Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 196505

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : SC18 - SC22 Full Version

Iron Deficiency Anaemia among Exclusively Breastfed Term Infants of 4-6 Months Age and its Contributing Factors: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51969.15999
Eesha , KC Aggarwal , Sumita Saluja

1. Resident Doctor, Department of Paediatrics, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. 2. Ex Head and Professor, Department of Paediatrics, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. 3. Professor, Department of Haematology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Eesha,
House No. 130, Type 4, GHTP Power Colony, Lehra Mohabbat,
Bathinda-151111, Punjab, India.
E-mail: eeshagarg94@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The risk of Iron Deficiency (ID) is a major concern associated with exclusively breastfed infants of age 4-6 months. According to World Health Organisation (WHO) iron should be universally supplemented from six months onwards instead of four months as recommended by American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP).

Aim: To determine ID and Iron Deficiency Anaemia (IDA) among infants of age 4-6 months and relation of same to various socioeconomic and maternal parameters.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based, prospective, cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Paediatrics of a tertiary care hospital in India. It included a sample population of 200 exclusively breastfed term infants, of age 4-6 months. Iron status was determined by studying the haemoglobin and serum ferritin levels and their associations to demographic, socio-economic and maternal parameters. Qualitative variables were analysed using the Chi-square test/Fisher’s-exact test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to find out significant risk factors of ID and IDA.

Results: Age wise distribution of infants was 91 (45.5%), 62 (31%), and 47 (23.5%) at 4, 5, and 6 months. Male-to-female ratio was 1.7:1. Mean±SD value of haemoglobin and serum ferritin was 10.82±0.60 g/dL and 44.60±25.02 µg/L, respectively. Prevalence of ID was 11 (12.09%), 16 (25.81%), and 16 (34.04%) at ages 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, age of mother <20 years (p-value 0.043), and increasing parity (p-value 0.001) were associated with low iron status.

Conclusion: Almost one-third healthy term exclusively breastfed infants become iron deficient by the age of six months. The study supports the need for iron supplementation from the age of four months universally instead of six months in exclusively breastfed term infants.

Keywords

Delayed cord clamping, Ferritin, Haemoglobin, Iron supplementation, Microcephaly, Stunting

Globally, anaemia affects 1.62 billion people, which corresponds to 24.8% of the population. However, the prevalence in developed countries is 9% compared to 43% in developing countries (1). The highest anaemia prevalence is in infancy, followed by age 1-4 years. Young children have the highest prevalence globally and the highest mean severity in all low and middle-income regions. Alarmingly, these are the only age groups with increased anaemia prevalence from 1990-2010. This age group should remain a high priority for anaemia control interventions. Overall, 50% of children are anaemic due to ID (2).

Iron is one of the most essential minerals in nutrition and health. It is found naturally in many foods in varying amounts. It is involved in many physiological functions in the body. Poor iron intake can lead to ID and later to anaemia. Globally, anaemia affects upto 47.4% of children, with the highest prevalence in developing countries. The prevalence of anaemia in India is 58.6% among children, a major public health problem (1).

Nutrition is an essential component in child health promotion, growth, and development during the first two years of life. Speed of neuropsychomotor growth and development is highest during the first two years of life. The health and nutrition of mothers and children are closely related to each other (3). WHO recommends Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) for the first six months of life for proper nutrition and to decrease the burden of infectious disease universally. However, the risk of ID is a major concern associated with EBF. There is universal consensus that breastfeeding has no substitute during the first few months of a child’s life. However, the duration of breastfeeding is always a subject of debate (4).

The iron content of human milk is 0.4-0.8 mg/L in colostrum and 0.2-0.4 mg/L in mature milk compared to the 0.5 mg/day required by infants from birth up to six months of age (4). The mean human milk intake of exclusively breastfed infants in developing countries at (1-6) months ranges between 699-854 mL/per day. Although iron in human milk is highly bioavailable, the iron content is at its highest in early transitional milk and decreases over the course of lactation (4). Most mothers in developing countries have high fertility and parity rate. This increases the chances of them being anaemic. As a result, the transfer of iron via the placenta reduces, and the foetus is at risk of ID. There is evidence that even children with normal birth weights but born of an anaemic mother may have low iron (5).

Delayed umbilical cord clamping (not earlier than 1 min after birth) is recommended for better maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. For the initial few minutes after birth, there is still circulation from the placenta to the infant. There is growing evidence that delayed cord clamping is beneficial and can improve the infant’s iron status for upto six months after birth (6). It needs to be further studied whether delayed cord clamping at birth is sufficient for adequate iron reserves till six months of age.

Anaemia in preschool children has adverse health effects on cognitive function, impaired motor development and growth, poor school performance, increased susceptibility to infections, decreased responsiveness and activity, and increased body tension and fatigue (7).

