Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 119308

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : October | Volume : 16 | Issue : 10 | Page : UC44 - UC47 Full Version

Effect of Air versus 1% Lignocaine used for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation on Laryngotracheal Morbidity after Laparoscopic Surgery- A Randomised Clinical Study

Published: October 1, 2022 | DOI:
Nirali Nimeshkumar Panchal, Bhumika Pradipkumar Pathak, Himali Narbheram Surani, Birva Nimit Khara

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 3. Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 4. Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Nirali Nimeshkumar Panchal,
8, Shaligram Greens, Rambhai Kaka Marg, Bakrol, Anand, Gujarat, India.


Introduction: Endotracheal intubation in general anaesthesia is associated with post intubation morbidity due to prolonged inflation of Endotracheal Tube (ETT) cuff with air. During laparoscopic surgery their incidence increases further. Lignocaine is likely to diffuse through ETT cuff when instilled into it. As a result, it decreases coughing, sore throat and hoarseness by reducing local irritation and inflammation of the airway.

Aim: To compare the effect of air and 1% lignocaine used for ETT cuff inflation on postoperative sore throat, hoarseness of voice and coughing in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries.

Materials and Methods: This double-blind randomised clinical study was conducted at Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Gujarat, India, between September 2021 to March 2022. Total of 54 patients were randomly divided into two groups with 27 in each; group A (air) and group X (1% lignocaine= 2% lignocaine and equal volume of normal saline). Postextubation patients were assessed for Postoperative Sore Throat (POST), hoarseness and coughing at 2 hours and 18-24 hours. Fisher’s Exact test was used to find the association between categorical variables in both the groups. The p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age in group A was 46.04±10.26 years, and in group X was 48.59±10.92 years. At 2 hours, in group X 11% (n=3) of patients had POST as compared to group A where nine patients (33%) reported POST (p=0.099). Group X showed a significantly reduced incidence of POST at 18-24 hours, hoarseness of voice, coughing at 2 hours and at 18-24 hours as compared to group A.

Conclusion: The use of 1% lignocaine for ETT cuff inflation in laparoscopic surgeries was associated with reduced incidence of POST, hoarseness of voice and coughing as compared to air.


Coughing, Hoarseness, Postoperative complication, Sore throat

Coughing, sore throat and hoarseness are most common, undesired and neglected postoperative laryngotracheal morbidity seen in patients who were given general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. There are various contributory factors for these side effects like trauma during intubation, drying of mucosa, infection, size of Endotracheal Tube (ETT), type of cuff, cuff pressure and inflating agents of ETT cuff (1).

Air is commonly used to inflate ETT cuff. Anaesthetic air or nitrous oxide is used as a carrier gas along with volatile anaesthetic agent during maintenance phase of anaesthesia that steadily increases endotracheal cuff pressure. ETT cuff pressures increases >30 cm H2O during laparoscopic surgeries after carbon dioxide insufflation for pnuemoperitoneum even though anaesthetic air is used as a carrier gas due to raised intrathoracic pressure, which in turn, increases peak inspiratory pressure which can lead to increased incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat (POST) and coughing (2).

Laryngotracheal morbidity is significantly reduced when saline, lignocaine or steroids are used as an instillation agent for ETT cuff inflation (3),(4),(5). Lignocaine is a local anaesthetic agent which when used for ETT cuff inflation diffuses into the tracheal mucosa through semi-permeable membrane of ETT cuff and blocks the activation of tracheal pain receptors even with very low lignocaine concentration (0.015%) (6). This effect is likely to reduce the incidence of postoperative sore throat and coughing. Lignocaine reduces the incidence of POST, coughing, hoarseness when used in different concentrations (2%, 4% with or without alkalinised preparation) for ETT cuff inflation (7),(8),(9). Till date, no study had been done with the use of non alkalinised 1% lignocaine as ETT cuff instillation agent in adults.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative laryngotracheal morbidity when low concentration non alkalinised 1% lignocaine was used to instil ETT cuff. The primary objective was to assess the effect of 1% lignocaine versus air for ETT cuff inflation on POST. Secondary objectives were to evaluate postextubation coughing and hoarseness of voice among the groups.

