Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 146912

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : FC20 - FC24 Full Version

Effect of Oral Contraceptive Pill and Metformin on Metabolic and Endocrine Parameters in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Prospective Interventional Study


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56913.16915
Mustafa Asad, Manab Nandy, Manasi Banerjee, Mayukh Mukherjee

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, KPC Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Calcutta Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Malda Medical College, Malda, West Bengal, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mayukh Mukherjee,
28 Netaji Lane Baidyabati Hooghly, Baidyabati-712222, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: mayukh.cnmc@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrinopathies, affecting women of reproductive age group worldwide. There is no comprehensive data, regarding the outcome of various treatment modalities.

Aim: To assess the effect of Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCP) and metformin on metabolic and endocrine parameters in PCOS.

Materials and Methods: It was a prospective interventional study, done over a period of 12 months from January 2017 to January 2018 at the Outpatient Department (OPD) of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical College, Kolkata. A total of 162 PCOS patients were recruited. The selected patients were divided into two groups A and B, based on the clinician’s assessment with respect to the patient profile. Group A received lifestyle intervention plus metformin (started at 500 mg / day and according to patient’s response and the clinical judgement titrated upto 2000 mg/day for 6 months) and group B received lifestyle intervention plus oral contraceptive pill. (fixed dose combination of ethinyl estradiol 50 micrograms and cyproterone acetate 2 milligrams per day for 6 months). The patients were assessed for metabolic parameters [Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), Post-Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS), Haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), lipid profile] and endocrine parameters [testosterone, prolactin and Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)]. The Student t-test, Chi-square test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test were used to compare the data.

Results: A total of 162 patients were recruited for the present study with the mean age in group A was 23.75±1.7 and in group B was 22.40±1.6 years. The mean HbA1C levels of group A before the initiation of the treatment was found to be 7.51±0.89% which was reduced to 7.45±0.49% and 6.83±0.34% at the end of two months and six months respectively (p-value=0.001). In group B, serum testosterone was significantly reduced from 2.86±0.48 to 2.18±0.42 (p-value=0.0001), however the glycemic control worsened.

Conclusion: OCPs and metformin do not significantly correct metabolic abnormalities associated with PCOS, although, gynecological symptoms are improved significantly. Comparatively, metformin helps in control of blood sugar levels but high BMI and deranged lipid profile remains unaltered by both metformin and OCP.

Keywords

Insulin resistance, Lipids, Testosterone

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrinopathies of women of reproductive age group (1). It is a complex endocrine condition, because of its multifactorial and polygenic etiology (2). Insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism are characteristics of PCOS (3). Insulin resistance is defined as a state in which the normal concentration of insulin produces subnormal effects on glucose homeostasis and utilisation. Because of insulin resistance there is obesity, type 2 diabetes, and abnormal lipid profile in PCOS patients (4). Insulin resistance in women with PCOS is more severe, in those who are overweight whereas, lean women with PCOS have less severe insulin resistance (5),(6),(7). Decreased levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein; and increased levels of triglycerides, ApoB and very low density lipoprotein is consistent with an insulin resistance state (8),(9),(10). It is difficult to determine, which of these two (insulin resistance or hyperandrogenism) should be implicated as the cause of these problems (11),(12). Increased insulin stimulates theca cells of ovaries via Luteinizing Hormone (LH), to produce excess testosterone which is the main source of androgen in PCOS (13). An enzyme called aromatase, which converts androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol is present in the adipose tissue. Since, PCOS patients have excess of adipose tissue, there is an increased production of androgens and estrogens (14). In 20% cases, increased pulsatility of Gonadotropin hormone Releasing Hormone (GnRH) causes increased prolactin which further stimulates adrenal androgen production, thus setting up a vicious cycle (2). Although, subclinical hypothyroidism was found in association with PCOS, (15) and they share certain common features of anovulatory cycles and high BMI (16).

