Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29172

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : February | Volume : 6 | Issue : 1 | Page : 47 - 50

Pre-Donation Deferral of Whole Blood Donors in District Transfusion Centre

Girish C.J., Chandrashekhar T.N., Ramesh B.K., Kantikar S.M.

1. MD (Pathology), Department of Pathology, Shimoga Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga - 577201. 2. MD (Pathology), Department of Pathology, Shimoga Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga - 577201. 3. MD (Pathology), Department of Pathology, Shimoga Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga - 577201. 4. MD (Pathology), Department of Pathology, Shimoga Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga - 577201.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Girish C.J.
Assistant Professor
“Guarimane” 4th Cross, 60 Feet Road
Vinobanagar, Shimoga 577201
Phone: 09972034266
E-mail: girishcj@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Blood transfusion saves lives and improves health, but millions of patients who need transfusion do not have timely access to safe blood. Pre-donation donor selection is done for the safety of the blood donor and recipient.
Aims: Primary objective of this study was to record and document the current rate and reasons for donor deferral in our District Transfusion Centre.
Methods and Material: Study was conducted on whole blood donors (voluntary/replacement), arrived for donating blood at our blood bank, during 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2010. The donor selection was done by pre-donation screening tests like questionnaire followed by physical examination and haemoglobin estimation. The deferred donor’s data was analysed. Results: Out of 9113 blood donors who came to donate blood, 94.81% were eligible for donation and 5.19% blood donors were deferred. The deferral rate among male population (401/8870 cases, 4.52%) and female population (72/243 cases, 29.63%) were observed. Most common cause of deferral in our study was hypertension (189, 39.95%), followed by anaemia (92, 19.45%), low body weight (43, 9.09%).
Conclusions: Hence studying the profile of blood donors will help to identify sections of the population which could be targeted, to increase the pool of voluntary blood donors and also to guide and provide the necessary essential database for the policy design and programme implementation.

Keywords

Pre-donation deferral, Blood donors, Donation, Anaemia

INTRODUCTION
Blood transfusion saves lives and improves health, but millions of patients who needs transfusion do not have timely access to safe blood. It is estimated that donation by 1% of the population (10 per 1000 population) is generally the minimum needed to meet a nation’s most basic requirements for blood; the requirements are higher in countries with more advanced health-care systems (1). National AIDS Control Organization’s (NACO) statistics show that the annual rate of blood donation in India is about 7.4 million units, against the requirement of 10 million units (2). The state of Karnataka contributes about 500,000 units, with 62% coming via voluntary blood donation (3). Pre donation donor selection is done for the safety of the blood donor and recipient. Various causes of the pre-blood donation deferral need to be studied systematically to improve the donation rate. Monthly statistics sent to the drug controller exclusively includes transfusion transmitted diseases data and excludes other major causes of deferral. Deferral is a painful and sad experience for blood donor as well as the transfusion centre and it necessitates additional efforts towards new recruitments. Moreover, deferring prospective donors often leaves them with negative feelings about themselves as well as the blood donation process (4). Most of the previous studies carried out concentrated mainly on blood groups and transfusion transmitted diseases, however very few studies are published regarding the pre-blood donation deferral. Primary objective of this study was to record and document the current rate and reasons for donor deferral in our District Transfusion Centre.

Material and Methods

Study was conducted on whole blood donors (voluntary/ replacement), arrived for donating blood at our blood bank, during 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2010. The donor selection was done by pre-donation screening tests like questionnaire followed by physical examination and haemoglobin estimation. The donors who were fit according to the Directorate General of Health Services guidelines, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2003) (5), were asked to donate blood. Deferred donors data was analysed with respect to age, sex, type of donor and causes for deferral which were also categorised into permanent and temporary causes based on the curability of the condition.

Results

Out of 9113 blood donors who came to donate blood, 8640 (94.81%) were eligible for donation and 473 (5.19%) blood donors were deferred. The deferral rate among male population (401/8870 cases, 4.52%) and female population (72/243 cases, 29.63%) were observed (Table/Fig 1). Deferral rate among female population was 6.5 times higher than the male population. Deferred donor age group ranged from 18 to 55 years with a mean age 30.09 years. Average age of the deferred female donors (23.68 years) was less than the male donors (31.24 years). The deferred donors were divided according to the age group as shown in the (Table/Fig 2). Deferral rate was highest among 18-30years age group (270, 57.08%) followed by 31-40 years (132, 27.90%), 41-50 years (57, 12.05%) & 51-60 years (14, 2.95%). Highest deferral rate among male (270/401, 50.87%) and females (66/72, 91.66%) were seen in 18-30 years age group. Most common cause of deferral in our study was hypertension (189, 39.95%), followed by anaemia (92, 19.45%), low body weight (43, 9.09%), DM (31, 6.55%), medication (28, 5.91%), hypotension (26, 5.49%) and other causes (64, 13.53%) including previous donation, chronic medical illness, previous surgery, menstruation, breast feeding, typhoid, allergy, immunisation, drug abuse, lymphadenopathy, alcoholism, tattooing.

