Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 4158

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : December | Volume : 16 | Issue : 12 | Page : AE01 - AE05 Full Version

Mandibular Ramus as a Tool For Sexual Determination: A Systematic Review


Published: December 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/59582.17242
Kishore Chandra Thakur, Tarang Srivastava

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kishore Chandra Thakur,
Flat No-33, Ground Floor, Lane 2, Madhu Vihar, Haripur, Kanwali, GMS Road, Dehradun, Uttrakhand, India.
E-mail: bestthakur@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Mandible being one of the sturdy bone resists damage and therefore its fragments are mostly available after mass disasters like explosions. After the pelvis, the mandible of the skull has significant sexual dimorphism. Many parameters of the mandible altogether make it suitable to identify sex from a given bone.

Aim: To determine sex with the help of parameters of the ramus of human mandible.

Materials and Methods: This systematic review included the articles from 2000 to 2020 and took one year duration. All studies were categorised under dry bone and radiological study. Only original articles of a cross-sectional study, cohort study and case-control study related to ramus and sex determinations were selected online by using available databases like Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar. All selected articles were then analysed for different types of ramus parameters studied. Studies that considered more than one parameter of ramus were included or otherwise rejected. Research articles that mentioned the efficacy of gender identification of bone by considering parameters of the ramus of the mandible, were tabulated.

Results: Commonly used ramus parameters by different researchers were maximum ramus breadth/width, minimum ramus breadth/width, ramus flexure and ramus height. In addition, coronoid height and projection height was also used by some. In most of the studies, parameters in males were higher than in females whereas gender predictive value was seen higher i.e, 70-83% when a combination of all ramus parameters was taken. In the case of consideration of a single parameter, gender predictive values ranged from 45-79%, and a higher sex predictive value was seen for males.

Conclusion: Only when the fragment of the mandible ramus is available, then it can be utilised for gender identification by using ramus width, ramus height along with other parameters based on availability. Ramus alone is a good tool for sex determination in the mandible.

Keywords

Panoramic, Radiographies, Sex dimorphism

After the pelvis, the role of the mandible is considered significant in the identification of gender (1),(2). Being the strongest bone of the face, mandible is more resistant to degradation and has more possibility to get fragments as a piece of evidence. There is a number of metric and non metric traits of mandible utilised in gender determination due to their property of sexual dimorphism (3),(4),(5). Mandible shape and size help to determine sexual dimorphism but the condyle and ramus part of the mandible have higher scores in the determination of gender (6). The study of different parameters of the mandible showing relevant sexual dimorphism has an important role in the field of archeology, anthropology, and forensic science in relation to the identification of race, age, and gender. A combination of metric traits adds more reliability due to its measurable quantitative element. When sex determination of bone is done by osteometric or radiograph method, metric analysis by radiograph methods stands superior in terms of accuracy and reproducibility (7).

In anthropology, sex determination is one of the pillars among other components like age and population. Age-related changes include remodeling with the growth of an individual. Morphological changes in the mandible due to food habits have major effects on the dimension of parameters of the ramus and condyle of the mandible. Radiograph methods like Orthopantomography (OPG) and Digital Panoramic radiography (DPG) are common routine procedures in dental and medical clinical fields (5),(6). A large amount of data available due to these routine procedures can be easily utilised for gender identification after filtering specific parameter dimensions, which can be beneficial in the field of forensic anthropology and forensic investigation.

With the increasing incidence of mass disasters by explosions, natural calamities, air crashes, and crimes there has been increased demand for data, with the help of which, identification of an individual and their gender can be done from fragments of the bone that are available. In the present systematic review, an attempt was made to summarise the role of the ramus of the mandible as a fragment for gender determination.

Material and Methods

This systematic review included the articles from 2000 to 2020 and analysis was done in one year duration (March 2021 to February 2022). An online search was done on available databases like Medline, Embase and Google Scholar. Related literature of the last 20 years from 2000 to 2020, was searched that included keywords like dry mandible, ramus, gender determination, radiological, orthopantomography osteologic, anthropology, forensic, and sexual dimorphism. In order to get more related articles, Boolean operators such as AND/OR/NOT were utilised. A combination of the mandible and sexual dimorphism, dry mandible or osteological study, the panoramic study of the mandible, ramus and gender determination and ramus not gonial width were utilised to search more titles, abstracts and original articles. References of the related articles were searched to extract more data. For the purpose of collecting relevant articles, certain inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated.

Inclusion criteria: Articles included were only those that came under the category of observational studies, cross-sectional studies, prospective and retrospective studies. Original articles, abstracts and full-text articles based on radiological and osteometric studies of the ramus of the mandible, with aim of study for sexual dimorphism were only included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Case report and review article were not included in the study. Any article on mandibles, but not based on gender determination or not on human mandibles was excluded. Articles about the growing mandible, irrespective of the aim for sexual dimorphism were also excluded from the study.

