Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 65428

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : QC01 - QC04 Full Version

Maternal Mortality: A Five Years Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Rajasthan, India


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52937.15838
Madhureema Verma, Gulshan Bano, Teena Nagar, Ajay Kumar Singh, Rajendra Prasad Nagar

1. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India. 4. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Nagar,
House No. 3, New Master Colony, Near Trauma Centre Hospital, Jhalawar-326001, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: drraj_teens@ymail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Women die due to complications during and following pregnancy and childbirth. Most of these complications develop during pregnancy and many are preventable or treatable. Maternal mortality in developing countries acts as one of the health indicators and reflects the efficiency of the nation health system.

Aim: To analyse the cause of maternal death in tertiary care setting over a period of five years.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective, observational study, conducted over a period of five years, from April 2015 to March 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India. The case records and death review forms of all maternal mortality were collected from hospital records and studies. Data regarding age, parity, locality, booking status, mode of delivery, cause of death, neonatal outcome, etc were collected in pretested proforma and then statistically analysed.

Results: There were 115 maternal deaths from April 2015 to March 2020. The average Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) over a period of five years was 243 per one lac live births in institute setting. Majority of maternal mortality were from toxaemia (25.2%), anaemia (20.8%), haemorrhage (20.0%) and sepsis (15.7%).

Conclusion: High maternal mortality is an important issue regarding maternal care. Toxaemia (hypertensive disorder of pregnancy), haemorrhage, sepsis and anaemia are still the common cause of maternal death. It can be prevented/reduced by improving healthcare facility in rural area by ensuring round the clock availability of gynaecologist, anaesthetist, blood product, intensive care facility and timely referral of high risk pregnancies. Family welfare services should be improved to reduce unwanted pregnancy.

Keywords

Haemorrhage, Maternal mortality, Sepsis, Toxaemia

Maternal mortality is a reflection of the care given to women by society and as an indicator for quality of heath for nation. It is unfortunate that maternal death occurs during the process of childbirth and most of them are preventable. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), a maternal death is defined as death of any women while being pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy irrespective of duration or site of pregnancy but not from accidental or incidental cause (1). Maternal mortality in developing countries acts as one of the health indicators and reflects the efficiency of the nation (2). This can be expressed in terms of MMR. It is defined as maternal death per 100,000 live births (3). The major complications that account for nearly two-thirds of all maternal deaths are severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth), infections (usually after childbirth), high blood pressure during pregnancy (preeclampsia and eclampsia), complications from delivery and unsafe abortions (4).

India has committed itself to the latest united nation target for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for MMR at 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 (3). Government of India is trying to reduce maternal mortality through various programs like Jananisuraksha Yojana, Jananishishu suraksha etc., Maternal death audits are being conducted at institutional level, district level expert to know the cause of maternal death and to improvise healthcare, if needed.

Various delays in care are being identified, medical officers and person involved in maternal care are being trained so they can provide skilled and effective care. Transport facility is available free of cost for mothers and neonates (5). Type of delay according to Thaddeus S and Maine D for maternal death are (6):

• Type 1 delay-Delay in decision making to seek help.
• Type 2 delay-Delay in transport due to poor roads and unavailability of vehicles.
• Type 3 delay-Delay at institutional level.

Tertiary care centres are providing state of care for every mother. There was no study available from this institute regarding maternal mortality so, this study was conducted to assess and analyse the cause of maternal death in our institute over a period of five years.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jhalawar Medical College and Hospital, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India between April 2015 to March 2020, and analysis of the study was done from January 2021 to March 2021. This study was conducted after approval from Institutional Ethical Committee via order S.no. 15/74 dated 09-10-2020.

Inclusion criteria

• All patients either booked in present hospital or referred from government or private sector hospitals and died in present hospital within 42 days of termination of pregnancy either due to causes directly related to pregnancy, aggravated by pregnancy or unrelated to pregnancy were included as the study population.
• Those patients after admission who were referred to critical care units, other departments for continued care and later died were also included in the study.
• Those patients who were directly admitted in other department for pregnancy with other medical problems and died, they were also included in this study.
• The study subjects included those with either intrauterine or extrauterine pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

• Those patients who died after 42 days of termination of pregnancy were excluded from the study.
• Those patients who nearly died but survived (near miss) were excluded from the study.

