Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 100665

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : October | Volume : 16 | Issue : 10 | Page : FC06 - FC09 Full Version

Drug Storage and Self-medication Practices in Kashmir, India: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: October 1, 2022 | DOI:
Rehana Tabassum, Syed Sajad Hussain, Sajad Hussain Arif

1. Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Syed Sajad Hussain,
Shalabagh, Zadibal, Srinagar-190011, Jammu and Kashmir, India.


Introduction: Among the various potential health risks, selfmedication and inappropriate storage of medicines at home are found to be very important. Inappropriate storage conditions and irrational use of medication without medical consultation may result in serious health problems. Worldwide there has been an increase in the self-medication rate, which can lead to waste of resources and serious adverse reactions.

Aim: To assess the practice of self-medication and household storage of medicines amongst the study population.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional and questionnaire based study conducted in the southern district of Kashmir, India from 1st September 2021 to 28th February 2022. A total of 471 households were included and interviewed to determine the practice of home storage of medicines and selfmedication pattern. Quantitative data was presented as means and standard deviation (mean±SD) and qualitative data as frequency and 95% Confidence Interval (CI).

Results: Almost three quarters of the households were having monthly income of less than 20,000 INR whereas 219 (46.50%) of them were illiterate. Proton pump inhibitors, minerals and vitamins, antibiotics and analgesics were the most common medicines stored at home. Drawer was the most common place used for storage of medicines whereas the refrigerator was used in less than 1% of cases for the same. Solid dosage forms were mostly used by the householders and the injectables were least used for household storage purposes.

Conclusion: The study revealed that the studied householders stored large amount of medicines in homes, often under inappropriate storage conditions. There is a need for better public knowledge and information about the risks of reuse of prescribed medications.


Households, Medicine prescription, Utilisation pattern

In self-medication practices, individuals use medicinal products to treat self-recognised diseases or symptoms. It also involves the intermittent or continuous use of medication which were prescribed by physician for chronic or recurrent disease or symptoms (1). Selfmedication has turned out to be a global concern involving both developed as well as developing countries (2). According to one estimate, about 60-80% of health problems are treated by selfmedication (3). In recent years, medicine consumption pattern has been changed, resulting in larger purchasing volumes of medicine. Hence the excessive amount of these medicines are being stored at home (4). Accumulation of medicine may lead to increased costs and can prove harmful to both patients as well as to other family members (5). Among the various factors that influence the practice of self-medication, increasing disease burden especially in developing countries, desire for quick recovery from illness and the acceptance of self-medication among communities are the commonest ones (6).

One of the reasons for irrational drug use can be related to the easy availability of drugs at home. The undesired storage of these drugs may affect the drug stability which increases the risk of unwanted effects as well as leads to ineffective drug therapy among its users (7),(8). Many studies have been carried out previously that have identified a relationship between medicine storage and self-medication practices (9),(10). In a study carried out by Kiyingi KS and Lauwo JAK, it was found that the presence of medicines in households is one of the risk factors for encouraging inappropriate drug use such as the use of the antimicrobial drugs in illnesses when they are not indicated mainly due to the ease of access (10). This includes medications stored intentionally while they are being used or medications that are incompletely used. Storing medicines at home have been found to increase the risk of self-medication and some authors have reported a high frequency of exchange of self-medication between family members (11). The much needed information on the access and use of medicine can be obtained from pattern, extent, source and storage conditions of medicines kept at household level. Studies on household use and storage of medicines have been conducted world over. Among the studies conducted, several studies revealed that significant proportions of households stored medicines whereas in some cases, all of them were keeping medicines at home (12),(13). Only a couple of studies have been conducted to enlighten the facts about the drug storage in Kashmir (14),(15). So the current study was carried out to enhance the knowledge regarding the practice of selfmedication and household storage pattern of various medicines in the Kashmir province of Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional and questionnaire based study that was undertaken in the southern district of Kashmir, India from 1st September 2021 till 28th February 2022. Chief Medical Officer of the Anantnag district was contacted to obtain formal permission to conduct the study and householders were informed in advance about the study to ensure their agreement to participate in the study. Selected households were visited and the data collection supervisors explained the objectives of the study.