After the screening, 126 relevant articles were collected. After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 34 articles were finalised for systemic review (Table/Fig 1).

All included materials were categorised into the radiological and osteological study, in relation to parameters of the ramus of the mandible and tabulated along with needful data. All the articles finalised were individually screened and analysed by the authors. Tabulation of studies with their population, parameters used, study tool, and conclusions were done.

Study of Risk of Bias

In case of any doubt in relation to exclusion or inclusion, the article was discussed among authors to reach a common consensus on excluding or including the article. A checklist for qualitative research by Munn Z et al., was used to assess the quality of articles. This tool assessment was based on review question clarity, inclusion criteria, appropriateness of the extent of use of resources, criteria of appraising studies, methods used to minimise errors, the combination of different studies, publication bias, and any directive for new ideas given or not (8). Any disagreement over any article was tried to finalise following the above leading questions to reach common consensus of exclusion and inclusion. This reduced bias of selection, but still selection bias could not be totally neglected .

Results

Considering all Indian studies, Max RB was 38.2 mm in males and 35.8 mm in females whereas Min RB ranged from 27.7 mm to 30.11 mm in males and 20.2 mm to 30.11 mm in females with overall accuracy 83.9% (5),(6),(7),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17) (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3). In (Table/Fig 3), the study on the population of Thailand shows that the Min RB in them was closer to the lower value of Min RB of the Indian population. Among all other countries,ramus height in Indians was in the range of 60.1 mm to 67.9 mm for males and 40.9 mm to 55.7 mm for females (11),(12),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28) (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). The ramus height of Thailand people (Table/Fig 5) was closer to the lower value of the ramus height range observed in the Indian population and it was a much lower value range from 44.18 to 49.94 mm seen in the population of Tanzania (28). The overall accuracy of sex determination was seen higher with parameter ramus breadth. There was a big range of accuracy of gender identification for ramus flexure noticed, ranging from 32 to 92%, but it was found that the percentage of accuracy was higher in males in comparison to females (29),(30),(31),(32),(34),(35),(36),(37) (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Many related articles showed that more than 22 parameters were studied in the mandible to understand their correlation with sexual dimorphism. The total article reviewed in the last 20 years showed that the most common parameters utilised for gender determination in the mandible were a gonial angle, ramus height, ramus breadth, ramus flexure, and bigonial width. Among these, correlations of parameters like gonial angle, ramus flexure and ramus breadth were more in accuracy alone or in combination, for sex determination through the mandible. Kharoshah MA et al., in their radiological study with a sample of 330 people in Egypt population concluded that, the overall predictive accuracy of sex prediction was 83.9% by using parameters bicondylar breadth, gonial angle, and minimum ramus breadth whereas it was 83.6% in males and 84.2% in females (13).

Saini V et al., took 116 mandibles of north Indian origin for their osteometric study over the different parameters of ramus only that included condylar height, projected height, coronoid height, minimum, and maximum ramus breadth. They found significant sexual dimorphism with an overall accuracy of 80.2% (32). Lin C et al., did a study of 240 mandibles of the Korean population to determine sex from ramus flexure parameters only, and found that, sex determination accuracy ranges from 50.4 to 77.1% by using discrimination functional analysis. They further added that accuracy increases up to 88.8%, if all variables of mandibular flexure were input in stepwise discriminant analysis (31).

Ercan I et al., took 415 samples of Turkish origin, to study of virtual assessment of sex by a linear and angular trait of mandibular ramus, using three-dimensional CT concluding an accuracy range of 51-95.6% in sex determination by using mandibular ramus. They further pointed out that accuracy increased to 89.7-98.6% if mandibular flexure upper border and max ramus breadth was utilised by applying bivariate analysis (38). A 99% accuracy rate was noticed by them when stepwise discrimination analysis was done. Saloni et al., in their study of ramus and gender determination by the radiological method using digital panoramic film of 200 Indian origin samples found significant differences and thus were able to get overall accuracy of sex determination by ramus parameters upto 77.6%, which was individually up to 78.4% in male and 76.8% in female respectively (5).

Kaur R et al., did a digital radiological study on 100 samples of the Indian Haryana region to find mandibular ramus and sex determination using ramus parameters like minimum and maximum ramus width, condylar height, and projection height of ramus. They found significant differences between male and female parameters (39). Indira AP et al., their radiographic study of 100 mandibles of Indian origin concluded that the mandibular ramus was a strong parameter for sex determination (22).