The case records files and maternal death review forms of all maternal deaths, who fit in the inclusion criteria were collected from the hospital medical record department and studied in detail and data were filled in pretested proforma.

After collecting relevant data, each patient’s case record was scrutinised with regard to booked or unbooked, age, parity, rural or urban, mode of delivery, admission to death interval, cause of death and neonatal outcome were analysed with a view to find out the factors associated and contributing to maternal death.

Direct maternal death define as those related to obstetric complications during pregnancy, labour or puerperium (six weeks) or resulting from any treatment received i.e., pregnancy induced hypertension, haemorrhage. Indirect cause of maternal death is those associated with a disorder, the effect of which is exacerbated by pregnancy i.e., anaemia, cardiac, medical disorders (7).

The number of live births from April 2015 to March 2020 was collected year wise. MMR of institution for the study period was calculated by using the formula:
MMR= TOTAL NUMBER OF MATERNAL DEATH / TOTAL NUMBER OF LIVE BIRTHS ×100,000

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered in Microsoft excel and results were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage.

Results

Total number of maternal deaths that occur in the study period of five year from April 2015 to March 2020 were 115. During this period of five year, there were 47,135 live births. The MMR for the five year, period was 243 per 100,000 live births (Table/Fig 1).

Among these 115 maternal death, majorities 49 (42.7%) were in 21-25 years age group. In present study maximum number of patients 48 (41.7%) were primigravida and 32 (27.8%) were second gravida. Maximum maternal deaths were reported 86 (74.8%) in unbooked patient as compared to booked patient 29 (25.2%) (Table/Fig 2).

Out of 115 deaths, 58 (50.4%) patients were died after vaginal delivery, only two patients died one after instrumental delivery and one after assisted breech vaginal delivery (Table/Fig 3).

Maximum number of patients 73 (63.4%) died within 12 hours of admission. Out of 115 patients, 9 (7.8%) patient died after 72 hours of admission (Table/Fig 4).

In present study, maximum number of patients, 82 (71.3%) died due to direct cause and 33 (28.7%) died due to indirect cause. Direct and indirect causes of death are shown in (Table/Fig 5).

In present study, out of 115 patients who died, 95 patients were delivered. Neonatal outcome is shown in (Table/Fig 6). Total of 18 patients remain undelivered and (15.7%) patients were remained undelivered and 2 (1.7%) patients had abortion.

Discussion

Reducing maternal mortality is a prime healthcare goal in developing countries. Total number of maternal deaths that occurred in the study period of five year from April 2015 to March 2020 was 115. During this five year study period, there were a total number of 47,135 deliveries in our institution. Different part of country has almost similar data regarding maternal mortality. (Table/Fig 7) showed the comparisons of maternal mortality data of different states of India (8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14).

The average MMR for this study period was 243 per 100,000 live birth. This is much less than the study done by Yadav K et al., that is 471.5/100,000 and higher than the MMR of Rajasthan that is 164/100,000 (15). The cause behind this high MMR was due to large number of referral patient in poor general condition at the time of admission.

Maximum number of maternal mortalities, 85 (73.9%) belonged to the age group of 21-30 years. This study was similar to the study done by Puri A et al., which was 71.53% (16). In present study, maximum mortality belongs to primiparous 48 (41.7%). Similar observation (44.2%) was seen in the study done by Mediratta G et al., (17). Maximum number of mortalities belongs to multiparous women in the studies conducted by Murthy BK et al., (18).

Proper antenatal care reduces the incidence of complications both in antenatal and intranatal period. Antenatal care help in detection of toxaemia, anaemia and other disorders like diabetes, cardiac disease etc., which can alter the course of pregnancy.

