Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 188505

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : LC32 - LC35 Full Version

Comparision of Low Birth Weight Babies in Mothers Seeking Antenatal Care Services at a Tertiary Care Hospital and at Other Healthcare Facilities: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52731.16042
Neelima Alka Singh , Akash Mishra , RN Mishra , Durgesh Shukla

1. Research Scholar, Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Research Scholar, Department of Biostatistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 3. Ex-Professor and Coordinator, Centre of Biostatistics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Demonstrator cum Statistician, Department of Community Medicine, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Durgesh Shukla,
Demonstrator cum Statistician, Department of Community Medicine, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: durgeshstatsgrmc2019@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The high prevalence of Low Birth Weight (LBW) due to Preterm Birth (PTB) and Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IGUR) still persists a challenge in India. This happens due to poor and infrequent utilisation of Antenatal Care (ANC) service.

Aim: To assess the difference of PTB and LBW newborns in mothers, who availed ANC at a tertiary care hospital against those who availed ANC at other healthcare facility.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Gynaecology Department in Sir Sundarlal Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India and 1858 mothers and their newborn were analysed. The data was obtained from the delivery register maintained at the Labour Room of the Department. The age of the mother, place where ANC services availed, birth weight of the newborn and the gestational age were recorded on a master chart. The newborn were considered LBW, if birth weight was <2500 gm, PTB if birth occurred <37 completed weeks of gestation and Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR), if birth weight was below the expected weight at birth for the gestational age. The prevalence of PTB, LBW and mean with SD of LBW were obtained. The association of PTB and LBW with place of ANC services availed was judged using Chi-square test. The 95% confidence interval of the prevalence was obtained by using logit transformation.

Results: Out of total 2420 deliveries, 1858 mothers and their newborn were analysed. The mean age of mothers was 26.4±4.3 years. Half (50.1%) of the mothers had taken ANC at SS Hospital and the rest at other healthcare facilities. The prevalence of LBW and PTB babies were 29.2% (95% CI: 27.1-31.3) and 28.8% (95% CI: 26.7-30.9), respectively. Overall, both PTB and LBW were found to be significantly associated with the place of ANC services. Prevalence of LBW born in mothers who received ANC at tertiary care hospital was 19.4%; while it was 39.0% in those receiving at other healthcare facilities. The prevalence of PTB and LBW was more than 1.6 times and twice in those taken ANC at other healthcare facilities than those at TCH irrespective of gestational age. Among the PTB, the LBW were 42.2% in mothers receiving ANC at the Tertiary Care Centre (TCH) against 65.6% in those receiving at other healthcare facilities. Among the full-term deliveries also, the LBW born were 13.1% in mothers receiving ANC at tertiary care as against 24.3% in those receiving at other healthcare facilities.

Conclusion: The mothers seeking ANC services at other healthcare facilities need education about the advantage of ANC by the service providers, for timely and better adherence to ANC.

Keywords

Gestational age, Preterm birth, Prevalence, Underweight

The birth weight of a new born below 2500 gm is called Low Birth Weight (LBW) baby irrespective of gestational age (1). Low birth weight is the result of either PTB or Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR). A study cited that the LBW born neonates are at 20 times higher risk of death than those with normal birth weight (2). These LBW children, in the long term suffer due from neurologic disabilities, impaired language development, and have increased risk of chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease and diabetes (3),(4),(5),(6),(7).

Globally, LBW is one of the leading causes of all the deaths under five years and considered as the valuable public health indicator of maternal health, nutrition, healthcare delivery, and poverty (8),(9),(10). It is demonstrated that reducing the burden of LBW is of much importance to save the cost on healthcare system and the household as well (11). Across the world, each year estimated preterm deliveries are 15 million and India with 3.5 million preterm babies is on the top (12),(13). In India, way back in 1999, nearly 30% (7.5 million) born were LBW that accounted for more than two-fifth (42%) of the global burden of which 60% were term but with growth restriction and 40% were preterm (13),(14). India, in 2013, reported nearly 0.75 million neonatal deaths and among these about half were either LBW or premature birth (15).

Thus, reduction in incidence of PTB and LBW is important to reduce its consequential effect of higher risk of childhood death, especially during neonatal period and poor physical and mental growth and the risk of chronic disease like diabetes and cardiovascular disease as well. Many analytical studies had identified socio-demographic, maternal, obstetrics and disease related conditions being the associated factors of PTB and LBW. Within the existing socio-economic condition and health infrastructure, the role of ANC services is well documented in reducing the overall prevalence of LBW babies (16),(17),(18),(19).

