Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 105383

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : December | Volume : 16 | Issue : 12 | Page : EC24 - EC27 Full Version

Prior Incubation as a Tool to Overcome Understaining of Leishman Stain: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: December 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58652.17289
Sneha Tata, Chethana Mannem

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, RGUHS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, RGUHS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sneha Tata,
43233, Prestige Falcon City, Konanakunte Cross, Kanakapura Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drsnehatata@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: A well stained peripheral smear is an integral part in the diagnosis and management of many clinicohaematologic conditions. Leishman stain is recommended universally by the International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH). However, a commonly encountered problem in tropical countries, especially during the rainy season, is under staining by Leishman stain as a result of interference by the atmospheric moisture. Hence, incubation of slides and/or buffer prior to standard Leishman staining protocol could bring out best staining qualities.

Aim: To assess the effects of prior incubation of slides and/or buffer on standard Leishman staining technique.

Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of eight weeks in the Central Laboratory, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India, in the months of October to November 2020. Blood samples were received in the central laboratory for routine haematological investigations. Total of 100 samples of left over non haemolysed Dipotassium Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (K2-EDTA) anticoagulated blood irrespective of age, gender and cell counts were included in the study. Slides were stained following prior incubation of slides and/or buffer at 37°C and compared with the standard staining technique. The staining characteristics of nucleus, cytoplasm and granules of White Blood Cells (WBCs), platelets and erythrocytes were observed. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant and higher f value (>104.35152) rejected the null hypothesis.

Results: Prior incubation of slides and/or buffer resulted in better stained smears which were found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.05) as compared to standard Leishman staining technique.

Conclusion: Minor modifications when applied to standard Leishman staining technique such as prior incubation of slides and/or buffer at 37°C produced best staining characteristics to overcome the effects of humidity which normally interfere with staining of slides.

Keywords

Buffer, Haematology, Humidity, Staining

Peripheral blood smear examination is an invaluable test in haematologic work-up, even in the age of artificial intelligence, automation and molecular diagnostics, with the cornerst one in diagnosis requiring a well stained peripheral blood smear (1). History of stains for blood films dates back to 19th century when Baeyer and Caro introduced eosin and methylene blue respectively while Ehrlich mixed it with an acidic dye to create a neutral stain which allowed differential staining of blood cells (2). Checin‘ski used eosin as the acidic dye to create the methylene blue-eosin prototype. Plehn, by altering the proportions of methylene blue and eosin widened the range of the colours. In 1891, Russia physician, Dmitri Leonidovich Romanowsky developed a staining procedure by mixing eosin Y, azure B and methylene blue (3). The resulting dye stained the nucleus and the granules of the cytoplasm in different shades of purple (4). Leishman’s stain, a variant of the Romanowsky stain, is named after Scottish pathologist William Borg Leishman. Leishman and Karl Reuter independently developed these stains. They combined eosin with polychromed methylene blue, filtering off the precipitate and redissolving it in alcohol. Leishman used methanol and substituted eosin B for eosin Y, whereas Reuter used absolute alcohol (2). Leishman stain is used universally for staining peripheral blood smearsand is recommended by International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH) (5),(6).

Automated haematology analysers have greatly reduced the need for peripheral blood smears. However, smear examination is still warranted when flagged forred cell fragments/schistocytes, abnormal cells/blasts or when clinically indicated as in early diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura pseudo-thrombocytopenia and malaria (7),(8). Peripheral smears also aid in the conclusive diagnosis of sickle cell disease or chronic myeloid leukaemia (1).

Further, many laboratories across India still rely on manual smear examination making a well stained peripheral blood smear prerequisite for correct diagnosis. However, factors such as humidity and temperature interfere in the staining process (1). With India being a tropical country, a commonly encountered problem is under staining of peripheral smears by Leishman stain, especially during the rainy season, as a result of interference by the atmospheric moisture (8). Studies on utility of Leishman stain as a cytological stain too, have reported understaining of 3-dimensional cell clusters, individual cells and the cytoplasmic constituents such as granules, along with intense staining of extracellular ground substance and nucleus. Giemsa stain, another commonly used Romanowsky stain in haematology and cytology, excellently stains the cytoplasm but shows reduced staining of nucleus and cytoplasmic granules (9). Hence, it was proposed to conduct a detailed study to assess the effects of prior incubation of slides and/or buffer on standard Leishman staining technique and to statistically evaluate the staining characteristics in comparison with standard Leishman staining technique and to reject the null hypothesis.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Central Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bangalore, India, over a period of eight weeks during the rainy months of October to November 2020 after obtaining approval by Institutional Ethics committee (IEC) with the ethical clearance number KIMS/IEC/A039/M/2020. The sample size was restricted to 100 samples based on a previous study and selected by simple random sampling method (8). The left over K2-EDTA anticoagulated blood samples received at the central laboratory for various haematology tests were included in the study irrespective of age, gender and cell counts. Haemolysed and clotted samples were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

For each sample collected, four different peripheral blood smears were made as described below:

1. Control Slide (CS): Standard Leishman staining: Slides were directly used without any incubation. Air dried peripheral smears were placed on the staining rack and covered with undiluted Leishman stain for one to two minutes following which double the amount of buffer water was poured and kept undisturbed for 8-10 minutes (10). The slides were then washed under running water stream and air dried.
2. Incubated Slide (IS): Smears were made on slides preincubated at 37°C for atleast one hour and stained according to the standard Leishman staining procedure.
3. Incubated Buffer (IB): Peripheral blood smears were stained similar to control slides, however buffer water priorly placed in an incubator at 37°C for atleast one hour was used.
4. Incubated Slide and Buffer (ISB): Both preincubated slide and buffer at 37°C were used in the standard Leishman staining procedure.

