A Comparative Study of the Feasibility of External Jugular Vein Cannulations versus Internal Jugular Vein Cannulations in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical ProceduresCorrespondence Address :
Dr. Zulfiqar Ali,
27, Nabdi Pora Hawal, Srinagar-190011, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Introduction: The Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) and subclavian vein cannulations are mainly performed in daily clinical practice. Although success rates for IJV and subclavian veins are high, still the complications are not infrequent. The External Jugular Vein (EJV) approach to the subclavian vein is less taught and less practiced. The fear of frequent failures has discouraged the practitioners from using this approach.
Aim: To compare the success rate, number of attempts, and complications associated with IJV and EJV catheterisations.
Materials and Methods: A total of 160 patients, requiring central venous catheterisation for various surgical procedures were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group I (n=80) underwent right IJV catheterisation and patients in group E (n=80) underwent right EJV catheterisation. The number of attempts for cannulation, success or failure of catheterisation and any complications associated with the procedure or in the post-operative period were noted in each group. The data was compared between the two groups by using Chi-square test and Studentâ€™s Independent samples t-test.
Results: The right IJV was successfully cannulated in 90% while as the right EJV was successfully cannulated in 70% of the patients (p=0.05). All cannulations were done by the same anaesthesiologist. Malpositioning of catheter was noted in eight patients in Group E while five patients had malpositions in Group I. Pneumothorax was encountered in two patients, and carotid artery puncture in three patients from group I.
Conclusion: The rate of success for IJV was better than the EJV. The complication rate of pneumothorax and carotid artery injury was more with IJV than EJV.
Central venous cannulation, Complications, Difficulty, Seldinger technique
Date of Submission: Feb 20, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Mar 05, 2020
Date of Acceptance: Mar 11, 2020
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2020
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 03, 2020
• Manual Googling: Mar 09, 2020
• iThenticate Software: Mar 20, 2020 (17%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
- Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
- Academic Search Complete Database
- Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- Google Scholar
- HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
- Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
- Journal seek Database
- Popline (reproductive health literature)