Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 119434

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : October | Volume : 16 | Issue : 10 | Page : BC22 - BC25 Full Version

Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve among Newly Diagnosed Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis Related Subclinical and Overt Hypothyroid Reproductive Women: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: October 1, 2022 | DOI:
Akinepalli Pullaiah, Veerendra Kumar Arumalla

1. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College Nalgonda, Telangana, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Veerendra Kumar Arumalla,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, KK Nagar, Chennai-600078, Tamil Nadu, India.


Introduction: Thyroid autoimmunity is a common autoimmune disorder among reproductive women. It is proposed that, thyroid peroxidase antibodies pass through the blood follicle barrier during follicular development which damages the growing follicles and oocytes. Previous studies have demonstrated the association between thyroid autoimmunity and ovarian failure. Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels are used as a marker of ovarian reserve in clinical practice.

Aim: To evaluate ovarian reserve among newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis (HT) related subclinical and overt hypothyroid women.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College Nalgonda, Telangana, India, from August 2020 to July 2021. The study included 180 subjects, 60 in each Overt Hypothyroid (EU group) (OH group), Subclinical Hypothyroid (SCH group) and Euthyroid subjects. Socio-demographic details and other parameters age, Body Mass Index (BMI), AMH, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), free T4 (fT4), Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies (TPOAb), Follicular Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Luteinizing Hormone (LH), Estradiol (E2), Antral Follicular Count (AFC) were evaluated and compared in all the three groups. The above data were recorded and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, Chi-square test, and Spearman’s correlation test were performed for statistical analysis.

Results: The median age, BMI, and total AFC were not statistically significant (p-value >0.05). Serum TPOAb levels were significantly (p-value <0.001) high in the OH group and SCH group when compared to the EU group. The AMH levels were significantly (p-value=0.015) high in the EU group compared to the OH group, but there were no statistically significant differences among other groups. The AMH values were negatively correlated with age among all the three groups. There was no significant correlation between AMH and other parameters analysed among different groups.

Conclusion: The AMH levels were significantly low in the OH group when compared to the EU group. There were no statistically significant differences among other groups. Age was found to be an independent factor for low AMH levels among all the three groups.


Anti-müllerian hormone, Thyroid autoimmunity, Thyroid stimulating hormone, Thyroid peroxidase antibodies

Autoimmune Thyroid Disease (AITD) is the most common endocrine disease among women of reproductive age. Its prevalence was reported to range from 5% to 15% (1). Hypothyroidism is associated with menstrual irregularities and infertility.Severe hypothyroidism is commonly associated with ovulatory dysfunction due to numerous interactions of thyroid hormones with the female reproductive system. Thyroid responsivity by the ovaries could be explained by the presence of thyroid hormone receptors in human oocytes (2). The pathophysiology of how Autoimmune Thyroid Disease (AITD) reduces ovarian reserve has not been well established. Given that thyroxin discovered in human follicular fluid is important for oocyte development and AITD decreases thyroid function by disturbing the hypothalamus pituitary gonadal axis, AITD may decrease ovarian reserve by affecting endocrinology (3). Secondly, antithyroid peroxidase antibodies may activate an immune reaction to damage the ovarian tissue because antithyroid antibodies are also detected in ovarian follicles (4),(5).

It is well known that a prolonged reduction in thyroid hormone concentration results in a broad spectrum of reproductive alteration, including abnormal folliculogenesis, alterations in the ovulation and fertilisation rate, and ovarian failure [6-8]. In clinical practice, hormonal markers like Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Estradiol (E2), Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH), and ultrasound parameter Antral Follicle Count (AFC) are used for evaluating ovarian reserve. Anti-müllerian hormone is produced by the granulosa cells of ovarian antral follicles. AMH concentrations show a significant correlation with oocyte count after superovulation and can be used as a good marker for evaluating ovarian reserve (9). Previous studies showed varying results on the association between TSH, Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies (TPOAb), and AMH (ovarian reserve). A study conducted by Ozturkunsal I et al., showed no significant correlation between AMH concentrations with the serum levels of TPOAb and TSH (10). Chen CW et al., showed positive TPOAb was associated with low ovarian reserve (11). Another study by Osuka S et al., showed that TPOAb is not likely to affect ovarian reserve in euthyroid women with normal TSH, but elevated TSH is associated with decreased AMH levels (12). Studies conducted by Polyzos NP et al., Korevaar TIM et al., Kucukler FK et al., and Morales Martínez FA et al., showed no relationship between thyroid hormone levels and AMH levels (13),(14),(15),(16).

