Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 59259

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : February | Volume : 6 | Issue : 1 | Page : 69 - 71

Tuberculosis of the Breast: A Review of 16 Cases

Suresh I. Basarkod, Yamanur P. Lamani, Shaileshkumar M. Emmi, Eshwar B.Kalburgi, Vijay Dombale, Vishwanath G., Chetan V.N

1. Associate Professor, dept. of Surgery, 2. Assistant Professor, dept. of Surgery, 3. Assistant Professor, dept. of Surgery, 4. Professor, dept. of Surgery, 5. Professor, dept. of Psychology, 6. Associate Professor, dept. of Surgery, 7. Post Graduate student, dept. of Surgery, S.N. Medical College & HSK Hospital, Navanagar, Bagalkot, Karanataka-587102, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Suresh I. Basarkod
Dept of Surgery, S.N. Medical College & HSK Hospital
Navanagar, Bagalkot-587102
Phone: 9620587511


Aim: To evaluate the clinico-pathological profile of the patients with tuberculosis of the breast.
Materials and Methods: The clinico-pathological data of the patients with tuberculosis of the breast, who were reviewed from June 2004 to June 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: Sixteen patients (2.01%) had tuberculosis of the breast out of 796 patients with breast lesions. A breast lump was the presenting symptom in 6 patients and a lump with a sinus was the symptom in 5 patients. Fine needle aspiration (FNAC) and biopsy were the diagnostic methods which were used. All the patients were treated with antitubercular treatment (ATT). Three patients needed additional surgical procedures.
Conclusion: Tuberculosis of the breast is a rare disease, which presents most commonly as a lump. As it mimics carcinoma of the breast, it can be a diagnostic dilemma. FNAC and biopsy are the mainstay of the diagnosis and imaging also offers little benefit. ATT is an effective line of management, along with a limited role of surgery.


Granulomatous inflammation, Breast, Tuberculosis, Mastitis

Tuberculosis is the most widespread and persistent of the human infections in the world. It can involve any organ. But tuberculosis of the breast is a rare form of tuberculosis (1), (2). The breast tissue is remarkably resistant to tuberculosis, as it provides an infertile environment for the growth and multiplication of the tuberculosis bacilli (3). Tuberculosis of the breast is an uncommon presentation of tuberculosis, even in the countries with a high incidence of pulmonary and extra pulmonary tuberculosis (4),(5). We have reviewed 16 cases of tuberculosis of the breast here, which were rare manifestations of a common disease in a country like ours.

Material and Methods

The clinico- pathological data of the patients with breast lesions, who were reviewed from January 2004 to December 2010 at S. N. Medical College and HSK Hospital, was retrospectively observed. Out of this, the data which pertained to tuberculosis of the breast was analyzed with respect to the clinical presentation, diagnostic methods and the treatment.


Sixteen patients had tuberculosis of the breast out of 796 patients with breast lesions who were studied (Table/Fig 1). All the 16 patients were females with a mean age of 28.2 years. Thirteen patients were below the poverty line. The right breast was affected in 8 patients and the left one was affected in 7 cases. One patient had involvement of both the breasts. The outer quadrant was involved in 9 patients, the central in 6 and the inner in 1. A breast lump was the presenting symptom in 6 patients, followed by a lump with a sinus in 5, only a sinus in 1, a breast abscess (cold) in 3 and an ulcer over the breast skin in 1. Seven patients Surgery Section had associated breast pain and 4 had constitutional symptoms. Six patients had axillary lymphadenopathy. Five patients had pulmonary tuberculosis. Two patients were positive for HIV. Fine needle aspiration was done in14 cases and it was conclusive in 12. 14 patients underwent biopsy procedures. Ultrasonography reports were available in 3 patients (Table/Fig 2). 13 patients received the standard antitubercular treatment and 3 received treatment as per the category 3 of the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) (Table/Fig 3).


