Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 19678

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : November | Volume : 16 | Issue : 11 | Page : DC16 - DC20 Full Version

Successful Isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Soil by Extended Incubation of Ashdown’s Agar: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: November 1, 2022 | DOI:
Sruthi Raj, Sujatha Sistla, Rajesh Amberpet, Sreeram Chandra Murthy Peela

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 2. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 3. Senior Research Fellow, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 4. Research Associate, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sujatha Sistla,
Professor, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate
Medical Education and Research, Puducherry-605006, India.


Introduction: Melioidosis is an infectious disease of humans and animals caused by an environmental saprophyte Burkholderia pseudomallei. Although the organism is associated with soil and water, environmental isolation is rarely successful which could be due to the existence of viable but non culturable forms.

Aim: To isolate B. pseudomallei from the soil to detect the environmental presence of this organism in and around Puducherry, India.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out from July 2018 to January 2021 at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India. A total of 473 soil samples were collected from areas surrounding the residence and workplaces of seven culture-proven melioidosis cases, from Puducherry and three districts of Tamil Nadu (Cuddalore, Nagapattinam and Villupuram) during the dry and wet seasons. Soil samples were enriched in Ashdown’s broth and cultured on Ashdown’s agar. The plates were incubated at 37°C and examined daily for seven days with a further extended period of incubation till the tenth day for samples that did not show growth. Suspected isolates were subjected to Vitek 2 system for biochemical identification. Confirmation of the isolates was carried out by antigen detection and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

Results: From 473 soil samples processed, bacteria with colony morphology similar to B. pseudomallei were isolated in 56 (11.83%) samples. Only one isolate, which was detected on the tenth day of incubation was confirmed as B. pseudomallei using antigen detection and PCR. This sample was collected during the wet season (December 2020) from Endur, in the Villupuram district of Tamil Nadu, India.

Conclusion: The study findings highlight the importance of extended incubation of culture plates at 37°C for up to ten days to improve the chances of isolation from the soil.


Environment, Gram negative, Melioidosis

Melioidosis is an emerging infection of humans and animals caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, a Gram negative, motile, non spore-forming environmental bacterium (1),(2). Although originally prevalent in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia, melioidosis cases are now being progressively identified in almost all other continents (3). Based on epidemiological modelling, the global incidence of melioidosis is ~165,000 and in India ~52,500 cases (4). This highly pathogenic bacterium is commonly found as a saprophyte in the soil and hence acquiring infection is likely among those exposed to such an environment. A higher incidence of melioidosis is reported during monsoon when the subterranean organisms migrate to the surface (1). The presence of non cultivable forms as well as the existence of a non virulent, closely related species, B. thailandensis makes isolation of B. pseudomallei from the soil a challenging task (5),(6). Both conventional culture-based methods and molecular tests using PCR have been employed for this purpose (7). Ashdown’s agar is the selective medium used for the isolation of B. pseudomallei. The presence of crystal violet and gentamicin inhibits the growth of unwanted bacteria. Glycerol helps to enhance the growth of B. pseudomallei. Both neutral red and crystal violet give B. pseudomallei colonies a characteristic purple colour (7). Additionally, B. pseudomallei can be detected using specific PCR assay targeting a Tat domain protein (7).

Although environmental B. pseudomallei has been isolated from other parts of the world, there are not many studies reported from India. There are only three reports of successful isolation, one from Cuddalore (Tamil Nadu), the second from the Malabar coastal region of Kerala and third from Mangalore (Karnataka). Among these Tamil Nadu and Karnataka are highly endemic areas for the disease (8),(9),(10).

Prior exposure to B. pseudomallei in the study population was documented by a seroprevalence of 19.8% among the high-risk population (11). So far, no attempts have been made to study the environmental distribution of B. pseudomallei. This information is critical in identifying high-risk zones for acquiring melioidosis. Thus, the aim of the study was to isolate B. pseudomallei from soil surrounding the residence and workplaces of patients diagnosed with melioidosis by culture.

