Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 72488

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : June | Volume : 6 | Issue : 5 | Page : 816 - 820

Homozygosity and Heterozygosity of the Pericentric Inversion of Chromosome 9 and Its Clinical Impact

Mohit Kumar, Atul Thatai, Shilpa S. Chapadgaonkar

1. Research Scholar Department of Biotechnology, Manav Rachna International University, Sector 43, Aravalli Hills, Faridabad, India. 2. Head, Molecular Biology Department, Dr. LalsPathlabs, Sector 18, Block E, Rohini, New Delhi -110 085, India. 3. Shilpa Samir Chapadgaonkar, Assistant professor, Department of Biotechnology, Manav Rachna International University, Sector 43, Aravalli Hills, Faridabad, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shilpa S. Chapadgaonkar E-57, Kapil Vihar Society, Sector 21 C, Faridabad, Haryana, India. Phone: 09868052680 E-mail: Shilpas.fet@mriu.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: This paper presents a detailed study of inversion in chromosome 9 and its correlation with sub-fertility amongst 26 couples. Until now, there have been conflicting views on the clinical outcome of the pericentric inversion in chromosome 9. Many researchers consider this anomaly as a predisposing factor for infertility.

Methods: In the present study, the karyotyping analysis of 500 couples was carried out to investigate the genetic basis for infertility in these subjects.

Results and Conclusion: It was observed that a significant fraction (5.2%) of the total group had a pericentric inversion in chromosome 9 as the only known abnormality. The incidence of this abnormality in infertile patients was significantly higher than the reported value of 1%-3% in the normal population. Moreover, it was observed that the incidence of the inv (9) karyotype in the male patients was 2.5 times higher than that in females. These correlations clearly indicated that the inv (9) karyotype was not a normal karyotype but that it had a harmful effect on fertility.

Keywords

Homozygosity, Pericentric inversion, Chromosome 9, Heterochromatin, Infertility

Introduction
The most common form of inversion which is encountered in human chromosomes is a pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 (inv 9), that occurs in 1%-1.65% of the general population (1). In the Asian population, the incidence of this anomaly is projected to be lower than that in other ethnic groups. Various studies have estimated it to be in the range of 0.25% (2).

In some of the previous reports, the clinical investigators had associated the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 (inv 9) with various abnormalities which had included infertility, miscarriages, sub-fertility, birth defects, abnormal pregnancies like intrauterine growth retardation, etc (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) 15]. On the other hand, there have been some reports which have denied the correlation between the minor polymorphic chromosomal variants and reproductive failure (16) (17). Apart from infertility related problems, inv (9) has also been associated with problems such as chromosomal aberrations (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) psychiatric disorders (23), ectodermal dysplasia (24) and azoospermia (25).

In our experience, we have observed a higher incidence of the inv 9 karyotype in patients with infertility related problems. Recently, we have come across two extremely rare cases of homozygosity for the pericentric inv (9). Both the patients had fertility related problems. These cases were instrumental in strengthening our belief that the pericentric inv (9) karyotype could not be categorized as a normal karyotype but that it had clinical implications. Therefore, in order to investigate the harmful effects of pericentric inv 9 on fertility, we analyzed the cases of 500 infertile couples that were referred for infertility in the recent 3 years (2009-2011) to the Dr. Lal Pathlabs, India.

Material and Methods

Subjects: Couples of Indian origin (n=500) with no known cause of infertility (idiopathic) were subjected to a karyotyping analysis. The mean age of the patients was 33 years and their age range was between 23-42 years. Also, 4500 normal subjects were analyzed cytogenetically as the control group. The data which was generated for the control group reflected the occurrence of inversion 9 in the general population. An informed consent was taken from all the subjects before blood was collected from all of them.

The karyotyping investigations were carried out on the cultures of the peripheral blood lymphocytes by using standard cytogenetics techniques. Short-term cultures of peripheral blood or were established and they were arrested in the metaphase stage. The metaphase spreads were analyzed by the standard GTG-banding technique (26).

The chromosomal abnormalities which were observed in the data set were reported in accordance with the ISCN guidelines (International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (27).

Results

This study involved 500 infertile couples (1000 individuals). 2 cases were diagnosed with homozygosity and 24 cases were diagnosed with heterozygosity for pericentric inv (9) (Table/Fig 1). Out of 25 couples who had infertility and inv (9) as the only cytogenetic anomaly, 18 male partners carried the inv (9) karyotype while the females were normal. Only in 7 couples, infertility was observed in the female partners with inv (9) karyotype. It was observed that the infertility could be expressed as primary or secondary infertility. However, 84% (21 out of 25) cases were of secondary infertility (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

Inv (9) regarded as a normal polymorphic form of chromosome 9. The breakpoints are preferentially located in the 9p12 or the 9q13-21.1 regions. Starke et al., 2002 (28) studied the heterochromatin organization in the pericentromeric region and the proximal long (q) and short (p) arms of human chromosome 9. They observed regions of sequence homology between the 9p12 and the 9q13-21.1 bands.

