Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 113553

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : October | Volume : 16 | Issue : 10 | Page : SC11 - SC14 Full Version

Profile and Outcome of DAMA among Paediatric Patients from a Tertiary Care Centre of a Non Profit Private Teaching Institute at Gujarat, India

Published: October 1, 2022 | DOI:
Amola Khandwala, Jigar Prabhulal Thacker, Vivek Mehta, Rahul K Tandon, Mamta R Patel, Krutika Rahul Tandon

1. Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, L.G. Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India. 5. Biostatistician, Department of Central Research Services, Central Research Services, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Krutika Rahul Tandon,
E-702, Sahjanand Status, Opposite GMM, JV Patel ITI College, Anand-Sojitra Road, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.


Introduction: The problem of Discharge Against Medical Advice (DAMA) has been reported globally, including in patients of the paediatric age group. Even the Indian subcontinent faces such problems, whether, it is the private sector or public sector. Terminal illness, low affordability, social reason are a few of the common reasons for this DAMA problem.

Aim: To know the outcome and demographic profile of DAMAs among paediatric patients at a tertiary care teaching institute.

Materials and Methods: This mix-method, prospective descriptive study was conducted in Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College and Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Gujarat, India, from March 2020 to February 2021. Contact details of patients, whose parents took DAMA from the hospital, were retrieved from the Electronic Health Record system. Interviews were recorded and the required information was gathered. Median (interquartile range), frequency, percentage and proportion of age, sex, diagnosis, and reasons of DAMAs were derived.

Results: Out of a total 1752 registered paediatric patients (1 month to 18 years), 74 patients were given DAMA, of which 42 consented to interview. The mean age of the subjects were 70.36±67.9 months and 65% were males. Amongst these 42, 31 (73.81%) were taken to home and 11 (26.19%) to another hospital; 20 (47.62%) patients died. Among the rest, 6 (14.28%) had morbidity. Total deaths were 20, out of which six died within one hour, another four died within 24 hours, two died within 7 days and rest eight died any time after 7 days till contacted. Family or social reason was the top cause of DAMA, whereas, poor prognosis with or without affordability issues was next. Among all diagnoses, nearly half of the cases were infectious/ inflammatory, 10.77% tumour/malignancy, and 6.15% trauma/ head injuries.

Conclusion: DAMA rate was not high in this study. But this was not preventable in majority of the cases as poor prognosis as well as family or social reasons were the major causes of DAMA.


Electronic health record, Discharges against medical advice, Morbidity, Poor prognosis, Terminal illness

Discharge Against Medical Advice (DAMA) refers to instances in which patients are discharged from a healthcare setting against the advice of their clinician. Patients who leave against medical advice are both a challenge and concern for physicians as these patients are lost to follow-up, and their outcomes remain unknown (1). Incidence, reasons, and outcome of DAMA have not been adequately studied but can have a significant impact on the evaluation of quality of care (2). The exclusion of these patients from analysis of research studies and quality audits such as calculation of standardised mortality ratio confounds results and reports.

DAMA has also been shown to be associated with significantly higher risk of morbidity and mortality, hospital readmission, and higher costs for the subsequent care of an initially inadequately treated condition (3),(4). It implicitly assumes that it is an informed decision that can only be taken by a mentally sound adult. It exonerates the clinician in case of adverse events. For the clinician, it is, however, frustrating and often unexpected. DAMA reflects a failure to reach a consensus between the attending physician and patient regarding the need for continued inpatient care. This failure may reflect, in part, poor communication and lower trust between the physician and the patient.

However, for the paediatric population it may not be true as alcoholrelated diseases and acute myocardial infarction are not the diseases of children. The present study was undertaken to evaluate DAMA among paediatric patients at the study institute, which is one of the private tertiary care teaching hospitals of western part of India. It is a 750-bedded multispeciality hospital with 90 paediatric beds with state of art paediatric and neonatal intensive care units. The primary aim of this study was to know the outcome of paediatric patients whose parents took DAMA from the hospital, and also to know their demographic and disease profile.