As the earlier studies showed varying results on how ovarian reserve was affected by thyroid autoimmunity, the present study aimed to evaluate ovarian reserve among newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s thyroiditis related subclinical and overt hypothyroid women using serum AMH levels and other relevant markers. The authors also aimed to find out the possible correlation between thyroid hormone status, thyroid autoantibodies, and AMH levels in the study subjects.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College Nalgonda, Telangana, India, from August 2020 to July 2021. The study was approved by Institutional Ethical Committee (No: IEC/GMC/06-2020). Written Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects.

Sample size calculation: From a previous study with an alpha error of 5% and power of 80%, required sample size was 168 (15). The sample size was calculated by using MedCalc statistical software version 20.0. Total of 180 women aged between 20-40 years were enrolled in the present study, with 60 subjects in each group.

• Newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis (HT) patients with Overt Hypothyroid (OH) (n=60).
• Newly diagnosed HT patients with Subclinical Hypothyroid (SCH) (n=60).
• Healthy subjects with Euthyroid (EU) (n=60).

Inclusion criteria: Newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis patients with OH and SCH who were attending General Medicine and Gynaecology Departments were included in the study, and healthy subjects with euthyroid were involved as the control group.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with thyroidectomy, thyroid treatment, polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, and history of ovarian surgery, patients on radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and diabetic subjects were excluded from the study.

Diagnosis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis was made when patients have high levels of antithyroid antibodies and parenchymal heterogeneity on ultrasonography of the thyroid gland (15). Increased TSH levels >10 μIU/mL together with low free T4 (fT4) were considered overt hypothyroidism and mildly increased TSH levels (4.2-10 μIU/mL) in the presence of normal free T3 (fT3) and fT4 values were regarded as subclinical hypothyroidism. Euthyroid was defined as patients with normal thyroid function tests (15).

Study Procedure

Venous blood samples were collected between the third to sixth days of the menstrual cycle from all the subjects. Serum was separated from whole blood and samples were stored at -20°C until an assay was performed. The TSH, fT4, TPOAb, FSH, Luteinizing Hormone (LH), E2, and AMH were measured on the Beckman Coulter – Access 2 Immunoassay System using the Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) method with Beckman Coulter commercial kits. The AMH concentration <1 ng/mL was considered as low. Reference ranges for TSH (0.34-5.6μIU/mL), fT4 (0.58-2.19 ng/dL), TPOAb (0.0-9.0 IU/mL), FSH (1.85-8.78 mIU/mL), LH (2.12-10.89 mIU/mL), E2 (26.5-161.3 pg/mL). These reference values were as given in the kit inserts used in the laboratory for assay. On the same morning as the blood tests, transvaginal ultrasonography evaluation of the Antral Follicle Count (AFC) was performed with a MINDRAY DC-7 model ultrasonography device in the lithotomy position. Antral follicles with a diameter of 2-10 mm were counted. Thyroid gland ultrasonography was performed using Philips ClearVue 650 ultrasound machine by an endocrinologist.

Statistical Analysis

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normal distribution of the quantitative variables. Descriptive statistics were presented as median and interquartile ranges (25th-75th percentile) for non normally distributed parameters. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test or Kruskal-Wallis test were used to evaluate the significance of the mean difference between more than two groups where applicable. To find out the correlation between two continuous variables, Spearman’s correlation test was used. Linear regression analysis was performed to test the influence of independent variables on AMH levels (dependent variable). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for windows version 21.0; (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical estimations. The statistical significance level was considered at p-value<0.05.