The Cases of Homozygosity for the Pericentric Inversion Chromosome 9

The homozygosity for inv (9) is extremely rare and therefore the reporting and the documentation of such cases is valuable.

Case 1: A couple was referred for the investigation of primary infertility. Here, the female was found to be normal, while the karyotype of the husband was found to be 46, XY, inv (9) (p11q13)x 2 (Table/Fig-2). The cytogenetic analysis of the parents of the patient could not be carried out due to the non-availability of samples.

Case 2: The patient was a 23 years old pregnant (28 weeks) female. The pregnancy had to be terminated due to the diagnosis of Down’s syndrome in the foetus. The karyotyping for the aborted foetus confirmed the presence of trisomy 21. The patient’s blood was sent for chromosomal analysis. The karyogram revealed a very rare case of homozygosity of the inversion in chromosome 9. The karyotype was found as 46, XX, inv (9) (p11q13) x 2. In this case, no other abnormality was reported. The karyotype of the patient’s husband was found to be normal. A higher incidence of a Down’s syndrome offspring where one of the parents had inv (9) had been documented in the past (29).

The study of Case 1 and Case 2 gave strong evidences on the correlation of the abnormal phenotypes with homozygosity for the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. This abnormality could be expressed as infertility or abnormality in the progeny.

Previous case reports involving homozygosity of the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. Most of the cases had suffered from infertility. Khaleghian and Azimi (2006) (30) reported a case of a female patient with homozygosity of the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. The patient was a 23-year female with a 28-week stillbirth (secondary infertility). Ceylan (2008) (31) discussed a case of a 27 year old male with primary infertility. Guven (2011) (32) reported a case of infertility which was caused by oligoasthenoteratozoospermia in a man with homozygosity of the pericentric inv (9). Cotter et al., (1997) (33) studied the incidence of inv (9) in foetuses. He reported the incidence of homozygosity for inv (9) in two cases. One of the foetuses suffered from severe intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR) and oligohydrominous, leading to foetal death and the other foetus was born as a normal term healthy baby. The baby had a normal life for the next five years. However, the study did not extend till its adult life to make any conclusion on its fertility.

Rarity of the homozygosity for inv (9) makes it difficult to analyze and compare the data. However, a higher prevalence of infertility in the subjects who had heterozygosity of inv (9) has been reported by many researchers. In the following section, we studied the impact of the heterozygosity for pericentric inversion 9 in the given study group.

The Effect of Heterozygosity for the Pericentric Inversion of Chromosome 9
Based on the study on the 4500 individuals of Indian origin, we have estimated the incidence of the pericentric inversion in chromosome 9 to be about 0.73% in the general population (unpublished data). In the present data set, out of the total 500 couples, 2 subjects were diagnosed with homozygosity for inv (9) and 24 subjects were diagnosed with heterozygosity for the pericentric inv (9).

In our study, 5.2% of the total cases who were examined for infertility had inv (9) as the only cytogenetic abnormality. It has to be noted that previous population studies which had involved the general population had estimated the prevalence of inv (9) to be 1%-3%, with the lowest incidence in the Asian population (around 0.25%). The other cytogenetic abnormalities together formed another 5.2% of the total, whereas in 89.6% of the patients, no detectable cytogenetic abnormality was found. The occurrence of inv (9) in patients with infertility was therefore significantly higher than the incidence of inv (9) as well as other cytogenetic abnormalities in the general population. This result clearly indicated the association of this anomaly with infertility.

