Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 190570

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : ZC01 - ZC06 Full Version

Three Dimensional Morphological Grading of Ankylosed TMJ for Surgical Planning: A Retrospective Observational Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/50424.15942
Rabin Chacko, Saurabh Kumar, Arun Paul

1. Professor, Department of Dental and Oral Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Dental and Oral Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Dental and Oral Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Saurabh Kumar,
Associate Professor, Department of Dental and Oral Surgery, Outpatient Department
Block, CMC, Thottapalayam, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dr.s.kumar.bds@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) ankylosis remains an enigma in craniofacial surgery due to the challenges encountered while restoring mouth opening, facial form and airway to normalcy. Though TMJ ankylosis is a relatively simple diagnosis to make, the specific surgical plan depends on the nature and extent of the fusion of the mandible with the cranial base.

Aim: To classify the pattern of bone deformity found in TMJ ankylosis using three Dimensional (3D) Computed Tomography (CT) imaging and its role in determining the type of procedures required for effective gap arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was done to evaluate the 3D CT reconstructed images of 66 consecutive patients having 82 ankylosed joints treated from January 2007 to December 2019 with a standardised protocol. A grading system was used with the following criteria: coronoid hyperplasia, sigmoid notch to skull-base fusion and loss of residual joint space. The gap arthroplasty required for each grade of ankylosis was also analysed. The complete data in the present study was tabulated in Microsoft Excel sheet and frequency (n) analysis was done for all variables.

Results: Out of 66 patients (82 ankylotic joints) 37 males and 29 females), age range 2.5-51 years, average age 18.2 years) 27% of the total joints surveyed belonged to grade 1 type of ankylosis. None of these joints had complete bony fusion (absence of the radiolucent zone between the cranium and condyle). A 10% of the joints had moderate ankylosis (grade 2). None of them revealed complete bony fusion (absence of the radiolucent zone) or fusion of the sigmoid with the cranial base. Grade 3 ankylosis was the most widely seen pattern of ankylosis (63% of the present study subjects) and 92% had a history of childhood onset. A 90% of the joints in this group had ipsilateral coronoid hyperplasia. A 48% of the joints with severe ankylosis (grade 3) showed bony fusion with the cranial base, with loss or absence of the radiolucent zone {Fusion Line (FL)} between the cranial base and the condyle.

Conclusion: The extent and severity of TMJ ankylosis needs to be ascertained prior to planning TM Joint ankylosis surgery. A 3D CT assessment and subsequent radiologic grading provides a reliable guide for ankylosis release.

Keywords

Gap arthroplasty, Muscle interposition, Temporomandibular joint ankylosis

The TMJ ankylosis remains an enigma in craniofacial surgery due to the challenges encountered while restoring mouth opening, facial form and airway to normalcy. The distorted pathological anatomy seen in this disease varies from patient to patient and therefore the management of each case needs to be tailor-made in relation to the severity and extent of the disease. Clinical decision making in any modality of treatment needs to be guided by information processed from the individual patient’s clinical features and investigations. In surgery especially, apart from the diagnosis, the technical procedures have to be customised to the level of difficulty of the individual case. Similarly, though TMJ ankylosis is a relatively simple diagnosis to make, the specific surgical plan depends on the nature and extent of the fusion of the mandible with the cranial base (1).

This retrospective study was an audit of a series of patients treated over a period of 12 years with an identical protocol and the same surgical team. A 3D radiographic study of the TMJ and its associated structures was done for each case to plan on the extent of bone removal and the approach needed to produce adequate release of trismus. Restoration of function and prevention of re-ankylosis is the primary goal of treatment in this disease (2). The audit was conducted to elucidate and classify the patterns of bone deformity of the fused cranio-mandibular complex and the type of procedures which would be needed for each grade of complexity. The article highlights on the current standard of care in management of TMJ ankylosis at a tertiary care centre and proposes a morphological grading classification to aid in planning of surgery.