The AAP in 2010 recommended universal iron supplementation for the term breastfed infants from four months of age (8). In the 54th World Health Assembly, WHO had shown concern that some infants exclusively breastfed for six months may become iron deficient. However, WHO has recommended iron supplementation in exclusively breastfed term infants after six months (9). Hence, the present study was carried out to determine the prevalence of ID and IDA in EBF infants from the age of 4-6 months and the need for iron supplementation. The main objective was to determine the iron status of EBF term infants at age 4-6 months and its relation to socio-economic status and maternal dietary and obstetric history. It is also important to guide clinicians whether to start iron supplementation at the age of 4 months or 6 months. It is an effort to bridge the gap in existing knowledge. This study might contribute by providing pertinent information for policymakers about the need for iron supplementation.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India, from November 2017 to April 2019. Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (2017-158). The study comprised of 200 inborn EBF term infants brought by parents for regular check-ups and immunisation at the age of 4-6 months.

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were full term, inborn infants with delayed cord clamping, birth weight (2.5-4 Kg), and exclusively/predominantly breastfed babies.

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were preterm babies, neonatal resuscitation at birth, known case of any cyanotic congenital heart disease, history of iron supplementation to baby, blood transfusion, and bleeding diathesis.

Sample size estimation: Sample size estimation taking prevalence of IDA 14.9% (14) as a reference, the minimum required sample size with a 5% margin of error and 5% level of significance was 195 patients. So, the total sample size was 210, adding an expected attrition rate of 10%.

Informed and written consent of parents was taken of infants those fulfilling the inclusion criteria. ID was defined as S. ferritin <12 μg/L, and in presence of infection (CRP >10 mg/L), it was defined as S. ferritin <30 μg/L (10). IDA was defined as ID along with Hb <105 g/L at the age of 4-6 months (11).

The EBF was defined as no food or drink, not even water, except breast milk (including milk expressed or from a wet nurse) for six months of life, but allowing the infant to receive Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS), drops, and syrups (vitamins, minerals and medicines). Predominant breastfeeding means that the infant’s predominant source of nourishment has been breast milk (including milk expressed or from a wet nurse as the predominant source of nourishment). However, the infant may also have received liquids (water and water-based drinks, fruit juice), ritual fluids and ORS, drops, or syrups (vitamins, minerals, and medicines) (12).

Growth parameters (stunting, overweight, underweight, microcephaly and macrocephaly) are defined as per WHO growth standards in (Table/Fig 1) (13).

A detailed questionnaire containing demographic and socio-economic information of the households and the caregiver like name, age, sex, occupation, education level, and socio-economic status using the modified Kuppuswamy scale (15). Infant information, including breastfeeding history, birth history, maternal nutrition status, feeding pattern and obstetric history was obtained. Then infant was examined along with anthropometric measurements (weight, length and head circumference). Infants underwent the following investigations complete blood count (automated haematology analyser Sysmex XT 2000i using Fluorescence flow cytometry), serum ferritin by using access 2 Immunoassay System Analyser), and C-reactive protein (Slide Agglutination method).

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage (%), and continuous variables were presented as mean±SD and median. Qualitative variables were correlated using the Chi-square test/fisher’s-exact test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to find out significant risk factors of ID and IDA. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0.

Results

The study comprised of 210 infants. All the infants were inborn, exclusively breastfed, of age group 4-6 months, with a 2.5-4 kg birth weight. Out of a total of 210, 10 samples were haemolysed. Results of the 200 infants were analysed.

The overall age wise ID and IDA are depicted in (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3). Baseline characters are described in (Table/Fig 4). Majority of the children belonged to the age group four months. Out of the total study population, 126 (63%) were males and 74 (37%) were females with a male to female ratio of 1.7:1. Out of total infants, it was found that 22 (11%) were underweight and 2 (1%) were overweight. A total of 14 (7%) infants were found to be stunted, and 11 (5.5%) had microcephaly. None had clinically apparent icterus, clubbing, lymphadenopathy, congenital malformations, or cyanosis. The respiratory, cardiovascular, abdominal and neurological examination were apparently normal in all.

Mean value of haemoglobin estimated was 10.82?0.60 g/dL. The mean value of S. ferritin estimated was 44.60?25.02 μg/L. The median value of haemoglobin and S. ferritin was 10.9 (8.3-12.4) g/dL and 47 (6-120) μg/L respectively. The total prevalence of ID was 21.5%, and IDA was 16% (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6).