Thus, series of four smears were obtained for each sample (4×100=400 blood smears). Each blinded smear was observed under 1000X (oil immersion) magnification for the staining characteristics of all blood elements and scored from 0 to 2. Smears showing ghost outline of WBCs, barely visible/unstained platelets and erythrocytes showing sharply refractile area of central pallor making chromia difficult to assess were considered as poorly stained smears and scored 0. Score 2 reflecting excellent staining characteristics was awarded for smears wherein WBCs showed crisp cytoplasmic borders, well stained nucleus and clearly discernible granules; well stained granulated platelets and well-preserved erythrocyte morphology and chromia. Smears which demonstrated staining characteristics which was neither 2 nor 0 were considered as satisfactory and scored as 1. Thus, each method would get a maximum score of 200 (100×2) and minimum score of 0.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was done using online free software in socscistatistics.com. One-way ANOVA test and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant and higher f value (>104.35152) rejected the null hypothesis.

Results

A total of 400 (100×4) smears were screened. The staining characteristics, such as crisp cytoplasmic borders, well stained nucleus and clearly discernible granules in WBCs; well stained granulated platelets and well-preserved erythrocyte morphology and chromia, showed poorest staining quality with standard Leishman staining technique (Table/Fig 1), while best staining characteristics were identified in smears prepared with prior incubation of both slides and buffer (Table/Fig 2). This was followed by smears prepared with only preincubated buffer (Table/Fig 3), further followed by smears prepared on preincubated slides alone (Table/Fig 4).

Thus, each slide was scored on a scale of 0-2 for the different staining characteristics such as WBC nuclear staining, crisp cytoplasmic borders and granule staining quality and overall smear quality which was inclusive of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and platelet morphology. The scores obtained for each staining techniques was summed up. The smears prepared following prior Incubated Slide and Buffer (ISB) obtained highest scores. Smears prepared with only preincubated buffer scored marginally better than smears prepared using preincubated slides alone. All the methods scored higher than CS (Table/Fig 5).

Statistical analysis to compare the staining characteristics of the nucleus, cytoplasm and granules of WBCs was performed. Prior incubation of both slides and buffer showed a higher value and was statistically significant with p-value <0.05 as shown in (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

The overall smear quality, which was scored based on staining characteristics of WBCs, erythrocytes and platelets, too demonstrated the best staining characteristics with prior incubation of both slides and buffer. The mean scores were 1.95, 1.31 and 1.25 for ISB, Incubated Buffer (IB) and Incubated Slide (IS) respectively as shown in (Table/Fig 9). The standard Leishman technique had a mean score of 0.46. The f-ratio value was 185.007788 and the results were statistically significant with p-value <0.001.

Thus, the overall scores for each method were summed up to yield a maximum of 800 and a minimum of 0. Prior incubation of IS and IB alone scored 485 and 507 respectively. The incubation of both slide and buffer (ISB) yielded highest score of 764 with f-ratio value of 539.2215 and was found to be statistically significant with p-value is <0.001. The CS yielding lowest score of 200 as shown in (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

Peripheral smear examination forms an integral part of haematologic work-up with a well stained peripheral smear being an absolute prerequisite. Several pioneers such as Caro, Ehrlich and Romanowsky have contributed to present days’ blood staining protocol. ICSH recommends Leishman stain made up of Azure B (oxidized methylene blue dye) and Eosin Y which provides good contrast, is inexpensive and readily available (6). The azures, containing the alkylamino substituents, are basic and bind to the acid nuclei forming a blue-purple colour while the acid dye eosin, containing a carboxyl group, binds to the alkaline cytoplasm forming red colouration.

Many laboratories in the present day are equipped with automated haematology analysers to evaluate complete blood counts. However, manual verification by checking blood films is often necessary for clinical/haematologic diagnosis as in case of malaria, schistocyte quantification in early diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and as per the guidelines recommended by the International Consensus Group for Haematology Review (11),(12). Further, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H2O-A22 (formerly NCCLS H2O-A), peripheral smear examination is recommended for the assessment of leukocyte differentials as a part of quality control and verification of automated analysers (13).

Thus, a well stained peripheral blood smear is imperative to correct diagnosis. However, an ideal peripheral blood smear is dependent on many factors which can be classified into:

1. Technical factors: time since collection of blood samples, blood drop size, angle and pressure of spreader, speed of smearing, reagents stability, absoluteness of methanol, staining time and washing of the slides.
2. Environmental factors: temperature, humidity and pH of the buffer (14),(15).