Material and Methods

The retrospective study (IRB approval No. 11886/ Dated 27.02.2019) included only those patients who had CT imaging with 3D reconstructed images which were used for planning of surgery from January 2007 to December 2019. All the data and the skull radiographic images were taken from the electronic database saved and archived by the institution and were analysed during 2019-2020 retrospectively.

Inclusion criteria: Those cases of ankylosis of given time period with complete data and preoperative 3D CT images were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those cases with incomplete data or radiographic images were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Sixty six patients having 82 ankylosed joints were analysed with a preoperative 3D computed tomographic image. Study of the deformed joint morphology in 3 dimensions assessed the extension of the ankylosis beyond the articular eminence, elongation of the coronoid, extracapsular fusion of the sigmoid notch to the cranial base, thickening of the cranial base above the ankylosis, extension of ankylosis laterally to zygomatic arch or posteriorly to involve the anterior tympanic plate (Table/Fig 1). The residual joint space was assessed using multiple views (Table/Fig 2). In addition, the transverse and anteroposterior width of the ankylosed joint was measured using the electronic scale for DICOM imaging (Table/Fig 3). The analysed joints were then graded according to their morphological assessment (3). Planned surgery corresponding to the staging and grading of the ankylotic joint was performed (3). Postoperatively the patients were then evaluated for the effectiveness of surgical planning based on assessment the adequacy of mouth opening, the surgical complications and follow-up evidence of progressive re-ankylosis.

Morphological Classification

Using the above criteria, the severity of ankylosis was graded according to the presence or absence of: a) Coronoid hyperplasia; b) Extracapsular extension e.g., fusion of the cranial base with the ramus in the region of the sigmoid notch; c) The radiolucent zone at the junction of the cranium and the joint representing the residual joint space.

Grade 1: Ankylosis in Grade 1 joints was limited to the region of the joint and did not show extra-articular involvement or coronoid hyperplasia (Table/Fig 4)a,b.

Grade 2: Joints with Grade 2 (moderate) ankylosis had accompanying coronoid hyperplasia but absence of fusion of the ramus with the cranial base anterior to the eminence. The extent of coronoid hyperplasia was determined using the sagittal section view, lateral skull view using the 3D reconstruction and the use of coronal sections in the region of the bilateral coronoid region (Table/Fig 5)a,b. If the coronoid tip extended upto or beyond the superior edge of the zygomatic arch, it was considered hyperplastic.

Grade 3: In the Grade 3 or the severe ankylosis group, the vertical ramus was found to be fused to the cranial base external to the original joint space in the region of the sigmoid notch, anterior to the articular eminence (Table/Fig 6)a,b. These kinds of joints even though have obliteration of sigmoid notch suggesting fusion external to the joint space, CT scan in the axial and coronal section still showed a radiolucent zone, however complete loss of the residual joint space (radiolucent zone) and bony fusion with the cranial base is more common finding in severe Grade 3 ankylotic group. There was also greater likelihood of fusion to anterior tympanic plate and the zygomatic arch in these cases.

Surgical Protocol

The excision arthroplasty done for these joints was reviewed using the operation records from electronic archives. Based on the findings, 3 categories of bone excision could be differentiated.

• Type 1 excision involved management of the TMJ region (Table/Fig 7).
• Type 2 excision involved removal of the ipsilateral coronoid in addition to the condylar component. The incomplete zone of fusion or residual joint space could be negotiated and the deformed condylar head separated from the cranial base and disarticulated by making a cut from the neck of the condyle to the sigmoid notch (Table/Fig 8).
• Type 3 excision involved creation of a gap by resection of the superior ramus block. This was achieved by creating a cut through the thickness of the vertical ramus below the bulk of the fused ankylotic mass superiorly and a second parallel cut was made 1-1.5 cm below the first (Table/Fig 9). The transverse thickness of the segment removed depended on the severity of the ankylosis and could measure upto 2.5 cm (Table/Fig 10). A gap of 1-1.5 cm was created between the cranial base and the mandible and clearance was obtained in all three dimensions. Excision was deemed adequate only if the mouth opening was more than 2.5 cm in children and 3 cm in adults. Access to the joint was achieved through the use of Preauricular and submandibular incisions.