Upto 33% of patients of PCOS have an association with a syndrome of medical disorder known as Syndrome X or Insulin Resistance Syndrome. Insulin Resistance Syndrome in PCOS has been linked to low adiponectin levels, which has a role in fatty acid metabolism and glucose metabolism thus predisposing to long term sequelae of Cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and obstructive sleep apnoea (17). For diagnosis of metabolic syndrome three or more of the criteria like waist circumference of >88 cm or >35 inches, fasting plasma glucose of ≥100 mg/dL, blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg, fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL and High-Density Lipoprotein [HDL-C] <50 mg/dL should be present (18). Metabolic syndrome is also seen in 10 % - 15% lean PCOS patients (19),(20). Hyperandrogenism, oligo-ovulation and insulin resistance are the main features of PCOS and the treatment is directed towards these three.

First line of treatment is lifestyle intervention and exercise (21),(22),(23),(24). For the management of weight and obesity exercise is recommended by Endocrine society (25) and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) (26). Patients of PCOS have high prevalence of central obesity (27). Symptoms of PCOS can be improved through weight loss and diet (28),(29). Oral contraceptives, clomiphene, gonadotropins, metformin, spironolactone and pioglitazone are the agents for medical management of PCOS (18). Metformin is an insulin sensitizer and it improves both metabolic parameters and ovarian function (30),(31). For the treatment of hyperandrogenic symptoms, combined oral contraceptives with Ethinyl Estradiol [EE] and Cyproterone acetate are considered as the first line therapy (32),(33).There is no comprehensive data regarding the outcome of various treatment modalities. This study intends to find out the effect of OCP and metformin on metabolic and endocrine parameters in patients with PCOS.

Material and Methods

This prospective interventional study was performed in the OPD of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India for a duration of 12 months from January 2017 to January 2018. Ethical Clearance (MC/Kol/IEC/Non-spon/369/11-2016) was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee.

Sample size calculation: PCOS patients were diagnosed using the Rotterdam criteria (34). The following formula was used to calculate the sample size:

n = Z2 P(1-2) / d2

n = Sample size, Z= Statistic level of confidence, P= Prevalence, d= Precision, For the level of confidence of 95%, which is conventional, Z value is 1.96. Prevalence = 12 % (35),(36), Precision = 5%.The minimum sample size required was 162.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Patient’s with PCOS, aged 15-35 years aged 15-35 years, who were not pregnant at the time of inclusion or anytime during the study period, patients who were not on any medications which can alter glucose levels and sex hormone levels (e.g.: Oral contraceptives, Metformin etc.) were included in the study. The women who were suffering from any other pre-existing or co-existing gynecological diseases, patients with pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia or any other medical conditions were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Patients selected were divided into two groups based on the clinician’s assessment with respect to the patient’s profile. A total of 71 patients were allotted in group A and 91 patients in group B. Counselling about healthy lifestyle and dietary advice for weight reduction was given to all the selected patients. Counselling was provided by nutritionist, regarding a balanced diet and adequate exercise. It was advised to have a low carbohydrate diet with high fiber content, with a total calorie intake of 1400 kcal/day and 150 min of moderate exercise a week (as per RCOG standard).

Group A received lifestyle intervention and oral metformin. At the initiation of the study, a dose of 500 mg was given and according to patient’s response and clinical judgement, the dosage of metformin was adjusted to a maximum of 2000 mg per day for 6 months. Group B was advised lifestyle intervention, and was given OCP (fixed dose combination of ethinyl estradiol 50 micrograms and cyproterone acetate 2 milligrams per day for 6 months). Each patient recruited in the study, was followed-up with all the relevant clinical and laboratory parameters for a period of six months. During the follow-up period, they were evaluated at 2nd month and 6th month from the date of initiation of the specific treatment. None of the patients developed serious adverse reaction to the given medication.

Study measures: After the written informed consent was taken, following data were collected from the participants- demographic profile of the patient, weight, hirsutism; detailed menstrual history which included duration of cycle, intermenstrual spotting, dysmenorrhea, amount of flow as guided by number of pads used and passage of clots if any, symptoms of androgen excess, and drug history. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. A detailed general examination was conducted for the identification of acne, hirsutism (scored by the Ferriman and Gallwey system (37)), acanthosis nigricans.