Material and Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out from July 2018 to January 2021 at JIPMER, Puducherry, India. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee for Human Studies, JIPMER, Puducherry, India, (JIP/IEC/2018/0230) and written informed consent was obtained from the occupants to collect the soil samples.

Selection of Study Sites and Method of Sampling

Seven locations in and around Puducherry were sampled between 2018 and 2021 during the dry and wet seasons (Table/Fig 1) (12). From each site, soil samples were collected from the residence of the patients and/or their workplace (Table/Fig 2) following a standard technique depending on the total area of house/field (13). Based on the site, ten or more sampling points were selected maintaining a distance of 2.5 m and 5 m between the sampling points, from residence and/or workplace, respectively (Table/Fig 2). With the use of protective gear (masks, gloves and rubber boots) soil samples were collected from a depth of 30 cm from the surface, using a metal gardening shovel. Approximately 20-40 g of soil from each sampling point was collected and transferred to sterile containers, labelled and transported on the same day to the laboratory without exposure to direct sunlight. The metal shovel was cleaned in between the sampling with clean water and 70% alcohol to remove all the visible debris.

Processing of Soil Samples and Isolation of B. pseudomallei

The soil samples were processed in the laboratory as per the following protocol. To 10 g of soil, 10 mL of Ashdown’s broth containing colistin 50 mg/L was added, vortexed for 30 seconds and incubated at 37°C for 48 hours after which 10 μL of the upper layer of the medium was plated onto Ashdown’s agar to achieve isolated colonies. The plates were incubated at 37°C and examined daily for seven days with a further extended period of incubation till the tenth day for samples that did not show growth. Characteristic purple, dry wrinkled colonies of B. pseudomallei were purified further by subculture on 5% sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar.

B. pseudomallei was provisionally identified based on the following results: Motile Gram negative bacilli with bipolar staining (Table/Fig 3), oxidase positive, oxidative utilisation of lactose, arginine dihydrolase positive and lysine decarboxylase negative and resistant to gentamicin (10 μg) and colistin (10 μg) (14). Vitek 2 system (bioM-rieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) was also used for biochemical identification.

Isolates which were provisionally identified as B. pseudomallei/B. cepacia by Vitek 2 system were tested using the InBiOS AMD Active Melioidosis Detect (InBiOS, Seattle, WA) kit for capsular polysaccharide antigen (15). Further confirmation of the isolates was carried out by PCR targeting a Type III secretion system gene cluster (TTS1) using previously published primers and protocol (16).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analysis was performed by entering the data in Microsoft excel sheet and expressing the results as numbers and percentage.


Soil samples were collected from the residence/workplace of seven confirmed melioidosis patients. A total of 473 soil samples were processed during the dry and wet seasons from different locations (Table/Fig 1). Many of the samples produced surface pellicle when incubated in Ashdown’s broth with colistin (Table/Fig 4). Fifty-six (11.8%) soil samples yielded isolates with colony morphology similar to B. pseudomallei on Ashdown’s agar. Of these, 1 (0.2%) was detected on the tenth day of incubation. These 56 isolates were tested using Vitek 2 system. Only one isolate was identified as B. pseudomallei while seven (1.5%) others were identified as B. cepacia. All these 8 (1.7%) isolates were subjected to antigen detection and PCR. The single isolate identified by Vitek 2 system as B. pseudomallei gave a positive result with these two tests. This was the isolate that grew on the tenth day of incubation, along the cracks which had developed in the medium (Table/Fig 5). This single positive isolate was obtained from Endur, in the Villupuram district of Tamil Nadu.


B. pseudomallei is an environmental saprophyte of soil and surface water and is known to cause a community-acquired infectious disease, melioidosis (17). Environmental sampling is important to develop a risk map for melioidosis, to take preventive measures and raise awareness among clinicians and laboratory personnel in these endemic areas (17). Diabetics and farmers are at increased risk of acquiring this disease with a male preponderance documented in other studies (1),(18). Even though melioidosis affects both animals and humans, evidence of zoonotic transmission or human to human spread is lacking (5).