The breast tissue is remarkably resistant to tuberculosis, as it fails to provide a conducive environment for the survival and multiplication of the tuberculosis bacilli, like the skeletal muscle and the spleen (3). The incidence of tuberculosis of the breast varies from 1% of all the breast lesions in the industrialized counties to as high as 4% in the Indian subcontinent (4), (5). In our study, 16(2.01%) patients had tuberculosis of the breast, out of 796 patients with breast lesions. Breast tuberculosis commonly affects women in their reproductive ages (6). Another predisposing factor is lactation (3), (7). Tuberculosis of the male breast has rarely been reported in the literature (7), (8). The high incidence of breast tuberculosis in certain areas has been linked to the prevalence of tuberculosis in the faucial tonsils of suckling infants (7). In our study, all the cases were females who were in the reproductive age group (mean age.28.2 years) and three were lactating. Other associated factors which were noticed in our study were HIV positivity in 2 patients and poor socio-economic status in 13 patients. Tuberculosis of the breast may be primary or secondary. However, it is generally believed that the infection of the breast is usually secondary to a tuberculus focus elsewhere in the body, which may or may not be clinically apparent. In a study series which was performed by Khanna et al. out of 52 patients who were studied, five patients had active pulmonary tuberculosis and 21 had axillary lymphadenopathy (7). In our series, 5 patients had pulmonary tuberculosis and 6 had axillary lymphadenopathy. The most accepted route for the spread of tuberculosis to the breast was retrograde lymphatic extension from the axillary lymph nodes (6). Mc Even classified breast tuberculosis into five types, viz (i) Nodular tubercular mastitis, (ii) Disseminated or confluent tubercular mastitis, (iii) Sclerosig tubercular mastitis, (iv) Tuberculous mastitis obliterans, and (v) Acute miliary tubercular mastitis (9). But at present, tuberculosis of the breast has been reclassified into nodular, disseminated and sclerosing. The nodular variant is often mistaken for a fibroadenoma or a carcinoma. The disseminated variety commonly leads to caseation and sinus formation. Sclerosing tuberculosis afflicts older women and it is slow growing, with the absence of suppuration (6). The most common presentation of tuberculosis of the breast is a lump, usually in the central or the upper outer quadrant of the breast, which may be sometimes be hard and irregular and which may mimic carcinoma (6), (10), (11). Other presentations include a lump with a sinus, multiple sinuses without a lump, breast abscess, and ulcer over the breast. Breast pain and constitutional symptoms help in differentiating tuberculosis from a carcinoma (6). In our study, the most common presentation was a lump (6) followed by a lump with a sinus (5) and breast abscess (3). The main differential diagnosis for tuberculosis of the breast is carcinoma. The factors which are predictive but not diagnostic for breast tuberculosis include constitutional symptoms, a mobile breast lump, multiple sinuses, and an intact nipple and areola in young, multiparous or lactating females. Nipple retraction, peau d’orange and involvement of the axillary lymph nodes are more common in malignancy than in tuberculosis (6). Fine needle aspiration (FNAC) is the most widely used investigation of choice (12) and its accuracy varies from 73% to 100% (2), (7). The demonstration of a caseating granuloma is conclusive of tuberculosis (2), (13) and it is not always mandatory to find a demonstration of acid fast bacilli (AFB) (6). In endemic countries, finding a granuloma in the FNAC studies warrants empirical treatment for tuberculosis (13). However, an excision biopsy is strongly advocated, to rule out other diagnoses like sarcoidosis, fungal infections, duct ectasia, and coexisting malignancy (12). In our series, among the 14 patients FNAC was conclusive in 12 patients, which showed caseating granulomas (Table/Fig 4) and AFB was not demonstrated. Though the mycobacterium culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, the time which is required for it and the frequent negative results which are seen with the paucibacillary specimens are important limitations of it. Moreover, culture is not always helpful for the diagnosis of breast tuberculosis (1). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is mostly used as a tool to distinguish tubercular mastitis from other forms of granulomatous mastitis; however, PCR is by no means the absolute choice for diagnosing tubercular infections and false negative reports are still a possibility (14). Imaging in breast tuberculosis is of limited value, except for a chest radiograph. Mammography or ultrasonography is unreliable in distinguishing breast tuberculosis from carcinoma or other pathologies (7). CT scan and MRI are seldom used for evaluating the extent of the disease (6). None in our series underwent mammography. Ultrasonography was done in only three patients and the reports were inconclusive. Most of these new techniques are too expensive and sophisticated to be of any practical benefit to the vast majority of TB patients who live in underdeveloped countries like India (6). In our series, 13 patients received the standard antitubercular therapy for six months and 3 patients received DOTS (category 3). Only 13 patients were followed up and they responded. Therapeutic guidelines have remarked that antitubercular therapy which is given for six months is sufficient; however, in some series, this therapy was administered in a different manner for variable periods (15). Surgical intervention was required in 4 cases, incision and drainage were required in 3 cases and sinus tract excision was required in one patient. Very rarely were mastectomy and axillary dissection required in painful ulcerative lesions (6). The potential limitation of this study was its retrospective nature, as it was not possible to investigate the risk factors. role helped in studying the diseases with a rare occurrence. Future studies with an increased number of samples may throw more light on this disease presentation.


