Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53303

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : October | Volume : 16 | Issue : 10 | Page : OC07 - OC10 Full Version

Angiographic Profile of Type 2 Diabetic Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: October 1, 2022 | DOI:
Anand Koppad, G Krupashree, Sushma Shetty, geeta chintamani

1. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. G Krupashree,
Chetana Hostel, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India.


Introduction: Coronary atherosclerosis is common in diabetics, and it is diffuse in form, with multivessel involvement. It demonstrates the involvement of multiple vessels rather than a single vessel.

Aim: To evaluate the angiographic profile of diabetic patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

Materials and Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional study which enrolled 104 diabetic patients presenting with STEMI from December 2019 to March 2020. Seventy percent or more stenosis in any major coronary artery or its major branches (>2.5 mm) was considered as significant.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 55.61±11.32 years, with 75 subjects being males and 29 subjects being females. A total of 28 (26.92%) had Anterolateral Wall Myocardial Infarction (ALWMI), 4 (3.84%) had Anteroseptal Wall Myocardial Infarction (ASWMI) 39 (37.5%) had Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction (AWMI), 1 (0.96%) had extensive AWMI, 2 (1.9%) had Inferolateral Wall Myocardial Infarction (ILWMI), while 30 (28.84%) patients had Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IWMI). Furthermore, 51 (49.0%) were thrombolysed while 53 (50.96%) patients were non thrombolysed. Thirty eight (36.53%) had single vessel disease, 40 (38.46%) had double vessel disease, while 26 (25%) had triple vessel disease. Among these patients, Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) was involved in 3 (2.88%) of patients. Seventy three patients had a Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) of greater than 8.5 and had multivessel involvement, whereas 31 had a HbA1c of less than 8.5. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) was observed during hospital stay in the form of death, recurrent myocardial infarction and cardiovascular stroke, which occurred in 20 (19.23%) patients of the total 104 diabetic patients.

Conclusion: In the present study, the severity and extent of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and incidence of triple/multivessel disease was significantly high in diabetics. Diabetic patients with high HbA1c had more coronary vessel involvement. In this case, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) is the mode of treatment.


Coronary artery disease, Left main coronary artery, Major adverse cardiac events

Diabetes mellitus is the second most common disease in the world, after cardiovascular disease. It is estimated that roughly 100 million people globally are affected by diabetes (1). Diabetes is a condition that causes both chronic and acute consequences. Cardiac disease is by far the most common cause of death among diabetics (2). Dyslipidaemia is seen in all patients with type 2 diabetes, and diabetics with high cholesterol have a 2-3 times higher risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) than non diabetics.

Coronary artery disease is the most common symptom of cardiac involvement in diabetics. Diabetic cardiomyopathy and cardiac autonomic neuropathy are less common. In hospital, autopsy, and epidemiological as well as longitudinal studies in many populations, accelerated and increased prevalence of CAD has been well documented. Cardiovascular disorders account for 70-80% of deaths in diabetics. Coronary artery disease is responsible for 40% of diabetic deaths in their fourth decade, and it accounts for 50- 70% of deaths among diabetics over the age of 65 years (2).

The deleterious macrovascular effects of diabetes mellitus are well known, and these are associated with an increased rate of atherosclerosis, which predisposes individuals to occlusive CAD, Myocardial Infarction (MI), and death. Patients with diabetes are more likely to develop a diffuse and fast progressing form of atherosclerosis, which increases the need for revascularisation (3).

Coronary angiography is the “gold-standard” procedure for identifying and evaluating CAD. Coronary artery disease manifests itself in a variety of ways, from stable angina to Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) to asymptomatic illness (4),(5). To build an effective therapeutic plan, it is necessary to understand coronary architecture (5). The prognosis of CAD is largely determined by the severity of the illness, the involvement of the left main and left anterior descending arteries, and Left Ventricular (LV) function (6).

Coronary atherosclerosis is common in diabetics, as revealed by angiography, and it is diffuse in form, with multivessel involvement. It demonstrates the involvement of multiple vessels rather than a single vessel. Diabetic patients had a much higher rate of left main coronary artery involvement than non diabetic patients (7).

Coronary artery narrowing of more than or equal to 70% was considered as significant stenosis (8). When compared to non diabetic individuals, diabetic patients exhibit a worse angiographic picture of ischaemic heart disease, with a higher prevalence of multivessel disease, narrow arteries, calcification, intracoronary thrombus, and less developed collaterals. Insulin-dependent diabetics have a higher prevalence of diffuse CAD with narrow arteries, presumably due to the metabolic illness’s longer progression and severity (9).

