Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 89564

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : June | Volume : 16 | Issue : 6 | Page : YC01 - YC04 Full Version

Correlation between Perceived Stress, Physical Fitness and Health Related Quality of Life in Young Adults


Published: June 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56794.16418
Tarunjit Kaur, Shagun Agarwal

1. Masters Scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Applied Medicines and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Applied Medicines and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shagun Agarwal,
House No- 9th Km Stone, NH-58, Delhi Meerut, NH 34, Duhai, Ghaziabad-201206, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: shagun.aggarwal@iamr.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: A majority of population all around the world battles with psychological conditions such as anxiety, stress and depression. Its effects on disease and certain health conditions is almost well known but what effect does it have on an individual free from disease is yet to be found.

Aim: To establish a relationship between perceived stress levels, physical fitness and health related quality of life in young adults.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Physiotherapy at Institute of Applied Medicine and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, from April 2020 to January 2021. A total of 120 subjects participated and were evaluated for perceived stress using Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), strength, endurance and flexibility were screened with help of dynamic sit up test, plank test and trunk lift test. World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL- BREF) was used to measure the Health Related Quality Of Life (WHOQOL- BREF) domains and the statistical test used was Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The mean age of subjects was 20.82 years out of which 64 were females and 42 were males. Significant negative correlation (r-value= -0.819) was observed between perceived stress and endurance, negative correlation of significant nature (r-value= -0.805) was present between perceived stress and strength, a non significant, weak positive correlation at (r-value=0.105) was seen between perceived stress and flexibility. Consistent significant negative correlation was seen (r-value= -0.386, -0.423, -0.203, -0.124) between perceived stress and HRQOL.

Conclusion: High perceived stress has a negative effect on physical fitness and HRQOL in young adults.

Keywords

Endurance, Flexibility, Standard of living, Strength, Stress

The world has faced numerous challenges during its duel with the pandemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The crisis were a broad spectrum of health, finance, political, ethical as well as concerned with management. Some of the main elements that were brought to light during this time were mental health, physical fitness and the quality of life that were majorly impacted by the catastrophe. One such factor that came into view during this time was stress, anxiety and depression (1) (Table/Fig 1).

The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression among the young adults in India is ranged from 5% to 70%, among which 18.5% had depressive symptoms, 24.4% suffered from the symptoms of anxiety and stress was observed in 20% of the population (2).

Previous study has shown that these psychological factors affect the humans adversely ranging from physical condition to mental well being (3). It is proved that chronic stress affects the autonomic nervous system and weakens the immune response, whereas people who have perceived stress are susceptible to common cold, diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis (4). Higher perceived stress levels in lives of children have been linked to increased occurrence of metabolic disorders (5). Stress has also been linked to its effect on wound healing as a study done on dental students showed that the participants healed from a mucosal punch biopsy wound 40% slower during the times of examinations as compared to when on vacation (6). Exposure to acute and chronic stress has also been linked to having an effect on memory and learning functions (7). In adults chronic stress is said to be associated with hormonal and inflammatory indicators of accelerated age (8).

Physical fitness and quality of life are key elements in an individual's life for proper functioning, any negative effect on those will lead to a poor living condition, morbidity and mortality (9). Thus this study aimed to identify the role that perceived stress plays on physical fitness and health related quality of life of otherwise healthy individuals.

Null Hypothesis: Increased perceived stress levels have no effect on strength, endurance, flexibility and Health Related Quality Of Life HRQOL of otherwise healthy individuals.

