Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 86087

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : August | Volume : 15 | Issue : 8 | Page : ZC13 - ZC16 Full Version

Anneroth’s Histopathological Grading System in Non Metastatic and Metastatic Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma- A Pilot Study

Published: August 1, 2021 | DOI:
Ambika Murugesan, Sekar Balakrishnan, Manoj Chandrasekar, K Indrapriyadharshini, Ravi Saranyan, E Manivannan, M Rajmohan

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of Pharmacology, VMKV Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 7. Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, KSR Institute of

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ambika Murugesan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology,
Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Sankakiri Main Road, Ariyanoor, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.


Introduction: Prognostic evaluation of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is mainly based on [Tumour (T), Nodes (N), and Metastases (M)] staging. To predict the biological and clinical behaviour of a tumour, histological grading systems plays an important role. Modified Anneroth’s grading system includes three parameters each for histologic features and tumour-host relationship.

Aim: To compare and analyse the histological features of tumour center and periphery of non metastatic and metastatic OSCC according to Anneroth’s histopathological classification and its association with regional lymph node metastasis.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective pilot study was conducted on 20 histopathologically proven cases of OSCC collected from the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. The OSCC cases those reported from March 2018 to June 2020 were included in the study. Among 20 cases, 10 non metastatic and 10 metastatic cases, were retrieved from archival blocks. Scores for the morphology and tumour-host relationship of non metastatic and metastatic tumours was assessed and graded by Anneroth’s grading system; then compared with the Broder's histopathological grading system. The histopathological scoring of lymph node was based on TNM staging. Chi-square test and Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis was done.

Results: Anneroth’s grading system showed a significant difference in pattern of invasion in tumour periphery of metastatic OSCC (p-value=0.01). Compared to Broder’s, Anneroth’s classification showed a highly significant corelation with lymph node metastasis (p-value=0.001).

Conclusion: Hence, Anneroth’s histopathological grading system can be used to predict the biological changes in metastatic and non metastatic OSCC and its increased possibility of regional lymph node metastasis.


Anneroth’s grading system, Metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma, Tumour periphery

Oral cancer ranks sixth among all the types of cancer globally, with 450,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths annually worldwide. In India, oral cancer has been reported with 77,000 new cases and 52,000 deaths annually (1),(2). The prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) depends on clinical, pathological and molecular factors (3). Among the clinical factors, TNM staging of cervical lymph nodes plays a vital role in determining prognosis of the OSCC (4). It is the uncontrolled growth rate and variation in pattern of spread by the tumour cells reflects that TNM staging alone is not sufficient in determining the prognosis (5). For better analysis of cellular and nuclear details by histochemical and immunohistochemical markers; understanding the biological behaviour of tumour is mandatory (6). Conventional histopathological grading system i.e., Broder’s grading system is the gold standard for grading OSCC. The system grades tumour cells based on their differentiation (well/moderate/poorly differentiated and undifferentiated). Hence, differentiation of tumour alone is not sufficient for predicting the biological behaviour of the tumour, because of the heterogenous population.

Anneroth’s grading system is based on six parameters for assessing and grading the tumour based on tumour cell population and tumour-host relationship. Thus, the grading system is more specific and helps in predicting prognosis. Many studies have reported increased alterations in the biological behaviour of tumour population in periphery of the tumour (5),(7),(8) when compared to the tumour center, which determines the invasiveness and metastatic potential of a tumour.

In this study, Anneroth’s system was applied to grade the histopathological aspects of tumour center and periphery, to analyse the biological behaviour of the tumour. The study also aimed to look for possible correlation between the Anneroth’s grading system and TNM staging.

Material and Methods

A retrospective pilot study was conducted on histopathologically proven cases of OSCC collected from the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. The OSCC cases that reported from March 2018 to June 2020 were included in the study. The Institutional Ethical Committee, VMRF (DU) approved the study (VMSDC/IEC/Approval No 185).

Inclusion criteria: Archival blocks and slides of histopathological proven cases of OSCC were retrieved along with the clinical details.

Exclusion criteria: Other variants of OSCC, metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of oral cavity and surgical specimen after chemotherapy and radiotherapy were excluded.

A total of 70 cases were collected, among them only primary tumours of OSCC confirmed by biopsy and located in any area of oral cavity were included. From the selected cases, slides with proper tumour center and periphery were segregated among metastatic and non metastatic cases.

In this pilot study, 10 cases of non metastatic and 10 metastatic OSCC cases were studied, in each case two samples were collected i.e., one from the tumour center and one from the tumour periphery. Hence, a total number of 40 samples with sufficient tumour periphery were included in this study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size estimation was done using the following formula

(Z)2×Std Dev×(1-Std Dev)/(Margin of error)2

The sample size was calculated assuming at the most 5% risk, with minimum 80% power and 5% significance level (significant at 95% confidence level. i.e., Z=1.96) and standard deviation of 0.5 and a margin of error (confidence interval).