On univariate analysis (Table/Fig 7), (Table/Fig 8) age of mother <20 year, parity, underweight, stunting, and microcephaly were found significantly associated with both ID and IDA. Sex of infant, religion, socio-economic status and diet of mother were not significantly associated with both ID and IDA. Variables on the univariate analysis found to be significant were tested on multivariate analysis. On multivariate regression analysis, the age of the mother <20 years was associated with ID (p-value=0.043), and increasing parity was associated with IDA (p-value=0.001).

Discussion

Anaemia accounted for 65.5 million Years of healthy Life Lost due to Disability (YLD) in 1990 (11.2% of worldwide YLD from all causes) and 68.4 million YLD in 2010 (8.8% of all YLD) (2). Anaemia is the result of a wide variety of causes that can be isolated but more often co-exist. The causes with maximum prevalence in both sexes and all periods are the same: IDA, hookworm, sickle cell disorders, thalassaemia, schistosomiasis, and malaria. About 50% of the cases of anaemia are due to ID in both sexes. Those younger than age five years have the highest prevalence and total YLD from anaemia (2).

So far, studies that have been done before, no conclusive results have been found about the need for iron supplementation in EBF term infants before six months. There are conflicting results about the duration of breastfeeding and IDA associated with it. No previous study has taken early cord clamping as an exclusion criterion, which may be a confounding factor.

In this study, ID at ages 4, 5, 6 months was 12.09%, 25.81%, 34.04%, respectively. ID increased significantly at age 5 and 6 months. Increased prevalence of ID with age was found in studies done by Krishnaswamy S et al., Marques RF et al., and Torres MAA et al., (14),(16),(17). However, ID was found insignificant in infants up to six months in a study done by Raj S et al., (18). The present study signifies that iron stores are only sufficient upto four months of age. Iron stores reduce after four months of age.

Males were found to have a higher percentage of ID and IDA, but it was not statistically significant (p-value 0.75 for ID and 0.737 for IDA). Higher prevalence in males was found in a study done by Siegel EH et al., in Nepal (19). Yang Z et al., pooled data from six randomised clinical trials conducted between 1994 and 2004, two in Ghana, two in Honduras, one in Mexico, and one in Sweden, with a total of 404 infants who were EBF, to study IDA risk factors. Males were significantly associated with both ID and IDA (20).

The age of a mother <20 years was associated with both ID and IDA. In a study done by Torres MAA et al., ID prevalence increased in infants of mother’s age <20 years. However, the relation was not statistically significant (p-value 0.72) (17). Adolescent pregnancy is a risk factor for low maternal and foetal iron stores. Low maternal iron stores can lead to low foetal iron stores (5). It was a significantly less evaluated aspect in previous studies. In this study, it was found significant even on multivariate analysis (p-value 0.043). Adolescent pregnancies are more common in marginalised communities driven by poverty and lack of education. It poses serious health implication to adolescent girls.

Increasing parity was found to be associated with both ID and IDA on univariate analysis and with ID on multivariate analysis. Similarly in another study, increasing parity was associated with ID in mothers (21). So both maternal and infant iron stores are not adequate to maintain normal iron status in infants. Similarly, in a study done by Kilbride J et al., in Jordan, term infants born to anaemic and non anaemic mothers were followed from birth to age 12 months. While there were no differences in cord blood levels for any haematologic variables, by nine months of age, infants of anaemic mothers had lower haemoglobin and red cell indices. The incidence of IDA, was 81% in infants of anaemic mothers and 65% in non anaemics (22). Similarly, Shukla AK et al., conducted a cohort study by enrolling 180 infant-mother pairs and divided into two groups; Group I: 90 term infants born to anaemic mothers (Hb <11 g/dL), Group II: 90 term infants born to non anaemic mothers (Hb >11 g/dL). Mean serum haemoglobin and serum ferritin of infants in group I were found to be significantly lower than that in group II (p<0.001) both at birth and at 14 weeks (5).

Religion and dietary pattern of the mother were not statistically significant for both ID and IDA. Religion doesn’t determine the type of dietary pattern. Muslims are predominantly non vegetarians, while Hindus are both vegetarians and non vegetarians by diet. In this study, exact calorie, protein and micronutrient intake was not quantified, which was a limitation of the study.

The family’s socio-economic status was not significantly related to either ID or IDA. There are not many studies that studied the relation of the socio-economic status of a family with ID in the age group of infants <6 months. Only one study states that infants belonging to low-income families should be given increased attention for ID and the need for iron supplementation (17). Infants belonging to low socio-economic status are prone to dietary nutritional deficiencies.

Prevalence of underweight, stunting and microcephaly was 11%, 7%, and 5.5%, respectively. All the parameters were found associated with both ID and IDA in univariate analysis. Similar results of underweight and stunting being related to anaemia were found in a study done by Siegel EH et al., in Nepal (19). Iron is an essential micronutrient needed for the growth and development of infants. So malnutrition is associated with ID (8). However, on multivariate analysis, nutritional parameters were not independent risk factors either for ID or IDA.