Inclusion criteria: Heads of households were asked to consent for their home to be included in the study and for them to participate in filling the questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria: Only respondents with any known emotional, psychiatric, and intellectual disturbances were excluded because these conditions could affect the reliability of their response.

A sample of 471 householders were recruited by stratifying the local regions of the district (north, south, east, west and central) into different sections to cover families of different socio-economic status. Householders from each section were selected through a systematic, random sampling technique to cover all parts of the Anantnag district. The requisite sample size was achieved based on the previous study carried out and the Department of Social and Preventive Medicine provided the statistical assistance for the study (16). Each household was given a code and considered as a unit. If a householder was not willing to participate, the next household in the sampling frame was taken until the sample size was reached (n=471).


An instrument composed of a structured interviewer-administered proforma was used for data collection [Proforma/Questionnaire]. It was developed by adapting tools used in previous studies and guidelines (16),(17) and was validated by subject experts. Householders responded to the instrument which collected data about their demographic characteristics including education status of head of family, their occupation and monthly income. During the interview, medication storage locations were directly inspected and all the medications found in the household were recorded. The medicine name, dosage form, source of the medicine, reason for storage, expiry date and storage place were taken into consideration. The reason for drug storage was not highlighted in final data as no specific reason was given by the respondents for the same and all the stored medicines were within the expiry date.

Statisctial Analysis

The data was reviewed, organised, tabulated and analysed using Microsoft Excel, 2010 version. Quantitative data was presented as means and standard deviation (mean±SD) and qualitative data as frequency and 95% CI.


Out of the total participants, majority of them 219 (46.50%) were illiterate and 90 (19.11%) could only read and write. Although 69 (14.65%) had completed their primary education and 66 (14.01%) had completed their secondary education and only 27 (5.73%) had completed their studies at college level. When the nature of occupation of the heads of householders was considered, a good number of them were labourers 102 (21.66%), followed by businessmen 81 (17.19%), drivers and farmers 72 (15.29%). Majority of households 207 (43.95%) had the monthly income of less than 10,000 INR, followed by those which had monthly less than 10,000- 20,000 INR, 141(29.94%). Only 3 (0.64%) households had monthly income of 50,000-60,000 rupees (Table/Fig 1).

All the households reported that they kept medicines at home. Total numbers of medicines stored by the studied population were 1674, as most of the households stored more than one medicine. Most common place to store the medicine was found to be drawer 894 (53.41%), followed by cupboard 366 (21.86%). Only 12 (0.72%) of householders used to store their medicines in refrigerator. The results of the present study showed that tablets were the most common drug formulation used 978 (58.42%), which was followed by capsules 318 (19%) and oral liquids 267 (15.95%). Injectables were used only in 15 (0.90%) instances. Proton pump inhibitors were the most common reported therapeutic category of drugs used by the householders 228 (13.62%). Minerals and vitamins were the next therapeutic category of drugs commonly used 186 (11.11%). Antibiotics and analgesics were equally used by 165 (9.86%) of the total householders questioned during the study (Table/Fig 2).


This pragmatic study was conducted in rural areas in the southern part of Kashmir, India, revealed the socio-demographic profile of the participating householders and revealed the various facts about the home storage of medication. Majority of the heads of the households were illiterate 219 (46.50%) and only 27 (5.73%) of them were having the college level education. This was in contrast to a similar study carried out in Kashmiri population where 94% of the studied population was found to be literate (14). This can be justified by the fact that the said survey was conducted in urban population where the majority population has access to educational institutes and the literacy levels are generally very high compared to rural areas where the current study was conducted. Majority of the studied cases 207 (43.95%) were having the monthly income of less than 10.000 rupees. These results were similar to the study carried out in Maharashtra, where the majority of households had monthly income of less than 15,000 INR (18). This can be justified by the fact that since the study was conducted in the rural areas where heads of the household used to indulge in the low wage work at the earliest of their age and paying least attention for their academic carriers.

