Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 37476

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2022 | Month : June | Volume : 16 | Issue : 6 | Page : OD11 - OD13 Full Version

Large Mediastinal Mass Managed Conservatively in an Elderly Woman


Published: June 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53769.16455
Dheeraj, Nitin Gupta, Ravi Kant, Monika Pathania

1. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Faculty, Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India. 4. Faculty, Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Monika Pathania,
Type 2 B,Flat No 3, Doctors Residential Complex, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rishikesh-249201, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail : anshupathania27@gmail.com

Abstract

Mediastinal masses have been eluding clinicians for a long time, owing to their common symptoms that are attributable to common infective and non infective etiologies and their rare incidence. They are generally diagnosed in the anterior mediastinum and include a variety of different entities demonstrating a range of clinicopathologic features. Chest computed tomography is important for the diagnosis, to know the extent of disease and helps in the prognosis. The prognosis of mature teratoma is excellent, surgical removal is curative. This case report was of a 58-year-old female, an unusual age of presentation, diagnosed as benign mature teratoma and was managed conservatively with periodic assessment for symptomatology. A conservative rather than surgical approach was chosen keeping in mind the socio-economic profile of the patient, surgical complications, and benign nature of the disease. The uniqueness of our case is hidden behind the unusual presentation of the disease coupled with belonging to an eastern world where surgical modalities are not as accessible and affordable. Hence, a conservative approach might be an equally effective solution, especially considering the age of presentation.

Keywords

Geriatric, Lung mass, Neoplasm, Teratoma, Thoracic cavity

Case Report

A 58-year-old married female presented to the Outpatient Department of General Medicine with a smoking index of 300 presented with the chief complaints of breathlessness for 2.5 months, Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade I, non progressive, associated with scanty whitish expectoration without any seasonal and diurnal variation, with no history of chest pain, palpitations, orthopnoea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea and no history suggestive of inhaler use. There was an acute aggravation of productive cough for the last 15 days with yellowish-white expectoration. There is no history suggestive of diurnal or postural variation. She had a single episode of blood-tinged sputum 14 days before hospital admission. There was no history of fever, weight loss, loss of appetite, night sweating, anxiety, palpitations, hoarseness of voice, difficulty in swallowing, jaundice, abdominal distension, pedal edema, or bleeding from any other site. There was no history of any chronic illness or any other addiction. There was no history of contact or exposure COVID-19 positive patients and tuberculosis patients.

On examination, local and systemic examinations were unremarkable with bilateral normal vesicular sound with no adventitious sound. Routine blood and urine parameters were found within normal limits. Considering the clinical profile, history and examination findings differential diagnosis of infection i.e, community acquired pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and neoplasm i.e, carcinoma lung, anterior mediastinal mass were made.

A chest X-ray showed a well-defined uniform round opacity in the left anterior mediastinum as shown in (Table/Fig 1). Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) of thorax was suggestive of a well-defined circumscribed round to oval heterogeneous dense lesion measuring approximately 8.4×8.4×10.4 cm with a thick rim of peripheral enhancement on the left side anterior mediastinum with variable attenuation as shown in (Table/Fig 2). Attenuation was consistent with fat, soft tissue density, and calcific components along with some areas of necrosis. Anteriorly and laterally, it was closely abutting adjacent ribs (no erosion) and intercostal muscles, medially abutting the Main Pulmonary Artery (MPA) and left pulmonary trunk, and posteriorly abutting the left main bronchus and left superior segment bronchus as shown in (Table/Fig 3) and (Table/Fig 4) respectively. Computed Tomography (CT) findings were consistent with teratoma, probably a mature teratoma. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography did not detect any intra-abdominal or pelvis mass. The cardiothoracic surgeon advised mass resection for the probable cure and diagnostic confirmation. However, resection could not be done as the patient was not willing for any surgical intervention, owing to poor socio-economic support. She also refused transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and biopsy.

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) (1) was used to assess the quality of life with a functional scale score of 76, Symptoms Scale Score of 10.3, and Global health status/Quality of Life (QoL) score of 33. The CT was suggestive of probable benign pathology and due to the lack of histopathological diagnosis and poor response of benign teratomas to radiation other treatment modalities were not explored (2).

She was given supportive care under oral co-amoxiclave empirical cover. Her symptoms were improved, coughing decreased with no expectoration. She was discharged in a hemodynamically stable condition with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (1) functional scale score of 82, symptoms scale score of 9.2, and global health status / QoL score of 55 after due counselling about the nature of illness and need for regular follow. She was planned to be monitored for symptom’s progression, quality of life assessment and chest X-ray.