The quality ANC services with continuous monitoring by health professional are an important issue to bring maximal reduction in PTB, and IGUR and consequently LBW. The aim of the present study was to compare the extent of preterm and underweight born babies to mothers availing ANC services at a Tertiary Care Hospital (TCH) and at other healthcare facility and further, to compare the trend of LBW babies with the gestational age between these two group of mothers.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on newborn from January 2018 to December 2018, in the Gynaecology Department of Sir Sundarlal Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences. Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi (Letter number: No. Dean/2019/EC/1519 Dated 25.09.2019). The data was obtained from the delivery register maintained at the Labour Room of the Department on born to mothers during January 2018 to December 2018. The data on age of the mother, the place of ANC services availed birth weight of babies and the gestational age were recorded.

Inclusion criteria: The mothers giving singleton birth on or after 28 weeks to 41 weeks of gestation were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Mothers giving birth to twin babies, births before 28 weeks and after 41 weeks of gestation and extremely LBW i.e., <1000 gm irrespective of gestational age were excluded. Also, mothers missing for the records for either age, birth weight or gestational age or the place of ANC services were also excluded.

Sample size estimation: The sample size for the estimation of prevalence was decided using the prevalence rate of LBW as 26% from a randomly selected one month birth weight recorded data January 2018 to December 2018. The sample size was determined using the following formula:

n=Z2α/2pq / d2

Where, ‘p’ is the prevalence rate of LBW=26%; ‘q’ is the prevalence rate of normal birth weight i.e., (100-p)=74%, d is the anticipated difference in the estimate=2% and Zασ/2=1.96 is the two tailed abscissa of normal distribution at 5%. Thus, the minimum sample size computed was 1848 mothers and their newborn. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, since the eligible mothers were 1858; hence all of them were considered in the study.

Out of 2420 deliveries, 1858 mothers and their newborn were eligible (after excluding 95 twin babies, 46 born before 28 weeks and after 41 weeks, five extremely LBW i.e., <1000 gm irrespective of gestational and 416 incomplete records).

Before performing the analysis, the weight and gestational age were categorised as LBW and PTB born babies following the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation (1).

• The newborn were LBW, if birth weight was <2500 gm and normal, if birth weight was ≥2500 gm.
• The PTB, if delivered at <37 completed weeks of gestation and full term, if delivered at ≥37 completed weeks of gestation.

Statistical Analysis

The prevalence of PTB and LBW along with their 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was computed using the logit transformation (15) and presented in percentage. The association of prevalence of PTB with place of ANC services as well as prevalence of LBW with place of ANC services separately for pre-term and preterm deliveries were judged using χ2 test. Further, the mean birth weight and prevalence of LBW along with 95% CIs at various gestational ages were also computed to assess the trend in birth weight and prevalence of LBW. The statistical computation was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 (20) and statistical significance was judged at α=0.05.

Results

Out of total 2420 deliveries, 1858 mothers and their newborn were analysed. The mean age of mothers was 26.4±4.3 years and mean parity was 1.8±0.9. The mean gestational age and birth weight of the new born were 37.2±2.6 weeks and 2681.4±589.9 gm, respectively. As indicated in (Table/Fig 1), the prevalence of preterm deliveries was significantly associated with the place of ANC services availed. It was much lower among mothers who received ANC services at TCH (21.9%; 95% CI: 16.8-28.1) compared to those who received at other healthcare facilities (35.7%; 95% CI: 30.7-41.0). The prevalence of LBW and PTB babies were 29.2% (95% CI: 27.1-31.3) and 28.8% (95% CI: 26.7-30.9), respectively.

Among the preterm deliveries, the prevalence of LBW babies was 42.2% in mothers who received ANC services at the TCH (Table/Fig 2); while it was 65.6% in mothers who received ANC services at other healthcare facilities. Among the full-term deliveries also, the LBW babies were 13.1% in mothers who received ANC services at TCH, against 24.3% in those who received at other healthcare facilities.

The birth weight at any gestational age was always higher in mothers who had received ANC services at TCH (Table/Fig 3). The difference of mean birth weight at each age of gestation except at or after 40 weeks was significant (p-value <0.05). The mean birth weight exceeding 2500 gm was at 35 weeks of gestation among the mothers who had received ANC services at TCH, while it was at 37 weeks in the other group. In the early age of gestation, the difference of mean birth of babies between the mothers who received ANC services at TCH and those received at other healthcare facilities was wider than those delivering at latter ages of gestation.

(Table/Fig 4) compares the proportion of LBW babies born beyond a specific gestational age between the two groups of mothers. Among those born at >33 weeks of gestation, the proportion of LBW was 17.3% in mothers who received ANC services at TCH, while it was 31.9% for the other. In both the groups, the proportion of LBW decreased as the gestational age increased, but the proportion of LBW was more than half among the mothers who had received ANC services at TCH.