Tuberculosis of the breast is a rare disease. It presents most commonly as a breast lump and it often mimics carcinoma of the breast as and so it can be a diagnostic dilemma. FNAC and biopsy are the mainstay for its diagnosis and imaging offers little benefit. The patients can be effectively treated with antitubercular drugs; surgery has only a limited role.


Kalac N, Ozkan B, Bayiz H, Dursun AB, Demirag F. Breast tuberculosis. Breast. 2002; 11:346–49.
Kakkar S, Kapila K, Singh MK, Verma K. Tuberculosis of the breast: A cytomorphologic study. Ada Cytol. 2000; 44:292–96.
Mukerjee P, George M, Maheshwari HB, Rao CP. Tuberculosis of the breast. J Indian Med Assoc.1974; 62:410–12.
Harris SH, Khan MA, Khan R, Haque F, Syed A, Ansari MM. Mammary tuberculosis: Analysis of thirty-eight patients. ANZ J Surg. 2006; 76:234–37
Tse GM, Poon CS, Ramachandram K, Ma TK, Pang LM, Law BK, et al. Granulomatous mastitis: A clinicopathological review of 26 cases. Pathology. 2004; 36:254–57.
Tewari M, Shukla HS. Breast tuberculosis: Diagnosis, clinical features and management. Indian J Med Res. 2005; 122:103–10.
Khanna R, Prasanna GV, Gupta P, Kumar M, Khanna S, Khanna AK. Mammary tuberculosis: A report of 52 cases. Postgrad Med J. 2002; 78:422–24.
Jaideep C, Kumar M, Klianna AK. Male breast tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 1997; 73:428–29.
McKeown KC, Wilkinson KW. Tuberculosis of the breast. Br J Surg. 1952; 39:420–9.
Jalali U, Rasul S, Khan A, Baig N, Khan A, Akhter R. Tuberculous mastitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005; 15:234–37.
Shinde SR, Chandawarkar RY, Deshmukh SP. Tuberculosis of the breast, masquerading as carcinoma: A study of 100 patients. World J Surg. 1995; 19:379–81.
Baharoon S. Tuberculosis of the breast. Ann Thorac Med. 2008; 3:110–14
Mehrotra R. Fine needle aspiration diagnosis of tuberculous mastitis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2004; 47:377–80.
Katoch VM. Newer diagnostic techniques for tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2004; 120:418-28
Tantrikulu A C, Abdurrahman, Abakay A O, Kapan M. Breast tuberculosis in southeast Turkey. Breast Care 2010; 5:154-157.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/3538.3906:1862


Date of Submission: Nov 03, 2011
Date of Peer Review: Dec 11, 2011
Date of Acceptance: Jan 09, 2012
Date of Publishing: Feb 15, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)