The only source of infection is exposure to B. pseudomallei contaminated soil or water (5). In endemic areas, B. pseudomallei is found in irrigated sports grounds, golf courses and irrigated rice fields (19). More number of melioidosis cases are reported from Southern India which can be attributed to similar climatic conditions and occupation when compared with other endemic areas (20). However, isolation rates of B. pseudomallei from soil in Southern India remain very low. One of the reasons for this could be poor sampling methods.

Detection of B. pseudomallei in soil depends on the selection of sampling sites. It is recommended to identify melioidosis cases and target their residence and workplace as performed in our study (17). Use of Geographic Information System (GIS) can improve the rate of isolation for large environmental surveys (17). Insufficient numbers of sampling sites, away from B. pseudomallei hotspots may give a false negative result (17). Researchers found B. pseudomallei by collecting 100 samples from the site yielding positive result. Isolation rates also depend on distance between the sampling sites as adjacent sampling points tend to give similar results (17). Therefore, depending on the total area of the collection site, a distance of 2.5 m and 5 m between each sampling site from the residence and fields, respectively was maintained. Soil sampling at a depth of 30 cm is recommended and was followed in this study, as rate of isolation is higher at this point compared to deeper layers (17).

Use of selective broth in soil culture helps in recovery of B. pseudomallei. Threonine-basal Salt Solution TBSS-50 (with colistin 50 mg/liter) and Ashdown’s broth are commonly used enrichment broths (7),(19),(21),(22). TBSS-50 contains L- threonine as sole source of carbon and nitrogen. Wuthiekanun V et al., found more luxuriant growth in TBSS-50 when compared to Ashdown’s broth (23). Brook MD et al., reported improved recovery rates of B. pseudomallei with Ashdown’s broth during dry season, as the stressed cells without water grew remarkably well, whereas TBSS-50 was found to be more useful during the wet months suppressing competitive organisms with selective agents (24). In the Indian studies on environmental isolation, Ashdown’s broth was successfully used (8),(10). This was replicated in the present study.

The presence of dry, rough and wrinkled surface pellicle at the broth-air interface of Ashdown’s broth was found. Pellicle formation in liquid cultures of B. pseudomallei could be due to positive aerotaxis. Possibly during monsoon when dry topsoil gets moistened with rain, B. pseudomallei moves upwards due to aerotaxis, towards the soil surface to find air-water interfaces between soil particles (5). This occurs due to rising water tables during or immediately after monsoons. The chances of isolation of B. pseudomallei from surface water are more during the rainy season due to this reason (25). In our study too we were able to isolate B. pseudomallei from the soil when collected during the rainy season when the soil was wet and muddy.

Even though a higher incubation temperature of 40°C is preferred as it inhibits the growth of other soil microflora, 37°C can also be used as an alternate based on availability (17). The media were incubated at 37°C for ten days. Due to dehydration, cracks developed within the medium and luxuriant growth of B. pseudomallei was observed along the cracks for one sample alone (Table/Fig 5). Therefore, extending the incubation to 10 days may be recommended to improve the isolation rate. Further studies are required to prove that this is not a chance finding.

There are reports of misidentification of B. pseudomallei as B. cepacia by Vitek 2 system (26). Moreover, all the eight isolates were further tested with antigen detection and PCR to confirm the identity and only the isolate identified by Vitek 2 system as B. pseudomallei was positive by the above two tests.

In endemic areas, B. thailandensis is frequently recovered from the soil along with B. pseudomallei. Even though they share similar colony morphology, there are differences in their polysaccharide-related genes (6). We did not find B. thailandensis in our study. Other bacterial flora such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ralstonia pickettii and Yersinia intermedia were identified in several soil samples despite using enrichment broth and selective media with antibiotics (Table/Fig 5).