In the above study, we considered the cases of 25 infertile couples, with one of the partner having inv (9) as the only cytogenetic anomaly [Table/Fig-1]. It was observed that in 18 couples, the male partners had carried the inv (9) karyotype while the female partner was normal. Whereas in 7 couples, the female partner had carried the inv (9) karyotype. Therefore, it can be said that the infertility was not specific to a particular sex. However, the ratio of the infertility in males and females was 2.57. It meant that men were 2.57 times more likely to suffer from infertility related problems due to the inv (9) karyotype as compared to the female subjects. In most of the previously reported cases, the incidence of infertility with the inv (9) karyotype in the male population was higher than that in the female patients. Similarly, Mozdarani et al. (2007) (13) had investigated the cases of 300 infertile couples. They had discovered a significantly higher incidence of inversion 9 in the male subjects and even in female subjects of a normal population and had concluded that the presence of inv (9) in the male population could lead to infertility due to spermatogenic disturbances. Uehara et al. (1992) (34) had carried out the chromosomal analyses of foetuses and infertile couples. The analysis of the infertile couples had revealed that the incidence of such an inversion in the males was significantly higher than the incidence in the normal population. The karyotyping of the foetuses revealed that the occurance of this inversion was higher in the foetuses of the parents with a history of clinically abnormal offsprings. It was observed that infertility could be expressed as primary or secondary infertility. A significantly high percentage (84% i.e., 21 out of 25 cases) of the cases were of secondary infertility. This was in accordance with previous reports in which it was said that the carriers of balanced structural aberrations had an increased risk of having progenies with an unbalanced karyotype, resulting in spontaneous abortions in the 1st and second trimesters. Farcas et al. (2007) (35), studied the cases of 354 couples who had a history of recurrent miscarriages. They found out that inv (9) was the most frequent chromosomal anomaly which was observed amongst the study lot. Similarly, Turleau et al. 1979 (4) studied 413 couples with a history of spontaneous abortions. They observed a significantly higher prevalence of pericentric inversions in the patients.

Case reports which have described the association of pericentric inv (9) and infertility as well as other problems, have been documented in the literature. Ghasemi et al., 2007 (36) reported two cases of inv (9) in one of partners from two sub fertile couples with no other abnormalities. Rossodivita et al., 1997 (37) documented two cases with structural variations of chromosome 9 which were associated with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and azoospermia. Akbas et al., (15) reported inv (9) in a 17 month old, mentally retarded, male child with a micropenis and other defects. Inv (9) has been considered as a predisposing factor for nondisjunction and an interchromosomal effect (38). Gardner and Sultherland (1996) (39), found out that the individuals who carried such inversions had an increased risk of having an unbalanced progeny, at a range of 1% to 10%. Similar observations were made by Ford and Lester (1978) (40), where they reported a high frequency of mitotic non-disjunction in the inv (9) cases.

The predominant cause of secondary infertility is said to be numerical aberrations in the foetuses and immunological factors (41). Serra et al. 2005 (29) studied the prevalence of Down’s syndrome in a parent with an inv (9) karyotype and observed that the presence of inv (9) in a parent increased by a factor of about 3 the incidence of extrachromosome 21 in the offspring. Kaiser (42), 1988 proposed that small inversions might lead to recombinants with a fatal deletion or an addition of a large fragment. Rao et al. (2006) (43) detected a high frequency of inv(9) (p12q13) in children with dysmorphic features and concluded that inv(9) definitely played a role in the abnormal phenotype development. They hypothesized that during an inversion event, there might be loss or suppression of the euchromatin chromosome region, leading to abnormalities.

Inv (9) has been considered to be a normal polymorph, as it mainly consists of centromeric heterochromatin with no known coding regions. Recent studies are now suggesting an important role of heterochromatin (44). Hsu (1975) (45) proposed that heterochromatin plays the passive role of an immune bodyguard. The transcription potential of a gene can also be susceptible to heterochromatic silencing by position effect variegation (46). Also, it has been proposed that the harmful effect of the inversion may be brought about by changes in the expression of the genes which are responsible for fertility and foetal growth. Using the advanced approaches of genomics and proteomics and applying the advanced gene expression techniques could help in finding out the causative mechanisms of infertility. Garcia_Peiro et al., 2011 (47) used flow cytometry and the SCD test to analyze the sperm DNA integrity in the case of a patient with infertility and the inv (9) karyotype. They discovered significant meiotic alterations, anomalous aneuploidy rates, high-sperm DNA fragmentation, and altered seminogram parameters in the patient.


Yashuhara et al. (2005) (48) studied the case of an ovarian cancer patient with the inv (9) karyotype. DNA sequence analysis and southern blot analysis showed multiple FGF7-like genes in the 9p11 region which were also duplicated to the 9q13 region on the aberrant chromosome 9. Surgical specimens of ovarian cancer with the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining showed overexpression of the FGF7 gene in the patient as well as other ovarian cancer patients. FGF 7 signalling plays a crucial role in the regulation and the maintenance of the male reproductive system (Cotton et al. 2008) (49). This aspect needs to be investigated deeply to know the mechanism by which the fertility is affected.

