Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 58576

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesTable and FiguresDOI and Others
Readers' Comments (0) Article in PDF Audio Visual Citation Manager Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1022 - 1025

Endovascular Management of Intracranial Giant Aneurysms: Experience on 25 Patients

Lakshmi Sudha Prasanna Karanam, Santhosh Joseph

1. M.D.,MUHS Interventional Neuroradiology 2. M.D.,Professor, Sri Ramachandra University

Correspondence Address :
Dr. (Prof) S.Joseph
Department of Interventional Radiology,
Sri Ramachandra University,Porur,Chennai, India.
Phone: 09930614135


Background & Aim: Various endovascular modalities are available for the management of intracranial aneurysms. We present our experience with these modalities in the management of the giant aneurysms.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the patients presenting with intracranial giant aneurysms, suspected clinically and confirmed on neuroimaging, in our institute between February 2003 and July 2008. Patients were treated by parent vessel occlusion, stent assisted coiling, balloon assisted coiling, stent grafts or onyx based upon clinical findings, cross compression and balloon occlusion test. Clinical and angiographic follow up done at intervals of 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months.

Results: The records of 25 patients (7 males and 18 females; aged 9 to 76 years) from the study period were available for analysis. In 21 of the 25 patients, the giant aneurysms were localized in the anterior circulation (majority in caroticopthalmic segment) while in 4, they were found in the posterior circulation. Total occlusion was seen in 19 of the 25 cases. A worsening of the mass effect was seen in 3 cases, and ICH was seen in 2. Transient neurological deficits were observed in 6 patients, while permanent deficits affected 3 patients. Death occurred in one patient in our study. During the follow-up period, an improvement in mass effect was seen in 23 patients. Recanalisation was observed in 2 patients who underwent a conservative treatment. Four patients continued to have persistent symptoms and one patient expired during the follow up.

Conclusion: Various endovascular modalities appear to be an effective and safe alternative treatment for the management of intracranial giant aneurysms.


Giant aneurysms, Endovascular coiling, Intracranial stent

How to cite this article :

Lakshmi Sudha Prasanna Karanam, Santhosh Joseph. ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF INTRACRANIAL GIANT ANEURYSMS: EXPERIENCE ON 25 PATIENTS. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2012 August [cited: 2018 Oct 18 ]; 6:1022-1025. Available from

Giant intracranial aneurysms (> 2.5 cm in diameter) comprise of ~5% of total intracranial aneurysms and cause mortality in >60% of patients in 5 years of presentation (1). The surgical intervention, though is considered as the standard mode of management, is often difficult and dangerous due to accompanying comorbidities and the state of arterial walls. Moreover, the longer temporary arterial occlusion times required during surgery may increase the risk of cerebral ischemia (2). Due to these limitations, endovascular approaches have gained popularity as a treatment for giant cerebral aneurysms. The endovascular options available for such treatment are parent vessel occlusion, coil embolisation, balloon assisted coil embolisation, stent-assisted coil embolisation and onyx filling of the aneurismal sac (3). We present our experience with the use of various endovascular modalities in the management of giant intracranial aneurysms during last 5 years.

Material and Methods

The presented data is a retrospective analysis of the patients managed for intracranial giant aneurysms in the departments of Neurosurgery and Intervention Radiology in a tertiary care referral centre between February 2003 and July 2008. The diagnosis of aneurysms was based upon clinical presentation and radiological findings (CT or MR angiography and DSA with 3-D rotation). The patients were managed with any of the endovascular modality based upon the clinical and radiological findings, as per unit protocol (discussed below). Flow diverters were not used in any ofSectionour cases due to their non-availability. The patients were followed up clinically after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the intervention. The information regarding persisting or upcoming symptoms and examination findings were recorded. Follow-up angiographies were performed at 6 months. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. A written informed consent was obtained from all the patients/guardians for the intervention. The study was approved by the institute ethics committee. Treatment strategy (4),(5). An endovascular procedure was performed in all patients under general anesthesia with proper pre- and post-procedure heparinisation. A balloon occlusion test was performed in thirteen patients; (8) had good cross circulation and passed the balloon occlusion test. All of the patients were administered dual anti-platelet agents (75 mg clopidogrel and 150 mg aspirin) for at least 3 months, followed by a regimen of a single anti-platelet agent (aspirin) for one year. Patients that had been treated with a stent were prescribed an anti-platelet regime for their lifetimes.

Parent vessel occlusion was performed in four patients (Table/Fig 1) whose aneurysms displayed large necks and very good cross-circulation, as confirmed by the balloon occlusion test, with a venous delay < 2 seconds. Simple coiling alone was conducted in 9 patients (Table/Fig 2) who had giant aneurysms with favorable geometry for direct coil delivery. Balloon-assisted coiling (Hyperfoam balloon) was performed in one patient (Table/Fig 3) in which the aneurysm was present in a distal location with an acute angle to the parent artery and with a normal parental artery.