During times of stress in the dry season, B. pseudomallei may persist in the environment in a Viable But Non Culturable (VBNC) state. B. pseudomallei is known to survive in distilled water for several years, in unfavourable conditions without any nutrients, it can also tolerate a wide pH spectrum, temperature range and ultraviolet radiation (5). In present study, failure to isolate the B. pseudomallei during the dry season could also be due to this viable but non culturable state of bacteria. However, the evidence for seasonal variation in isolation was inconclusive as three studies reported a higher isolation rate in the wet season while two studies reported isolation in dry seasons in a systematic review by Limmathurotsakul D et al., (17).

Similar to this study, isolation of B. pseudomallei from soil was investigated by other researchers in India. Prakash A et al., attempted isolation of this pathogen from Cuddalore district, roughly 30 km from Subramaniapuram and 40 km from Kurunjipadi, the two sites in this study. While Prakash A et al., isolated B. pseudomallei from eight soil samples just after the rainy season in 2010, researchers collected soil samples in both dry and wet seasons (July and October 2018) (Table/Fig 1) (8). Their sampling sites were immediately next to a river (Vellar river) while they collected inland. This may have been responsible for the failure to isolate B. pseudomallei in this study. Interestingly, the only site where they were able to isolate was next to a lake (Endur lake). In another study by Chandrasekar S and Dias M, in the district of Mangalore, B. pseudomallei was isolated at a site next to a river (Gurupura river) (10). Similar findings were noted in a study by Peddayelachagiri BV et al., with successful recovery of B. pseudomallei from river banks of Kerala Backwaters (9). This is an interesting finding as isolation was common next to freshwater bodies and their catchment areas. Thus, sampling nearby water bodies may greatly improve the isolation of B. pseudomallei and investigators may consider this fact while planning further studies.

Moist and humid conditions during the monsoon are known to increase the pathogen virulence and environmental B. pseudomallei load (1). It has been suggested that B. pseudomallei can be recovered from soil culture when collected within the first 90 cm from the surface where it is more likely to prevail and cause health hazard (5). One of our sites of soil collection had a hand pump for water supply along with dense trees that provided continuous moisture, shade and ambient temperature for the pathogen to remain viable in surface layers of soil for a longer period. Therefore, we could recover B. pseudomallei from the same site. Inaccurate choice of sampling site could also be a reason for failure to isolate B. pseudomallei from culture. In our study, soil samples collected from other areas of the same residence as well as the residence of other melioidosis cases yielded negative results, even though they were collected from the deeper layers of dry soil.

Regular watering and use of fertilisers rich in phosphates, nitrates and urea are found to increase the load of B. pseudomallei in soil. Phosphates are utilised by B. pseudomallei during oxidative stress response, motility and biofilm formation. B. pseudomallei reduces nitrates to nitrites that is used for anaerobic respiration. Urea hydrolysed to ammonia is used in biosynthetic pathways. Nitrifying soil bacteria oxidise urea to nitrates. Higher occurrence of B. pseudomallei in soil was found near animal sheds, due to high urea concentration (19). B. pseudomallei prefers an acidic range (2),(19). A study from the U.S, reported the presence of clay resulted in anaerobic conditions unfavourable for the bacteria whereas the sand particles increased the oxygen content of the soil thereby favouring the growth and survival of B. pseudomallei (27). Even though we collected soil with an increased fraction of sand from one of the sites, we were unable to isolate the pathogen.