She was followed-up at 1,3 and 6 months, there was no significant deterioration in the quality of life with an EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scale score of 92, symptoms scale score of 7.6, and global health status / QoL score of 66 with minimal limitation in working capacity, non-progressive symptoms, and no significant change in size on chest X-ray as evident in (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Mediastinal teratomas are germ cell tumors developed from ectopic pluripotent stem cells that failed to migrate from the yolk sac endoderm. Mediastinal teratomas are remnants of primordial germ cells usually found in the anterior mediastinum, characterizing the most common extragonadal germ cell tumors. They account for approximately 15% of anterior mediastinal masses in adults and almost 25% in children. They are the most common mediastinal germ cell tumors, accounting for 50-70% of all (2). Most of the symptoms are attributable to pressure effects on the adjacent structures.

Histologically teratomas are classified as mature or immature. Chest CT is important for the diagnosis, to know the extent of disease and helps in the prognosis. The prognosis of mature teratoma is excellent, surgical removal is curative (3).

Histologically, they should contain elements from all three embryological layers. However, elements from only two layers are commonly found (4). They usually occur in gonads, but extragonadal sites are not very uncommon (like mediastinum, pineal area, sacrococcygeal areas) (5). The high occurrence of germ cell tumors in the mediastinum can be explained by the distribution of fetal germ cell precursors (primordial germ cells) that migrate from the yolk sac endoderm to germinal ridges which virtually extend throughout the axial dimension of the early developing fetus. Some of them may survive the aberrant migration, resulting in germ cell tumors development (5).

Mature teratoma occurring in the mediastinum are benign but have malignant potential. The typical age of presentation is in the 3rd and 4th decades, with a mean age of 28 years (5). Benign teratoma constitutes <5% of all anterior mediastinal masses above 40 years of age (6). There is no gender preponderance; however, immature teratomas are seen exclusively in males. This case presents a case of 58-years-old female at the time of presentation which is very unusual for anterior mediastinal mass. Mature teratoma is usually a slow-growing tumor. The majority are located in the anterior compartment (80%) and the remaining involve multiple compartments (13-15%). They are incidentally found on chest x-rays and are normally asymptomatic. About 30-59% of adult mediastinal teratomas are asymptomatic (5). Symptoms are frequently attributable to mass effects and commonly present with pain (chest, back, or shoulder), shortness of breath, cough, and fever (due to repeated infections).

Chest CT with intravenous contrast is considered as the investigation of choice as it depicts different tissue attenuations. The CT not only aids in the diagnosis of lesions but also in the staging of the disease process. Specific etiologies of anterior mediastinal masses may necessitate further imaging testing. All male patients with a mediastinal germ cell tumor should undergo testicular ultrasound as part of a thorough work-up for primary gonadal malignancy. If there is a strong suspicion of non seminomatous germ cell tumors, Alpha-Foetoprotein (AFP) and beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) is also required, since levels will often be increased.

A diagnostic biopsy is obtainable via transthoracic or transbronchial needle aspiration, mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, or Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS). However, a tissue biopsy is not always necessary for the diagnosis of an anterior mediastinal mass when the clinical picture and the radiographic characteristics fit a classic prototype, as is typically the case with thymoma, teratoma, and thyroid goiter.

Mature teratomas are well-demarcated, displacing rather than invading adjacent structures; are of variable size (3-25 cm; with a mean diameter of 10 cm); usually encapsulated cystic mass with septal or rim enhancement of variable attenuation which is consistent with different tissue characteristics i.e, fat, water-dense cystic spaces, fat-fluid levels, homogeneous soft-tissue density, and variable degree of calcifications. Teeth or bones are not frequently seen (8%). The presence of a fat-fluid level is accepted as diagnostic but is rarely seen. On the contrary, immature teratomas are usually solid (2). In the present case, Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) thorax was suggestive of a well-defined circumscribed round to oval heterogeneous dense lesion measuring approximately 8.4×8.4×10.4 cm with variable attenuation. Attenuation was consistent with fat, soft tissue density, and calcific components along with some areas of necrosis. Echocardiography may reveal extra pericardial mass compressing and invading surrounding structures. Immature teratomas constitute heterogeneous signal intensity on MRI. The MRI is highly sensitive in delineating minimal invasion by fat plane obliteration and lacks ionizing radiation. In the present case, mass was compressing the surrounding structure without any invasion, anteriorly and laterally, mass was closely abutting adjacent ribs with no erosion and intercostal muscles, medially abutting the main pulmonary artery and left pulmonary trunk, and posteriorly abutting the left main bronchus and left superior segment bronchus.