Polycystic ovaries on Ultrasound Sonograpghy (USG) were defined as presence of 12 or more follicles in each ovary, measuring 2-9 mm in diameter, and / or increased ovarian volume > 10 mL (38). Improvement in USG was considered, if the number of follicles decreased to less than 12 in number and / or the ovarian volume reduced to less than 10 cc during the two scheduled follow-up visits.

For the metabolic parameters, Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), Post-Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS), Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), and lipid profile (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, triglycerides) were recorded. And for the endocrine parameters testosterone, prolactin and Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) levels were measured.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package For The Social Sciences software version 26.0 software (version 26). Data were presented as mean±standard deviation and percentages (numbers). The Student’s t-test, Chi-square test and ANOVA test were used to compare the data. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 162 patients were recruited for the present study of which 24 did not follow-up. The mean age in group A was 23.75±1.7 and in group B was 22.40±1.6 years. Group A (n=61) received lifestyle intervention plus metformin and group B (n=77) received lifestyle intervention plus OCP. A flow chart of the study is depicted in (Table/Fig 1). There was no significant difference in the socio-economic status between both the groups (Table/Fig 2).

The mean weight of group A at the starting of the treatment was 58.40±2.63 which reduced to 53.84±1.77 at the end of the 6 months (p=0.001). The mean weight of group B at the starting of the treatment was 49.39±2.21 which increased to 52.34±2.06 (p=0.001). This difference was again statistically significant. Frequency of hirsutism and acne was more in group B at the initiation of the treatment. At the end of the treatment in both the groups, hirsutism and acne reduced. However, only the reduction in the prevalence of acne in group B at the end of the treatment was statistically significant (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4).

The mean HbA1C levels of group A before the initiation of the treatment was found to be 7.51±0.89% which was reduced to 7.45±0.49% and 6.83±0.34% at the end of two months and six months respectively (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 5).

Before the initiation of treatment, the mean TSH level of group A was found to be 3.67±0.52 IU/L which marginally increased to 3.72±0.38 IU/L and then reduced to 3.57±0.45 IU/L at the end of 2nd month and 6th month respectively (p-value=0.1803) (Table/Fig 6).

The mean HbA1C levels of group B before the initiation of the treatment was found to be 5.51±0.39% which became 5.52±0.28% and 5.48±0.26% at the end of 2nd months and 6th months respectively (p-value=0.7151) (Table/Fig 7).

Among the endocrine parameters, only the serum testosterone was reduced significantly at the end of the treatment in group B (Table/Fig 8).

The mean HbA1C levels among the study subjects in group A at the end of the study were 6.83±0.34% as compared to 5.48±0.26% among group B study population. The difference was found to be highly significant (p=0.0001). Among the lipid profile, the differences in total cholesterol, LDL and TG was statistically significant (Table/Fig 9).

The mean testosterone levels among the study subjects in group A at the end of the study were 2.47±0.70 mmol/L as compared to 2.18±0.42 mmol/L among group B study population. The difference was found to be statistically significant (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 10).

A total of 25 (40.1%) of the study population in group A had USG changes, suggestive of PCOS before initiation of the treatment, which got reduced to 23 (37.7%) and 22 (36.1%) at the end of 2nd month and 6th month of treatment respectively. The rate of improvement of the USG changes of PCOS among the study population was found to be not statistically significant (p-value=0.09). Similarly, 47 (61%) of the study population in group B had USG changes suggestive to PCOS before initiation of the treatment, which got reduced to 35 (45.4%) and 29 (37.7%) at the end of 2nd month and 6th month of treatment respectively. The rate of improvement of the USG changes of PCOS among the study population was found to be highly significant (p-value<0.001).

Discussion

Polycystic ovarian syndrome is one of the most common endocrinopathies affecting woman of reproductive age group. The first line of therapy for all women with PCOS is lifestyle modification, including diet and exercise (38). Lifestyle intervention is particularly important in individuals with dyslipidaemia (18),(39). In a meta-analysis done by Sirmans SM et al., it was shown that the prevalence of PCOS varies, depending on which criteria are used to make the diagnosis, but is as high as 15%–20% (40). The study also highlighted, that PCOS women are more prone to metabolic derangements and infertility related issues. They also emphasised, that PCOS patients are more likely to have increased coronary artery calcium scores and increased carotid intima-media thickness. The current study showed that the metabolic difference mean in FBS in the two study groups were 5.08±0.24 mmol/L and 4.68±0.18 mmol/L (p=0.0001) respectively whereas the mean PPBS was 5.85±0.35 mmol/L and 5.22±0.26mmol/L (p=0.0001) respectively at the beginning of the study.