The age, BMI, and hormonal parameters including AMH and AFC of the three groups were represented in (Table/Fig 1). Comparisons were made among different groups (OH group vs EU group, SCH group vs EU group, OH group vs SCH group) (Table/Fig 1). Median age, BMI and total AFC were similar among the different groups and the differences between the median age, BMI and total AFC were not statistically significant (p-value>0.05). Serum TPOAb levels were high in OH group 366.1 IU/mL (IQR: 305.9-410) and SCH group 277.1 IU/mL (IQR: 222.3-320) when compared to EU group 6.05 IU/mL (IQR: 3.7-8.6). There were statistically significant differences (p-value<0.001) among the different groups (OH vs EU, SCH vs EU, OH vs SCH) (Table/Fig 1).

Serum TSH values were high in the OH group and SCH group, when compared to the EU group. Differences between serum TSH values among the three groups was a statistically significant (p-value <0.001). Serum fT4 values were low at 0.5 ng/dL (IQR;0.32-0.67) among Hashimoto’s thyroiditis when compared to EU group 1.3 ng/dL (IQR;1.1-1.42) the differences between the serum fT4 values among OH vs EU, SCH vs EU, OH vs SCH groups was statistically significant, p-value<0.001. Serum FSH, LH, and E2 values were low in the OH group and SCH group when compared to the EU group. Differences between serum TSH values among the three groups was a statistically significant (p-value<0.05). Serum AMH values were low at 1.1 ng/mL (IQR: 0.27-1.3) in the OH group when compared to the EU group 1.45 ng/mL (IQR: 1.17-2.30), the difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). But the difference in AMH values among the SCH group vs EU group, OH group vs SCH group was not statistically significant (Table/Fig 1).

Correlation analysis of AMH with other parameters showed that the AMH values were negatively correlated with age among all the three groups, (OH group: r-value=-0.718; p-value <0.001, SCH group: r-value=-0.402; p-value=0.028, and EU group: r-value=-0.701; p-value <0.001). There was no significant correlation between the AMH values and BMI, TPOAb, fT4, FSH, LH, E2, and total AFC among all the three groups (Table/Fig 2). Linear regression analysis was performed on total Hashimoto’s cases (OH group+SCH group) to test the influence of independent variables on AMH levels (dependent variable). Linear regression analysis in total Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis cases showed AMH levels were independently correlated with only age t-value=-3.03 and p-value=0.004 (Table/Fig 3).


Thyroid autoimmunity is the most common autoimmune disorder in women of reproductive age, the effect of the autoimmune system on the female reproductive system was demonstrated by many studies (17),(18),(19). It has been shown that autoantibodies were detected in women with premature ovarian failure, thyroid dysfunction or thyroid autoimmunity can affect the ovarian reserve (12). Although underlying mechanisms of how thyroid antibodies affect ovarian reserve are not clearly understood, the possible mechanism may be that anti-TPO passes through follicle barrier during follicular evolution and that may result in the destruction and damaging of growing the follicles and oocytes. Thyroid antibodies seem to have a direct impact on ovarian tissue (20),(21).

AMH has gained importance as a reliable marker of ovarian reserve. Several studies were conducted earlier to find out the association between ovarian reserve, AMH as a marker and thyroid autoantibodies, and TSH. A study by Polyzos NP et al., assessed the association between serum AMH levels, TSH, and thyroid autoantibodies levels and found that serum AMH levels were not associated with TPOAb or TSH levels (13). Another study by Saglam F et al., showed lower serum AMH levels in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease than in controls (22). However, in the multivariate analysis, they found that TSH was not the factor influencing AMH levels. Kuroda K et al., demonstrated that serum AMH levels showed an inverse correlation with serum TSH levels. But they did not include thyroid antibodies in their analysis (23).