In present study, 86 (74.8%) maternal death seen in unbooked cases and 29 (25.2%) maternal death seen in booked cases. Similar result was seen in the study done by Jain M et al., and Jadhav AJ and Rote PG (19),(20). In the present study, maximum number of maternal deaths 85 (73.9%) were from the rural population which was similar to the study done by Bellad MB et al., (21). Maternal mortality was higher in rural population because of illiteracy, inadequate antenatal visits, inaccessible emergency healthcare services, lack of transport facilities and late referral.

In present study, 58 (50.4%) maternal deaths occurred after vaginal delivery and 35 (30.4%) died after caesarean section. These findings were similar to Yadav K study where he reported out of all maternal deaths, 101 (47.2%) patients delivered vaginally and 22 (10.3%) patients died who underwent caesarean section.

Maximum maternal death (83%) occurred in the postpartum period, similar result were reported in the study done by Das R et al., and Dogra P and Gupta KB (22),(23). The causes behind postpartum death were mostly the pathology which started in antenatal period may get exacerbated following the labour. It also indicates the need for continuous vigilance and prompt action of complication in postpartum period.

In the present study, majority of the women (41.7%) died within 6 hours followed by 37.3% within 7 to 24 hours of admission. Similar reports were also given by Bharaswadkar GB and Kurtadikar ML in which 36.3% died in 6 hours and 27.2% died within 7 to 24 hours of admission(24).

These findings suggests that majority of the patient reaching the tertiary care quite late, poor general condition of women on admission, late referrals or long travel time. Appropriate treatment at periphery and timely referrals to higher centre can prevent most of these deaths. Programs like basic emergency obstetrics care and skilled attendant at primary centre gives a ray of hope in reducing maternal mortality.

In present study, (71.3%) maternal death belongs to direct cause and (28.7%) were belongs to indirect cause. Direct obstetrics death includes death from hypertensive disorder (25.2%), haemorrhage (20%) and sepsis (15.7%). Similar results were seen in the study done by Oladapol OT et al., (25). Hypertensive disorders were the most common cause of maternal death which indicate that proper monitoring of blood pressure were not done at peripheral centre, patients did not know about the warning signs usually referred in critical condition. Haemorrhage was the second most common direct cause (20%). Similar observation was seen in study done by Ps R et al., (17.4%) maternal mortality due to haemorrhage (26). The provision of timely blood transfusion can save lives at risk due to severe haemorrhage. The availability of blood banks at all first referral units and their proper functioning are needed.

Sepsis was seen in 15.7% of the cases. Incidence of sepsis is decreased over the years due to use of higher antibiotics, early detection of infection, banning of illegal abortions and improved standard of ICU care.

Most common indirect cause of maternal death were anaemia (20.8%) , jaundice (1.7%) and cardiac disease (1.7%); Yadav K et al., reported similar results 16.3%, 1.9%, and 1.9% respectively (15). Anaemia is a preventable disease and measures should be taken to improve status preconceptionally and during pregnancy. It also impedes the mother’s ability to resist infection or cope with haemorrhage and increases the maternal morbidity and mortality.

Present study showed that there were multiple factors contributing to maternal death. Age, parity, booking status and associated conditions etc. had influence on maternal death. Data of five year were collected and analysed. This study can help institute to plan policy regarding antenatal, natal and postnatal care of pregnant women.

Limitation(s)

It was a retrospective study and some data were not available like maternal nutrition, socio-economic status, literacy status of mother and family and accessibility of nearest healthcare centre. Detail scrutiny of each maternal data is required to assess the effect of other factors for maternal death.

Conclusion

As most common cause of maternal death was toxaemia of pregnancy (hypertensive disorder of pregnancy) followed by haemorrhage, sepsis and anaemia. Maternal death can be prevented/reduced by improving health education, and improving healthcare facility in rural area. Training of medical officers, staff nurses and ASHA workers working in rural area by programs like basic emergency obstetric care and skilled birth attendant training can help in reducing maternal mortality. Early detection of high-risk cases and timely referral to higher centre is of paramount importance.