The present study revealed that nearly three-fourth of households stored medicines either in the drawer or cupboard whereas less than 1% of them used the refrigerator for storage purpose. The correct storage place of the medicine depends on the nature of the medicine itself. Most of the drugs can be stored at desired room temperature whereas few medicines such as antibiotic suspensions after preparation must be kept cool but not frozen. These results were similar to the study conducted in Qatar, where most medicines were kept in the bedroom drawer (19). The adequacy of household storage is influenced by the location of the medicine. One of the risk factors for the occurrence of accidental poisoning in children and suicide attempts have been found to be storing drugs at places which are easily accessible (20),(21). Criteria for adequate home storage of medications given by some regulatory agencies are to store medicines out of reach of children and to be protected from heat, humidity, light, and dust (22),(23).

Tablets were the formulations most commonly used for self-medication 978 (58.42%). However, it should be emphasised that tablets might be the most frequently used dosage form in self-medication simply because most medicines for self-medication come in tablet form. This was followed by capsules formulation which was used in 318 (19%) cases. Solid dosage formulations (tablets and capsules) are commonly used drug formulations because of their ease of administration and acceptability in the community (24). Similar results were reported by a study carried by Martins RR et al., (25).

The results of the current study showed that stored medicines belonged mostly to four categories: proton pump inhibitors, minerals and vitamins, analgesics and antibiotics. Almost similar results were reported in a study carried out on Iranian households where analgesics, adult cold remedies and antibiotics were the three most commonly used therapeutic drug categories (26). The respiratory medicines (16.8%), Central Nervous System (CNS) agents (16.4%) and antibiotics (14.3%), were found to be most commonly reused medicines in a study carried out by Abou-Auda HS (27).

The present study results were in contrast to the British study, 28.0% cardiovascular medicines, 19.1% CNS agents, 14.8% respiratory agents, 11.4% gastrointestinal agents and only 4.0% antibiotics were returned to pharmacies (28). One of the risk factors for encouraging inappropriate drug use such as using the antimicrobial drugs in illnesses when they are not indicated is the ease of access to them. This inappropriate use of antimicrobials can potentially cause adverse drug reactions and lead to development of antimicrobial resistance, which is considered as the most serious challenge throughout the world (29). Similar studies have been tabulated in (Table/Fig 3) (8),(19),(26).


Although the present study was a community based and was not based on a specific target group however an absence of a standard definition of self-medication and the study design which did not include a comparison group means the results should be interpreted with caution and many more studies are needed to authenticate the results.


The studied householders stored large amount of medicines in homes. Most common place to store the medicine was found to be drawer (53.41%) and tablets (58.42%) were the most common drug formulation used. Since the study was carried out in rural population, most of the households were having low education level and belonged to low socio-economic sectors. Most often the stored medicines were not stored under proper storing conditions which can lead to unauthorised use of these medicines by the family members. Since large amount of medicines belonging to various drug classes (Analgesic, Multivitamins, Antibiotics and Antihypertensive) were stored by the households, the prescribers have to take into account that their patients are likely to keep several prescription medicines in their homes. These patients are potential providers of these medicines to their relatives and friends which can lead to unsafe self-medication. There is a need for better public knowledge and information about the risks of reuse of prescription medications.