In Grade 1 cases, with removal of the condylar complex alone, the disc was repositioned when available otherwise no definitive muscle interposition was done. In all Type 2 and Type 3 excisions pterygo-masseteric interposition was done by mobilising the medial pterygoid muscle from the medial surface of the ramus and transferring it across the defect to be sutured to the masseter on the lateral aspect (Table/Fig 11)a,b. The interposition was facilitated by manually distracting the mandible downwards using traction wire passed through the bone above the lower border. In turn, this maneuver increased the gap of the arthroplasty to an average of 2.5 cm. The overcorrection produced a lateral and posterior open bite on the side of arthroplasty (Table/Fig 12)a,b. A bite block was fabricated postoperatively and cemented to the lower posterior teeth. After settling of the occlusion, the block was selectively reduced to allow eruption of the opposing arch dentition during the growth period in children (Table/Fig 13)a-c. Prosthetic joint replacement was done in adult patients with bilateral TMJ ankylosis (Table/Fig 14).

Forced mouth opening exercises or aggressive painful physiotherapy after the surgery was not required since satisfactory mouth opening was obtained intraoperatively and the patients could open their mouths without difficulty in the postoperative period. They were encouraged to perform the mouth opening exercises several times a day. Patients were followed-up at yearly basis and assessment was done to identify any early sign of re-ankylosis of the joint. Reconstruction of the joints was delayed in children and planned as a secondary procedure after confirming persistent freedom in mouth opening and no recurrence of the ankylosis. Growth in children was monitored and documented.

Statistical Analysis

The complete data was tabulated in Microsoft Excel sheet and frequency (n) analysis was done for all variables. The measurements of temporomandibular joint were calculated as average values.

Results

Out of 66 patients, age range 2.5-51 years, average age 18.2 years, (82 ankylotic joints) assessed 37 were males and 29 were females. A 52 of these patients had a history of childhood trauma (before the age of 13 years) and 14 of these had adult onset ankylosis. History of trauma was the most common aetiology of the ankylosis (62 cases) apart from 3 cases of joint infection and one patient with ankylosing spondylitis. There were 16 cases with bilateral TMJ ankylosis.

A 27% of the total joints surveyed belonged to Grade 1 type of ankylosis. None of these joints had complete bony fusion (absence of the radiolucent zone between the cranium and condyle) (Table/Fig 15)a. The transverse and Anteroposterior (AP) measurements were 36% and 54% larger than the normal condyle. Injury during adulthood was the common cause of ankylosis in this category. A 10% of the joints had moderate ankylosis (Grade 2). None of them revealed complete bony fusion (absence of the radiolucent zone) or fusion of the sigmoid with the cranial base. The transverse and AP measurements were 47% and 78% larger than the normal condyle. (Table/Fig 15)b. All the cases of moderate ankylosis were seen in childhood onset ankylosis.

Grade 3 ankylosis was the most widely seen pattern of ankylosis (63% of total joints of present study) and 92% had a history of childhood onset. A 90% of the joints in this group had ipsilateral coronoid hyperplasia. A 48% of the joints with severe ankylosis (Grade 3) showed bony fusion with the cranial base, with loss or absence of the radiolucent zone (FL) between the cranial base and the condyle. The ankylosed mass in this group was on an average 62% larger than the average normal condyle in the transverse dimension and 96% larger in the AP dimension. A 48 (92%) of the 52 joints in this category were consequent to childhood trauma. Two of the adult’s joints in this category were in a case of ankylosing spondylitis and were not secondary to trauma.