Alternate Hypothesis: Increased perceived stress levels leads to decline in strength, endurance, flexibility and HRQOL of otherwise healthy individuals.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Physiotherapy at Institute of Applied Medicine and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, from April 2020 to January 2021. A total of 120 subjects participated. Ethical and Scientific clearance was obtained from IAMR, Ghaziabad, UP (Ref No. IAMR/22/3195) adherence to Helsinki Declaration of 1975 that was revised in 2013 was also followed. The sampling technique was Convenience Sampling. Instruments and tools used were a stop watch, yoga mat and tape measure.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The subjects having age between 18-30 years, ambulant having a sedentary lifestyle with normal body mass index were included in the study. The subjects having any neuromuscular disorders, backache, recent spinal fracture/surgery/trauma, recent abdominal surgery/ trauma, spinal deformities, cardiovascular conditions were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Scales and Questionnaires used in the study were:

Physical activity readiness questionnaire: It was endorsed by American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and is a self screening tool that can be used to safety or peril of exercises based on subjects health history, current symptoms, and risk factors. Hence serves as an excellent tool for pre exercise testing and prevents any injury that may result due to excessive or high intensity exercise (10).

Perceived stress scale: It is a self reporting psychological instrument used to measure the perception of stress. It is a tool that quantifies the extent to which circumstances in a person's life are considered as stressful. It consists of 10 questions to which the subject encircles the most relevant option from number 0-4. Scores are obtained by reversing responses and then summing across all scale items (11).

World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)- BREF: It is a field trial version of WHOQOL-100 developed by WHOQOL Group. This assesses the quality of life in 4 domains (Domain 1: Physical Health, Domain 2: Psychological, Domain 3: Social relationships, Domain 4: Environment). It consists of 26 questions and scoring is done by calculating raw scores by summing of items under each domain and then converting them into transformed scores by using the transformed scores table (12).

Procedure: All participants were informed about the research that data collected will be confidential and a consent from each of them was obtained. Demographic details of the subject were collected and evaluated for any exclusion criteria with PAR-Q

Subject were then provided with the Perceived Stress Scale and WHO QOL- BREF and were asked to fill them according to the instructions provided.

To assess for physical fitness of the participants following tests are performed:

Dynamic sit-up test for strength: The test was conducted in three performance levels with increasing difficulty. This variation of the sit-up strength test is part of the ALPHA-Fit test protocol for adults (13).

Procedure: The subject lies in a crook lying position on the floor mat with their feet supported by holding them firmly to the ground. Five sit ups are performed by the subject each at three different levels. For the first five sit ups the subject tries to reach mid patella with the fingertips of both hands while keeping the arms straight and palms resting on thighs. For the second five sit ups, the arms are folded over chest, with the aim to reach the thighs with both elbows. For the last five sit ups, the subject touches the back of their earlobes with fingertips, and attempts to touch their thighs with their elbows [Table/Fig-2-4]. The test score is the number of correctly performed sit ups i.e, a number between 0 and 15 (13).

Plank test for endurance: The subject support their upper body on their elbows and forearm whereas the lower body is in a straight line bearing the weight on their toes. The individual was asked to lift their hips off the ground. The stopwatch is started as soon as the individual attains the position and is held for as long as he can. The time is stopped when the individual is unable to hold the position anymore (Table/Fig 5) (14). The time for which the position is held is recorded as the test score.

Trunk lift test for flexibility: Subject lies prone with the toes pointed back behind their body and hands placed under their thighs. Place a marker on the floor in line with the subjects eyes and instruct them to focus on the marker throughout the procedure. When ready the subject lifts their upper body from the ground in a steady and controlled manner and holds the position till measurement is taken from the tip of the chin to the floor. Once the measurement is complete the subject is instructed to return back to the normal position and the readings are recorded in inches (Table/Fig 6) (15).

Statistical Analysis

The IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0 was used in the study for analysis of the data. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to find the association between perceived stress and strength, perceives stress and endurance, perceived stress and flexibility, perceived stress and physical health domain of QOL, perceives stress and psychological domain of QOL, perceives stress and social relationships domain of QOL, perceived stress and environment domain of QOL. The p-value <0.01 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 120 subjects participated in the study but only 106 were selected. The mean age was 20.82 years, out of which, 64 were females and 42 were males. A mean and standard deviation of 19.66 and 6.332 of perceived stress score was recorded for trunk lift scores with 42.16 sec being the mean and 22.037 sec standard deviation of the plank scores. The sit up score had an average of 10.33 and standard deviation 2.907 whereas 7.265 was the mean deviation and 2.6106 was the standard deviation recorded (Table/Fig 7).

