Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 36352

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2022 | Month : May | Volume : 16 | Issue : 5 | Page : TD04 - TD07 Full Version

Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Isolated Renal Echinococcosis: A Case Report


Published: May 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51916.16315
Kalidindi Valli Manasa, Satish D Patil, Anil G Joshi

1. MBBS, Department of Radio-diagnosis, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radio-diagnosis, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Radio-diagnosis, Shri B.M. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kalidindi Valli Manasa,
MBBS, Department of Radio-diagnosis, Shri B.M.Patil Medical College
and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: vallimanasa.abhi@gmail.com

Abstract

Echinococcosis is a parasitic infection caused by Echinococcus tapeworm. The most common organs involved are liver, lungs and spleen. Primary renal echinococcosis is a very rare manifestation of hydatid disease. Clinical manifestations in primary renal echinococcosis are variable and can have varied symptomatologies which are non specific. A 62-year-old female patient presented with abdominal fullness since six months, palpable mass and left flank pain since three months. On imaging, a large multiloculated cyst and multiple peripherally situated daughter cysts involving the middle and lower pole of left kidney with gross dilatation of upper pole calyx with severe cortical thinning was noted. It usually presents as a cystic renal mass on imaging and often gets misdiagnosed and operated as a cystic renal malignancy. Hence, radiological imaging plays an important role and care should be taken when dealing with a cystic renal mass to avoid unnecessary nephrectomies.

Keywords

Echinococcus infection, Hydatid cyst, Kidneys, Nephrectomy

Case Report

A 62-year-old female patient presented to Out Patient Department (OPD) with complaints of abdominal fullness since six months, palpable mass and left flank pain which was dull aching type since three months. On per abdomen examination, there was a large non tender mass filling the left hypochondrium, left lumbar and umbilical regions which are firm in consistency and measuring approximately about 10x9 cm. No history of weight loss and cachexia. No evidence of significant lymphadenopathy. Systemic examination otherwise shows no significant abnormality. No significant family history noted.

On ultrasound abdomen, a thin-walled cystic lesion (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2) giving posterior acoustic enhancement measuring about 12×12 cm involving mid and lower pole of left kidney with multiple daughter cysts within giving ‘cyst within cyst’ appearance was noted (Table/Fig 2). On colourdoppler imaging, the cyst wall showed minimal vascularity (Table/Fig 3).

On non contrast computed tomography: Left kidney was enlarged in size with evidence of a large well defined thin walled multiloculated hypodense cystic lesion measuring about 12 cm × 10 cm × 12 cm with multiple daughter cysts and septations within giving ‘Cart-Wheel appearance’ causing architectural distortion was noted involving the middle and lower pole of left kidney (Table/Fig 4). The lesion was causing expansion of the perinephric space and obliteration of anterior pararenal space, however posterior para-renal space was relatively preserved (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6). No evidence of calcific foci noted within.

The mass was seen medially crossing the midline and displacing the aorta and Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), laterally it was displacing lateral conal and transversalis fascia, anteriorly the mass was seen displacing gerota’s fascia and parietal peritoneum, posteriorly displacing zuckerkandl’s fascia, superiorly displacing body and tail of pancreas, splenic vessels, inferiorly it is seen displacing small bowel loops and descending colon.

Gross dilatation of upper pole of the calyx was noted with severe cortical thinning measuring about 5 mm. Sudden abrupt narrowing of the distal ureter was noted for a length of 1.5 cm causing gross hydroureter – possibly due to inflammatory stricture (Table/Fig 6).

On contrast enhanced computed tomography: On postcontrast study, the lesion shows minimal enhancement of peripheral capsule and internal septations (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9). Upper pole of left kidney shows excretion of contrast on delayed phases (Table/Fig 10).

A provisional diagnosis of ‘Infective aetiology- likely Renal echinococcosis’ was given with a possible differential to be considered as cystic renal malignancy.

Patient was put on bi-imidazoles 400 mg twice daily for four weeks duration as a measure to prevent spillage and anaphylaxis during surgery. Partial nephrectomy was performed, at which the cyst was removed en bloc. Patient was put-on three-month course of albendazole 200 mg twice daily and advised for a follow-up ultrasound after three months.

Gross specimen shows: Incised cystic mass with multiple smaller, smooth-walled daughter cysts, which were filled with translucent fluid (Table/Fig 11).

On Histopathological examination cyst showed a thin inner germinal layer, middle laminated layer and an outer adventitial layer. Parasitic membranes were obvious in most examined sections, some were continuous and intact containing brood capsules with protoscolices (Table/Fig 12).

Hence, a final diagnosis of renal echinococcosis was made: Postoperative period was uneventful, and patient came for follow-up after two months and an ultrasound was done which was normal (Table/Fig 13).

Discussion

Primary renal hydatid disease is a zoonotic disease which is caused by ingestion of the parasitic eggs through contaminated food, water, soil, or through direct contact with animals. Parasite generally crosses duodenal mucosa and renal involvement occurs due to haematogenous spread. Renal hydatid does not show specific signs or symptoms and is very rarely involved compared to that of liver or spleen (1). Patients present with non specific symptoms like palpable mass in case of large cysts, flank pain, hydatiduria, malaise, and fever (2). In present study, patient presented with complaints of chronic left flank pain, palpable mass and fullness.