The above study was supported by a similar study done by Damera A et al., (40). Loth SR and Henneberg M, found mandibular ramus flexure help to determine the sex of the mandible with an accuracy of up to 91% due to a significant difference (3). Pokhrel R and Bhatnagar R 2013 (16) concluded that, a fragment of a mandible having a ramus can be used for gender determination when they found significant differences in the parameter of the ramus and were able to determine the sex of the mandible with an overall accuracy of 82.9% with help of ramus breadth and 70.9% with condylar length and breadth by using discriminate functional analysis method (16). For this study, they took 158 rami of 79 mandibles of Indian origin. Kronoiti EF et al., found significant differences and sexual dimorphism in the ramus of the mandible by using discriminate functional analysis by taking 70 adult Greek population mandibles (1).

The collection of huge data over years on different parameters related to the ramus of the mandible enables anthropologists to identify the gender of an individual with the help of fragments of the mandible. Predictive accuracy increases as parameters like ramus height, ramus width, and ramus flexure, when combined all together to identify gender through the ramus of the mandible. In addition to gender identification, these parameters data could be utilised in the field of cosmetic surgery like reconstruction of the face. Comparative study over parameters of different populations and ethnicity would help to understand anthropological connections among them, if any or to evaluate factors, that lead to changes in morphometric dimensions of the mandible. The development of more aesthetic prostheses could be possible, if the compilation of all related parameters was done and analysed based on age, population, and gender.

Limitation(s)

The non availability of sufficient data, based on a cadaveric study was a big limitation and could not be well-blended, with studies based on radiological and osteometric studies.

Conclusion

Different parameters like ramus breadth, ramus height and ramus flexure all together play a significant role in sexual dimorphism identification of the mandible and can be utilised in combination to identify the sex of fragment of ramus of the mandible with predictive accuracy, ranging from 64-84%. Considering the fact that, most of the studies included were on the Indian population which showed the same trend as those of another geographical area i.e most parameters were on the higher side in males. The parameters like ramus breadth, were comparatively lower in people of Thailand and ramus height of Tanzania population was toward the lower end of the range seen in the Indian population. Validated measurements based on different gender, ethnic patterns, and populations should be kept in mind during anthropological studies, forensic applications, and surgical reconstruction of faces.