Material and Methods

This double-blind, randomised clinical study was carried out at Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Gujarat, India, between September 2021 to March 2022. The approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) was obtained (IEC/HMPCMCE/120/ Faculty/14/290). The study was also registered at the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2021/09/036245). Written informed consent from the patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were taken.

Sample size calculation: This is based on the study of Gaur P et al., which showed that occurrence of POST was 26% and 40% in the air group while 6% and 8% in the lignocaine group at 1 hour and 24 hour respectively, considering 5% level of significance with a power of 80%, required sample size was 27 in each group using WINPEPI software (7).

Inclusion criteria: Patients with age group of 18-60 years of either gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I, II, III posted for laparoscopic surgeries lasted for more than 1 hour duration, Mallampati classification I-II, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30 kg/m2 were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with anticipated difficult airway, oropharyngeal airway introduced perioperatively, ≥2 trial of intubation, laryngotracheal diseases, recent or recurrent upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), history of raised intraocular pressure, intracranial pressure, ischaemic heart disease, gastric regurgitation, required rapid sequence intubation, failed extubation, nasogastric tube and tracheostomy tube in-situ were excluded from the study.

A total of 54 participants were randomly allocated to two groups based on computer-generated randomisation table (Table/Fig 1).

• Group A (n=27): The cuff was inflated with 4-6 mL air
• Group X (n=27): The cuff was inflated with 4-6 mL 1% lignocaine (2% lignocaine + equal volume of normal saline).

Study Procedure

General Anaesthesia (GA) was given using inj. fentanyl 2 mcg/ kg, inj.propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg and inj. vecuronium 1 mg/kg. After achieving adequate muscle relaxation, laryngoscopy was performed by the attending anaesthesiologist with more than three years of experience and trachea was intubated with polyvinyl chloride, soft seal, high volume, low pressure, cuffed ETT of size 8 mm internal diameter in males and 7.5 mm in females.

As per group allocation, in group A, cuff was inflated with 4-6 mL air and in group X, cuff was inflated with 4-6 mL 1% lignocaine (2% lignocaine + equal volume of normal saline) until audible leak was heard. ETT cuff inflation with lignocaine was done slowly because of its higher viscosity than air. Slow inflation of cuff with lignocaine ensures pressure equilibrium in the system as elasticity of the cuff tends to force lignocaine solution to the pilot balloon when inflating pressure is stopped and cuff pressure may consequently drop. During surgery, anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen, air and sevoflurane with on controlled mechanical ventilation. At the end of surgery, after confirming all four equal responses of train of four on peripheral nerve stimulator and adequate tidal volume, patients were reversed and extubated. Patients were observed for POST, hoarseness of voice and coughing at 2 and 18-24 hours by an observer who was unaware of cuff infiltrating agent.

Postoperative Sore Throat (POST)

POST was graded on a 4 point scale with (10):

• 0- No sore throat
• 1- Mild (scratch throat)
• 2- Moderate (similar to that noted with cold)
• 3- Severe sore throat (more severe than cold)

Hoarseness: Hoarseness was graded on a 4 point scale with (10):

• 0- No hoarseness
• 1- Mild hoarseness (noted by the patient)
• 2- Moderate hoarseness (obvious to observer)
• 3- Severe (aphonia, patient not able to speak).

Statitistical Analysis

Data entry was done by the blinded observer. Statistical analysis was done using STATA 14.2 software. Descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation, frequency and percentage was used to depict baseline profile of participants. Fisher’s Exact test was used to find the association between categorical variables like POST, hoarseness and coughing in both the groups. The p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Both the groups were comparable for demographic profile, ASA physical status of the patients, duration of surgery and position of patients during surgery as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Incidence of POST at 2 hours, was low in group X (11%) as compared to group A (33%) (p=0.099). At 18-24 hours, incidence of POST was significantly low in group X (11%) compared to group A (40.7%). Severity grading of POST was also low at both 2 and 18-24 hours in group X as compared to group A (Table/Fig 3).