In a study conducted by Kocer D et al., in Turkey, it was shown that metformin decreases oxidative stress and improve insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and endothelial dysfunction (41). The present study also showed that lifestyle intervention plus oral metformin improves the glycemic control and dyslipidemia in PCOS patients.

In another study conducted by Aydogmus H et al., it was shown that total testosterone (p-value=0.01), LH (p-value<0.00), Total cholesterol (p-value=0.02), insulin (p-value<0.00) and triglyceride (p-value<0.00) were significantly more among the PCOS patients as compared with healthy women having polycystic ovarian morphology with regular menstrual cycle (42).

Another institution-based study was done by Tao T et al., in an urban set up in Northern China. This was a randomised, parallel, open-label study, in which 63 patients were randomly distributed into three treatment groups: the first treatment group received metformin, saxagliptin was given to the second group and the third group received both the drugs. In the third group, reduction in HBA1c was significant as compared to the first and the second group (saxagliptin vs. combination treatment vs. metformin: - 1.1 vs. -1.3 vs. -1.1%, p-value=0.016), whereas HbA1c reduction was similar between the first and the second group (p-value> 0.05) (43). All the three groups significantly reduced the homeostasis model assessment- insulin resistance index and increased the deposition index (p-value<0.01 for all). Homeostasis Model Assessment- Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR)- cell function among the metformin and combination groups, had no significant change also the insulinogenic index among all three groups (p-value >0.05 for all) had no change. However, BMI and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (p-value <0.01 for both) was significantly reduced in saxagliptin and metformin group. Similarly, the present study also demonstrated that oral metformin significantly improved the glycaemic parameters (p-value=0.0001). Metformin however, did not improve significantly the endocrinological parameters (p-value>0.05). The follow-up time of the present study was only 6 months as compared to 24 months for the study conducted by Tao at al., The present study also could not evaluate the HOMA-IR and other high-end parameters for insulin resistance due to logistic reasons.

Medeiros SF et al., conducted a meta-analysis in Brazil to examine the impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on the characteristics of PCOS patients (44). Total of 1,537 euthyroid PCOS patients and 301 subclinical hypothyroid PCOS patients were selected from 9 studies.Both groups had similar anthropometrical parameters. Patients with subclinical hypothyroidism hypothyroid PCOS had higher total cholesterol and triglyceride (p-value=0.036 and p-value=0.012) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p-value=0.018). In euthyroid PCOS, fasting glucose was less (p-value=0.022). In both the groups androgen levels were similar (p-value >0.05). The present study showed that the mean TSH levels did not show any significant improvement at the end of the study period with oral metformin and lifestyle modification (p-value=0.1803). The same findings were echoed in the study population who received OCP with lifestyle modification (p-value=0.6479) at the end of study period of 6 months. The mean TSH at the end of the study period when compared between the two groups also showed no significant difference (p-value=0.1503). These findings suggest that the standard modalities of treatment, namely metformin and OCP, do not have any significant bearings on the thyroid profile of PCOS patients.

Metabolic and endocrine sequelae of PCOS as explained are morbid and incurs high mortality rates. Diabetes affects macro and microvasculature leading to end organ damage in eyes, kidneys and heart. Dyslipidaemia accounts for premature atherosclerosis and a prothrombotic state, which is life-threatening. Central obesity causes obstructive sleep apnoea which is itself an independent risk factor for cardiac failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension and arrhythmias, that severly impair quality of life. Most women tend to ignore these co-morbidities once menstrual irregularities are relieved with OCPs or fertility is achieved with ovulation induction drugs like metformin and clomiphene (45),(46),(47),(48). It should be emphasised that management of PCOS should also seek to correct or prevent these clinical consequences by appropriate early screening of high-risk individuals. A small reduction in weight (2-5%) can result in significant improvement in metabolic and endocrine parameters, thus reducing disease progression. Incorporation of moderate exercise in daily activities and low-calorie diet intake, reduces risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (49). However, the currently available treatment modalities i.e., OCP and metformin, though may be of undisputed benefit in resolving menstrual irregularities and infertility in PCOS, they are largely ineffective in treating these health issues once developed, as seen in the present study.