Diabetic patients with ACS are at a higher risk for recurrent heart attacks and strokes, but they also benefit more from vigorous treatment than their non diabetic counterparts. Potent antiplatelet therapy, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, heparin or Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) early invasive evaluation, and, if suitable, stent-based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) are the mainstays of treatment (10). In patients with complicated coronary architecture, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) may be a viable option. Surgeons, on the other hand, are typically hesitant to operate in the presence of ongoing ischaemia. The use of drug-eluting stents has been linked to a significant reduction in restenosis in both non diabetic and diabetic patients. This results in further improvement in the outcomes of diabetic patients with ACS (11).

The present study aimed to assess diabetic patients’ risk factors and angiographic profile, as well as the impact of diabetes mellitus on the clinical course of patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

Material and Methods

The present study was a single-centre cross-sectional study carried out in the Intensive Coronary Care Unit (ICCU), Department of General Medicine, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India, from December 2019 and March 2020. The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approved the study vide letter number KIMS: ETHICS COMM: 107/2: 2018-19. The patients were enrolled into the study after obtaining written consents from them or their attendants.

Sample size estimation:

n=(z)2pq/d2 n=sample size, CI=95%, d=0.2, z=1.96, p=0.125,
n=(1.96)2 x0.125x0.875/(0.2)2x10

Inclusion criteria: Diabetic patients with acute MI who had ST segment elevation and T wave changes with reciprocal changes, as well as new pathological Q waves on their Electrocardiogram (ECG).

Exclusion criteria: Patients with acute STEMI who were non-diabetic. Detailed history, clinical examination and the following investigations with coronary angiography were carried out: Complete Blood Count (CBC), blood urea, serum creatinine, serum electrolytes, Liver Function Test (LFT), ECG, 2D ECHO, Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c), and coronary angiography.

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into Microsoft Excel datasheet and was analysed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics software version 23.0. Data collected was represented as number and percentages in tabular form. p<0.05 was considered for statistical significance after assuming all the rules of statistical tests. Chi-square test was used as test of significance for qualitative data.


The study included a total of 104 diabetic patients with acute STEMI admitted in ICCU. Mean age of subjects was 55.61±11.32 years; 75 subjects were males and 29 subjects were females. Majority of subjects were in the age group of 51 to 70 years (28.9%).

(Table/Fig 1) shows duration of diabetes, other co-morbidities and risk factors among patients. Majority of patients were diabetic for more than 5 years, associated with other co-morbidities like hypertension and risk factors like alcoholism, smoking, and tobacco chewing.

There were 55 (52.88%) patients who had atypical chest pain and 49 (47.12%) people who had typical chest pain. Along with chest pain they also presented with other symptoms like dyspnoea, sweating, vomiting, and abdominal pain (Table/Fig 2).

Among 104 patients, 39 patients had AWMI, 28 patients had ALWMI, 30 patients had IWMI. Most of the patients were in the age group of 51-70 years. (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4) shows that there was no association between HbA1c values, diabetes duration, and type of STEMI.

There were 51 thrombolysed patients and 53 patients who were non thrombolysed. Thrombolysis was performed on 44 patients with typical chest pain, while thrombolysis was not done on five patients with typical chest pain. Seven individuals with atypical chest pain received thrombolysis, but the remaining 48 patients did not. Sixty three (60.58%) patients had LV dysfunction, while 41 (39.42%) had a normal 2D ECHO. Twenty three of the 51 patients who underwent thrombolysis showed LV dysfunction. Left ventricular dysfunction was found in 40 of the 53 individuals who did not receive thrombolysis (Table/Fig 5). Seventy three patients had a HbA1c of greater than 8.5, whereas 31 had a HbA1c of less than 8.5.

Coronary angiography was used in the study. Double Vessel Disease (DVD) was found in 40 (38.46%) patients, Single Vessel Disease (SVD) in 38 (36.54%), and Triple Vessel Disease (TVD) in 26 (25%). The observation that DVD/TVD was more than SVD, suggests that in diabetes there was multivessel involvement (Table/Fig 6).

The Left Anterior Descending (LAD) vessels were involved in 79 individuals in the study, 60 of whom were males and 19 of whom were females. It also demonstrates that diabetic individuals are more likely to have LAD involvement. Left Circumflex (LCX) vascular involvement was found in 62 patients, 45 of whom were males and 17 of whom were females. There were 50 patients with Right Coronary Artery (RCA) vascular involvement, 33 of whom were men and 17 of whom were women. Three patients, one male and two females, had Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) vascular involvement (Table/Fig 7). Patients had Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) with stenting in 58 cases, CABG in 28 cases, and medical treatment in 18 cases.

According to the findings, 15 diabetic individuals within a period of less than 5 years had DVD, 18 had SVD, and 10 had TVD. There were 25 DVD patients, 20 SVD patients, and 16 TVD patients with a duration of more than 5 years. It shows that diabetic patients who have had the disease for more than 5 years have multivessel involvement (Table/Fig 8).