Stent-assisted coiling was performed in 5 cases (Neuroform in four and LEO in one patient) (Table/Fig 4). These patients had a diseased parental artery with an obtuse angle between the aneurysm and the parent artery. It should also be noted that affordability played a role in selecting a treatment. Stent graft was used in 4 patients (Jomed stent graft) (Table/Fig 5). These patients had aneurysms that were situated in the proximal portion of the internal carotid artery, where a stent can be easily maneuvered. These patients also had good arterial anatomy with no tortuous course. Onyx was used in one patient that had a favorable neck to artery ratio and a positive seal test (Table/Fig 6).


The records of 25 patients (7 males and 18 females; aged 9 to 76 years) from the study period were available for analysis. The majority of our patients (20) presented with symptoms related to mass effect, such as headache and cranial nerve palsies. Eight of our patients presented with occulomotor nerve palsy, while six presented with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Only one patient suffered from intraparenchymal haemorrhage. 21 aneurysms were noted in the anterior circulation, while the remaining 4 occurred in the posterior circulation. 9 aneurysms were in the cavernous segment, 10 in the carotico-ophthalmic segment, 1 in the posterior communicating artery and 1 in the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Of those 4 in posterior circulation, 3 were located in the basilar artery, and 1 was in the vertebral artery. All of the abovementioned aneurysms had a fundus diameter > 2.5 cm.

Total occlusion of the aneurysm was achieved in 19 cases (Raymond 1), and partial occlusion was feasible in 6 cases with contrast filling the neck of the aneurysm (Raymond 2). An improvement in mass effect was seen in 23 patients during the follow-up period. However, there was an initial worsening of the mass effect in 3 of the patients. These patients had increasing headaches, worsening visual symptoms and cranial nerve palsies. Transient neurological deficits were seen in 6 patients (these patients had improved by the time of the follow-up occurring one month after treatment), and permanent neurological deficits occurred in 3 patients (permanent cranial nerve palsy in 2 and dense motor deficit in 1 patient). Follow-up control angiographies were performed in 18 patients. The control angiography revealed recanalisation in 2 patients who underwent coiling and were being managed conservatively. Overall4 patients continued to have persistent symptoms in follow up and death occurred in one patient in the present series.


From our presented data, various endovascular modalities appear to be effective and safe alternative treatment for the management of intracranial giant aneurysms.In 21 of the 25 patients, the giant aneurysms were localized in the anterior circulation (majority in caroticopthalmic segment) while in (4), they were found in the posterior circulation. Giant aneurysms are often seen at the sites of maximum hemodynamic stress, such as the cavernous, supraclinoid and vertebrobasillar regions. Giant aneurysms are formed from constant aberrant1024vascular remodelling caused by abnormal hemodynamic flow and secondary healing processes in response to constant vessel injury by remodelling stresses. The majority of our patients (80%) presented with symptoms related to mass effect, such as headache and cranial nerve palsies. Giant aneurysms are dynamically active; continuous growth, despite near total thrombosis, results in the mass effect. The thrombus is the source of periodic distal emboli, and hemorrhage may occur at any point (1).

Currently, the indications for endovascular treatment of giant aneurysms with the aim of sparing the parent vessel are anticipated surgical difficulty, co-morbidities precluding craniotomy, poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage, and unfavorable morphological features (6),(7). Total occlusion of the aneurysm was achieved in 19 cases (Raymond 1), and partial occlusion was feasible in 6 cases with contrast filling the neck of the aneurysm (Raymond 2). Raymond classified coiled aneurysms as complete occlusion of the aneurysm (class 1), minor recanalisation (class 2) which means persistence of the residual neck and major recanalisation (class 3) which include persistence of the residual aneurysm (8).

In this study, four of the patients presented with very wide aneurysm necks, excellent collateral circulation across the circle of Willis in the balloon occlusion test and venous delays < 2 s. These characteristics prompted us to occlude the parent vessel in these patients. Detachable coils were initially used by Cognard et al., (1997) in a group of 4 patients with giant aneurysms. Occlusionwas reported in 75% of the patients, and recanalisation occurred in 50% during the one-year follow-up period. In another study, Guglielmi Detachable Coils were solely used for the endovascular treatment of 40 patients, and recanalisation was seen in 52.9% of these patients after 11 years (4),(9). We used detachable coils alone in 9 of our patients, resulting in good angiographic outcomes, and 2 patients presented with recanalisation within one year. Aneurysm geometry is a very importantvfactor in endovascular treatment. The dome:neck ratio and the neck width determine the stability of coils placed in the aneurysm, as well as the likelihood of both primary neck occlusion and later recanalisation. The geometry also dictates the need for adjunctive strategies, such as stent assistance or balloon remodelling, to retain and stabilize the endovascular repair.