The method of arthroplasty used in this study when reviewed, revealed that 18 out of 22 cases of Grade 1 ankylosis required surgery of the TMJ complex alone without coronoidectomy (Type 1 surgery). Four cases of adult ankylosis in this category required resection of the coronoid in addition to condyle (Type 2 excision) due to restriction of mouth opening following removal of the TMJ complex. All eight of the Grade 2 joints required excision of the primary joint complex along with removal of the coronoid (Type 2 excision).

Grade 3 joints required Type 2 or Type 3 excision depending on the mobilisation of the ankylotic mass with respect to the cranial base. Of the 52 Grade 3 joints, 30 required Type 3 resection and 22 required Type 2 excision (Table/Fig 15)a. All the cases which had bony fusion with the cranial base (loss of radiolucent zone in CT axial/coronal cuts) required Type 3 arthroplasty.

Sixteen patients required bilateral joint ankylosis surgery and four cases of unilateral ankylosis underwent excision of the opposite side coronoid. Prosthetic joint replacement was done in seven adult patients with bilateral TMJ ankylosis.

Postoperative haematoma required re-exploration and evacuation in one case. Six cases had mild facial weakness which had resolved within three months. None of the patients expressed dissatisfaction with the appearance of the incision scars. By the end of one year, three patients (4 joints) showed reduced mouth opening and evidence of re-ankylosis. These recurrences were seen in Grade 3 type of ankylosis alone. Re-ankylosis began in the region of the amputated coronoid stump in all the cases (Table/Fig 16). Six patients with bilateral moderate to severe ankylosis developed anterior open bite postoperatively (Table/Fig 17).

Discussion

Morphological studies of the ankylosed TMJ have been conducted in the past and these have been the basis of planning surgery for release of the fused skeletal structures. Sawhney CP in 1986, proposed a classification of the ankylosed joint skeletal structures using plain X-rays and correlated his radiological interpretation with the operative findings (3). He D et al., studied the coronal scans of ankylosed joints and proposed a classification similar to that of Sawhney CP (3),(4), and highlighted the relation of the medially displaced condylar segment to the intracapsular ankylosis. El-Hakim IE and Metwalli SA in their study of 33 cases found that CT images are a vast improvement over plain X-rays and recommended the use of coronal and axial scans for the preoperative planning of TMJ surgery (5).

Xia L et al., studied the significance of a radiolucent plane within the joint between the condylar and cranial articular surfaces in CT sections and found that its presence or absence correlated to the clinical maximal inter-incisal mouth opening and developed a classification using this finding to modify the existent classifications based on Sawhney CP study (1),(3). In the new proposal, Type 4 ankylosis referred to those cases which had complete bony ankylosis with disappearance of the radiolucent line. Their surgical findings corroborated the radiological findings and the interpretation of increased difficulty during surgery was confirmed. This zone has also been called the residual joint space or FL and its existence has been proven histologically as a junction of osseous and fibro-cartilagenous tissue in which bone can continue to grow by endochondral ossification (6). The current classifications have enabled surgical decision making in the transverse (coronal) and vertical plane. However, the decision to include the coronoid and the vertical ramus in the arthroplasty should also be determined prior to surgery. This can be done by investigating the ankylosis in the sagittal plane.

In the present study, the extent of the ankylosis in the anteroposterior dimension has been studied in addition to transverse and vertical dimensions. CT visualisation of the sagittal plane has been recommended for various joint conditions but its role in the study of the anteroposterior extent of TMJ ankylosis has not been adequately emphasised (7). A 3D CT reconstruction is a valuable adjunct to the two dimensional (2D) images obtained in different planes using conventional CT and helps the surgeon judge the nature and extent of the skeletal pathology and plan surgery more effectively. This is especially relevant in craniofacial surgery (8),(9). Use of the DICOM modality on the workstation makes the archived CT images available for further study by the individual surgeon who can rotate and view the reconstructed skull from different angles. The present retrospective study of ankylosed TMJ availed this facility.