Incidence of hoarseness of voice was significantly low in Group X in comparison to group A at both 2 hours, and 18-24 hours. At 2 hours, in both the groups only mild and moderate hoarseness of voice was observed but its incidence was less in group X compared to group A; whereas, at 18-24 hours none of the patients complained of hoarseness of voice in group X (Table/Fig 4). Just after extubation, group X showed lower incidence of coughing in comparison to group A, which was statistically significant (Table/Fig 5).


Incidence of laryngotracheal morbidity is as high as 30-70% in surgical patients, which makes them most common and unpleasant side effect (7),(11). In laparoscopic surgeries, carbon dioxide insufflation during pneumoperitoneum causes upward displacement of the diaphragm, increasing intrathoracic pressure and reducing lung compliance leading to rise in peak inspiratory pressure, which leads to over-inflation of ETT cuff and rise in ETT cuff pressure (2),(12). This raised ETT pressure is laterally transmitted to the tracheal wall, which in turn blocks the tracheal submucosal perfusion and causes ischaemic erosion and necrosis of mucosa. These give rise to postoperative laryngotracheal morbidity (13). These complications are exaggerated as the duration of surgeries increases and also when the Trendelenburg position is maintained (12),(14).

Polyvinyl chloride ETT cuff is permeable so when lignocaine is used for ETT cuff inflation, it provides continuous availability of lignocaine at the tracheal mucosa. Lignocaine blocks the sodium ion (Na+) channels of sympathetic nerves of tracheal mucosal wall and causes local vasodilatation. This helps in improving tracheal submucosal blood flow, thus reducing laryngotracheal morbidity without increasing serum concentration of lignocaine, vocal cord paraesthesia, inhibition of deglutition reflex and other systemic sideeffects (6).

In various studies, 2-4% lignocaine with or without alkalinised preparations were used in ETT cuff instillation for prevention of laryngotracheal morbidity (15),(16),(17),(18). This study was intended to evaluate effectiveness of non alkalinised 1% lignocaine versus air for prevention of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness of voice and postextubation coughing in laparoscopic surgeries.

In this study, at 2 hours group X showed lower incidence of POST in comparison to group A but it was not statistically significant; whereas at 18-24 hours, incidence of POST was low in group X compared to group A, which was statistically significant. Both at 2 hours and 18-24 hours, none of the patients in group X had severe (grade 3) POST, whereas in group A (7.4%) patients had severe POST. Abraham JM et al., conducted a similar study in 100 patients and compared air and 2% plain lignocaine for ETT cuff inflation (16). The incidence of POST in immediate postoperative period was 72.5% in air group and 27% in lignocaine group and after 4 hours it was 72% in air group and 25 % in lignocaine group. Both these incidences were statistically significant. Despite using 2% lignocaine their incidence of sore throat was higher at both the times in comparison to the present study (16). They had used oxygen:nitrous oxide (4:2) anaesthesia for maintenance while in the present study air was used instead of nitrous oxide. That might be the cause of a lower incidence of sore throat while using 1% non alkalinised lignocaine. In the study performed by Gaur P et al., hundred patients were compared for incidence of sore throat and coughing using air (group A) vs 2% alkalinised lignocaine (group L). The incidence of sore throat at 1 hour in group A was 26% compared to 6% in group L and at 24 hours the incidence of sore throat in group A was 40% vs 8% in group L. In comparison to the present study their incidence of POST was slightly less as they had used 2% alkalinised lignocaine instead of 1% plain lignocaine like the present study (7). Podder S and Bhat G, also reported that the severity of POST at 2 hours and 4 hours was low in lignocaine group in comparison to air and saline group (9).