In the present study, the authors have estimated the AMH, TSH, fT4, TPOAb, FSH, LH, E2, and AFC values among newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis patients with overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. The current study found that, serum AMH levels were low in the OH group, when compared to the EU group (controls). AMH values were negatively correlated with age among all the three groups. Age was found to be an independent risk factor affecting the AMH levels. There was no significant correlation between the AMH values and BMI, TPOAb, fT4, FSH, LH, E2, and total AFC among all the three groups. Present study results showed that, there was a negative correlation between age and AMH levels among all three groups. Age was found to be an independent risk factor affecting the AMH levels. There was no significant correlation between AMH values and TPOAb and TSH values in the present study, this was similar to a study conducted by ÖztürkÜnsal İ et al., (10).

Chen CW et al., (11) reported that positive TPOAb are associated with low ovarian reserve. The current study, found high TPOAb among Hashimoto’s disease patients when compared to the euthyroid group but there was no significant correlation between AMH levels and TPOAb. Another study by Osuka S et al., (12) reported that TPOAb are not likely to affect ovarian reserve in euthyroid women with normal TSH, but elevated TSH was associated with decreased AMH levels. Studies by Polyzos NP et al., Korevar TIM et al., and Kucukler FK et al., reported that there was no relationship between thyroid hormone levels and AMH values (13),(14),(15). The present study findings are similar to these studies. The current study could help to assess ovarian reserve among overt and subclinical Hashimoto’s thyroid patients simultaneously and compared with the euthyroid subjects.


Newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s thyroiditis patients were included in the present study; the effect of thyroid autoimmunity on ovarian reserve might have been inadequately assessed as authors did not measure thyroglobulin antibodies.


The present study concluded that, there was significantly decreased ovarian reserve among overt hypothyroid individuals. Also there was no significant decrease of ovarian reserve among subclinical hypothyroid subjects. Age was found to be independent marker for decline in AMH levels irrespective of thyroid status. Thus, it was inferred that newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s thyroiditis related overt hypothyroidism but not the subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with decreased ovarian reserve.


The authors would like to thank Dr Jyothi, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for her help in the data collection and support throughout the study.


