Diathermy Versus Conventional Scalpel in Making an Abdominal Incision: A Prospective StudyCorrespondence Address :
Rajendra Prasad Choubey,
ANIIMS, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India.
Introduction: Scalpel incisions produce nominal harm to neighboring and adjacent tissues. Diathermy is considered to be an efficient mode of incision and its use is widespread, but due to scarring potential, advanced wound contamination rate and poor wound healing, the extensive use of surgical diathermy for incisions.
Aim: To compare the use of electrosurgery and conventional scalpel in making an abdominal incision with respect to blood loss, operating time, wound infection rate and post-operative pain.
Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study in which patients above 16 years of age were included and all patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to two arms of the study. In Group A, incision by conventional scalpel and in group B, incision by diathermy were made. Incisions were of three types i.e., Kocher’s incision were 4, Midline were 22 and Pfannestiel were 44. Data was collected and entered in the Microsoft excel sheet and analysed for blood loss, operating time, wound infection rate and post-operative pain.
Results: Total number of patients included in this study was 70. Age of the participants were in range of second to seventh decade, youngest being 19 years and the oldest being 73 Years of age. Male and female ratio was 1:6. Time taken for incision and blood loss in group B is less than group A respectively. (p=0.009, p=0.001) in all types of incision. Rate of complications following electrocautery incision were also low and no haematoma or seroma were noted in those wounds.
Conclusion: Diathermy technique is compatible with conventional scalpel being safe, effective and simple. Less blood loss was noted with clearer field of dissection, as compared to one created by conventional steel scalpel. Because of the faster haemostasis, the mean time of making an incision was also less in case of diathermy.
Electrosection, Incision, Scalpel incision, Wound infection
Shruti Pandey, Rajendra Prasad Choubey, Indra Tiwari Narain. DIATHERMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SCALPEL IN MAKING AN ABDOMINAL INCISION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2019 October [cited: 2019 Nov 15 ]; 13:PC09-PC11. Available from
Date of Submission: May 31, 2019
Date of Peer Review: Jun 17, 2019
Date of Acceptance: Sep 06, 2019
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2019
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: No
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS: [Jain H et al.]
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 01, 2019
• Manual Googling: Sep 09, 2019
• iThenticate Software: Sep 18, 2019 (13%)
Etymology: Author Origin
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
- Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
- Academic Search Complete Database
- Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- Google Scholar
- HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
- Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
- Journal seek Database
- Popline (reproductive health literature)