMaterial and MethodsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : May | Volume : 6 | Issue : 4 | Page : 574 - 576

A Comparative Study of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Recovery after Submaximal Exercise in Sedentary and Regularly Exercising Healthy Adult Students

Manpreet Singh Anand, Aditya Jain

1. MBBS, MD (Physiology) Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology Giansagar Medical College Banur, Distt Patiala, Punjab, India.

Correspondence Address :
Aditya Jain
House No. 13, Khalsa College Colony,
Patiala, Punjab, India - 147001
Phone: 9872877959


Objective: The present study was undertaken to compare the pattern of the blood pressure(BP) and the heart rate recovery(HRR) after a submaximal exercise on the treadmill, in sedentary and regularly exercising healthy adult students who were of the age range of 18-25 years.

Materials and Methods: 75 non-smoker students of the age group of 18-25 years, with sedentary lifestyle habits were selected as the subjects (group A). 75 non-smoker students of the age group of 18-25 years, who did regular physical exercises were also taken as the subjects (group B). The subjects who were free from any cardiovascular abnormalities were taken up from the student community of Patiala. The blood pressure and the heart rate recovery patterns after submaximal exercises on the treadmill were compared between the two groups.

Results: From the present study, it was concluded that the heart rate recovery of the regularly exercising group was significantly higher than that of the sedentary group. In this study, it was also observed that the systolic blood pressure (BP) and the diastolic BP recovery of the regularly exercising group were significantly higher than those of the sedentary group in the first five minutes post exercise.


Blood pressure recovery, Heart rate recovery, Treadmill, Submaximal exercise

A sedentary lifestyle can contribute to many preventable causes of death. A lack of physical activity is one of the leading causes of preventable death worldwide (1). Many studies have proven sedentary lifestyles and lack of physical activity to be the risk factors for anxiety, cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes, colon cancer, high blood pressure, obesity, osteoporosis, lipid disorders, kidney stones and many more diseases. Gallagher MJ et al. (2) concluded that morbidly obese individuals had severely reduced cardiorespiratory fitness. Regular physical activity increases the exercise capacity and it plays a role in both the primary and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (3). Michael L et al. (4) observed that exercise testing could be used to assess the prognosis, particularly when emphasis was placed on non-electrocardiographic measures such as exercise capacity, chronotropic response, heart rate recovery and ventricular ectopy. Both exercise training and weight loss have been shown to decrease the left ventricular mass and the wall thickness, reduce the arterial stiffness and improve the endothelial function (5). The purpose of the present study was to establish the blood pressure and the heart rate recovery pattern in sedentary adult students after submaximal exercises on the treadmill and to compare the results with those from a group of young students who exercised regularly.

Material and Methods

The present study was undertaken to compare the pattern of the blood pressure and the heart rate recovery after submaximal exercises on the treadmill in sedentary and regularly exercising healthy adult students who were of the age group of 18-25 years. The students who did not participate in atleast 30 minutes of moderate physical activity which did not make them sweat or breathe hard, such as fast walking, slow bicycling, skating, pushing a lawn mower, etc on 5 or more days/week or in atleast 20 minutes of vigorous physical activity that made them sweat or breathe hard, such as basketball, soccer, running, swimming, fast bicycling, fast dancing etc, on 3 days or more/week were considered to have a sedentary lifestyle (inadequate participation in moderate and vigorous physical activity), while those students who participated in these activities were considered to be regularly exercising, healthy adult students. 75 non-smoker students of the age group of 18-25 years, with sedentary lifestyle habits, were selected as the subjects (group A). 75 non-smoker students of the age group 18-25 years, who did regular physical exercises were also taken as the subjects (group B). The subjects were taken up from the student community of Patiala. Individuals who were found to be free of any cardiovascular abnormalities were taken up for the study. The heart rate and the blood pressure was measured as per the standard procedures which were described by Nageswari and Sharma (6). Heart rate: The heart rate in beats/minute was measured by radial artery palpation at the wrist. Blood pressure: The blood pressure was measured by using the auscultatory method (for systolic and diastolic BP) with the subjects in the sitting posture. The blood pressure was measured in mm of mercury (mm of Hg). A standardized mercury sphygmomanometer and a stethoscope were used. The same instruments were used for recording the blood pressure of all the subjects.

Treadmill Exercise The subjects were asked to perform the exercises on the treadmill and the following guidelines were followed: • The treadmill slant was the same (0°) for all the subjects and at all the speeds. • The room temperature was in the range of 20-25°C. • The subjects were given instructions about the proper method of using the treadmill for the required exercises. • During the exercise, the heart rate was monitored by using the electronic display device which was inbuilt in the treadmill machine, which showed the pulse rate of the exercising subjects. The exercise was stopped immediately when the heart rate crossed the predefined endpoint value. The end point heart rate was taken as 170 beats/minute for males and 160 beats/minute for females. • The subjects were made to run on the treadmill at a speed of 3km/hr for 60 seconds. • Then, the treadmill speed was increased to 4.5 km/hr and this speed was maintained for 45 seconds. Thereafter, the treadmill speed was increased in steps of 1.5km/hr after every 45 seconds till the endpoint was reached. The maximum speed which was used in this study was 10.5 km/hr. There was no time limit for this speed and the subjects exercised till the endpoint was reached. • When the end point heart rate was reached, as was shown by the display device on the treadmill machine, the exercise was stopped and the time was noted. • The subjects were immediately shifted to chairs and they were allowed to relax in a sitting position. • The required observations and readings were taken.

