Article in PDF
How to Cite
Citation Manager
Readers' Comments (0)
Audio Visual Article Statistics
Link
to PUBMED
Print this Article
Send to a Friend
Advertisers
Access Statistics Resources
Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."
Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011
Dr. Shankar P.R.
"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."
Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011 Anuradha
Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.
Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020
Case report
Full Version
Bilateral Anatomical Variations in the Formation, Communication and the Termination of the Retromandibular Vein
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Veena Vidya Shankar,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy,
MS Ramaiah Medical College,
MSRIT Post, Bangalore, Karnataka-560054, India.
Phone: 9980308735, 080-23355472
E-mail: veena24shankar@gmail.com.
A sound knowledge of variations of superficial and deep veins of Head & Neck region is important during operative, diagnostic and endovascular procedures of head and neck to surgeons, interventional radiologists and clinicians. The objective of this case report was to bring awareness to the clinicians about the variations in the veins of head & neck in general & the RMV specifically. The clinical, surgical and embryological significance of these variations have been emphasised.
Retromandibular vein, Variations, External jugular vein, Internal jugular vein, Facial vein
INTRODUCTION
The veins of the head and neck have a complex developmental pattern which predisposes them to variations in their formation and drainage. The standard anatomical description of the veins of the face is the superficial temporal vein uniting with the maxillary vein to form the Retromandibular Vein (RMV) within the substance of the parotid gland. The RMV divides into the anterior and the posterior divisions. The anterior division joins with the facial vein, inferior to the angle of the mandible, to form the common facial vein that drains into the internal jugular vein. The posterior division joins with the posterior auricular vein to form the external jugular vein which drains into the subclavian vein (1),(2). The knowledge on the varied drainage patterns of the veins of the head and neck is important and relevant, as they are often used for cannulation in intravenous infusions, central venous pressure monitoring and in microvascular anastomosis. The surgeons can also avoid any unnecessary bleeding during the intraoperative trial and error procedures (3). RMV is an important anatomical element in radiology which can be used to localize a tumour in the parotid gland in relation to the facial nerve and in surgery, as a landmark to dissect the facial nerve and its branches.
During the routine cadaver dissection in the Department of Anatomy at M.S.Ramaiah Medical College, variations of the major veins of the head and neck region were observed in a 60yr old male cadaver. The part was neatly dissected and photographs were taken.
On the left side (Table/Fig 1), the superficial temporal vein bifurcated into the anterior and the posterior divisions. The anterior division joined with the maxillary vein to form the RMV. The posterior division joined with the posterior auricular vein to form the external jugular vein which drained into the subclavian vein. The RMV divided into the anterior and the posterior divisions at the angle of the mandible. A connecting venous channel-V1 which measured 3.8cms, ransuperficial to the submandibular gland and was connected to the facial vein and the single anterior jugular vein to form a common venous channel – V2 which measured 1.6cms, which drained into the beginning of the anterior division of the RMV. About 2.5cm distal to this drainage, the anterior division of the RMV opened into the internal jugular vein [Table/Fig 1A] . Further, the anterior division continued and joined the posterior division of the RMV to form asingle vein at the junction of the lower and the middle third of the sternocleidomastoid, and drained into the left subclavian vein.
On the right side (Table/Fig 2) , the superficial temporal vein bifurcated into the anterior and the posterior divisions. The anterior division joined with the maxillary vein to form the RMV. The posterior division joined with the posterior auricular vein to form the external jugular vein which drained into the subclavian vein. The RMV trifurcated at the angle of the mandible. The anterior division received the facial vein and the submandibular vein. The middle division continued downwards and forwards and it joined with the anterior jugular vein, which is a single vein and it drained into the subclavian vein. The posterior division drained into the internal jugular vein.
The venous drainage of the head and neck region gets established after the formation of the skull. The first vessel that can be identified is the ventral pharyngeal vein which drains the mandibular and the hyoid arches to the cranial part of the precardinal vein – the future internal jugular vein. The ventral pharyngeal vein receives tributaries from the face and the tongue and it becomes the linguofacial vein. It anastomoses with the primitive maxillary vein to form the facial vein, which receives a strong tributary from the temporal region – the RMV and it drains into the internal jugular vein through the linguofacial vein. The external jugular vein arises from the neck region from a tributary of the cephalic vein (1). The variations in the size and the pattern of the veins of the neck are quite common (2).There have been cases which have been reported, where the facial vein terminated into the external jugular vein (4); the RMV unitedwith the facial vein at a higher level in the parotid gland (5); the facial vein drained into the superficial temporal vein with an undivided RMV; the right facial vein drained into the superficial temporal vein, about 5mm above an undivided RMV (6); and the common trunk of the RMV joined with the anterior facial vein to form the common facial veins, with the absence of the external jugular vein bilaterally. The anomalous venous patterns are due to the regression and/or the retention of the venous anastomotic channels (7).
The superficial temporal vein and the RMV have been used as guides to expose the facial nerve branches in the parotid gland in superficial parotidectomy and also in cases of open reductions of the mandibular condyle fractures (8). These veins are usually used as grafts during carotid endarterectomy and surgical microvascular anastomosis, especially in oral reconstruction procedures (9). Any malformations and variations of the veins of head and neck should be kept in mind preoperatively, as this helps the surgeons in planning the operative procedures (10).
To conclude, the bilateral spectrum of the anatomic variations in the formation, communication and the termination of RMV makes this a rare, special case.
ID: JCDR/2012/4536:2494
Date of Submission: May 16, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Jun 01, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Aug 25, 2012
Date of Publishing: Sep 30, 2012
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
- Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
- Academic Search Complete Database
- Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- Embase
- EBSCOhost
- Google Scholar
- HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
- Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
- Journal seek Database
- Popline (reproductive health literature)
- www.omnimedicalsearch.com