The mean of physical health, psychological, social relationship and environmental domains scores of WHOQOL- BREF were 53.09, 59.88, 57.25, 58.26 with standard deviations being 13.478, 15.409, 20.160, 14.360.

Perceived stress and endurance: The correlation between perceived stress scores and plank held in seconds showed a significant negative correlation with r-value= -0.819 (Table/Fig 8).

Perceives stress and strength: The correlation between perceived stress scores and sit ups performed in numbers showed a significant negative correlation with r-value= -0.805 (Table/Fig 9).

Perceived stress and flexibility: The relationship found between perceived stress and trunk lift values in inches presented a positive correlation although not very significant with r-value=0.105 (Table/Fig 10).

Perceives stress and health related quality of life: The physical health domain (D1) of QOL showed a significant negative correlation with perceived stress with r-value-0.386. Psychological domain of QOL (D2) also presented a significant negative correlation with perceived stress with r-value-0.423. The association of social relationships domain of QOL (D3) with perceived stress had a negative correlation at r-value-0.203 that was less significant than D1 and D2. Environmental domain of QOL (D4) had a negative correlation with perceived stress, although not very significant at r-value-0.124 (Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

The analysis addressed the correlation between perceived stress, physical fitness and health related quality of life in young adults. Physical fitness can be divided into two groups i.e, health related and skill related and in this study it was addressed in categories, namely strength, endurance and flexibility which are a part of health related fitness and play a major role in normal functioning of the body (16). Dynamic sit up test, plank test and trunk lift test was used in the study to measure these components as they are excellent tools that provide us with quantitative values, are simple to perform and understood by the subject and are time saving.

The study demonstrated that perceived stress has a measurable impact on strength and endurance. Increase in perceived stress lead to decrease in strength and endurance. Consequently, little to no effect of perceived stress was seen on flexibility. Hence, this null hypothesis was rejected. A study by Li Q et al., has shown that stress hormone causes oxidative damage in skeletal muscle further impairing their quality and function (17). The study supports the statement as significant decrease in muscle strength and endurance was observed as stress increases. Another study by Allen DL et al., has shown that daily psychological stress induces atrophic gene expression and loss of muscle mass (18). An increase in muscle stiffness was also seen in stress sensitive women (4).

Research done in the past has proved that reduction in perceived stress levels causes lesser negative feelings of anxiety, depression and improves one's sense of well-being (12). The statement is further supported by the results of this study as analysis verified a significant decrease in quality of life as there was an increase in perceived stress in individuals. The psychological domain of quality of life was the most affected by an increase in levels of perceived stress followed by physical health domain, social relationships and environment domain.

A study on Chinese adults by Qi M et al., showed significant correlations between HRQoL and perceived stress levels in individuals post the outbreak of COVID-19 which was also found in this study (19).

This study shows a strong negative correlation between perceived stress level, physical health domain and psychological domain of HRQoL which can further be validated by a study conducted by Seo EJ et al., that showed indirect effect of perceived stress on depressive symptoms and health promoting lifestyle behaviour (20). Another study by Cao B et al., that indicated dislike towards physical activity in people with higher levels of perceived stress (21).

Østerås B et al., conducted a study on Norwegian adolescents to seek a correlation between physical fitness and stress levels and found that the stress factor lack of joy had a negative correlation with components of physical fitness which further validates the results of this study (22).

The result of the analysis clearly presents the inverse relationship between perceived stress, physical fitness components and 4 domains of quality of life with the exception of flexibility. Therefore, stress is not only responsible for affecting the psychological well being in individuals but also has an adverse effect on their physical fitness, social lives as well as their surroundings. It can also be stated that mere absence of disease does not make you physically fit and quality of your life high. An active initiative needs to be taken to assess people for perceived stress and provide solutions in order to maintain a fit physical, psychological and social state.