Discussion

Birth weight is a valuable public health indicator of maternal health, nutrition, healthcare delivery, and poverty (8),(9),(10). As reported in 2013, LBW babies at higher risk of death during neonate period (15). India with its infrastructural network of subcenters, primary healthcare centres, community healthcare centres, district hospitals, state medical college hospitals, and other hospitals in the public and private sectors has observed commendable reduction in the prevalence of LBW born babies i.e., from 30% in 1999 (13) to 17.5% in 2015 (21). Still ANC services are not up to the level of satisfaction. The proportion of women who had four or more ANC visits increased from 37% in 2006 to only 51% in 2016 (21). Many Indian women do not go for early registration and do not complete the recommended four or more ANC visits which was higher in rural mothers than the urban or rural (22). In fact, mothers lack the knowledge regarding the importance of early registration. Delayed registration may be due to a younger age of pregnancy, poor education, poor adherence to peripheral staff advices and may be distance from nearest healthcare facilities (23). Under such conditions, reducing the prevalence of LBW is a challenging task indicating the need of focussed effort to reduce the burden of LBW and its consequential effects.

The peripheral health workers e.g., Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) and Angan Wadi Workers (AWW) are putting efforts on rural mothers to minimum of four antenatal check-up which include check-up of weight and blood pressure, abdominal examination, immunisation against tetanus, and iron and folic acid prophylaxis, as well as anaemia management (22). Most of these mothers seek the ANC by the general physicians; while at TCH by the experts in the field of Gynaecology. Moreover, TCH have equipment and facilities for routine ANC check-ups. Usually, TCH are present in the city areas where mothers are literate and educated resulting to more attention towards the advices by the gynaecologists, while it is less among the mothers availing the services from other healthcare facilities.

Under the existing socio-demographic, maternal, obstetrics and disease related conditions; adequate and quality ANC services is the best option in reducing the incidence of LBW babies (16),(17),(18),(19). Studies of Haryana and Karnataka had reported the beneficial effect of ANC check-up and consumption of iron tablets on birth weight (17),(19). The present analysis compared the prevalence of PTB and LBW between mothers who took ANC service at the TCH and those at other healthcare facilities under the assumption that TCH is expected to provide better ANC services and mothers adhere to the advices.

The overall prevalence of LBW was 29.2% which is almost similar to the reported prevalence 29.53% and 27%, respectively by the study conducted at tertiary care teaching hospital, Maharashtra (24) and rural PHC, Karnataka (25). In others studies at tertiary care hospitals, large variation in prevalence of LBW between south and north had been reported (13.7% in south and 32.30% in north) (26),(27). In the present study, though the prevalence of LBW is in between other studies at tertiary care hospitals, but towards higher side and much higher than the prevalence at national figure in mothers who were able to recall the birth weight (18%) (21). The present study indicated that prevalence of LBW was almost twice (39.0%) among mothers who had received ANC services at other healthcare facility compared to those who availed ANC at TCH (19.4%). This discrepancy in LBW is contributed by the high prevalence of PTB (35.7%) in mothers who had received ANC services at other healthcare facility and poor intrauterine growth even if had full-term delivery. A hospital-based study had also indicated preterm deliveries to contribute the highest to LBW compared to full-term deliveries (24). This discrepancy in LBW is also substantiated as the mean birth weight of those born at each age of gestation was always higher in mothers who availed ANC services at TCH. The gap in birth weight between the two groups of mothers was although found to decrease with increased gestation age but prevalence of LBW always remained almost double irrespective of gestational age. In babies born at >33 weeks of gestation, the proportion of LBW was 17.3% in mothers who availed ANC services at TCH, while it was 31.9% in the other. While babies born at >39 weeks of gestation, the proportion of LBW was much less, only 6.0% in mothers who availed ANC services at TCH that was more than twice (16.2%) in those who availed ANC services at other healthcare facilities, infact majority of the mothers who availed ANC services at other healthcare facilities are rural and lack in availing recommended ANC services. This fact is evidenced in one of the studies on newborn babies at a tertiary care hospital in north-east that showed a significant association of LBW with ANC visit and with 26% overall prevalence of LBW and about 80% mothers were of rural areas (28).

Limitation(s)

In the present study, authors provided results for the other healthcare facilities on the data extracted from the delivery register which was maintained in the labour room of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Since the data of other healthcare facilities includes few referred cases; so, there is possibility of presence of referral bias. Detailed clinical and socio-demographic variables were not available of the mothers. Thus, it was difficult to compare socio-economic and demographic characteristics and the underlying medical conditions that are likely to influence the LBW of babies.