The treatment of choice for mediastinal teratoma due to possible complications such as compression of adjacent tissues, rupture, or malignant transformation is complete surgical excision (3). However, surgical excision may be hampered by tight adhesions with the neighborhood structures creating operative difficulties, particularly around the pericardium, great vessels, thymus, diaphragm, and phrenic nerve. Other complications are intraoperative perforation of a cystic cavity, pleural effusions, and haemorrhages (8). Large tumors with extensive adhesion can lead to a large wound surface, incomplete lung expansion, injury to vital organs and residual cavity in the chest, postoperative bleeding, and infections. Preserving the phrenic nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve, vagus nerve, and brachial plexus nerve are paramount, but at times, injuries are inevitable with devastating ill-effects (7). Mediastinal teratoma is usually not fatal itself but the complications of extensive surgical procedures, such as pneumonectomy, can cause death (8). Postoperative complications and surgical site infections further worsen the results.

She was an active smoker with chest mass on X-ray and so the differential diagnosis of infection- (community acquired pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis) and malignancy was considered. Her CT scan was suggestive of mature teratoma. The patient was unusually presented in her late 50s. It can be due to atypical age presentation and, perhaps, slow growing benign nature of the neoplasm, hence diagnosed late. She had typical pressure symptoms without any invasion or architectural distortion. Her symptoms responded well to conservative medical management.

Patient was counselled about the nature of illness and its natural course. She was planned for surgical excision. Unfortunately, she did not consent for surgery owing to her socio-economic issues and the non aggressive nature of the illness. Further less effective treatment options were explored, however, tissue biopsy could not be done. Since her symptoms were non progressive and not alarming and benign nature of teratoma, patient was planned for conservative management and regular follow-up. The patient was followed-up at 1, 3, 6 months, and 6th monthly thereafter for her symptoms, quality of life, and chest radiograph.

Her symptoms did not progress at the end of the 6th month. There were no alarming signs of progressive breathlessness, distressing cough, fever, expectoration, hemoptysis, chest pain, loss of appetite, or loss of weight. Patient was able to do all her chores and has resumed her farm activity with no limitation.

The conservative approach can be explored further over surgical excision for benign teratomas without warning signs; considering access to Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (CTVS) surgeons and surgical complications, socio-economic impact on the patients in resource constraint setups in the Indian sub-continent, and other developing countries. Nevertheless, the patient’s willingness is of paramount importance.

Conclusion

Mediastinal masses have been eluding clinicians for a long time, owing to their common symptoms that are attributable to common infective and non infective etiologies and their rare incidence. The high incidence and prevalence of infective etiologies in developing countries make their diagnosis even more challenging. The large anterior mediastinal tumor may present as benign teratomas with atypical age of presentation, this must be kept in the differential. Risk and benefit for surgical excision of large mediastinal masses may be individualized among elderly patients periodic assessment for symptomatology for warning signs with quality of life is the key.

References

1.
Fayers PM, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual: this manual is intended to assist users with scoring procedures for the QLQ-C30 version 3 and earlier, and the QLQ supplementary modules. Brussels: EORTC; 2001.
2.
Differential for an anterosuperior mediastinal mass | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. [cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/differential-for-an-anterosuperior-mediastinal-mass.
3.
No TH, Seol SH, Seo GW, Kim DI, Yang SY, Jeong CH, et al. Benign Mature Teratoma in Anterior Mediastinum. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(9):726. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Choi SJ, Lee JS, Song KS, Lim TH. Mediastinal teratoma: CT differentiation of ruptured and unruptured tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(3):591-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
WD T, E B, HK M-H, CC H. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. [cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours/Pathology-And-Genetics-Of-Tumours-Of-The-Lung-Pleura-Thymus-And-Heart-2004
6.
Carter BW, Marom EM, Detterbeck FC. Approaching the patient with an anterior mediastinal mass: a guide for clinicians. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2014;9(9 Suppl 2):S102-109. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Tian Z, Liu H, Li S, Chen Y, Ma D, Han Z, et al. Surgical treatment of benign mediastinal teratoma: summary of experience of 108 cases. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):36. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Agarwal G, Kar DK. Teratoma of the anterior mediastinum presenting as a cystic neck mass: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2008;2(1):23. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53769.16455

Date of Submission: Jan 6, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 25, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 19, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 23, 2022 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com