The displacement of the traumatised condylar segment anteriorly may explain the fusion of the sigmoid notch region of the mandible with the base of skull. This is clearly visualised in the sagittal sections which also reveal the extent of the coronoid enlargement. Elongation of the coronoid is also evident in the 3D reconstruction of the cranium when seen from the lateral aspect. This view enables the observation of the external auditory meatus and the presence or absence of fusion of the ankylotic mass with the anterior tympanic plate (10). Grade 1 and grade 2 ankylosis do not show extra-articular extension. Teremek AT used absence of involvement of the sigmoid notch as the selection criteria for his study of 15 cases of TMJ ankylosis (11). Coronoid hyperplasia on the side of the ankylosis was the most common feature of the childhood onset ankylosis and was not seen in the adult onset joints. Overgrowth of the coronoid is consequent to the ongoing development of the paediatric mandible and the unbalanced pull of the Temporalis muscle. Resection of the coronoid is required in cases with hyperplastic coronoids. A 25% of the joints did not require coronoid excision and primary joint surgery alone was adequate for these cases. Kaban LB et al., has recommended aggressive management of TMJ ankylosis including ipsilateral coronoid excision for all cases and contralateral coronoid excision when necessary (12). Contralateral coronoid hyperplasia can also be determined using the same CT views. Need for resection of the contralateral coronoid can be determined preoperatively and confirmed during the surgery if the mouth opening following excision of the ankylosed joint does not exceed 3 cm intraoperatively (13). Type 3 excision was required for most of the joints with severe (Grade 3) ankylosis and for all cases which showed complete fusion and had lost the residual joint space.

Surgery for TMJ ankylosis needs to be tailor-made according to the extent and severity of the bone fusion causing restriction of mouth opening. Three-dimensional extent of surgery needs to be carefully estimated prior to surgery to avoid errors in execution. Aggressive removal of the ankylotic bone including the medial aspect of the ankylosis is essential for success (12). The three types or levels of excision are customised to deal with the specific needs of each case according to the bone morphological pattern of each ankylosed joint.

Access to the entire ankylosed bone skeleton is essential and this is provided by the dual approach using the preauricular and submandibular incisions. The submandibular approach provides passage to both the inferior and anterior extent of the ankylosis, including the coronoid, without risking damage to the facial nerve through stretching the preauricular incision downwards. The approach enables downward traction on the mandible to increase the gap and also allows the medial pterygoid muscle to be mobilised. Use of the medial pterygoid as an interpositional muscle flap is advantageous because it is locally available and can be stretched across the exposed cut bony edge of the residual ramus. Since, it is sutured laterally to the masseter, it may partly mimic the activity of the disc (Table/Fig 11). The submandibular incision also enables anchoring of the joint prosthesis to the residual ramus. The aesthetics of the scar was also acceptable to all of the patients treated. Anterior open bite is a frequent complication of surgery for bilateral TMJ cases and was seen in six of the 16 bilateral cases. This is again because of the unbalanced pull of the retractor muscles on the mandible and the shortening of the mandible which may also explain the greater tendency for bilateral TMJ ankylosis cases to recur.

Recurrence of ankylosis is a postoperative complication which needs to be avoided as far as technically possible (2) and this requires a policy of “Get it right first time”. Adequate planning and choice of excision based on the pattern of bone fusion will reduce the incidence of recurrence (12). However, the few cases of recurrence (3 out of 66 patients) seen in the present study subjects, indicates that despite radical excision and muscle interposition, recurrence can occur in severe TMJ ankylosis. Reattachment and ossification of the temporalis tendon, which retracts the mandible upwards and backwards, may be the initiator of the process of bony recurrence as noticed in the review CT scans (Table/Fig 17).

Prosthetic joint replacement combined with proportional jaw lengthening may provide a solution for bilateral and recurrent Grade 3 ankylosis in adults (14). This is obtained by maintaining the gap across the length of the arthroplasty and correcting the muscular imbalance caused by unopposed backward and upward pull of the retractor muscles of the mandible to prevent the shortening of the ramus. This was successfully obtained in all ten of present study patients (seven bilateral and three unilateral) treated with alloplastic joint prosthesis (Table/Fig 13). Ramus lengthening would also help to address the issues of obstructive sleep apnoea and skeletal deformity correction needed in these patients (15).