Necessary sample size=(1.96)2×(0.5)×(1-0.5)/(0.10)2=40 Sample.

Hence, a total number of 40 samples with sufficient tumour periphery were included in this study.

The Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained sections were graded by Broder’s (9) and Anneroth’s Multifactorial grading system. According to Broder’s system the gradings were - well differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated while that based on Anneroth’s grading were: grade I: score of 6-12, grade II: score of 13-16 and grade III: score of 19-24 (6). The clinical staging of the tumour was done based on TNM staging system (10).

Statistical Analysis

The data was compiled in Microsoft Excel sheet and transferred to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Both descriptive and inferential statistics have been applied. Chi-square test and Spearman’s corelation coefficient test was used. The cut-off p-value was less than 0.05.


Both the grading system showed a significant cellular difference in both tumour center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic OSCC. Comparatively, Anneroth’s multifactorial grading system showed highly significant p-value of 0.007 and 0.001 in tumour center and periphery of non metastatic and metastatic tumours respectively (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2) (Table/Fig 3) (Table/Fig 4). Among the six parameters of Anneorth’s, pattern of invasion showed a significant difference in the periphery of metastatic OSCC with a significant p-value=0.01, respectively (Table/Fig 5).

Among the 20 cases, 7 cases (35%) were of T2 category, 7 (35%) cases were of T3 category and 6 cases (30%) were of T4 category. Only 12.5% of cases were palpable among T2 category, in T3-71% of cases were palpable and in T4-100% of cases were palpable. Histopathologically, nodal positivity was observed in 10 (50%) cases. Statistically, no significant relationship existed between T factors and lymph node metastasis. The relationship between the Anneroth’s grading system and TNM staging for non metastatic and metastatic cases are tabulated in (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7), respectively. When comparing the association between metastatic and non metastatic groups with TNM staging, metastatic cases of OSCC showed a significant result with p-value=0.001.

Spearman correlation coefficient was done to analyse the correlation between the Anneroth’s system and TNM staging. A positive correlation was observed with increased in TNM staging with increased histopathological grading (Table/Fig 8). Comparatively, Anneroth’s grading system showed a significant correlation with TNM staging both in tumour center and periphery with a p-value=0.001 (Table/Fig 9).


In head and neck tumours, 90% of cases were OSCC whose unabatable growth and invasive potential increases the locoregional spread (9),(11). Metastasis to lymph nodes signify the next stage in the progression of cancer. TNM staging is a prognostic factor to determine the extent of the diseases and to predict the outcome of cancer patients (12). However, rate of growth and invasiveness depends not only on the clinical staging, mostly on differences in the degree of differentiation of tumour cells which contributes to the heterogenous population (13),(14). Histological prognostic factors are important in assessing the clinical and biological behaviour of the tumour. In 1920, Broder’s quantitative grading system for cancer was initiated still it lacked a correlation with prognosis. To make the morphologic and histologic criteria to be more precise Anneroth and Hansen modified the histopathological grading system for application to OSCC.

In this study, tumour center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic tumours were graded by the Anneroth’s and Broder’s grading system to know the difference in the cellular details and invasiveness of the tumour. Comparatively, Anneroth’s system showed significant cellular difference in tumour periphery of metastatic OSCC with increased potential to regional LN metastasis.

Baba AI and Câtoi C found that there are cellular differences between tumour center and periphery, where the cell population in tumour center has normal intercellular connections, with desmosomes and junctional complexes, while these are absent or reduced at the periphery (15). Sharma M et al., stated that areas with a high invasive rhythm shows cells that are completely detached from the tumour mass, and whose interconnections disappear altogether (16). Bankfalvi A and Piffko J and Tumuluri V et al., reported that the tumour population in the invasive front determines the actual behaviour of the tumour, which provides information for assessing the clinical aggressiveness and thereby the prognosis of the tumour (17),(18). It is also stated that the tumour cells in the invasive front were in less differentiated state when compared the differentiated cell population in the center. Tumuluri V et al., and Byers RM et al., reported that cell population in the invasive tumour front has an affirmative correlation between the multifactorial histopathological grading system, prognosis and risk factors in OSCC (19),(20).

In Anneroth’s classification, the total scoring of the six parameters gives an idea about the extension, involvement and aggressiveness of the tumour. Though, Broder’s system exhibits a significant relationship between the tumour center and periphery, it is based only on one parameter i.e., degree differentiation of a cell. In this study, Anneroth’s grading showed highly significant results in both center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic OSCC. Similar findings were observed in the study conducted by Akhter M et al., where both the grading system showed significant results but Anneroth’s grading system was more significant when compared to Broder’s grading system (7).

Okada Y et al., and Dantas DD et al., observed no significant difference between and the nodal positivity and the T factors (21),(22). Study also reported a positive relationship between the Anneroth’s grading system and cervical node metastasis and postulated that the histopathological findings could serve as a predictor in cervical lymph node metastasis. In addition, Haque MA et al., also reported a significant relation between the multifactorial grading system and palpable lymph nodes (23). The present study differs from the above investigations by analysing the cellular changes in both tumour center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic OSCC. The results also favour to predict, higher the alteration in tumour cell population in periphery of the tumour higher is the possibility of metastasis to regional lymph node.