Limitation(s)

Randomisation was not done for the recruitement of the subjects, which might have lead to selection bias. A limitation of present study might have been the short duration of follow-up and logistic restrictions of our center.

Conclusion

Both oral metformin and oral contraceptive pills are efficacious treatment modalities for PCOS patients and cause significant improvement in menstrual symptoms within 6 months of initiation of treatment. However, patients with poorer metabolic parameters have been more benefitted with oral metformin therapy whereas patients with good metabolic parameters and poorer endocrinological profiles have been comparably further improved with oral contraceptive pills Further recommendations for treatment options may be combination therapy of OCP and metformin or addition of statins with lifestyle modification.

References

1.
Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA, Hoeger KM, Murad MH, Pasquali R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2013;98:4565-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Dutta DC. Text Book Of Gynaecology. 7th ed. Kolkata India: Jaypee Publication- India; 2016.
3.
Pasquali R, Gambineri A. Insulin-sensitizing agents in polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:763-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Palomba S, Santagni S, Falbo A, La Sala GB. Complications and challenges associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: Current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:745-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Dumitrescu R, Mehedintu C, Briceag I, Purcarea VL, Hudita D. The polycystic ovary syndrome: An update on metabolic and hormonal mechanisms. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2015;8(2):142-45.
6.
Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: Mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev. 1997;18:774-800. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Reaven GM. Bantinglecture 1988. Role of insulinresistance inhuman disease. Diabetes 1988; 37(12): 1595-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
German AC, Shapiro MD. Assessing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk with advanced lipid testing: State of the Science. Eur Cardiol. 2020;15:e56. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.18. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Hirano T. Pathophysiology of diabetic dyslipidemia. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018;25(9):771-82. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17023. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Brunzell JD, Ayyobi AF. Dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2003;115(Suppl 8A):24S-8S. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Mark L, Dani G. Diabetic dyslipidaemia and the atherosclerosis. Orv Hetil. 2016;157(19):746-52. doi: 10.1556/650.2016.30441. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Mukherjee J. Basics of Gynaecology. 2nd ed: Academic Publisher India; 2019.
13.
Sathyapalan T, Atkin SL. Mediators of inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome in relation to adiposity. Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:01-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Singla R, GuptaY, Khemani M, Aggarwal S. Thyroid disorders and polycystic ovary syndrome: An emerging relationship. IJEM. 2015;19(1):25-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Yu Q, Wang JB. Subclinical hypothyroidism in PCOS: Impact on presentation, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk. Kantartzis K, editor. BioMed Research International. 2016;2016:2067087. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2067087. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Chandrasekaran S, Sagili H. Metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.TOG. 2018;20(4). [crossref]
17.
Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1113-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Sathyapalan T, Kilpatrick ES, Coady AM. The effect of atorvastatin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized double blind placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:103-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Azziz R. Controversy in clinical endocrinology: Diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome: The Rotterdam criteria are premature. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:781-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women.Journal of Clinical Endocrinology. 1961;21:1440-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Fogel RB, Malhotra A, Pillar G, Pittman SD, Dunaif A, White DP, et al. Increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1175-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Kuchenbecker WK, Groen H, van Asselt SJ, Bolster Johanna HT, Zwerver J, Slart Riemer HJ, et al. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome and obesity, loss of intra-abdominal fat is associated with resumption of ovulation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2505-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Harrison CL, Lombard CB, Moran LJ, Teede HJ. Exercise therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:171-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Hutchison SK, Stepto NK, Harrison CL, Moran LJ, Strauss BJ, Teede HJ. et al. Effects of exercise on insulin resistance and body composition in overweight and obese women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:48-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Legro SR, Arslanian AS, Ehrmann AD, Hoeger KM, Murad MH, Pasquali R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):4565-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group: Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:19-25. [crossref]