Finally, based on this clinical study, it can be concluded that the pericentric inv (9) (p11q13) is not an uneventful rearrangement and that it leads to a relatively higher possibility of various clinical problems, such as reproductive failure and the occurrence of abnormalities in the offspring. It can be hypothesized that the susceptibility locus for infertility and other abnormalities may be located at the breakpoint of the inversion on chromosome 9, which may lead to the cloning of a susceptibility gene for the unspecified abnormalities. These findings have paved the way for further research at the molecular level, to find out the physiological effects of inv (9) which lead to infertility.

References

1.
Cheong KF, Knight LA, Tan M, Ng IS. Variants of chromosome 9 in phenotypically normal individuals. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore. 1997; 26: 312-14.
2.
Teo SH, Tan M, Knight L, Yeo SH, Ng I. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9; incidence and clinical significance. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995; 24: 302-04.
3.
Boue J, Taillemite Jl, Hazael-Massieux P, Leonard C, Boui A. Association of the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 and reproductive failure in ten unrelated families. Humangenetik. 1975; 30:217-24.
4.
Turleau C, Chavin-Colin F, Grouchy J. Cytogenetics of recurrent abortions. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynec. Fend. Biol. 1979; 9: 65-74.
5.
Tibiletti MG, Simoni G, Terzoli GL, Romitti L, Fedele L, Candiani GB. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in couples with repeated spontaneous abortions. Acta Eur. Fertil, 1981; 12: 245-24.
6.
Andrews T, Roberts DF. Chromosome analyses in couples with repeated pregnancy loss. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1982; 14: 35-52.
7.
Tho SPT, McDonough PG. Chromosome polymorphisms in 110 couples with reproductive failure and subsequent pregnancy outcome. Fertil. Steril. 1982; 38: 688-94.
8.
Lyberatou-Moraitou E, Grigori-Kostaraki P, Retzepopoulou AZ, Kosmaidou-Aravidou Z. Cytogenetics of recurrent abortions. Clin. Genet. 1983; 23: 294-97.
9.
Abdous A, Pen-Ming L. Ming, Hosam T, Salem E, Reece A. The clinical importance of the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in the prenatal diagnosis. J Maternal and Fetal Investigation. 1997; 7:126-28.
10.
Mokhtar MM. Chromosomal aberrations in children with suspected genetic disorders. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 1997; 3:114-22.
11.
Kim SS, Jung SC, Kim HJ, Moon HR, Lee JS. Chromosome abnormalities in a population which was referred for suspected chromosomal aberrations. A report of 4117 cases. J. Korean Med. Sci. 1999; 14:373-76.
12.
Sasiadek M, Haus O, Lukasik-Majchrowska M, Slezak Paprocka Borowicz M, Busza H, Plewa R, Cytogenetic analysis in couples with spontaneous abortions. Ginekol Pol. 1997; 68: 248-52.
13.
Mozdarani H, Mohseni Meybodi A, Karimi H. Impact of the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 [inv (9) (p11q12)] on infertility. Indian J. of human Genetics. 2007; 13: 26-29.
14.
Rao BV, Kerketta L, Korgaonkar S, Ghosh K. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9[inv (9)(p12q13)]: Its association with genetic diseases. Indian J. of human Genetics. 2006; 12(3): 129-32.
15.
Akbas E, Senli H, Hallioglu O, Batmaz S, Erdogan NE. Association of the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 (inv
9.
[p11q13]) and genetic diseases: a case report. Lab Medicine. 2010; 41:96-98.
16.
Blumberg BD, Shulkin JD, Rotter JI., Mohandas T, Kaback MM. Minor chromosomal variants and major chromosomal anomalies in couples with recurrent abortions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1982; 34: 948-60.
17.
Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, Hutzler M, Chin A, Hassold T. Does the karyotype of a spontaneous abortion predict the karyotype of a subsequent abortion? – Evidence from 273 women with two karyotyped spontaneous abortions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1987; 41: 465-83.
18.
Holbek S, Friedrich U, Lauritsen JG, Therkelsen AJ. Marker chromosomes in parents of spontaneous abortuses. Humangenetik. 1974; 25: 61-64.
19.
Nielsen J, Friedrich U, Hreidarson AB, Zeuthan E. The frequency of 9qh+ and the risk of chromosome aberrations in the progeny of individuals with 9qh+. Humangenetik, 1974; 21: 211-16.
20.
Faed MJW, Lamont M, Morton HG, Robertson J, Smail P. An XYY boy with a short stature and a case of Klinefelter’s syndrome (XXY) in a family with inversion 9. Clin. Genet. 1978; 14:241-45.
21.
Wang HS, Hamerton JL. C-band polymorphisms of chromosome 1, 9 and 16 in four subgroups of mentally retarded patients and a normal control population. Hum. Genet. 1979; 51: 269-75.