Bell J, Dziekan G, Pollack C, Mahachai V. Self-Care in the Twenty First Century: A Vital Role for the Pharmacist. Advances in Therapy. 2016;33(10):1691-703. [crossref] [PubMed]
Aoyama I, Koyama S, Hibino H. Self-medication behaviours among Japanese consumers: Sex, age, and SES differences and caregivers’ attitudes toward their children’s health management. Asia Pac Fam Med. 2012;11(1):7. [crossref] [PubMed]
Awad AI, Eltayeb IB. Self-medication practices with antibiotics and antimalarials among Sudanese undergraduate university students. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(7):1249-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
De Bolle L, Mehuys E, Adriaens E, Remon JP, Van Bortel L, Christiaens T. Home medication cabinets and self-medication: A source of potential health threats? Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(4):572-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
Garey KW, Johle ML, Behrman K, Neuhauser MM. Economic consequences of unused medications in Houston, Texas. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(7-8):1165-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
Yousif MA, In-home storage and utilization habits: A Sudanese study. East Mediterr Health J. 2002, 8(2/3):422-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
Wondimu A, Molla F, Demeke B, Eticha T, Assen A, Abrha S, et al. Household storage of medicines and associated factors in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135650. [crossref] [PubMed]
Ocan M, Bbosa GS, Waako P, Ogwal-Okeng J, Obua C. Factors predicting home storage of medicines in Northern Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:650. [crossref] [PubMed]
Barah F, Gonçalves V. Antibiotic use and knowledge in the community in Kalamoon, Syrian Arab Republic: A cross-sectional study. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(5):516-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kiyingi KS, Lauwo JAK. Drugs in the home: Danger and waste. World Health Forum. 1993;14(4):381-84.
Sahebi L, Vahidi RG. Self-medication and storage of drugs at home among the clients of drugstores in Tabriz. Curr Drug Saf. 2009;4(2):107-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
Sharif SI, Abduelkarem AR, Bustami HA, Haddad LI, Khalil DS. Trends of home drug storage and use in different regions across the northern United Arab Emirates. Med Princ Pract. 2010;19(5):355-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
Paniz VMV, Fassa AG, Maia MFS, Domingues MR, Bertoldi AD. Measuring access to medicines: a review of quantitative methods used in household surveys. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:146. articles/10.1186/1472-6963-10-146. [crossref] [PubMed]
Mir SA. A cross-sectional study on self-medication practices and medication adherence among Kashmiri urban population. Asian J Pharm Clin Res, 2018;11(4): 390-92. [crossref]
Kumari R, Kiran, Kumar D, Bahl R, Gupta R. Study of knowledge and practices of self-medication among medical students at Jammu. J Med Sci. 2012;15(2):141-44. [crossref]
Hardon A, Hodgkin C, Fresle D. How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers. World Health Organisation/University of Amsterdam/Royal Topical Institute. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2004. Accessed on 08.08.2022. Available on:
World Health Organisation (WHO) International Working Group for Drug Statistics Methodology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and Clinical Pharmacological Services. Introduction to drug utilization research. World Health Organisation 2003. Accessed on: 08.08.2022. Available On: handle/10665/42627.
Pandey SD, Chaudhari VL. Cross sectional study of factors associated with home storage of medicines. J Chem Pharm Res. 2016;8(8):1114-120.
Kheir N, Hajj ME, Wilbur K, Kaissi R, Yousif A. An exploratory study on medications in Qatar homes. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:99-06. Doi: 10.2147/DHPS. S25372. Epub 2011 Dec 20. [crossref]
Özdemi R, Bayrakci B, Teksam Ö, Yalçin B, Kale G. Thirty-three-year experience on childhood poisoning. Turk J Pediatr. 2012;54(3):251-59.
Budnitz DS, Salis S. Preventing medication overdoses in young children: An opportunity for harm elimination. Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):1597-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
World Health Organisation. Annex 9. Guide to good storage practices for pharmaceuticals. Geneva; 2003 [cited 2017 Jun 30]. (WHO Technical Report Series, 908). Available from: quality_assurance/Guide GoodStoragePracticesTRS908Annex9.pdf.
Royal Pharmaceutical Social of Great Britain. The handling of medicines in social care, London. 2007;7-32. pdf.
Teni FS, Surur AS, Belay A, Wondimsigegn D, Gelayee DA, Shewamene Z, et al. A household survey of medicine storage practices in Gondar town, northwestern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):238. [crossref] [PubMed]
Martins RR, Farias AD, Oliveira YMDC, Diniz RDS, Oliveira AG. Prevalence and risk factors of inadequate medicine home storage: a community-based study. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:95. Doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000053. [crossref] [PubMed]
Foroutan B, Foroutan R. Household storage of medicines and self-medication practices in south-east Islamic Republic of Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2014; 20(9):547-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
Abou-Auda HS. An economic assessment of the extent of medication use and wastage among families in Saudi Arabia and Arabian Gulf countries. Clin Ther. 2003;25(4):1276-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
Daniszewsi R, Langley CA, Marriot JF, Wilson KA, Clewes P, Wilkinson M, et al. An investigation of medicines returned to general practitioners and community pharmacies. Int J Pharm Pract. 2002;10(S1):s42. [crossref]
Liu Y-C, Huang W-K, Huang T-S, Calvin MS, Kunin M. Inappropriate use of antibiotics and the risk for delayed admission and masked diagnosis of infectious diseases. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(19):2366-70. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56886.17091

Date of Submission: Apr 05, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 25, 2022
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2022

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 13, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 22, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 24, 2022 (25%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)