In the present study, incidence of hoarseness of voice was significantly low in group X both at 2 hours and 18-24 hours. Also, in both the groups none of the patients complained of severe (grade 3) hoarseness of voice. Incidence of mild and moderate hoarseness was also less in group X at 2 hours and at 18-24 hours and none of the patients reported hoarseness of voice. In the study performed by Rizvanovic N et al., 90 patients were assessed for hoarseness while using air, saline and 2% alkalinised lignocaine for ETT cuff inflation. The incidence of hoarseness at 2 hours in group A was 60% vs 23.3% in group L. At 24 hours their incidence in group A was 30% compared to 6.7% in group L. Their incidence was higher than the present study even though they used alkalinised 2% lignocaine (19).

This could be because of the use of nitrous oxide with oxygen for maintenance of anaesthesia whereas in the present study air was used instead of nitrous oxide. In the study performed by Rajegowda SK et al., severity of hoarseness was assessed using 4% plain lignocaine and compared it with air, saline and hydrocortisone. They observed that at 6 hours, incidence of mild and moderate hoarseness was 20% and 11% in group A versus 7% mild hoarseness in group L, which was statistically significant. At 12 hours, in group A 11% patients had mild hoarseness whereas none of the patients had hoarseness in group L (5). In comparison to their study, the present study had slightly higher incidence of mild and moderate hoarseness in group X at 2 hours. At 18-24 hours, results are comparable for lignocaine group, in both the studies. In the present study, only 1% of lignocaine was used for instillation of ETT cuff whereas in the former, 4% of lignocaine was used, which could be the reason for higher incidence of mild and moderate hoarseness. Nagarajaiah P et al., studied the effectiveness of air, N2O and 2% lignocaine for ET cuff inflation and assessed the intensity of sore throat pain in three groups using visual analogue scale, which showed significantly low scores with lignocaine group (20).

This study showed statistically significant reduced incidence of coughing in group X (Table/Fig 5). Soren DK et al., studied the effect of alkalinised 1% and 0.5% lignocaine in paediatric patients and compared with air and saline group (13). Their results showed lower incidence of coughing in 1% alkalinised lignocaine compared to air immediate postextubation (5% vs 10%) and at 8 hours postextubation (0% vs 5%). In comparison to the present study, their incidence of coughing was very less because they had maintained the intra-cuff pressure around 20 cm H2O by inflating or deflating the cuff while in our study we had not measured the intracuff pressure using manometer. Gaur P et al., and Acharya G et al., also reported a decresed incidence of coughing while using 2 % alkalinised lignocaine while in the present study, similar results were achieved using 1% non alkalinised lignocaine (7),(15).

Laryngotracheal morbidity after ETT GA is the prime concern for anaesthesiologists. That is why various studies had been carried out to reduce their incidence and severity using different concentrations of alkalinised and non alkalinised lignocaine (2%,4%,10%) for endotracheal tube cuff inflation and these studies are included in meta-analysis and systematic reviews (11),(21). In the present study, a low concentration (1%) of non alkalinised lignocaine was used and still it helped in reducing laryngotracheal morbidity.


This was a single-centre study; multicentric study can be done for more accurate results. Endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring with manometer for air and three-way transducer set for lignocaine was not used.


The present research concluded that using low concentration of non alkalinised lignocaine (1%) for ETT cuff instillation significantly reduced the incidence of POST, hoarseness and coughing in laparoscopic surgeries with air-oxygen GA.