Based on simplicity, specificity and cost, culture is considered a standard method for detection of B. pseudomallei from the soil although it is labour intensive (17). Limitations of culture to detect B. pseudomallei, in its viable but non culturable state, during stress and dry season is well known (7). Molecular techniques have a greater potential for screening the environmental samples compared to culture. The PCR assays could be used for epidemiological investigations, but do not indicate the viability of the pathogen (7). In endemic areas, rate of isolation of B. pseudomallei from soil was found to be ten times more sensitive by conventional PCR than by culture (24). Lau SK et al., found that in 1420 samples, use of conventional PCR improved detection in 6.8% of the samples as opposed to 0.6% positivity using culture alone (7). Another study by Chen YS et al., reports culture negativity in 46.1% of soil samples, that were positive by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA-PCR (RAPD-PCR) (22). Kaestli M et al., report the most sensitive method of detection of B. pseudomallei with the use of TTS1 real-time PCR (28). Studies on genetic relatedness between the environmental and the corresponding clinical isolate are ongoing and would help to establish soil as the source of infection.


Prior chemical analysis of the soil which would have indicated the likely sites of positive isolation was not carried out. Use of real-time PCR may have improved the rate of detection of B. pseudomallei.


This study unequivocally demonstrates the presence of B. pseudomallei in the soil of Endur village located 51 km from Villupuram District of Tamil Nadu, India. Additional environmental studies will determine the distribution of B. pseudomallei from this area and the surrounding villages aiding to map the risk of melioidosis in this geographical region. Based on the present study the authors recommend an extended incubation time of ten days to improve the isolation rate of this important environmental pathogen.


The authors sincerely thank JIPMER for the intramural research grant provided to conduct this study.


