Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 71088

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
Knowledge is treasure of a wise man. The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help ones reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journalsNo manuscriptsNo authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2012 | Month : June | Volume : 6 | Issue : 5 | Page : 910 - 912 Full Version

Giant Angiomyolipoma of the Kidney with Perinephric Extension: A Rare Case

Published: June 1, 2012 | DOI:
Vijay Kumar K.R., T. Arul Dasan

1. Dr Vijay Kumar K.R, Assistant professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka 560004 India. 2. Corresponding Author.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. T. Arul Dasan Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka 560004 India. E-mail: (;


Angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are one group of benign tumours that are distinguishable radiologically. Because AMLs are composed of different tissues which include fat, muscle, vascular elements, and even cartilage, the fat in particular, may be detected radiologically. Angiomyolipomas, particularly when they are small, warrant no treatment. They are resected only when they are over 4 cm or when they are symptomatic due to the risk of bleeding.


Giant angiomyolipoma, Hamartoma, Fat attenuation, Computed Tomography, MRI

AMLs are hamartomatous tumours which are composed of mature adipose tissue, thick-walled blood vessels, and sheets of smooth muscle. The amount of each component varies in each tumour. When an incidental solid renal mass is encountered, angiomyolipoma should be excluded. The imaging features are quite characteristic, that clinches the diagnosis. We are reporting a rare case of giant angiomyolipoma which extended into the perinephric space.

Case Report

A 28-year old female presented to our department with the complaint of a gradually formed, painless abdominal swelling which involved the right lower abdomen, of a duration of about 25 days. Her vitals were stable and her physical examination revealed a large, firm, non tender swelling in the right lumbar region, which extended to the right iliac fossa.

Laboratory investigations revealed the following results: her routine serological tests showed an Hb% of 11.3gm, ESR of 3mm/Hr, RBCs-5.1 Million/Cc, WBCs-7400cells, Rbs-91gm, urea-25mg/dl, creatinine – 1.4 mg/dl , Na+ -142 (mEq/L), K+ -4.4 (mEq/L), chloride-102 (mEq/L) and Ca+ 9gm. The routine urine studies and microscopy were within normal limits. Her chest radiograph showed a normal picture.

Ultrasound of the abdomen revealed a hyperechoic lesion which extended from the right hypochondrium to the right iliac fossa, which displaced the kidney medially. Multiple small hyperchoic lesions were noted in the cortices of both the kidneys.

Contrast enhanced CT scan showed a predominant fat attenuation lesion which arose from the postero-lateral cortex of the right kidney, extending from the right hypochondrium to the right iliac fossa and displacing the kidney medially. Large vessels of ~ 7-8mm calibre were found to traverse the lesion.

On MRI, the lesion showed hyperintensity on both the T1 and the T2 sequences and it showed signal suppression on the STIR sequence.

The intraoperative findings revealed a well encapsulated tumour which was adherent to the right kidney. The patient underwent Section right nephrectomy with mass excision. The mass lesion measured 20(CC) x 17(TR) x 13(AP) cms in size and it weighed approximately 1500 gms. The cut section of the tumour mass was solid and it appeared bright yellow in colour. It contained prominent large blood vessels with no secondary changes. Histopathology and haemoxylin – eosin staining revealed a non -capsulated, well marginated lesion with abundant adipocytes, with smooth muscle and blood vessel components.


Angiomyolipomas are the most frequent mesenchymal benign neoplasms of the kidney, with a prevalence of 0.3–3%. They occur more commonly in women than in men. Angiomyolipomas, particularly when they are small, warrant no treatment, while they are resected only when they are over 4 cm or symptomatic, due to the risk of bleeding.

Angiomyolipomas contain smooth muscle and vascular, lipomatous, and myeloid elements in different proportions. When an incidental solid renal mass is encountered, angiomyolipoma should be excluded (1).

The overall female: male ratio is approximately 4:1, which suggests a hormonal component to the tumour growth (2). It can occur sporadically, or it can be part of the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Sporadic angiomyolipomas account for 80 percent of the AML, they are usually solitary and they occur almost exclusively in women in the fourth to fifth decades of life (mean age 43 years) (3).

Most of the small angiomyolipomas are asymptomatic and they are found incidentally during radiological studies. Research has shown that 25-50 percent of the patients have some or all of the features and the stigmata of TSC. The classical presentation of AML is a palpable tender mass (47%), flank pain (53%) and gross haematuria (23%); this is known as ‘Lenk’s triad’ (4).

However, it is rare to have a diagnosed AML with this triad. The less frequently associated symptoms include nausea or vomiting, fever, anaemia and blood pressure alteration (5).

Imaging Feature
Imaging FEATURES Small angiomyolipomas (less than 3cm in diameter) appear typically as hyperechoic, sharply marginated, and homogeneous lesions on the gray-scale ultrasound (US) (6). Large angiomyolipomas (more than 3cm in diameter) may reveal a homogeneous or heterogeneous bright appearance on the US due to solid, adipose and haemorrhagic components (7).