Technical factors can be appropriately managed by adequate staff training and maintenance of quality assurance programs while the environmental factors act as natural confounders which affect the staining quality of smears. Excessive acidic pH causes excessive pinkish discoloration of smear while excessive basic pH causes bluish discoloration. One should even avoid pipetting from the stock solution so as to minimise exposure of moisture which can deteriorate the quality of Leishman stain (8). Furthermore, pH, temperature and humidity are interdependent on one another. With India being a tropical country, humidity in the air influences the staining quality resulting in understaining of the slides especially during rainy months (8).

The staining procedure with ISB showed excellent staining characteristics with clear nuclear features, crisp cytoplasm and well appreciated granules similar to a study by Sareen R et al., who demonstrated best morphological features in peripheral blood smears following prior incubation of glass slides and buffer solution (8). The process of incubation provides for controlled, contaminant-free environment by regulating conditions like temperature and humidity. However, in the present study, comparing the effects of only IS and IB, overall better staining characteristics were experienced with prior IB as against Sareen R et al., who found improved the staining qualities of blood smear with prior slide (IS) incubation technique (8). The Leishman stain and buffer solution and staining time was retained the same as in routine staining procedure except that the same buffer solution was priorly incubated in IB and ISB technique in this study. It was observed that overall prior incubation of either slide/buffer or both resulted in better results than routine Leishman staining technique (CS) similar to Sareen R et al., (8).

Furthermore, in this study, p-value was found to be highly significant (<0.001) in assessment of all the cell characteristics. The results also showed a higher f-value, which rejected the null hypothesis and underlines a positive effect of incubation on the Leishman staining quality similar to the findings by Sareen R et al., who showed a higher f-value when comparing the three modified Leishman staining procedures (8).

Limitation(s)

The study did not assess the utility of incubation on other Romanowsky stains such as giemsa, which is also associated with understaining of the smears. Further, these findings are pertinent to tropical countries with high humidity. Hence, studies involving large population groups are needed to verify the findings.

Conclusion

Peripheral blood smears, being an important part of haematologic work-up, a well stained smear is for paramount importance. Minor modifications like prior slide and/or buffer incubation results in simple, yet effective solution to understaining of slides in tropical countries like India which can be easily adopted in routine laboratory practice.

References

1.
Adewoyin AS, Nwogoh B. Peripheral blood film-a review. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2014;12(2):71-79.
2.
Krafts KP, Hempelmann E, Oleksyn BJ. The color purple: From royalty to laboratory, with apologies to Malachowski. Biotech Histochem. 2011;86(1):07-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Stefanović D, Samardžija G, Redžek A, Arnaut M, Nikin Z, Stefanovi M, et al. Buffered Romanowsky-Giemsa method for formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections: taming a traditional stain. Biotechnic Histochem. 2017;92(5):299-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Lillie RD. Romanowsky-Malachowski stains the so-called Romanowsky Stain: Malachowski’s 1891 use of alkali polychromed methylene blue for malaria plasmodia. Stain Technol. 1978;53(1):23-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Bain BJ, Lewis SM. Preparation and staining methods for blood and bone marrow films. In: Barbara BJ, Imelda B, Michael AL, Lewis SM, editors. Dacie and Lewis Practical Hematology. 11th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 2011: 52. [crossref]
6.
ICSH reference method for staining of blood and bone marrow films by azure B and eosin Y (Romanowsky stain). Br J Haematol. 1984;57(4):707-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Zini G, d’Onofrio G, Briggs C, Erber W, Jou JM, Lee Sh, et al. ICSH recommendations for identification, diagnostic value and quantification of schistocytes. Int J Lab Hematol. 2012;34(2):107-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Sareen R, Kapil M, Gupta G. Incubation and its effect on Leishman stain. Journal of Laboratory Physicians. 2018;10(3):357-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Doddagowda SM, Shashidhar HA, Rajendra Prasad CSB. Leishman-Giemsa Cocktail- Is it an effective stain for air dried cytology smears. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):EC16-EC18. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Carman R. Handbook of CMAI medical laboratory technology. 2 nd ed. Christian Medical Association of India. 2005:86-89.
11.
Lesesve JF, El Adssi H, Watine J, Oosterhuis W, Régnier F. Evaluation of ICSH schistocyte measurement guidelines in France. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology. 2013;35(6):601-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Gulati G, Song J, Florea AD, Gong J. Purpose and criteria for blood smear scan, blood smear examination, and blood smear review. Ann Lab Med. 2013;33(1):01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, H20-A2 Reference Leukocyte (WBC) Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrumental Methods; Approved Standard, second ed., CLSI, USA. 2007, p.76.
14.
Vu QH, Van HT, Tran VT, PhucHuynh TD, Nguyen VC, Le DT, et al. Development of a robust blood smear preparation procedure for external quality assessment. Pract Lab Med. 2021;27:e00253. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Fasakin KA, Okogun GRA, Omisakin CT, Adeyemi AA, Esan AJ. Modified Leishman stain: The mystery unfolds. Br J Med Res. 2014;4(27):4591-06. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58652.17289

Date of Submission: Jun 24, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 05, 2022
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 29, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 29, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 04, 2022 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com