The MACE was observed during the hospital stay in the form of death, recurrent MI, and cardiovascular stroke occurred in 20 (19.23%) of patients of total 104 diabetic patients.


A total of 104 diabetic patients with acute STEMI were included in the study. The study looked at risk factors, diabetes duration, HbA1c levels, and angiographic profile. Among the predominant male sample, multivessel/triple vessel involvement was more common. Diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c>8.5%) made up 70.2% of the participants in this study. This shows that inadequate glucose management causes greater coronary artery involvement and stenosis severity to increase. This observation was consistent with Malthesh MK et al., (1). In the index study, the peak incidence of MI in diabetics was observed in the fifth and sixth decades. This result resembled the findings of Chowdhary I and Sambyal V (2).

With a diabetic duration of more than 10 years, triple/multivessel disease was significantly greater (58.7%). These findings are consistent with another study by Lüscher TF et al., which found that the risk of coronary heart disease increased 1.38 times for every 10 years of diabetes duration (3).

The LAD was the most commonly affected vessel in the index study, and coronary angiography revealed that diabetics had a considerably greater prevalence of multivessel illness. This finding is consistent with other studies that also found that diabetics have a greater incidence of multivessel disease (4),(5). Few other authors reported an increased incidence of TVD, and more diffuse lesions were noted. As a result, the extent and severity of CAD in diabetic patients with ACS were much higher (6),(7). Further, there is literature that showed the angiographic extent and severity of CAD to be high among diabetic patients with ACS (8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13).


It was a single-centred study. There was no follow-up data, that could have provided more information regarding MACE.


The severity and extent of CAD and triple/multivessel disease was significantly high among diabetics. With a diabetic duration of more than 10 years, the risk of triple vessel or multivessel illness was found to be significantly higher. Diabetics with poor control, high HbA1c levels, and a greater number of coronary vascular involvement required CABG as a therapy option. Involvement of LMCA was significantly high and severity of stenosis and total occlusion of vessels were more commonly seen in diabetic patients. The LAD artery was the most commonly involved vessel.


Malthesh MK, Mohammed Sakib TM, Mallesh P. Coronary artery involvement in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Sci Study. 2016;3(12):299-02. Doi: 10.17354/ijss/2016/169.
Chowdhary I, Sambyal V. Study of extent of involvement of various coronary arteries in diabetic and non-diabetic patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. JK Sci. 2016;8(3):132-35.
Lüscher TF, Creager MA, Beckman JA, Cosentino F. Diabetes and vascular disease. Circulation. 2003;108(13):1655-61. Doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000089189.70578.e2. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kini P. Clinical, demographic and angiographic profile in diabetic patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes - A tertiary care center study. Indian Heart J. 2015;67:S48. Doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2015.10.113. [crossref]
Sanchís J, González VB, Bodí V, Núñez J, Lauwers C, Ruiz-Nodar JM, et al. Invasive strategy in patients with advanced diabetes and non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Angiographic findings and clinical follow-up. PREDICAR study results. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006;59(4):321-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
Roffi M. Impact of diabetes on acute coronary syndrome management. Kardiovaskulare Medizin. 2004;7:325-30. [crossref]
Raman M, Nesto RW. Heart disease in diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996;25(2):425-38. Doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70331-5. [crossref] [PubMed]
Hegde SS, Mallesh P, Yeli SM, Gadad VM, Punja MG. Comparative angiographic profile in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8(9):MC07-MC10.
Sadikot SM. Aetiopathogenesis of chronic complications of diabetes. J Diabetic Assoc India. 1998;28(2):44-60.
Willerson JT, Golino P, Eidt J, Campbell WB, Buja LM. Specific platelet mediators and unstable coronary artery lesions. Experimental evidence and potential clinical implications. Circulation. 1989;80(1):198-05. Doi: 10.1161/01. cir.80.1.198. [crossref] [PubMed]
Uçucu M, Öner FA, Yurdakul S, Ergüney M. P0571 in-hospital mortality in patients with impaired fasting glucose and myocardial infarction. Eur J Int Med. 2009;20:s189. Doi:10.1016/s0953-6205(09)60591-4. [crossref]
Mansuri Z, Sharma V, Jain S. Study of angiographic profile of diabetic patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Indian Heart J. 2017;69:S35. Doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.09.074. [crossref]
Narayanan L, Hanifah M. Profile of acute coronary syndrome in young diabetics: A review. Int J Adv Med. 2020;7(5):869. Doi: 10.18203/2349-3933. ijam20201628. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53314.16873

Date of Submission: Nov 17, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Feb 09, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 23, 2022
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2022

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 18, 2021
• Manual Googling: May 23, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 15, 2022 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)