Serology plays a less important role in diagnosis of hydatid disease due to high false negative results (3). Imaging plays an important and major role in diagnosing as well as staging of renal hydatid cyst. Ultrasound demonstrates large thin-walled cyst with multiple daughter cysts within giving ‘cyst within cyst’ appearance (4), floating membranes and hydatid sand. The Gharbi ultrasound classification of cystic echinococcosis (5) consists of five stages: homogeneously hypoechogenic cystic thin-walled lesion (stage 1), septated cystic lesion (stage 2), cystic lesion with daughter lesions (stage 3), pseudo-tumour lesion (stage 4) and calcified or partially calcified lesion -inactive cyst (stage 5). This lesion falls into stage 3 Gharbi ultrasound classification of cystic echinococcosis.

Computed tomogram is a more sensitive imaging modality to look for daughter cysts, calcifications, intracystic gas and for anatomical localisation. CT demonstrates a large thin walled cystic lesion with multiple peripherally placed daughter cysts and septations within giving ‘Cart-wheel appearance’. The lesion may show minimal enhancement of capsule and septations on postcontrast study (6).

In general, surgery is the treatment of choice for large renal hydatid cysts (7). If a preoperative diagnosis of hydatid cyst is made, the surrounding area around the cyst must carefully be isolated by gauze packs, aspiration of the cyst must be done and the cystic fluid must be replaced with scolicidal agent. Another technique is called partial cysto-pericystectomy where the cyst along with the hydatid membrane and daughter cysts are removed with scolicide-soaked swabs (8). Remnant pericystic margin is then sutured. Usually, nephrectomy must be reserved for a non functioning kidney only. So, in case of small cysts, focal or partial resection would be a better option. World Health Organisation (WHO) Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE)-2010 classification system (5) based treatment is used for cystic echinococcus infection. Active lesions need surgical intervention or Percutaneous Aspiration, Injection and Reaspiration (PAIR) + medical management due to risk of spread. However, PAIR is usually avoided due to risk of peritoneal seeding. Inactive lesions need monitoring. Surgical management includes extraperitoneal partial or total nephrectomy. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is avoided as it carries risk of cyst rupture and incomplete removal of the hydatid cyst.

Complete nephrectomy is reserved for non functioning kidneys. Medical management includes administration of albendazole (5-7 mg/kg twice daily) in combination with PAIR and is reserved for non operable cases. Preoperatively to make the cysts less tense three cycles of bi-imidazoles of four weeks duration two weeks apart should be given to prevent spillage and anaphylaxis. To prevent recurrences three months course of albendazole should be given postoperatively.

Few of the recent case reports published in the literature on isolated renal Echinococcus stress upon the possibility of isolated renal hydatid disease getting misdiagnosed and operated as cystic renal tumours (9), however most of these studies used a single imaging modality to describe its characteristics (10). It is important to be familiar with the radiological signs and imaging features, which are clearly described in this case report using various modalities like ultrasound, colour Doppler imaging, non enhanced CT and contrast enhanced CT. All the typical features of renal hydatid disease like large multiloculated thin-walled cystic lesion with multiple daughter cysts giving ‘cart-wheel appearance’ and daughter cysts with low density content than the maternal matrix have been described in this case report.However, the limitation of this case report was, there was no Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (DTPA) scan done prior to planning the partial nephrectomy to assess residual kidney function adequately.

Renal echinococcosis can mimic few cystic renal malignancies and there are reported cases of preoperative misdiagnosis especially in non endemic areas (11). Hence, care should be taken while dealing with cystic renal lesions and avoid unnecessary nephrectomies.

Conclusion

Primary renal echinococcosis is a very rare manifestation of hydatid disease, which presents as a cystic renal mass on imaging and often gets misdiagnosed and operated as a cystic renal malignancy. Hence, care should be taken and echinococcosis should be considered as a differential when dealing with a cystic renal mass to avoid unnecessary nephrectomies.

References

1.
Kumar SA, Shetty A, Vijaya C, Geethamani V. Isolated primary renal echinococcosis: A rare entity. International Urology and Nephrology. 2013;45(3):613-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Cappello E, Cacopardo B, Caltabiano E, Volsi SL, Chiara R, Sapienza M, et al. Epidemiology and clinical features of cystic hydatidosis in Western Sicily: A ten-year review. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2013;19(48):9351. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Nail LC, Reimundes ER, Galluzzo CW, Lebowitz D, Ibrahim YL, Lobrinus JA, et. al Disseminated alveolar echinococcosis resembling metastatic malignancy: A case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2017;11(1):01-06. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Chaouch MA, Dougaz MW, Cherni S, Nouira R. Daughter cyst sign in liver hydatid cyst. Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 2019;43(4):737-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
WHO Informal Working Group. International classification of ultrasound images in cystic echinococcosis for application in clinical and field epidemiological settings. Actatropica. 2003;85(2):253-61. [crossref]
6.
Mehta P, Prakash M, Khandelwal N. Radiological manifestations of hydatid disease and its complications. Tropical Parasitology. 2016;6(2):103. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Singh V, Devana SK, Gorsi U, Bal A. Isolated renal hydatid cyst masquerading as cystic renal tumor. Urology. 2019;133:e11-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Pakala T, Molina M, Wu GY. Hepatic echinococcal cysts: A review. Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology. 2016;4(1):39. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Mohamed I, Tarik M, Mohammed A, Alaoui W, Abdelghani O, Ali B, et al. Primary hydatid cyst looked like renal cell carcinoma: Case report. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2020(9):1-3. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Hamamci EO, Besim H, Korkmaz A. Unusual locations of hydatid disease and surgical approach. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2004;74(5):356-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Alqasem S, Alqurmalah S, Alsahn B, Ahmed A, Moazin M, Alfakhri A, et al. Unilocular huge renal hydatid cyst mimicking simple cyst: A rare case report. Urology Case Reports. 2020;31:101165. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51916.16315

Date of Submission: Aug 15, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 29, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 11, 2022
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 18, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 09, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Feb 18, 2022 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com