Vidyalakshmi K, Lipika S, Vishal S, Damodar S, Chakrapani M. Emerging clinico epidemiological trends in melioidosis: Analysis of 95 cases from western coastal India. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(7):e491-7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.02.012. [crossref] [PubMed]
Potisap C, Khan MAW, Boonmee A, Rodrigues JLM, Wongratanacheewin S, Sermswan RW. Burkholderia pseudomallei-absent soil bacterial community results in secondary metabolites that kill this pathogen. AMB Express. 2018;8(1):136. Doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0663-7. [crossref] [PubMed]
Currie BJ. Melioidosis: Evolving concepts in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(1):111-25. Doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398389. [crossref] [PubMed]
Limmathurotsakul D, Golding N, Dance DA, Messina JP, Pigott DM, Moyes CL, et al. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nat Microbiol. 2016;11(1):15008. Doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.8. [crossref] [PubMed]
Inglis TJJ, Mee BJ, Chang BJ. The environmental microbiology of melioidosis. Rev Med Microbiol. 2001;12(1):13-20. Doi: 10.1097/00013542-200101000-00002. [crossref]
Hantrakun V, Thaipadungpanit J, Rongkard P, Srilohasin P, Amornchai P, Langla S, et al. Presence of B. thailandensis and B. thailandensis expressing B. pseudomallei-like capsular polysaccharide in Thailand, and their associations with serological response to B. pseudomallei. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(1):e0006193. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006193. [crossref] [PubMed]
Lau SK, Chan SY, Curreem SO, Hui SW, Lau CC, Lee P, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples from an oceanarium in Hong Kong detected using a sensitive PCR assay. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2014; 3(10):e69. Doi: 10.1038/emi.2014.69. [crossref] [PubMed]
Prakash A, Thavaselvam D, Kumar A, Kumar A, Arora S, Tiwari S, et al. Isolation, identification and characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil of coastal region of India. SpringerPlus. 2014;3:438. Doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-438. [crossref] [PubMed]
Peddayelachagiri BV, Paul S, Nagaraj S, Gogoi M, Sripathy MH, Batra HV. Prevalence and Identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Near-Neighbor Species in the Malabar Coastal Region of India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(9):e0004956. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004956. [crossref] [PubMed]
Chandrasekar S, Dias M. Soil sampling of Burkholderia pseudomallei in and around Mangalore, India- an Explorative Study. J Bacteriol Mycol. 2017;4(2):1046. [crossref]
Raj S, Sistla S, Melepurakkal Sadanandan D, Kadhiravan T, Chinnakali P. Estimation of seroprevalence of melioidosis among adult high-risk groups in Southeastern India by indirect Hemagglutination assay. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(5):e0000431. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000431. [crossref]
Climate & Weather Averages in Puducherry, Pondicherry, India [Internet], [cited 2022 Apr 17]. Available from: https://www.timeanddate.come/weather/india/puducherry/climate.
Limmathurotsakul D, Wuthiekanun V, Chantratita N, Wongsuvan G, Amornchai P, Day NPJ, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei is spatially distributed in soil in Northeast Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(6):e694. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000694. [crossref] [PubMed]
Gillian P, Lum G, Vandamme P, Whittier S. Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas, Ralstonia, Brevundimonas, Comamonas, Delftia, Pandoraea and Acidovorax. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH, editors Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2003. p.729.
Peeters M, Chung P, Lin H, Mortelmans K, Phe C, San C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the InBiOS AMD rapid diagnostic test for the detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei antigen in grown blood culture broth. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(6):1169-77. Doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3237-3. [crossref] [PubMed]
Tellapragada C, Shaw T, D’Souza A, Eshwara VK, Mukhopadhyay C. Improved detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei from non-blood clinical specimens using enrichment culture and PCR: Narrowing diagnostic gap in resource-constrained settings. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22(7):866-70. Doi: 10.1111/tmi.12894. [crossref] [PubMed]
Limmathurotsakul D, Dance DAB, Wuthiekanun V, Kaestli M, Mayo M, Warner J, et al. Systematic review and consensus guidelines for environmental sampling of Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(3):e2105. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002105. [crossref] [PubMed]
Suputtamongkol Y, Chaowagul W, Chetchotisakd P, Lertpatanasuwun N, Intaranongpai S, Ruchutrakool T, et al. Risk factors for melioidosis and bacteremic melioidosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(2):408-13. Doi: 10.1086/520223. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kaestli M, Harrington G, Mayo M, Chatfield MD, Harrington I, Hill A, et al. What drives the occurrence of the melioidosis bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei in domestic gardens? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(3):e0003635. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003635. [crossref] [PubMed]
Tipre M, Kingsley PV, Smith T, Leader M, Sathiakumar N. Melioidosis in India and Bangladesh: A review of case reports. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2018;11(5):320. Doi: 10.4103/1995-7645.233179. [crossref]
Smith MD, Wuthiekanun V, Walsh AL, White NJ. Quantitative recovery of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89(5):488-90. Doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90078-0. [crossref] [PubMed]
Chen YS, Lin HH, Mu JJ, Chiang CS, Chen CH, Buu LM, et al. Distribution of melioidosis cases and viable Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil: Evidence for emerging melioidosis in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1432-34. Doi: 10.1128/JCM.01720-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
Wuthiekanun V, Smith MD, Dance DA, White NJ. Isolation of Pseudomonas pseudomallei from soil in north-eastern Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89(1):41-43. Doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90651-7. [crossref] [PubMed]
Brook MD, Currie B, Desmarchelier PM. Isolation and identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil using selective culture techniques and the polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;82(5):589-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
Currie BJ, Jacups SP. Intensity of rainfall and severity of melioidosis, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(12):1538-42. Doi: 10.3201/eid0912.020750. [crossref] [PubMed]
Zakharova IB, Lopasteyskaya YA, Toporkov AV, Viktorov DV. Influence of Biochemical features of Burkholderia pseudomallei strains on identification reliability by Vitek 2 system. J Glob Infect Dis. 2018;10(1):07-10. Doi: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_39_17. [crossref] [PubMed]
Hall CM, Busch JD, Shippy K, Allender CJ, Kaestli M, Mayo M, et al. Diverse Burkholderia species isolated from soils in the Southern United States with no evidence of B. pseudomallei. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0143254. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143254. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kaestli M, Mayo M, Harrington G, Watt F, Hill J, Gal D, et al. Sensitive and specific molecular detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, in the soil of tropical northern Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(21):6891-97. Doi: 10.1128/AEM.01038-07. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57824.17135

Date of Submission: May 17, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 05, 2022
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2022

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 19, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 25, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 02, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)