References

1.
Kranioti EF, García Donas JG, Langstaff H. Sex estimation of the Greek mandible with the aid of discriminant function analysis and posterior probabilities. Rom J Legal Med. 2014;22:101 04. [crossref]
2.
Reddy KSN, Murthy OP. The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 33rd edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2014;65.
3.
Loth SR, Henneberg M. Sexually dimorphic mandibular morphology in the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001;115(2):179-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Donnelly SM, Hens SM, Rogers NL, Schneider KL. Technical note: A blind test of mandibular ramus flexure as a morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998;107(3):363-66. 3.0.CO;2-Y>[crossref]
5.
Saloni, Verma P, Mahajan P, Puri A, Kaur S, Mehta S. Gender determination by morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus in sriganganagar population: A digital panoramic study. IJDR. 2020;31(3):444. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Mathew NS, Chatra L, Shenoy P, Veena KM, Prabhu RV, Sujatha BK, et al. Gender determination in panoramic radiographs, utilizing mandibular ramus parameters: A cross-sectional study. J Dent Res Rev. 2017;4:32-35. [crossref]
7.
Samatha K, Byahatti SM, Ammanagi RA, Tantradi P, Sarang CK, Shivpuje P. Sex determination by mandibular ramus: A digital orthopantomographic study. J Foren Dent Sci. 2016;8:95-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, Tufanaru C, Stern C, McArthur A, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: An introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI evidence synthesis. 2020;18(10):2127-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Bhagwatkar T, Thakur M, Palve D, Bhondey A, Dhengar Y, Chaturvedi S, et al. Sex determination by using mandibular ramus-A forensic study. JAMDSR. 2016;4(2):01-06.
10.
Kumar BN, Ramesh T, Reddy SR, Chennoju SK, Pavani K, Praveen KNS, et al. Morphometric analysis of mandible for sex determination-A retrospective study. IJSRM. 2016;4 (3):01-09.
11.
Kallalli BN, Rawson K, Ramaswamy VK, Zakarneh WH, Singh A, Zingade J, et al. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters by computed tomography: A prospective radiographic short study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2016;28:07-10. [crossref]
12.
Jambunath U, Govindraju P, Balaji P, Poornima C, Latha S. Former sex determination by using mandibular ramus and gonial angle-A preliminary comparative study. Int J Contem Med Res. 2016;3(11):3278-80.
13.
Kharoshah MA, Almadani O, Ghaleb SS, Zaki MK, Fattah YA. Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17:213 15. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Kujur B, Wakode NS, Gaikwad MR, Wakode SL. Most reliable parameter of the mandible used for sex determination. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(4.2):4611-15. [crossref]
15.
Sharma M, Gorea RK, Gorea A, Abuderman A. A morphometric study of the human mandible in the Indian population for sex determination. Egyp J of Foren Sci. 2016;6:165-69. [crossref]
16.
Pokhrel R, Bhatnagar R. Sexing of mandible using ramus and condyle in Indian population: A discriminant function analysis. Eur J Anat. 2013;17:39 42.
17.
Ongkana N, Sudwan P. Gender difference in Thai mandibles using metric analysis. Chiang Mai Med J. 2009;48:43 48.
18.
Abbas B, Najm AA. Evaluation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in relation to age and gender using digital panoramic radiograph. Diyala J Med. 2020;18(2):55-61. [crossref]
19.
Taleb NSA, Beshlawy DME. Mandibular ramus and gonial angle measurements as predictors of sex and age in an Egyptian population sample: A digital panoramic study. J Forensic Res. 2015;6:5.
20.
Leversha J, McKeough G, Myrteza A, Skjellrup-Wakefiled H, Welsh J, Sholapurkar A, et al. Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):49-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Al-Shamout R, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, Al-Habahbah A. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pakistan Oral and Dent J .2012;32(1):81-87.
22.
Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination-A digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;4:58 62. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Datta A, Siddappa, Gowda VK, Channabas SR. A study of sex determination from human mandible using various morphometrical parameters. Indian J of Fore and Comm Med. 2015;2(3):158-66. [crossref]
24.
Pillai TJ, Devi TS, Devi CK. Studies on human mandibles. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13:08 15. [crossref]
25.
Kumar MP, Lokanadham S. Sex determination and morphometric parameters of human mandible. Int J Res Med Sci. 2013;1:93 96. [crossref]
26.
Carvalho SP, Brito LM, Paiva LA, Bicudo LA, Crosato EM, Oliveira RN, et al. Validation of a physical anthropology methodology using mandibles for gender estimation in a Brazilian population. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:358 62. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Rai R, Ranade AV, Prabhu LV, Pai MM, Madhyastha S, Kumaran M. A pilot study of the mandibular angle and ramus in Indian population. Int J of Morpho. 2007;25(2):353-56. [crossref]
28.
Fabian FM, Mpembeni R. Sexual dimorphism in the mandibles of a homogenous black population of Tanzania. Tan J Sci. 2002;28(2):4753. [crossref]
29.
Badran DH, Othman DA, Thanaibat HW, Amin WM. Predictive accuracy of mandibular ramus flexure as a morphologic indicator of sex dimorphism in Jordanians. Int J of Morpho. 2015;33(4):1248-54. [crossref]
30.
Galdames IC, Valenzuela JS, Quezada NA, Contreras CE, Rivas ZA, López MC. Ortopantomographic blind test of mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex in Chilean young adults. Int J Morphol. 2008;26:89 92. [crossref]
31.
Lin C, Jiao B, Liu S, Guan F, Chung NE, Han SH, et al. Sex determination from the mandibular ramus flexure of Koreans by discrimination function analysis using three dimensional mandible models. Foren Sci Int. 2014;236:191.e1-e6. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK, et al. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J of Foren Sci. 2011;56(S1):S13-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Franklin D, Higgins OP, Oxnard CE. Oxnard sexual dimorphism in the mandible of indigenous South Africans: A geometric morphometric approach. S Afr J Sci. 2008;104(3):101-09.
34.
Balci Y, Yavuz MF, Cagdir S. Predictive accuracy of sexing the mandible by ramus flexure. Homo. 2005;55(3):229-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Haun SJ. Brief communication: A study of the predictive accuracy of mandibular ramus flexure as a singular morphologic indicator of sex in an archaeological sample. Amer J of Phys Anthro. 2000;111(3):429-32 . 3.0.CO;2-1>[crossref]
36.
Kemkes GA, Löbig F, Stock F. Mandibular ramus flexure and gonial eversion as morphologic indicators of sex. Homo. 2002;53:97 111. [crossref]
37.
Hill CA. Technical note: Evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;111:573 77. 3.0.CO;2-I>[crossref]
38.
Ercan I, Oguzhan E, Türkay R, Sema A, Can I, Solmaz D, et al. Virtual assessment of sex: Linear and angular traits of the mandibular ramus using three-dimensional computed tomography. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016;27(7):627-32. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002979. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Kaur R, Pallagatti S, Aggarwal A, Mittal PG, Singh M, Patel ML. Mandibular ramus as a strong expressor of sex determinations: A digital radiographic study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 1):421-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Damera A, Mohanalakhsmi J, Yellarthi PK, Rezwana BM. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. J Foren Dent Sci. 2016;8(2):74-78. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/59582.17242

Date of Submission: Aug 09, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 20, 2022
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 22, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 17, 2022 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com