It includes that only one area of the tumour was analysed for periphery. The mean score calculated from two or more periphery of whole tumour may represent the accurate biological behaviour of the tumour and can be used to assess early metastasis.


Anneroth’s multifactorial grading system of OSCC can be taken as a valuable diagnostic and predictive tool for assessing regional lymph node metastasis. This was a retrospective study and in future a prospective study with a larger sample size has to be carried for confirming the above results. For further improving the clinical value of the histological grading system, use of proliferative and vascular immunohistochemical markers can be accounted to predict the biological behaviour of the tumour.


The authors would like to thank Dr C Bharath, Assistant Professor of Department of Community Dentistry and Dr Balamanikandan, Associate Professor of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for their expert advice, support and valuable suggestions while conducting this study.


Borse V, Konwar AN, Buragohain P. Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India. Sensors International. 2020;2020:100046. [crossref] [PubMed]
Salehiniya H, Raei M. Oral cavity and lip cancer in the world: An epidemiological review. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2020;7(8):3898-905. [crossref]
Jadhav KB, Gupta N. Clinicopathological prognostic implicators of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Need to understand and revise. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(12):671-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
Büntzel J, Hornig A, Glatzel M, Micke O, Bruns F, Schäfer U, Fröhlich D. Tumour markers and lymphatic metastasis in head and neck cancer patients. Anticancer Research. 2005;25(3A):1539-42.
Dissanayake U. Malignancy grading of invasive fronts of oral squamous cell carcinomas: Correlation with overall survival. Translational Research in Oral Oncology. 2017;2:01-08. [crossref]
Jagtap MM, Shukla S, Acharya S, Tamhane A, Bhake A. Utility of histochemical and immunohistochemical profile in grading of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(1):01-05. [crossref]
Akhter M, Hossain S, Rahman QB, Molla MR. A study on histological grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its co-relationship with regional metastasis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2011;15(2):168. [crossref] [PubMed]
Nguyen L, Fifis T, Malcontenti-Wilson C, Chan LS, Costa PN, Nikfarjam M, et al. Spatial morphological and molecular differences within solid tumours may contribute to the failure of vascular disruptive agent treatments. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):01-03. [crossref] [PubMed]
Bhargava A, Saigal S, Chalishazar M. Histopathological grading systems in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review. J Int Oral Health. 2010;2(4):01-00.
Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: The 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2010;17(6):1471-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
Acharya S, Kumari N, Srivastava P, Arnold D, Nikhil K. Architectural changes in the regional lymph nodes of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2019;23(2):305. [crossref] [PubMed]
Gospodarowicz MK, Miller D, Groome PA, Greene FL, Logan PA, Sobin LH. The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society. 2004;100(1):01-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
Wittekind C, Compton CC, Greene FL, Sobin LH. TNM residual tumour classification revisited. Cancer. 2002;94(9):2511-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
Rahima B, Shingaki S, Nagata M, Saito C. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2004;97(4):423-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
Baba AI, Câtoi C. Comparative oncology. Bucharest: Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; 2007.
Sharma M, Sah P, Sharma SS, Radhakrishnan R. Molecular changes in invasive front of oral cancer. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2013;17(2):240. [crossref] [PubMed]
Bankfalvi A, Piffko J. Prognostic and predictive factors in oral cancer: The role of the invasive tumour front. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2000;29(7):291-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
Tumuluri V, Thomas GA, Fraser IS. Analysis of the Ki-67 antigen at the invasive tumour front of human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2002;31(10):598-604. [crossref] [PubMed]
Tumuluri V, Thomas GA, Fraser IS. The relationship of proliferating cell density at the invasive tumour front with prognostic and risk factors in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2004;33(4):204-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
Byers RM, El-Naggar AK, Lee YY, Rao B, Fornage B, Terry NH, et al. Can we detect or predict the presence of occult nodal metastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue? Head and Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 1998;20(2):138-44. 3.0.CO;2-3>[crossref]
Okada Y, Mataga I, Katagiri M, Ishii K. An analysis of cervical lymph nodes metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Relationship between grade of histopathological malignancy and lymph nodes metastasis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003;32(3):284-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
Dantas DD, Ramos CC, Costa AD, Souza LB, Pinto LP. Clinical-pathological parameters in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2003;14(1):22-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
Haque MA, Goswami UK, Rahman MM, Islam MW, Morshed MM, Islam MR, et al. Association of Anneroth’s Scoring and frequency of cervical lymph node metastasis among primary oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research. 2019;6(2):69-72. [crossref]

DOI and Others


Date of Submission: Mar 03, 2021
Date of Peer Review: May 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2021
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2021

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 29, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jul 05, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jul 17, 2021 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)