27.
Ahmadi A, Akbarzadeh M, Mohammadi F, Akbari M, Jafari B, Tolide-Ie HR, et al. Anthropometric characteristics and dietary pattern of women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Indian. J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(4):672-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Kiddy DS, Hamilton-Fairley D, Bush A, Short F, Anyaoku V, Reed MJ, et al. Improvement in endocrine and ovarian function during dietary treatment of obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992;36(1):105-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Moran LJ, Noakes M, Clifon PM, Tomlinson L, Galletly C, Norman RJ, et al. Dietary composition in restoring reproductive and metabolic physiology in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(2):812-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Bailey CJ, Turner RC. Metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:574-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, Tosi F, Perrone F, Caputo M, et al. Metformin effects on clinical features, endocrine and metabolic profiles, and insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month trial, followed by open, long-term clinical evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:139-46. [crossref]
32.
Legro RS, Barnhart HX, Schlaff WD, Carr BR, Diamond MP, Carson SA, et al. Clomiphene, metformin, or both for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:551-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Luque-Ramirez M, Alvarez-Blasco F, Botella-Carretero JI, Martínez-Bermejo E, Lasunción MA, Escobar-Morreale HF. Comparison of ethinyl-estradiol plus cyproterone acetate versus metformin effects on classic metabolic cardiovascular risk factors in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2453-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to PCOS. Human Report. 2004;19:41-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Nidhi R, Padmalatha V, Nagarathna R, Amritanshu R. Prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome in Indian adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011;24:223-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Nair MK, Pappachan P, Balakrishnan S, Leena ML, George B, Russell PS. Menstrual irregularity and poly cystic ovarian syndrome among adolescent girls: A two year follow-up study. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79(Suppl 1):S69-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology. 1961; 21:1440-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Wild RA, Carmina E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dokras A, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular risk and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: A consensus statement by the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (AE-PCOS) Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2038-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Banaszewska B, Pawelczyk L, Spaczynski RZ, Dziura J, Duleba AJ. Effects of simvastatin and oral contraceptive agent on polycystic ovary syndrome: prospective, randomized, crossover trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:456-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Sirmans SM, Pate KA. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clinical Epidemiology. 2014;6:01-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Kocer D, Bayram F, Diri H. The effects of metformin on endothelial dysfunction, lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(5):367-371. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Aydoğmuş H, Kelekçi S, Elmali F, Aydoğmuş S. Can we use serum Anti Mullerian hormone to differentiate the diagnosis between polycystic ovary syndrome patients and healthy women with polycystic ovarian morphology and regular menstrual cycles. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(10):1011-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Tao T, Wu P, Wang Y, Liu W. Comparison of glycemic control and β-cell function in new onset T2DM patients with PCOS of metformin and saxagliptin monotherapy or combination treatment. BMC Endocrine Disorders. 2018;18:04. [crossref] [PubMed]
44.
Medeiros SF, Medeiros MAS, Ormond CM, Barbosa JS, Yamamoto MMW. et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism impact on the characteristics of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. A meta-analysis of observational studies. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83:105-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Glueck CJ, Papanna R, Wang P, Goldenberg N, Sieve-Smith L. Incidence and treatment of metabolic syndrome in newly referred women with confirmed polycystic ovarian syndrome. Metabolism. 2003;52:908-15. [crossref]
46.
Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, Rinfret S, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1113-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
47.
Apridonidze T, Essah PA, Iuorno MJ, NestlerJE. Prevalence and characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:1929-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
Helvaci N, Karabulut E, Demir AU, Yildiz BO. Polycystic ovary syndrome and the risk of obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Endocr Connect. 2017;6(7):437-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
49.
Taylor D, Pal L. Sell E. Speroff’s Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility 9th Edition. Philadelphia, USA: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56913.16915

Date of Submission: Apr 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 16, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 01, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 30, 2022 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com