Various authors have opined that release of the ankylosis and restoration of mouth opening was the first priority in children since function and the muscular envelope could correct the loss of the growth centre as postulated by Moss ML and Salentijn L (2),(10),(11),(16). The protocol followed in present study centre is similar and we advocate delay in definitive reconstruction and facial deformity correction after ensuring persistent and adequate mouth opening, in children. In the interim, myofunctional appliances like the bite block used in the present study subjects would help direct the growth.

Limitation(s)

The number of joints studied (n=82) in this study centre may not be representative of the global population of all patients with TMJ ankylosis. This could be addressed by having a multicentre evaluation of the 3D morphology of the ankylosed TMJ to classify complexity and estimate prevalence of each grade of disease.

Conclusion

Pathological anatomy of the ankylosed craniofacial skeleton can be classified according to the grades of severity depending on the extent of bony fusion and coronoid involvement. A 3D imaging of the joint, especially in the sagittal plane, is a reliable guide for planning the extent of gap arthroplasty. Grade 3 ankylosis requires radical excision of bone in three dimensions (Type 3 excision). The submandibular incision affords good access for adequate bone resection and for use of the medial pterygoid muscle as an interpositional flap. Prosthetic joint reconstruction is required in adults with bilateral TMJ ankylosis. Since the approach and extent of surgery of the ankylosed joint is determined by the extent of involvement of the ankylosis in all dimensions, careful preoperative planning and study of the 3D CT scans is mandated.

References

1.
Xia L, An J, He Y, Xiao E, Chen S, Yan Y, et al. Association between the clinical features of and types of temporomandibular joint ankylosis based on a modified classification system. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):10493. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Roychoudhury A, Parkash H, Trikha A. Functional restoration by gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A report of 50 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(2):166-69. [crossref]
3.
Sawhney CP. Bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: Follow-up of 70 patients treated with arthroplasty and acrylic spacer interposition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77(1):29-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
He D, Yang C, Chen M, Zhang X, Qiu Y, Yang X, et al. Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: Our classification and treatment experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(6):1600-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
El-Hakim IE, Metwalli SA. Imaging of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. A new radiographic classification. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31(1):19-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Li JM, An JG, Wang X, Yan YB, Xiao E, He Y, et al. Imaging and histologic features of traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2014;118(3):330-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Kavin T, John R, Venkataraman SS. The role of three-dimensional computed tomography in the evaluation of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4(Suppl 2):S217-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Görgü M, Erdoğan B, Aköz T, Koşar U, Dağ F. Three-dimensional computed tomography in evaluation of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000;34(2):117-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Jl M, Mw V. The “third” dimension in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(6):759-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Sarma UC, Dave PK. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: An Indian experience. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;72(6):660-64. [crossref]
11.
Temerek AT. Conservative gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular ankylosis not involving the sigmoid notch: A selected age group study. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;54(5):e38-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kaban LB, Bouchard C, Troulis MJ. A Protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67(9):1966-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Zhi K, Ren W, Zhou H, Gao L, Zhao L, Hou C, et al. Management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: 11 years’ clinical experience. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(5):687-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Wolford L, Movahed R, Teschke M, Fimmers R, Havard D, Schneiderman E. Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Can Be Successfully Treated With TMJ Concepts Patient-Fitted Total Joint Prosthesis and Autogenous Fat Grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(6):1215-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Hu Y, Zhang L, He D, Yang C, Chen M, Zhang S, et al. Simultaneous treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis with severe mandibular deficiency by standard TMJ prosthesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45271. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Moss ML, Salentijn L. The capsular matrix. Am J Orthod. 1969;56(5):474-90. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/50424.15942

Date of Submission: May 18, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Aug 12, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jan 03, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 19, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 27, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 01, 2022 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com