Conclusion

The present study indicated 1.6 times higher prevalence of PTB among mothers who availed ANC services at other healthcare facilities than those at TCH that resulted to a higher prevalence of LBW. Prevalence of LBW, even in full-term deliveries, in mothers seeking ANC services at other healthcare facilities was much higher. This reveals that mothers who availed ANC services at other healthcare facilities either adhere poorly or missed with quality ANC services. This may happen when mothers lack the knowledge of importance of ANC care. Hence, mothers need to be educated about the advantage of ANC by the healthcare professionals providing ANC service.

References

1.
Organization WH. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth revision, 2nd ed. World Health Organization. 2004.
2.
Chen Y, Li G, Ruan Y, Zou, L, Wang X, Zhang W. An epidemiological survey on low-birth-weight infants in China and analysis of outcomes of full-term low birth weight infants. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13(1):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Avchen RN, Scott KG, Mason CA. Birth weight and school age disabilities: A population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(10):895-901. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Cheung YB. Early origins and adult correlates of psychosomatic distress. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:937-48. [crossref]
5.
Kelly YJ, Nazroo JY, McMunn A, Boreham R, Marmot M. Birth weight and behavioural problems in children: A modifiable effect? Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(1):88-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Mi D, Fang H, Zhao Y, Zhong L. Birth weight and type 2 diabetes: A meta analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(6):5313-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Smith CJ, Ryckman KK, Barnabei VM, Howard BV, Isasi CR, Sarto GE, et al. The impact of birth weight on cardiovascular disease risk in the Women’s Health Initiative. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26(3):239-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663-73.
9.
Badshah S, Mason L, McKelvie K, Payne R, Lisboa PJ. Risk factors for low birthweight in the public-hospitals at Peshawar, NWFP-Pakistan. BMC Pub Health. 2008;8(197):01-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Idele P, Hogan D, Mathers C, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: A systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2275-86. [crossref]
11.
Sicuri E, Bardaji A, Sigauque B, Maixenchs M, Nhacolo A, Nhalungo D, et al. Costs associated with low birth weight in a rural area of Southern Mozambique. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28744. [crossref]
12.
WHO, Global nutrition targets 2025: Low birth weight policy brief Geneva. World Health Organization. 2014.
13.
World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Low birthweight: Country, regional and global estimates. World Health Organization. 2004.
14.
Skjaerven R, Gjessing HK and Bakketeig LS. Birth weight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand. 2000;79:440-49. [crossref]
15.
Registrar General of India. Sample registration system (SRS) statistical report. 2013. New Delhi.
16.
Rajeswari R, burman B, Sundar JS, Ramya K. Trends in birth weight and the prevalence of low birth weight in a tertiary care hospital, Chennai. IOSR-JDMS. 2015;14(8):07-13.
17.
Johnson AR, Surekha A, Dias A, William NC, Agrawal, T. Low birth weight and its risk factors in a rural area of South India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2015;2(3):339-44. [crossref]
18.
Manna N, Sarkar J, Baur B, Basu G, Bandyopadhyay L. Socio-Biological determinants of low birth weight: A community based study from rural field practice area of Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal (India). IOSR-JDMS. 2013;4(4):33-39. [crossref]
19.
Kumar M, Verma R, Khanna P, Bhalla K, Kumar R, Dhaka R, et al. Prevalence and associate factors of low birth weight in North Indian babies: A rural based study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(9):3212-17. [crossref]
20.
IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
21.
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16. International Institute for Population Sciences, 2017. Mumbai, India.
22.
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-2006. International Institute for Population Sciences, 2007. Mumbai, India.
23.
Mahajan H, Sharma B. Utilisation of maternal and child health care services by primigravida females in urban and rural areas of India. ISRN Preventive Medicine. 2014;01-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Patale PJ, Monika SM, Seema SB Gokhe. A study of epidemiological co-relates of low-birth-weight babies born in tertiary care hospital. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(3):1006-1010. [crossref]
25.
Aivall P, Swamy MK, Narasannavar AB. Biosocial determinants of birth weight in a rural PHC of North Karnataka: A cross-sectional study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2015;4(5):630-33. [crossref]
26.
Anju Ade, Brunda NK, Ramesh P. A retrospective study of birth weight and their risk factors among rural women. IJHSR. 2016;6(8):19-23.
27.
Agarwal G, Ahmad S, Goel K, Kumar V, Goel P, Garg M, et al. Maternal risk factors associated with low-birth-weight neonates in a tertiary care hospital, northern India. J Community Med Health Educ. 2012;2(9):01-04. [crossref]
28.
Gogoi N. Maternal and neonatal risk factors of low birth weight in Guwahati Metro, Assam, Northeast India. Acad J Ped Neonatol. 2018;6(5):90-95. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52731.16042

Date of Submission: Oct 06, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 13, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 17, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 09, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 17, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 27, 2021 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com