Out of the total 473 deferrals, 237 cases were due to permanent causes and 236 were due to temporary causes. Highest Deferral rate in younger age group 18-30 years (189/237, 79.74%) included temporary causes, while permanent causes were seen in older age group 31-60 years (155/236, 65.67%) Refer (Table/Fig 3).Common deferral causes in younger population 18-30 years age group were anaemia, low weight and hypotension. Common deferral causes in older population 31-60 years age group were hypertension and diabetes mellitus (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Safe donor selection is the first step towards safe transfusion services. National and international efforts are on to ensure safe blood supply through screening, education and strict criteria laid down by the Directorate General of Health Sciences, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2003) (5) and Eligibility criteria for blood donation American Red Cross (6).

Deferral rate ranged from 5.6-35.6% across the world in previous studies, however low incidence are reported from Manipal (7) (5.2%), Rabeya (8) (5.6%), Bangalore (9) (5.84%) in concordance with our study (5.19%). Higher deferral rate are seen in both national and international regions like Singapore (10) (14.4%), Lucknow (11) (16.4%), Maiduguiri (12) (17.7%) and Trinidad and Tobago (13) (35.6%). Variation in deferral rate can be attributed to multiple factors such as: an higher incidence of first time donorsin Singapore (10), in turn resulting in detection of relatively higher permanent (neurological diseases & chronic hypertension) and temporary (sexually transmitted diseases) deferral causes; During the study period at Lucknow (11) compulsory blood screening for transmittable viral disease like hepatitis was not universally followed but past history of jaundice was included as an exclusion criteria; Cut-off point of haemoglobin was not operational, inviting more number of anaemic donors resulting in higher deferral rate in Maiduguiri (12). Higher prevalence of high risk sexual activity in Trinidad & Tobago (13) was a major cause for deferral. Apart from this, variation in donor selection criteria like weight, age, haemoglobin percentage, donation interval, high risk sexual activities, endemicity of transmittable diseases and imposition of religious restriction on donation of human parts including blood could have summated to the deferral.

Delhi (14), Bangalore (9) & Manipal (7) studies showed that female donor population was very low which was similar to our study and can be attributed to ignorance, fear, lack of awareness and motivation among females. Most common cause of deferral was anaemia among females (9),(13),(15) reflecting ill health, poor nutritional status and higher prevalence of anaemia which is also observed in our study. Categorization of deferred donor population into temporary and permanent groups is essential for optimising donor re-recruitment and retention in the long run. The major temporary deferral causes were anaemia and low weight (8),(9),(14) including in our study. Evaluation and management of anaemia and recruitment to donate at a later date is pivotal in ensuring donor retention (7).

Lower age group donors were rejected mainly because of temporary causes (18-30years, 189/270, 70%) and higher age group donors were rejected mainly because of permanent causes (40-60 years, 58/71, 81%).

Most common cause of deferral was hypertension accounting for 39.95% in contrast with other studies. (2),(11),(13) Probable reasons for this could be fear of phlebotomy, sight of blood, first-time donation and white coat hypertension. Moreover, hypertension being a modern epidemic which often goes undiagnosed and is an incidental finding in most cases. (16) Hypertension was the most common cause of deferral among permanent causes in our study and also in other studies (9),(14) conducted in India. This signifies hypertension as the major under diagnosed epidemic in Indian population.

Recruitment of fresh donors by organising voluntary donation camp requires manpower, money, motivation of donors and precious time. All these can be curtailed by calling back the temporarily deferred donors after correction of their cause as done in the previous study in maiduguiri (12) where nearly 70% came back and donated blood.

In Shaz (17) study, donors aged more than 60 years were allowed to donate, but our guidelines restrict donating blood beyond age group. There is a need to study the incidence of permanent deferral causes in this age group verses screening cost verses benefits of procuring blood.