Material and Methods

This mix-method, prospective descriptive study was conducted at Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College and Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Gujarat, India, during March 2020 to February 2021. The approval from Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained, (IEC/HMPCMCE/118/faculty16, dated on 15/02/2020).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: All patients from 1 month to 18 years were included in the study whose parents took DAMA from Emergency Department or Paediatric Intensive Care Unit or Paediatric Ward. Paediatric patients seen by other department where Department of Paediatrics was not involved at any stage of evaluation or treatment were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Contact details of parents or caretaker were retrieved from computer record system within 24 hours to one week of DAMA, and the parents were contacted by the first author telephonically after one month of DAMA. After the initial introduction of self by the first author, interview was started and the mobile call was recorded, with their permission. Recorded calls were transcribed by first author and then useful information and interpretation of information were done collectively by all authors. Every attempt was made not to hurt their sentiments and/or bad experiences, if any, while interviewing. Apart from the demographic details and subsequent outcome, the reasons of DAMA were also noted. The reasons of DAMA were there in system because on duty Doctors and Hospital Counsellors were required to do so whenever any patient took DAMA, as per hospital policy. The reasons for DAMA were also verified from parents at the time of interview.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of the data was performed using STATA 14.2. Descriptive Statistics (Mean±SD), Median (interquartile range), frequency (%) were used to depict the baseline profile of the study participants.


Out of total 1752 registered paediatric patients (except neonates), 74 patients were given DAMA, of which 42 consented for interview subsequently when contacted telephonically. The mean age of those 74 patients were 70.36±67.9 months and male:female ratio was 1.8:1 (65% were males). Other demographic characteristics were shown in (Table/Fig 1). Majority of patients were from upper lower or lower middle class, from joint family and from rural background. Most of parents’ age-group was 21-35 years whereas in majority of cases mothers were housewives.

Patients took DAMA from the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Paediatric Ward, and Emergency Department in almost equal proportion. However, in comparison to total 285 (PICU), 951 (Paediatric Ward) and 516 (Emergency Department) admission, DAMAs were sought by 27 (9.47%), 24 (2.52%) and 23 (4.5%) patients, respectively. The various reasons for taking DAMAs were primarily family or social issue, poor prognosis and poor affordability mainly. (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) shows outcome of the DAMA patients, where almost half of the patients died. Majority of parents did not regret the decision of DAMA. The overall DAMA rate in the present study was 4.22%. Outcome of DAMA is presented in (Table/Fig 4).


The present study aim was to know burden of DAMAs at the study institution, its subsequent outcome, and reasons for DAMA among the paediatric age group. DAMA among children also has clinical, ethical, and legal consequences. It was also linked to an increased risk of readmission and complications (5). The overall DAMA rate in the present study was 4.22%.

Though the DAMA rate was comparable to other studies (6),(7),(8), it may or may not hold true as the current study was carried out during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which caused widespread fear and panic. Variations in DAMA rate appears to have different study settings and, geographical or socio-economic factors. Ibekwe RC et al., (9) and Al-Ghafri M et al., (10) reported lower rates as compared to Indian studies (6),(7),(8) and even among Indian studies, northern parts reported more DAMAs though both are teaching hospitals similarities were that majority DAMAs were from lower socio-economic status.

In the present study, DAMAs in males were more than females. A similar higher proportion of DAMA rate is reported in other studies (7),(11). No gender bias was also reported in other studies (6),(8),(12) This can be taken as an extension of the societal behaviour for spending less for sickness in female child and they were not brought to hospital especially private sector. Likewise, a higher proportion of care providers of male terminally sick patients were DAMA, as they probably planned to spend money availing care in a higher paid centre. In the present study, around 80% of the mother were either illiterate or educated upto the primary standard. In a study done by Awasthi S and Pandey N, found that paternal illiteracy can be the significant risk factor for DAMA cases (7). In the present study, 76.19% of the patients were from rural area but Awasthi S and Pandey N, reported it to be 91.1% (7).

Awasthi S and Pandey N, and Datta D et al., also agreed that DAMA among paediatric patients was most commonly due to financial reasons (7),(8). Financial factors are more relevant in countries where health services are not free at point of care, as also highlighted in studies from Nigeria (12) and Iran (13), where financial constraints were cited as a common reason for DAMA.

In the present study, 35.72% DAMA occurred due to poor prognosis, irrespective of affordability issue. In the study done by Awasthi S and Pandey N, low-probability of survival or perceived terminal illness was the reason in majority (41.82%) (7). In present study, 9.52% DAMA were due to dissatisfaction to hospital staff/policies which was little lower than reported in the Awasthi S and Pandey N, (7) (11.82%). In the present study 7.14% of the cases, DAMA occurred due to lack of some facilities especially for paediatric age group. In our study, family and social pressure as a reason for DAMA was seen among 35.71% while in a study done by Awasthi S and Pandey N, it was 18.18% (7). This variation can be explained by different setup of trust versus public hospital.