Krassas G, Poppe K, Glinoer D. Thyroid function and human reproductive health. Endocr Rev. 2010;31(5):702-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
Poppe K, Velkeniers B, Glinoer D. Thyroid disease and female reproduction. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66(3):309-21. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02752.x. PMID: 17302862. [crossref] [PubMed]
Zhang SS, Carrillo AJ, Darling DS. Expression of multiple thyroid hormone receptor mRNAs in human oocytes, cumulus cells, and granulosa cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 1997;3(7):555-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
Persani L, Rossetti R, Cacciatore C, Bonomi M. Primary ovarian insufficiency: X chromosome defects and autoimmunity. J Autoimmune. 2009;33(1):35-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
Hsieh YT, Ho JYP. Thyroid autoimmunity is associated with higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency-A nationwide Health Insurance Research Database study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(6):1621-29. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/ deab025. PMID: 33569594. [crossref] [PubMed]
Abalovich M, Mitelberg L, Allami C, Gutierrez S, Alcaraz G, Otero P, et al.Subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity in women with infertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23(5):279-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
Joshi JV, Bhandarkar SD, Chadha M, Balaiah D, Shah R. Menstrual irregularities and lactation failure may precede thyroid dysfunction or goitre. J Postgrad Med. 39(3):137-41.
Vissenberg R, Manders VD, Mastenbroek S, Fliers E, Afink GB, Ris-Stalpers C, et al. Pathophysiological aspects of thyroid hormone disorders/thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(3):378-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
Tuten A, Hatipoğlu E, Oncul M, İmamoğlu M, Acikgoz AS, Yilmaz N, et al. Evaluation of ovarian reserve in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2014;30(10):708-11. Doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.926324. [crossref] [PubMed]
Ozturkunsal ?I, Heps, en S, Akhanli P, Calapkulu M, Sencar ME, Yalcindag? A, et al. Evaluation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels in women with Hashimoto thyroiditis in the reproductive age. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(2):716-21. Doi: 10.3906/sag-2012-177. PMID: 33705640; PMCID: PMC8203119. [crossref] [PubMed]
Chen CW, Huang YL, Tzeng CR, Huang RL, Chen CH. Idiopathic low ovarian reserve is associated with more frequent positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies. Thyroid. 2017;27(9):1194-1200. Doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0139. PMID: 28810821. [crossref] [PubMed]
Osuka S, Iwase A, Goto M, Takikawa S, Nakamura T, Murase T, et al. Thyroid autoantibodies do not impair the ovarian reserve in euthyroid infertile women: A cross-sectional study. Horm Metab Res. 2018;50(7):537-42. Doi: 10.1055/a- 0637-9430. Epub 2018 Jul 10. PMID: 29991084. [crossref] [PubMed]
Polyzos NP, Sakkas E, Vaiarelli A, Poppe K, Camus M, Tournaye H. Thyroid autoimmunity, hypothyroidism and ovarian reserve: A cross-sectional study of 5000 women based on age-specific AMH values. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(7):1690-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
Korevaar TIM, Minguez-Alarcon L, Messerlian C, de Poortere RA, Williams PL, Broeren MA, et al. Association of thyroid function and autoimmunity with ovarian reserve in women seeking infertility care. Thyroid. 2018;28(10):1349-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kucukler FK, Gorkem U, Simsek Y, Kocabas R, Guler S. Evaluation of ovarian reserve in women with overt or subclinical hypothyroidism. Arch Med Sci AMS. 2018;14(3):521. [crossref] [PubMed]
Morales-Martinez FA, Sordia-Hernandez LH, Ruiz MM, Garcia-Luna S, Valdes- Martinez OH, Vidal-Gutierez O. Association between thyroid autoimmunity and ovarian reserve in women with hypothyroidism. Thyroid Res. 2021;14(1):06. Doi: 10.1186/s13044-021-00095-0. PMID: 33752726; PMCID: PMC7983266. [crossref] [PubMed]
Hefler-Frischmuth K, Walch K, Huebl W, Baumuehlner K, Tempfer C, Hefler L, et al. Serologic markers of autoimmunity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2291-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
Fenichel P, Gobert B, Carre Y, Barbarino-Monnier P, Hieronimus S, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome in autoimmune disease. Lancet. 1999;353(9171):2210. [crossref] [PubMed]
Ott J, Aust S, Kurz C, Nouri K, Wirth S, Huber JC, et al. Elevated antithyroid peroxidase antibodies indicating Hashimoto’s thyroiditis are associated with the treatment response in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2895-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
Monteleone P, Parrini D, Faviana P, Carletti E, Casarosa E, Uccelli A, et al. Female infertility related to thyroid autoimmunity: The ovarian follicle hypothesis. Am J ReprodImmunol. 2011;66(2):108-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
Serin AN, Birge O, Uysal A, Gorar S, Tekeli F. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis worsens ovaries in polycystic ovary syndrome patients compared to Anti-Mullerian hormone levels. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):44. Doi: 10.1186/s12902-021- 00706-9. PMID: 33750377; PMCID: PMC7941903. [crossref] [PubMed]
Saglam F, Onal ED, Ersoy R, Koca C, Ergin M, Erel O, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone as a marker of premature ovarian aging in autoimmune thyroid disease. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(2):165-68. Doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.973391. Epub 2014 Oct 16. PMID: 25319839. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kuroda K, Uchida T, Nagai S, Ozaki R, Yamaguchi T, Sato Y, et al. Elevated serum thyroid-stimulating hormone is associated with decreased anti-Mullerian hormone in infertile women of reproductive age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(2):243-47. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58369.17072

Date of Submission: Jun 10, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 27, 2022
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2022

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 16, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 18, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 04, 2022 (22%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)