A combination of stent and onyx were employed in a group of 11 patients described by Mawad et al., (2002), with 81% complete occlusion, 9% morbidity and 18% mortality (10). Stent-assisted coiling was performed in five of our patients. Diseased parental arteries and the obtuse angles of the neck of the aneurysms in these patients rendered them suitable for stent-assisted coiling with near complete occlusion of the aneurysm from the circulation. Stent graft was used in four other patients in our study with successful outcomes. In these patients, aneurysms were present in the proximal portion of the ICA, less tortousity of the internal carotid artery which can easily be negotiated. However, the location of these aneurysms in the more proximal segment was quite favorable to negotiate stent grafts in these patients. Bare stent grafts were used to treat giant aneurysms and 100% occlusion was achieved (11). A modified procedure, known as balloon-assisted coiling was performed in one patient by introducing a balloon remodelling technique. It was necessary to use a Hyperform balloon to assist coiling in this patient due to the acute angle of the aneurysm, which was located distally on a healthy parental artery. In another study, Molyneux et al., (2004) demonstrated a balloon remodeling technique performed in conjunction with Onyx delivery into the aneurismal sac; this study reported an effective occlusion in 64% of the 19 patients included in the CAMEO trial (Cerebral Aneurysm Multicenter European Onyx). The mortality and major morbidity were 9 and 12.5%, respectively, and there was no recanalisation up to one year after treatment (12).

Overall 4 patients continued to have persistent symptoms in follow up and death occurred in one patient in the present series and these results are on par with previous reports (13). The patient became unstable 48 hours after the intervention, and a CT scan showed intraventricular haemorrhage. The mortality of untreatedgiant aneurysms is approximately 60 to 100 % within 2 to 5 years. The mortality and morbidity rates for anterior circulation aneurysms are 7.4 and 26.9% while, for posterior circulation aneurysms, these rates are 9.6 and 37.9%, respectively (14).


Endovascular treatment of giant aneurysms is a promising alternative treatment with promising results. The selection of appropriate techniques and materials is essential to obtain favourable results. Understanding the complex anatomy of the aneurysm is crucial to successful navigation and intervention.


Choi IS, David C: Giant intracranial aneurysms: Development, clinical presentation and treatment. Eur J Radiol 46:178–194, 2003.
Drake CG: Giant intracranial aneurysms: experience with surgical treatment in 174 patients. Clin Neurosurg 26:12–95, 1979.
Parkinson, Eddleman, Batjer H, Bendok,: Giant intracranial aneurysms: Endovascular challenges: Neurosurgery 59:103-112, 2006.
Cognard C, Pierot L, Boulin A, Weill A, Tovi M, Castaings L et al.,: Intracranial aneurysms: Endovascular treatment with mechanical detachable spirals in 60 aneurysms. Radiology 202:783–92, 1997.
Peerless SJ, Drake CG: Treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Neurosurg Rev 5:149–154, 1982.
Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Hasn P, McDougall CG: Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 54:6–17, 2004.
Han PP, Albuquerque FC, Ponce FA, MacKay CI, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF et al., Percutaneous intracranial stent placement for aneurysms.J Neurosurg 99:23–30, 2003.
Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):1998-2004.
Murayama et al.,(Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Jahan R,Frazee J, Martin N,Vinuela F:Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11years’ experience. J Neurosurg 98:959– 66, 2003.
Mawad ME, Cekirge S, Ciceri E, Saatci I: Endovascular treatment of giantand large intracranial aneurysms by using a combination of stent placementand liquid polymer injection. J Neurosurg 96:474– 82, 2002
Islak C, Kocer N, Albayram S, Kizilkilic O, Uzma O, Cokyuksel O: Barestent-graft technique: A new method of endoluminal vascular reconstruction for the treatment of giant and fusiform aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1589–95, 2000.
Molyneux AJ, Cekirge S, Saatci I, Gal G: Cerebral Aneurysm Multicenter European Onyx (CAMEO) trial: Results of a prospective observational study in 20 European centers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:39–51, 2004.
Fleming JB, Hoh BL, Simon SD, Welch BG, Mericle RA, Fargen KM, Pride GL, Purdy PD, Shannon CN, Harrigan MR. Rebleeding risk after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun;114(6):1778-84.
Raaymakers TW, Rinkel GJ, Limburg M, Algra A: Mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A metaanalysis. Stroke 29:1531–38, 1998.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4420:2354

Date of Submission: Apr 27, 2012
Date of Peer Review: May 12, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jul 07, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2016: 132.37
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Embase & EMbiology
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)