Conclusion

Differing deferral causes in different locality, socio-economic status, age group and sex are of vital significance in formulating and modulating policies towards modern blood transfusion services. Hence studying the profile of blood donors will help to identify sections of the population which could be targeted to increase the pool of voluntary blood donors and also to guide and provide the necessary essential database for the policy design and programme implementation. Among temporary causes for deferral, anaemia and low weight are the two most common causes in both males and females which can be easily alleviated by proper nutritious supplement. So we have suggested to state blood council to properly maintain the records of all the deferred donors with their causes, and ask them to return for blood donation after correcting their illness. The deferral data is not widely recorded and reported to policy makers for transfusion services. If collected and studied in a systematic way it will definitely improve the collection of blood from prospective blood donors. The older age group blood donors have higher number of diabetes mellitus, so they must be screened stringently before blood donation. Similar studies involving larger population, stringent screening methodologies involving more parameters are needed for the upliftment of the blood donation rate and quality.

Acknowledgement

Dr. Chidananad P.S., Assistant Professor, SIMS, Shimoga.
Staff of Blood Bank, District Mc.Gann Hospital, SIMS, Shimoga.

References

1.
WHO. Media centre, fact sheets, Blood safety and availability, Facts and figures from the 2007 Blood Safety Survey, Fact sheet N°279 November 2009 URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs279/en/index.html assessed on 10th NOV 2011
2.
Department of AIDS Control Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India Annual report 2008-2009 pg 27 URL:http:// nacoonline.org/upload/Publication/Annual_Report_NACO_2008-09. pdf. assessed on 10th Nov 2011
3.
Karnataka State AIDS Prevention Society. Annual Action Plan 2010- 2011, p. 129
4.
Brecher ME. AABB Technical Manual; 15th Edition. Bethedsa: AABB press; 2005. p. 101.
5.
DGHS guidelines, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2003) Saran
6.
American Red Cross, Eligibility criteria for blood donation. URL: http:// www.redcrossblood.org/donating-blood/eligibility-requirements/ eligibility-criteria-topic. assessed on 10th Nov 2011
7.
Unnikrishnan B, Rao P, Kumar N, Ganti S, Prasad R, Amarnath A, et al., Profile of blood donors and reasons for deferral in coastal South India. AMJ 2011; 4(7):379-85.
8.
Rabeya Y, Rapiaah M, Rosline H, Ahmed SA, Zaidah WA, Roshan TM. Blood pre-donation deferrals-a teaching hospital experience. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008;39(3):571-4
9.
Sundar P, Sangeetha SK, Seema DM, Marimuthu P, Shivanna N. Predonation deferral of blood donors in South Indian set-up: An analysis. Asian J Transfusion Sc. 2010; 4(2):112-15.
10.
Lim JC, Tien SL, Ong YW. Main causes of pre-donation deferral of prospective blood donors in the Singapore blood transfusion service. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993; 22:326-31.
11.
Chaudhary RK, Gupta D, Gupta RK. Analysis of donor-deferral pattern in a voluntary blood donor population. Transfusion Med. 1995;5(3): 209-12.
12.
Kagu MB, Ahmed SG, Bashir MA, Malah MB, Usoro A, Gimba I, et al., Deferral patterns of voluntary blood donors at the National Blood Transfusion Service, North East Zonal Centre, Maiduguri. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2010 Jun; 39(2):119-25.
13.
Charles KS, Hughes P, Gadd R, Bodkyn CJ, Rodriquez M. Evaluation of blood donor deferral causes in the Trinidad and Tobago National Blood Transfusion Service. Transfus Med. 2010; 20(1):11-4.
14.
Bahadur S, Jain S, Goel RK, Pahuja S, Jain M. Analysis of blood donor deferral characteristics in Delhi, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009; 40(5):1087-91.
15.
Agnihotri N. Whole blood donor deferral analysis at a centre in Western India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2010 July; 4(2): 116–22.
16.
Trembath CR, Hickner JM, Bishop SW. Incidental blood pressure elevations: a MIRNET project. J Fam Pract. 1991;32(4):378-81
17.
Shaz BH, James AB, Hillyer KL, Schreiber GB, Hillyer CD. Demographic variations in blood donor deferrals in a major metropolitan area. Transfusion. 2010 Apr; 50 (4):881-7.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/3755:1841

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: NONE.

Date of Submission: Nov 30, 2011
Date of Peer Review: Dec 26, 2011
Date of Acceptance: Dec 30, 2011
Date of Publishing: Feb 15, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com