Ali NP, Tauhid-ul-Mulck M, Noor M, Mollick MT, Ahmed M, Chowdhury MR, et. Lidocaine as ETT cuff inflating agent. J Armed Forces Med Coll, Bangladesh. 2009;5(1):25-28. [crossref]
Yildirim ZB, Uzunkoy A, Cigdem A, Ganidagli S, Ozgonul A. Changes in cuff pressure of ETT during laparoscopic and open abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):398-01. [crossref] [PubMed]
Bennett MH, Isert PR, Cumming RG. Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness following tracheal intubation using air or saline to inflate the cuff-a randomised controlled trial. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28(4):408-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
Rafiei MR, Arianpour N, Rezvani M, Ebrahimi A. Effects of intracuff dexamethasone on post-extubation reactions. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17(4):338-43.
Rajegowda SK, Ashwini GS. Intra-cuff lignocaine, saline, air and hydrocortisone on incidence of post-extubation airway complications-A randomised controlled study. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2019;6(4):502-07. [crossref]
Abbasi S, Mahjobipoor H, Kashefi P, Massumi G, Aghadavoudi O, Farajzadegan Z, et al. The effect of lidocaine on reducing the tracheal mucosal damage following tracheal intubation. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(9):733-38.
Gaur P, Ubale P, Khadanga P. Efficacy and safety of using air versus alkalinized 2% lignocaine for inflating ETT cuff and its pressure effects on incidence of postoperative coughing and sore throat. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(4):1057-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
Rao M, Snigdha TA, Vijay K. Instillation of 4% lidocaine versus air in the ETT cuff to evaluate post intubation morbidity-a randomised double blind study. J Anesth Clin Sci. 2013;2(2):19. [crossref]
Podder S, Bhat G. Effect of intracuff inflation with alkalinised lignocaine, saline and air on early postoperative airway morbidity-a randomised control trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(6):UC05-UC09. [crossref]
Budania LS, Chamala V, Rao M, Virmani S, Goyal KA, Nanda K, et al. Effect of air, anesthetic gas mixture, saline, or 2% lignocaine used for tracheal tube cuff inflation on coughing and laryngotracheal morbidity after tracheal extubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34(3):386-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
Lam F, Lin YC, Tsai HC, Chen TL, Tam KW, Chen CY. Effect of intracuff lidocaine on postoperative sore throat and emergence phenomenon: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trails. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136184. [crossref] [PubMed]
Geng G, Hu J, Huang S. The effect of ETT cuff pressure changes during gynecological laparoscopic surgery on postoperative sore throat: A control study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(1):141-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
Soren DK, Panda P, Rautray SS, Pati I, Pattnaik SS. A comparison between effectiveness and safety of ETT cuff filled with air, plain lignocaine and alkalinized lignocaine for postoperative sore throat and emergence phenomena. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018;6(04):1120-29. [crossref]
Wu CY, Yeh YC, Wang MC, Lai CH, Fan SZ. Changes in ETT cuff pressure during laparoscopic surgery in head-up or head-down position. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014:14:75. [crossref] [PubMed]
Acharya G, Gill RS, Arya CP, Arora K. Comparison of intracuff lignocaine and air and its related complications. Indian J Appl Basic Med Sci. 2016:3(4):382- 87.
Abraham JM, Abraham S, Varghese SM. How effective is intra-cuff lignocaine in reducing postoperative sore throat and emergence cough: A comparative study. Int. J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2020;9(8):1226-31. [crossref]
Rao M, Snigdha TA, Vijay K. Instillation of 4% lidocaine versus air in the ETT cuff to evaluate post intubation morbidity-A randomised double blind study. J Anesth Clin Sci. 2013;2(2):19. [crossref]
Rakhi T, Ranjan RK, Bhat S, Sunil BV. Comparison between the efficacy of saline, alkalinised lignocaine 2% and alkalinised lignocaine 4% in the cuff of ETT to reduce the incidence of cough and sorethroat during extubation. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2021;14(02):755-60. [crossref]
Rizvanovic N, Causevic S, Hrncic N, Hatibovic H. Effect of intracuff alkalinized 2% lidocaine on ETT cuff pressure and postoperative throat symptoms in anaesthesia maintained by nitrous oxide. Med Glas. 2019;16(1):7-12.
Nagarajaiah P, Manissery J, Shenoy T, Padmanabha U. A comparative study to assess the effectiveness of using air, a 50% N2O:O2 and lignocaine 2% to inflate the ETT cuff during general anaesthesia. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4(3):684-87.
Li H, Yue Y, Qu Y, Mu D. Lidocaine for postoperative sore throat: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2020;86(5):546-53. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57885.17097

Date of Submission: May 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 29, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 24, 2022
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2022

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 24, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 20, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 22, 2022 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)