Angiomyolipomas consist of variable quantities of blood vessels, smooth muscle, and fat. Most of the angiomyolipomas can be diagnosed by identifying portions of the mass which have an attenuation of −10 HU or less, which are indicative of fat (8). However, approximately 4%–5% of the angiomyolipomas may either not contain any fat cells or they may contain an insufficient amount of fat cells to allow a diagnosis which is based on imaging(9),(10). The MR imaging examination should include the application of the T1- and T2-weighted sequences and of a frequency-selective fat-suppressed dynamically acquired T1-weighted sequence before and after intravenous gadolinium chelate administration. The fat suppression techniques generally are unhelpful in detecting fat in the angiomyolipomas with minimal fat, because such masses contain little or no fat and they often appear isointense to the renal parenchyma on the T1-weighted images (9). If a mass exhibits areas of signal suppression, a fat-containing angiomyolipoma should be considered as a strong possibility. Most of the angiomyolipomas can be diagnosed with confidence by identifying the presence of the fat cells within a noncalcified renal mass (10).

AMLs can vary in size from a few millimeters to larger than 20 cm (11). It is unusual to see an AML which is larger than 10 cm and therefore many studies have demonstrated that any AML which measures over that size is considered as a “giant”.

The two major morbidities which are associated with renal AMLs are retroperitoneal haemorrhage and impingement of the AML on the normal tissue, which can impair the renal function (2),(12). Enlarging angiomyolipomas can develop micro- and macro-aneurysms that can rupture. These can be sudden and painful, and occasionally life-threatening. Several studies have demonstrated that the frequency of the symptoms and the risk of bleeding (rupture) increases with the size of the AMLs. The reported risk of haemorrhage varies markedly, ranging from 3 to 50 percent. In a review on angiomyolipomas which were ≥ 4 cm, 82 to 94 percent were found to be symptomatic and 50 to 60 percent were found to bleed spontaneously (13).

The management of angiomyolipomas historically, has been correlated with their symptoms. Most of the patients with small tumours (less than 4 cm) that tend to be asymptomatic are managed conservatively, with periodic ultrasonography (14). However, patients with tumours which are larger than 8 cm, generally tend to be asymptomatic. It is these larger tumours that are at a greater risk of spontaneous or traumatic ruptures, resulting in haemorrhagic complications. These patients are therefore treated with angiography and selective arterial embolization as a first line treatment. Partial or radical nephrectomy is indicated if there is persistent haemorrhage, a suspicion of malignancy, or failed embolization Atypical angiomyolipomas with an absent fat component are about 5% and they usually appear iso or slightly hyperdense when they are compared to the adjacent kidney on unenhanced CT, due to the smooth muscle components, and the homogeneously enhancing masses after the contrast administration.

A similar pattern may be observed in complicated benign cysts (haemorrhagic, protein-rich or gelatinous), renal metastasis and RCC. The evidence of hyperdense and fat masses in the kidney at the same time is diagnostic of multiple angiomyolipomas (1).


Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR et al. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 2008; 249:16–31.
Nelson CP, Sanda MG. The contemporary diagnosis and the management of renal angiomyolipomas. J Urol 2002; 168(1):1315-25.
Blute ML, Malek RS, Segura JW: Angiomyolipomas: clinical metamorphosis and concerns. Urol 1988; 139(1):20-24.
Seyam RM, Bissada NK, Kattan SA, et al. Changing trends in the presentation, diagnosis and the management of renal angiomyolipomas: comparison of the sporadic and the tuberous sclerosis complexassociated forms. Urology. 2008; 72:1077-82.
Oesterling JE, Fishman EK, Goldman SM, Marshall FF: The management of renal angiolipomas. J Urol 1986; 135:1121-24.
Li R, Zhang X, Hua X, Cai P, Zhong H, Guo Y, et al. Real-time contrastenhanced ultrasonography of resected and immunohistochemically proven hepatic angiomyolipomas. Abdom Imaging 2009; DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9592-x.
Helenon O, Correas JM, Balleyguier C, et al. Ultrasound of renal tumors. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1890-1901.
BosniakMA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii S, Raghavendra BN. CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 497–501.
JinzakiM, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology 1997; 205: 497–502.
Sant GR, Heaney JA, Ucci AA Jr, Sarno RC, Meares EM Jr. Computed tomographic findings in renal angiomyolipoma: a histologic correlation. Urology 1984; 24: 293–96.
Wright T, Sooriakumaran P. Renal angiomyolipoma presenting with a massive retroperitoneal haemorrhage due to deranged clotting factors: a case report. Cases Journal 2008; 1:213.
Bissler, JJ, Kingswood, JC. Renal angiomyolipomata. Kidney Int 2004; 66:924.
Soulen, MC, Faykus, MH Jr, Shlansky-Goldberg, RD, et al. Elective embolization for the prevention of hemorrhage from renal angiomyolipomas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5:587.
Dickinson M, Ruckle H, Beaghler M. Renal angiomyolipoma: optimal treatment based on the size and symptoms. Clin Nephrol 1998; 49(5):281-86.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4364:2249

Date of Submission: Mar 31, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Apr 18, 2012
Date of Acceptance: May 10, 2012
Date of Publishing: Jun 22, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)