The data was statistically evaluated to know the differences between the blood pressure and the heart rate recovery patterns of the two groups.

This data showed a significant intergroup difference in the heart rate recovery in the two groups in the first four minutes. The results showed that the H.R.R. of the regularly exercising group (group B) was significantly higher than that of the sedentary group (group A) in the first four minutes.The table shows the comparison of the diastolic BP recovery in the first five minutes post exercise between groups A and B. On comparing the statistical analysis, a better diastolic BP recovery in the group B in the first, second and fourth minutes post exercise was observed. In the third and fifth minutes, there was a non significant intergroup difference in the diastolic BP recovery.


In the present study, it was observed that the resting H.R. of the regularly exercising group was significantly lower than that of the sedentary group. Similar results were reported by various other studies (7). They found that the resting heart rate of the athletes was lower than that of the sedentary controls. In the present study, it was observed that the heart rate recovery of the regularly exercising group was significantly higher than thatof the sedentary group in the first four minutes after the exercise. In the fifth minute, the difference became non significant. Similar results were reported by Wilmore JH et al (8). They stated that the heart rate of the athletes returned to the pre-exercise levels more quickly as compared to that in the sedentary individuals. Morshedi- Meibodi et al (9) also conducted a study on the heart rate recovery after treadmill exercise testing and on the risk of cardiovascular disease events. They observed that a very rapid heart rate recovery immediately after the exercise was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events. The present study also demonstrated that the systolic BP recovery of the regularly exercising group was significantly higher than that of the sedentary group in the first five minutes post exercise. Dimkpa U and Ugwu AC (10) concluded that the higher physical activity level of the subjects was associated with a faster systolic blood pressure recovery to normal. This could have been due to the effect of the exercise training in improving the vascular endothelial functions and the vasodilatory capabilities; hence a decrease in the systemic vascular resistance.

This study also showed that the diastolic BP recovery of the regularly exercising group was significantly higher than that of the sedentary group in the first, second and fourth minutes post exercise. In the third and fifth minutes, there was a non significant intergroup difference in the diastolic BP recovery. In present study, the better diastolic BP recovery in the exercising group was possibly due to their better cardiorespiratory fitness as compared to that in the sedentary subjects. Hagberg JM et al (11) observed that aerobic exercise added an independent blood pressure–lowering effect in certain hypertensive groups, with a decrease of 8 to 10 mm Hg in both the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure measurements.


The present study highlighted the fact that the heart rate recovery of the regularly exercising group was significantly higher than that in the sedentary group. In this study, it was also observed that the systolic BP and the diastolic BP recovery of the regularly exercising group were significantly higher than those of the sedentary group in the first five minutes post exercise.


Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of the population health data. Lancet. 2006 May;367(9524):1747-57.
Gallagher MJ, Franklin BA, Ehrman JK, Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, DeJong AT. Comparative impact of morbid obesity vs heart failure on the cardiorespiratory fitness. Chest 2005; 127:2197-2203.
Chandrashekhar Y, Anand IS. Exercise as a coronary protective factor. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1723-39.
Michael L, Erika SF, Mark W, Paul K. Exercise testing in asymptomatic adults-A statement for professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Circulation 2005;112:771-76.
Bacon SL, Sherwood A, Hinderliter A, Blumenthal JA. Effects of exercise, diet and weight loss on high blood pressure. Sports Med. 2004;34(5):307-16.
Nageswari SK, Sharma R. Practical Workbook of Human Physiology, 1st edition, Jaypee Brother’s Medical Publishers New Delhi. 2006; 39-53.
Dixon EM, Kamath MV, McCartney N, Fallen EL. Neural regulation of the heart rate variability in endurance athletes and sedentary controls. Cardiovasc Res 1992; 26 (7): 713-19.
Wilmore JH, Costill DL, Gleim GW. Physiology of sport and exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1995; 27(5).
Morshedi-Meibodi A, Larson MG, Levy D, O’Donnell CJ, Vasan RS. The heart rate recovery after treadmill exercise testing and the risk of the cardiovascular disease events. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90:848-52.
Dimkpa U, Ugwu AC. Independent multiple correlates of the postexercise systolic blood pressure recovery in healthy adults. Int J Exerc Sci. 2010; 3(1):25-35.
Hagberg JM, Montain SJ, Martin WH III, Ehsani AA. Effect of exercise training in 60 to 69 year old persons with essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:348-53.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)