Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 38976

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2022 | Month : May | Volume : 16 | Issue : 5 | Page : AD01 - AD03 Full Version

Dual Innervation to the Gluteus Maximus: A Case Report with Clinical Implications


Published: May 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52660.16319
Jailenne I Quiñones-Rodríguez, Amarilis Camacho-Quiñones, Natalia Y Cárdenas-Suárez, Norman Ramírez

1. Graduate Student, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine, Bayamón, Puerto Rico, USA. 2. Medical Student, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine, Bayamón, Puerto Rico, USA. 3. Medical Doctor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Juan City Hospital, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA. 4. Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Mayaguez Medical Centre, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, USA.

Correspondence Address :
Jailenne I Quiñones-Rodríguez,
Graduate Student, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universidad Central Del Caribe School of Medicine, Bayamon, Puerto Rico, United States of America.
E-mail: jailenne.quinones@uccaribe.edu

Abstract

Anatomical variations of the gluteus maximus have significant clinical implications. The gluteus muscle is commonly innervated by the Inferior Gluteal Nerve (IGN). However, this innervation could be affected by its embryological development. An anomalous innervation of the gluteus maximus by the Sciatic Nerve (SN) was identified during a bilateral dissection of the gluteal region. Dissection was performed on an elderly female cadaver, preserved with 10% formalin, and performed following the guidelines given in Grant’s Dissector 16th edition. The left and right gluteus maximus were innervated by their corresponding IGN. However, both demonstrated an additional innervation by the SN. This branch by the SN was located proximal to the IGN and emerged near the inferior border of the piriformis muscle. Patients with dual gluteus maximus innervation can present with clinical signs and symptoms which might be easily misdiagnosed. Therefore, physicians need to be aware of this abnormal innervation to accurately diagnose and avoid potential iatrogenic nerve injuries during interventions.

Keywords

Botulinum toxin, Inferior gluteal nerve, Muscle relaxants, Piriform syndrome, Sciatic nerve

Case Report

An anatomical variation was found in an elderly adult female cadaver during a gross cadaveric dissection session for first-year medical students held at the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universidad Central del Caribe, School of Medicine (UCC-SoM). The past medical history, family history, and cause of death were not available. The dissected cadaver displayed an anomalous bilateral innervation of the gluteus maximus muscle (GM). The left and right GM were innervated by their corresponding IGN with an unusual innervation by a branch of the SN. Both SN branches were located proximal to their corresponding IGN and emerged near the inferior border of the piriformis muscle bilaterally (Table/Fig 1)a,b. The SN branches subsequently divided into multiple rami that spread through the fascia of each GM. Further evaluation revealed an atypical location of the IGN on the right gluteal region, where the latter traveled perpendicular and superficial to the SN (Table/Fig 2).

The left and right gluteus medius muscles were reflected to visualise the deep lateral rotators and associated neurovascular structures. No anatomical variations were identified regarding the gluteus minimus muscles, piriformis muscles and the corresponding tendons within the left and right gluteal areas (Table/Fig 3). The superior and inferior gemellus muscles were observed bilaterally with a predominant tendinous portion of the obturator internus muscle dividing both structures, as expected. The left and right quadratus femoris muscles were also identified bilaterally, and better visualised on the left side.

Discussion

Anatomical variations of the GM are rare with a high clinical significance (1),(2),(3),(4). The GM is the largest and most superficial muscle in the gluteal region, commonly recognised as the strongest extensor of the hip joint (5). The latter also functions as an accessory muscle in the lateral rotation of the hip joint and in the stability of the pelvis (5). Regarding its innervation, the muscle is usually innervated by the IGN, a branch of the sacral plexus arising from the ventral rami of the L5 to S2 (5). However, the latter might vary depending on its embryological development, resulting in a variation in the muscle’s innervation. The theory of relative innervation contemplates that this variation might be secondary to its embryology, correlating the developing muscle fibers and the proximity of the nerves (6).

Embryological basis: During limb development, the GM is formed from myoblasts and the fusion of several muscle components as well as its nerve genesis and attachment. It has been described that the innervation of limbs is an early embryological development, where the lower limbs are supplied from the last 4th lumbar and the first three sacral metameres (lumbosacral plexus) (7). Thus, anatomical variations concerning innervations to the lower limbs are most likely due to an abnormal process during limb development at mid-4th week of gestation (7).

Several studies have described variations within the gluteal region, but limited literature described a bilateral and dual innervation of the GM by it's corresponding IGN as well as a branch of the SN (1),(2),[,3],(4). Even though there is limited research on the explanation of dual innervation in the gluteal region, Tichý M and Grim M provided insight through their research observations that the human GM develops as a result of a fusion of two foetal muscles (8). The portion of the GM originating from the coccyx, pars coccygea, is a separate foetal structure from the portion originating proximally termed as pars sacroilleaca (8). Subsequently, in the prenatal period, these two portions fuse together creating a cohesive muscle structure whose muscle fibers and bundles mask the prenatal borderline of the original fusion (8). According to these findings, the dual innervation of the IGN and a branch of the SN could be secondary to the fact that the GM embryological formation is a fusion of two foetal muscles.

Patients with an abnormal innervation to the lower limb muscles such as GM, could present with ambiguous clinical symptoms. In literature, there have been several studies reporting multiple forms of abnormal innervations of the GM by the SN (1),(2),(3),(4). Implications of this variations are of clinical and surgical importance.