In present study, 73.81% of the children were taken to the home after getting DAMA while 26.19% were taken to another hospital. In a study done by Al-Mohammadi E et al., 28% were readmitted to other hospitals (5). These findings might indicate the caregiver’s dissatisfaction, which led him or her to obtain DAMA from the initial hospital. In the present study, mortality rate after getting DAMA was 47.62%. However, an important aspect is that around 38.1% survived without morbidity. An alarming point was that 93% of parents had no regret of DAMA, suggesting that whether a child died or survived, parents had a firm belief that their decision regarding DAMA was appropriate.

Disease or system-wise profile was also compared to other studies (Table/Fig 5). The study institute had a significant proportion of patients with cardiac ailments as the hospital gets referrals due to its well-developed Paediatric Cardiac Centre. In the study done by Ndu IK et al., the most common condition contributing to DAMA was malaria (20.1%), followed by pneumonia (15.7%) and sepsis (12.3%) (14). Whereas, Victor AM et al., reported respiratory (31%) system followed by gastrointestinal cases (25%) (15).


Due to COVID-19 pandemic, it is difficult to say that the findings derived represent the true scenario related to DAMA. Also, only around two-thirds of the total DAMA could be traced or contact and narratives recorded by telephonic conversation may have some limitations as compared to personal visit and personal interviews.


Nearly half of the DAMA patients died and rest were alive with majority of them having no morbidity. Overall, DAMA rate was not high. Poor prognosis with or without affordability issue was the leading cause of DAMA, followed by family/social reason, lack of facility and dissatisfaction to hospital and its staff among other reasons. Majority of the parents did not regret their decision of DAMA.


Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Barnett S. Hospital discharge against advice after myocardial infarction: Deaths and readmissions. Am J Med. 2007; 120(12):1047-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
Ba L, Zhang M, Su L, Cheng Z, Xu Y. Nine-year change of mortality and discharge against medical advice among major trauma patients in a Chinese Intensive Care Unit. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 42(1):47-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
Saitz R, Ghali WA, Moskowitz MA. The impact of leaving against medical advice on hospital resource utilization. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(2):103-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
Aliyu ZY. Discharge against medical advice: Sociodemographic, clinical and financial perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2002; 56(5):325-27.
Al-Mohammadi E. Pediatric discharge against medical advice. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019;32(2):366-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
Vidya BU, Shetty A. Study on demographic factors of discharge against medical advice in pediatric population. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2020;7(2):359-62. [crossref]
Awasthi S, Pandey N. Rural background and low parental literacy associated with discharge against medical advice from a tertiary care government hospital in India. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2015;3(1):24-28. [crossref]
Datta D, Mondal T, Sarkar M, Chel S, Das SK, Nandy A, et al. Leave against medical advice in children: Rural Indian Perspective. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2020;67(1):01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
Ibekwe RC, Muoneke VU, Nnebe-Agumadu UH, Amadife MA. Factors influencing discharge against medical advice among paediatric patients in Abakaliki, Southeastern Nigeria. J Tropic Paediatr. 2009;55(1):39-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
Al-Ghafri M, Al-Bulushi A, Al-Qasmi A. Prevalence of and reasons for patients leaving against medical advice from paediatric wards in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016;16(1):e74-e77. [crossref] [PubMed]
Babatola AO, Olatunya OS, Ogundare EO, Ajibola AE, Ojo TO, Oluwayemi IO, et al. Pediatric Discharges Against Medical Advice: A Review of Cases in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. J Compr Ped. 2021;12(3): e107577. [crossref]
Okechukwu AA. Discharge against medical advice in children at the university of Abuja Gwagwalada Nigeria. J Med Med Sci. 2011; 2(7):947-52.
Onyiriuka, Alphonsus N. Pediatric discharge against medical advice: Experience from a Nigerian secondary healthcare institution. 2011:194-99.
Ndu IK, Asinobi IN, Ekwochi U, Amadi O, Osuorah CD, Ayuk A. Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) among the paediatric age group in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital Parklane, Enugu. J Experimental Res. 2016;4(1):55-62.
Victor AM, Shanti A, Fahed AA. Discharge against medical advice among children admitted int pediatric wards at Al-Jahra Hospital, Kuwait. Kuwait Medical Journal. 2014;46(1):28-31.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57795.17048

Date of Submission: May 16, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 17, 2022
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2022

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 10, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 12, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 16, 2022 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)