References

1.
Park K. Preventive Medicine in Obstetric, Paediatrics and Geriatrics: Park's Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 20th edition. Jabalpur: M/S Banarasi Das Bhanot. 2009;479-83.
2.
Panting-Kemp A, Geller SE, Nguyen T, Simonson L, Nuwayhid B, Castro L. Maternal deaths in an urban perinatal network, 1992-1998. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1207-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Reproductive Health Indicators: Guidelines for their Generation, Interpretation and Analysis For Global Monitoring. WHO, 2006.
4.
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels JD, et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2014;2(6):e323-33. [crossref]
5.
Khandale SN, Kedar K. Analysis of maternal mortality: A retrospective study at tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obustet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1610-13. [crossref]
6.
Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1091-110. [crossref]
7.
WHO. The WHO Application of ICD-10 to Deaths during Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium: ICD-MM, 2012.
8.
Ashok V, Santosh M, Anupa S. A study on maternal mortality. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2008;58(3):226-29.
9.
Vidyadhar B, Bangal A, Purushottam A, Giri B, Garg R. Maternal mortality at a tertiary care teaching hospital of rural India: A retrospective study. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2(4):1043-46. [crossref]
10.
Mukherjee S, Mukherjee S, Sarkar RR. A six year retrospective study of maternal mortality at a tertiary teaching institute in Uttar Pradesh. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:1407-09. [crossref]
11.
Ashraf Ali M, Babitha MC, Lokeshchandra HC, Sharma KD, Zehra M, Reddy MS. A study of changing trends of maternal mortality at the tertiary care centre, MMC & RI Mysore, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:239-42.
12.
Sethi PS, Sharma S, Chawla I. Maternal mortality in a tertiary care centre in North India: A retrospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5559-62. [crossref]
13.
Sridevi G, Shanmugavadivu L. Analysis of maternal mortality at a government teaching hospital GMKMCH, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India: A retrospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:5093-96. [crossref]
14.
Ramola M, Jain S, Gupta V, Bansal N, Singh P. Analysis of maternal deaths over a period of three years at a tertiary care centre of Uttarakhand, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:1357-60. [crossref]
15.
Yadav K. A retrospective analysis of maternal deaths over a period of five year at a tertiary care hospital of central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obastet Gynecol. 2018;7(11):4657-60. [crossref]
16.
Puri A, Yadav I, Jain N. Maternal mortality in an urban tertiary care hospital of North India. The J Obstet Gynecol India. 2011;4:280-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Mediratta G, Khullar H, Bhandari SK. An observational study of maternal mortality in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi. J Indian Acad Clini Med. 2015;16(2):161-65.
18.
Murthy BK, Murthy MB, Prabhu PM. Maternal mortality in a tertiary care hospital: A 10-year review. Int J Prevent Med. 2013;(4):105.
19.
Jain M, Maharaje S. Maternal mortality: A retrospective analysis of ten years in a tertiary hospital. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2003;34:103-11.
20.
Jadhav AJ, Rote PG, Maternal mortality changing trends. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2007;57:398-400.
21.
Bellad MB, Vidler M, Honnungar NV, Mallapur AS, Ramadurg U. Maternal and newborn health in Karnataka State, India: The community level interventions for preeclampsia (CLIP) trial's baseline study results. PLOS ONE. 2017. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166623. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Das R, Biswas S, Mukherjee A, Maternal mortality at a teaching hospital of rural India: a retrospective study. Int J Biomed Advan Res. 2014;5(2):114-16. [crossref]
23.
Dogra P, Gupta KB. A study of maternal mortality at a tertiary institute. Obs Gynae Today. 2009;115:58-60.
24.
Bharaswadkar GB, Kurtadikar ML. Evaluation of maternal mortality and their factors in GMCH, Aurangabad, India. Int J Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):879-82. [crossref]
25.
Oladapol OT, Sule-Odul AO, Olatunjiil AO, Danie OJ. "Near-miss" obstetric events and maternal deaths in Sagamu, Nigeria: A retrospective study. Reprod Health. 2005,2(1):9. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Ps R, Verma S, Rai L Kumar P, Pai MV, Shetty J. “Near Miss” obstetric events and maternal deaths in a tertiary care hospital: An audit. J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:393758. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52937.15838

Date of Submission: Oct 19, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 29, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 09, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 23, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 09, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 30, 2021 (24%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com