22.
Mattei JF, Mattei MG, Balestrazzi P, Giraud F. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 9, inv(9) (p 22; q 32) with recurrent duplication-deletion. Clin. Genet. 1983; 24: 220-22.
23.
Kumar HV, McMahon KJ, Allman KM, McCaffrey B, Rowan A. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 and personality disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry 1980; 155: 408-10.
24.
Moreno-Fuernmayor H, Rodldan-Paris L, Bermudez H. Ectodermal dysplasia in females and the inversion of chromosome 9. J. Med. Genet. 1981; 18: 214-17.
25.
Matsuda T, Horii Y, Nonomori M, Yoshida O . Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in male infertility. Jpn. J Fertil. Steril. 1991; 36: 666-71.
26.
Verma R S, Babu A. Human chromosome. Manual of Basic techniques, 2nd ed. Mcgraw –Hill: New York; 1995.
27.
ISCN. An international System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Editors- Lisa G. Shaffer, Marilyn L. Slovak, Lynda J. Campbell; 2009.
28.
Starke H, Seidel J, Henn W, Reichardt S, Volleth M, Stumm M, et al. Homologous sequences at the human chromosome 9 bands p12 and q13-21.1 are involved in different patterns of pericentric rearrangements. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10: 790–800.
29.
Serra A, Brahe C, Millington-Ward A, Neri G, Tedeschi B, Tassone F, et al. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9: its prevalence in 300 Down syndrome families and in molecular studies of nondisjunction. Am. J. Med. Genet. Suppl. 1990; 7: 162-68.
30.
Khaleghian M, Azimi C. Homozygosity of the pericentric inversions of chromosome 9 in a patient’s parents with stillbirth. Iranian. J. Public Health. 2006; 35:28-33.
31.
Ceylen G, Ceylen C, Yuce H. A rare case with homozygosity for the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 and primary infertility. American Journal of Case Reports 2008; 9: 385-88.
32.
Guven ESG, Dilbaz S, Ceylander S, Acar H, Cinar O, Ozdegirmenci O, Karcaaltincaba D. An uncommon complementary isochromosome of 46,XY, i(9)(p10),i(9)(q10) in an infertile oligoasthenoteratozoospermic man. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 95(1): 290e5-290.e8.
33.
Cotter PD, Babu A, MC Curdy LD, Cagganam, Willne JP, Desnick RJ Homozygosity for the pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. Prenatal diagnosis of two cases. Ann. Genet. 1997; 40(4): 222-26.
34.
Uehara S, Akai Y, Takeyama Y, Takabayashi T, Okamura K, Yajima A. The pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in prenatal diagnosis and infertility. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1992; 166(4):417-27.
35.
Farcas S, Belengeanu V, Stoian M, Stoicanescu D, Popa C, Andreescu N. Considerations regarding the implication of polymorphic variants and chromosomal inversions in recurrent miscarriage. Jurnalul Pediatrului, 2007; 10, 39-40.
36.
Ghasemi N, Kalantar SM, Aflatoonian A, Tayebi N. Subfertile couples with inv (9) (p11q13): Report of two cases. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 2007; 12(1):, 63-65.
37.
Rossodivita A, Radicioni A, Spera G, Colabucci F. The structural variants of chromosome 9. A possible association with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1997; 10: 419-24.
38.
Krishna DS, Al-Awadi SA, Farag TI. Pericentric inversion, recombinant aneusomy and other associated chromosomal aberrations: random or non-random. Am J Hum Genet. 1992; 51(4): A291(1146).
39.
Gardner RJM, Sultherland GR. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxf Monogr Med Genet. 1996; 29: 139-52.
40.
Ford JH, Lester P. The factors which affect the displacement of the human chromosomes from the metaphase plate. Cytogenet. Cell Genet.1982; 33: 327-32.
41.
Tan Y, Hu L, Lin G, Sham JST, Gong F, Guan XY, Lu G. Genetic changes in human fetuses from spontaneous abortions after in vitro fertilization which were detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Biol. of reproduction. 2004; 70: 495-99.
42.
Alan R. Pericentric inversions: their problems and clinical significance. In: Kaiser P. The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements. Liss Inc, 1988; 163-247.
43.
Rao BV, Kerketta L, Korgaonkar S, Ghosh K. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 (P12q13): its association with genetic diseases. Indian J of Hum Genet. 2006; 12(3):129-32.
44.
Erdtmann B. Aspects of the evaluation, significance and the evolution of the human C-band heteromorphism. 1982; 61(4): 281-294.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4209:2242
Date of Submission: Mar 01, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Apr 11, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jun 02, 2012
Date of Publishing: Jun 22, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com