Limitation(s)

This study was conducted at a single centre. It was a hospital-based study, not population-based. The dietary pattern of the mother was not studied extensively by 24 hour recall method. So, the relation of IDA with the dietary pattern of the mother could not be accurately analysed.

Conclusion

Almost one-third healthy, term EBF infants become iron deficient by age six months. The study supports the need for iron supplementation from the age of four months universally instead of six months in EBF term infants. Iron is essential for growth and development of infants. Deficiency of iron is associated with underweight, stunting and microcephaly. Increasing parity and age <20 years of mother is associated with low iron in infants. There should be sufficient gap between each pregnancy so that maternal iron stores could be restored. Adolescence pregnancy is associated with ID in infants. It is a modifiable risk factor.

References

1.
McLean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D, de Benoist B. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993-2005. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:444-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kassebaum NJ, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi M, Wulf Sk, Johns N, Lozano R, et al. A systematic analysis of global anaemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood. 2014;123:615-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Beard J. Recent evidence from human and animal studies regarding iron status and infant development. J Nutr. 2007;137:524S-30S. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Butte, Nancy F, Lopez-Alarcon, Mardia G, Garza, Cutberto & Expert Consultation on the Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding (2001: Geneva, Switzerland). Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life/Nancy F. Butte, Mardia G. Lopez-Alarcon, Cutberto Garza. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42519. [Last accessed on 2021 Sept 4].
5.
Shukla AK, Srivastava S, Verma G. Effect of maternal anaemia on the status of iron stores in infants: A cohort study. J Family Community Med. 2019;26:118-22.
6.
McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD004074. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Carter RC, Jacobson JL, Burden MJ, Armony-Sivan R, Dodge NC, Angelilli ML, et al. Iron deficiency anaemia and cognitive function in infancy. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e427. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Baker RD, Greer FR, Committee on Nutrition American Academy of Pediatrics. Diagnosis and prevention of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in infants and young children (0-3 years of age). Pediatrics. 2010;126:1040-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
World Health Organization. Fifty-Fourth World Health Assembly Provisional agenda item 13.1 (A54/INF.DOC./4). 2001. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Available from: http: http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA54/ea54id4.pdf. [Last accessed on Sept 05, 2021].
10.
World Health Organization. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System (WHO/NMH/NHD/MNM/11.2). 2011. Serum ferritin concentrations for the assessment of iron status and iron deficiency in populations. Available from: http://www.who. int/vmnis/indicators/serum_ferritin.pdf. [Last Accessed on Sept 5, 2021].
11.
Domellof M, Dewey KG, Lonnerdal B, Cohen RJ, Hernel O. The diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency in infants should be reevaluated. J Nutr. 2002;132:3680-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O’Hare D, Schanler RJ, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115:496-506. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age ; methods and development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/technical_report/en/index.html. [Last accessed on August 27, 2021].
14.
Krishnaswamy S, Bhattarai D, Bharti B, Bhatia P, Das R, Bansal D. Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in 3-5 months-old, breastfed healthy infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84:505-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Singh T, Sharma S, Nagesh S. Socio-economic status scales updated for 2017. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:3264-67. [crossref]
16.
Marques RF, Taddei JA, Lopez FA, Braga JA. Breastfeeding exclusively and iron deficiency anaemia during the first 6 months of age. Rev Assoc Medica Bras (1992). 2014;60:18-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Torres MAA, Braga JAP, Taddei JAAC, Nóbrega FJ. Anaemia in low-income exclusively breastfed infants. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006;82:284-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Raj S, Faridi MMA, Rusia U, Singh O. A prospective study of iron status in exclusively breastfed term infants up to 6 months of age. Int Breastfeed J. 2008;3:3. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Siegel EH, Stoltzfus RJ, Khatry SK, LeClerq S, Katz J, Tielsch JM. Epidemiology of anaemia among 4- to 17-month children living in south central Nepal. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:228-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Yang Z, Lönnerdal B, Adu-Afarwuah S, Brown KH, Chaparro CM, Cohen RJ, et al. Prevalence and predictors of iron deficiency in fully breastfed infants at 6 mo of age: Comparison of data from 6 studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1433-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Derso T, Abera Z, Tariku A. Magnitude and associated factors of anaemia among pregnant women in Dera District: A cross-sectional study in northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:359. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Kilbride J, Baker TG, Parapia LA, Khoury SA, Shuqaidef SW, Jerwood D. Anaemia during pregnancy as a risk factor for iron-deficiency anaemia in infancy: A case-control study in Jordan. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:461-68. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51969.15999

Date of Submission: Aug 19, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 24, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 22, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 20, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 21, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 23, 2022 (23%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com