Limitation(s)

The sample size used in the study was small in order to represent the whole population.

Conclusion

High perceived stress has a negative effect on physical fitness and HRQoL in young adults. Although flexibility had a positive correlation with perceives stress it remained non significant hence further research is required to establish any significant association between the two.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to all the participants who participated in the process of data collection and fellow MPT Scholar Neha Goyal for supporting me throughout the research process.

References

1.
Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Globalization and Health. Global Health. 2020;16(1):57. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Sahoo S, Khess CR. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among young male adults in India: a dimensional and categorical diagnoses-based study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198(12):901-04. Doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181fe75dc. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kimura T, Tsuda Y, Uchida S, Eboshida A. Association of perceived stress and stiff neck/shoulder with health status: multiple regression models by gender. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2006;55(4):101-07.
4.
McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(4):367-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Eisenmann JC. Secular trends in variables associated with the metabolic syndrome of North American children and adolescents: a review and synthesis. Am J Hum Biol. 2003;15:786-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Marucha PT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Favagehi M. Mucosal wound healing is impaired by examination stress. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:362-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Schwabe L, Joels M, Roozendaal B, Wolf OT, Oitzl MS. Stress effects on memory: An update and integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012; 36:1740-49. [PubMed: 21771612]. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Epel ES. Psychological and metabolic stress: a recipe for accelerated cellular aging? Hormones (Athens). 2009;8:07-22. [PubMed: 19269917]. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Blair SN, Brodney S. Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(11 Suppl):S646-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Shephard RJ. PAR-Q, Canadian Home Fitness Test and exercise screening alternatives. Sports Med. 1988;5(3):185-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Lee EH. Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nursing Research. 2012;6(4):121-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403-09. [crossref]
13.
Suni J, Husu P, Rinne M. Fitness for health: the ALPHA-FIT test battery for adults aged 18–69. Tester’s Manual. Tampare, Finland: Published by European Union DS, and the UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research. 2009.
14.
Tong TK, Wu S, Nie J. Sport-specific endurance plank test for evaluation of global core muscle function. Phys Ther Sport. 2014;15(1):58-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Jackson AW, Morrow Jr JR, Jensen RL, Jones NA, Schultes SS. Reliability of the Prudential FITNESSGRAMâ„¢ Trunk Lift Test in Young Adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(1):115-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Kariyawasam A, Ariyasinghe A, Rajaratnam A, Subasinghe P. Comparative study on skill and health related physical fitness characteristics between national basketball and football players in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4434-6. PMID: 31300031; PMCID: PMC6624989. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Li Q, Zhang M, Chen YJ, Wang YJ, Huang F, Liu J. Oxidative damage and HSP70 expression in masseter muscle induced by psychological stress in rats. Physiol Behav. 2011;104(3):365-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Allen DL, McCall GE, Loh AS, Madden MC, Mehan RS. Acute daily psychological stress causes increased atrophic gene expression and myostatin-dependent muscle atrophy. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2010;299(3):R889-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Qi M, Li P, Moyle W, Weeks B, Jones C. Physical activity, health-related quality of life, and stress among the Chinese adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6494. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Seo EJ, Ahn JA, Hayman LL, Kim CJ. The association between perceived stress and quality of life in university students: the parallel mediating role of depressive symptoms and health-promoting behaviors. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2018;12(3):190-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Cao B, Ren Z, Mcintyre R, Teopiz KM, Gao X, Ding L. Are Physical Activities Associated with Perceived Stress? The Evidence from the China Health & Nutrition Survey. Front Public Health. 2021;9:697484. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Østerås B, Sigmundsson H, Haga M. Physical fitness levels do not affect stress levels in a sample of Norwegian Adolescents. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2176. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56794.16418

Date of Submission: Mar 31, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Apr 23, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 03, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Apr 18, 2022 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com