Clinical Significance: Patients with the dual innervation to the GM by the IGN and SN can present signs and symptoms which might be easily misdiagnosed. Pain in the gluteal region, in patients with this variation, could be associated with other conditions related to the SN, such as piriformis syndrome. Piriformis syndrome is an uncommon, neuromuscular disorder caused by inflammation of the piriformis muscle with subsequent compression of the SN (9). This nerve regularly exits the pelvis through the inferior border of the piriformis muscle (5). Patients with this condition commonly report inferior medial quadrant buttock pain, sciatica, hip pain, intolerance to sitting and dyspareunia in females (9). Likewise, the pain may radiate into the back of the thigh, but it may also occur in the lower leg at dermatomes L5 or S1. Piriformis syndrome is a clinical diagnosis. However, patients may require electromyography, nerve conduction studies and/or nerve stimulation to confirm the entrapment of the SN (9).

Clinical Implications: In this report, the abnormal SN branches emerged below the piriformis muscle and proceeded laterally to innervate the GM. Patients with this anatomical variation might present with non specific symptoms. Inflammation of the piriformis muscle in patients with this dual anatomical innervation could present with clinical complaints opposed to the typical symptomatology of piriformis syndrome. The patient may also complain of non specific pain in all quadrants of the gluteal region. In addition, the inflammation of the GM could also compress the abnormal SN branch causing pain in all quadrants of the gluteal region. An accentuated pain could be expected given the abnormal branch of the SN to the GM. Independent of the underlying anatomy, treatment of piriformis syndrome consists mainly of the use of muscle relaxants, Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), and physical therapy (9). Some patients may benefit from steroid injections, botulinum toxin therapy or surgical intervention, if previous conservative therapy had failed (9).

As previously suggested, patients with an abnormal branch of the SN to the GM could be at a higher risk for iatrogenic nerve injury secondary to gluteal injection or surgical procedures. The diffuse lateral position of the SN places this structure in a high-risk position to be penetrated by a needle while administering a deep muscle injection. Most of the SN injuries, secondary to a deep muscle injection, are associated with injection placed outside the upper quadrant of the gluteal region (10).

Concerning surgical procedures, direct injuries to the SN may be caused by pressure, heat, crush or cut to the nerve itself. The indirect nerve damage may be due to positioning, compression, or traction during interventions (10). Any of these events could occur during surgeries involving the gluteal region, such as acetabular fracture repairs, total hip arthroplasty, insertions of implants during gluteoplasty, among others (11). Given that patients with the variation presented in our case may exhibit a nonspecific complaint due to their abnormal anatomy, iatrogenic nerve injuries may occur unexpectedly during surgical interventions. Likewise, if any nerve injury occurs, recognition is critical given that it may result in muscle or limb paralysis if left untreated.

Conclusion

The atypical innervation of the SN to the GM found during this study allowed us to recognise the multiple complications that could represent this dual innervation. Ranging from simple clinical manifestations to iatrogenic nerve injuries, this variation is relevant to medical professionals. Knowledge about this anatomical variation is critical to prevent complications in surgical interventions, intramuscular injections, and nerve block during anaesthesia. Treatment options and surgical approaches should be also targeted to offer effective interventions in patients with this variation.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge Dr. Waleska Crespo, President (UCC), Dr. José Capriles-Quiros, Dean of Medicine (UCC), and the Anatomy and Cell Biology Department for providing the funding for this project. The authors also thank, Jose Quiles for the graphic design. Furthermore, they would like to thank Dr. Norberto Torres Lugo (Orthopedic Surgery Department, University of Puerto Rico) for providing critical feedback. Most importantly, the authors would like to recognize and be grateful to the people who donated their bodies and their families for making this study possible. This work was supported by a grant from the NIH NIGMS P20GM103475.

Authors’ contributions: J.Q.R, A.C.Q, N.C.S., N.R Writing - original draft, conceived and designed the study, conducted research, provided research materials, collected data, and wrote the initial draft of the article. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft and are responsible for the content and similarity index of the manuscript.

References

1.
Sumalatha S, D Souza A, Yadav J, Mittal S, Singh A, Kotian S. An unorthodox innervation of the gluteus maximus muscle and other associated variations: A case report. Australasian Medical Journal. 2014;7(10):419-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Thomas H, Nayak VS, Prasanna LC. A rare variation in the innervation of gluteus maximus muscle-a case report. Global Journal of Advanced Research. 2015;2(9):1394-96.
3.
Vanitha, D’Souza A, Nayak V. Variations in the innervations to the gluteus maximus muscle: A case report. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2014;3(3):721. [crossref]
4.
Leal MC, Alexander JG, Beber EH, Baptista JS. The absence of piriformis muscle combined muscular fusion, and neuro-vascular variation in the gluteal region. Autopsy & Case Reports. 2021;11:e2020239. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Barker PJ, Hapuarachchi KS, Ross JA, Sambaiew E, Ranger TA, Briggs CA. Anatomy and biomechanics of gluteus maximus and the thoracolumbar fascia at the sacroiliac joint. Clin Anat. 2014;27(2):234-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Hinsey JC. The innervation of skeletal muscle. Physiological Reviews. 1934;14(4):514-85. [crossref]
7.
Pansky B. Review of medical embryology. New York: Macmillan; 1982.
8.
Tichý M, Grim M. Morphogenesis of the human gluteus maximus muscle arising from two muscle primordia. Anatomy and Embryology. 1985;173(2):275-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Cassidy L, Walters A, Bubb K, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Piriformis syndrome: implications of anatomical variations, diagnostic techniques, and treatment options. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(6):479-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Yeremeyeva E, Kline DG, Kim DH. Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries at buttock and thigh levels: the Louisiana State University experience review. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(4 Suppl):A63-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Serra F, Aboudib J, Cedrola J, de Castro C. Gluteoplasty: anatomic basis and technique. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2010;30(4):579-92. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52660.16319

Date of Submission: Oct 02, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 19, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 26, 2021
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 04, 2021
• Manual Googling: Oct 18, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 22, 2021 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com